
The roads where you're most likely to have your mobile stolen in London's West End as phone theft soars to record levels
Europe's busiest shopping road had 6,539 reports of phones being taken last year - ahead of Regent Street on 2,002, according to Metropolitan Police data.
Shaftsbury Avenue and Charing Cross Road in the theatre district were third and fourth with 1,032 and 946 respectively between January and December 2024.
Completing the top ten were Wardour Street on 929, Greek Street on 623, Piccadilly on 591, Old Compton Street on 507, Strand on 494 and Leicester Square on 455.
Figures showing Westminster's 'repeat streets' for mobile phone thefts have been released by Scotland Yard following a Freedom of Information request.
Former Met Detective Chief Inspector Mick Neville has urged the force to do more to fight phone crime - after he nearly fell victim to a theft himself three months ago.
Mr Neville, who managed to hold onto his phone during the incident outside Charing Cross railway station, told The Standard: 'What are the Met doing?
'It's not difficult when you actually know which roads are being targeted. Officers need to be less concerned with the psychology of crime and catch more criminals.
'These snatchers must be laughing at the law because they know just one per cent of thefts are solved. Each of the 30 streets must have hundreds of CCTV cameras.
'So the second thing is to actually gather images. See if they are wearing distinctive clothing - even if you can't see their faces - and link offenders to multiple offences.'
Phone theft has become an epidemic in London, hitting a record level last year – with the number of devices snatched more than tripling in four years.
Some 70,137 phones were reported stolen to the Met in the capital in 2024, up by nearly 40 per cent from 52,428 in 2023. As recently as 2020, the figure was 20,000.
Susan Hall AM, leader of the City Hall Conservative Group, told MailOnline: '6,539 thefts on Oxford Street alone is obscene.
'With the prospect of pedestrianisation looming, I've spoken to residents in Westminster who are horrified at how police cuts and pedestrianisation will only exacerbate this.
'For God's sake, Sadiq - get a grip on this and actually put the welfare of the public first. His inaction is rapidly making the West End more and more lawless.'
Her Tory colleague Neil Garratt, who wrote the Tackling London's Theft Epidemic report earlier this year, added: 'These figures are shocking but not surprising.
'In February, my report into London's spiralling phone theft epidemic showed exactly how the Mayor can get a grip, but he refuses.
'Instead, he sits back blaming the phone companies while Londoners and visitors to our great city fear to take out their phone. This problem is solvable, so I am urging him, again, to take action now.'
Earlier this week, Bridgerton star Genevieve Chenneour revealed she had left London and moved back in with her mother after her phone was grabbed by a teenage thief.
The actress was targeted by 18-year-old Zacariah Boulares at a Joe & The Juice café in Kensington in February – and the prolific criminal was jailed for just 22 months on Tuesday despite embarking on a 'ruthless' spree of thefts.
One of the capital's most prolific phone snatchers, Sonny Stringer, was jailed for two years in August last year after stealing 24 phones in just one morning before evading police by riding on an electric motorbike at speeds of nearly 50mph.
And in November 2024, four prolific London phone thieves were jailed for handling more than 5,000 stolen phones - with two spending thousands of pounds from victims' bank accounts.
Zakaria Senadjki, 31, Nazih Cheraitia, 34, Ahmed Abdelhakim Belhanafi, 25, and Riyadh Mamouni, also 25, were sentenced to a total of 18 years.
The cost of their crimes was said to have totalled £5.1million, with officers believing many of the phones were sold abroad.
A Met spokeswoman said today: 'We are seeing phone thefts on an industrial scale, fuelled by criminals making millions by being able to easily sell on stolen devices either here or abroad.
'In response, we have increased patrols in hotspot areas while officers are using phone-tracking data and intelligence to pursue those responsible.
'By intensifying our efforts, we're catching more perpetrators and protecting people from having their phones stolen in the capital.
'The Met is also working with other agencies and government to tackle the organised criminality driving this trade and calling on tech companies to make stolen phones unusable.
'We are reminding victims to report their phone as stolen as soon as possible to maximise the chance of catching the perpetrator, too often thefts are reported hours or days later.'
'The first thing Sir Mark Rowley needs to do is put extra officers on those streets, not only patrolling but ready to stop those on the e-bikes.'
Conservative politicians have called on London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to do more to address growing concerns about the spiralling crime rates in the capital.
And a spokesperson for the Labour politician told MailOnline: 'The Mayor has long been clear we need decisive and coordinated action to halt the burgeoning global trade of stolen phones which is driving criminality and violence across the world.
'Evidence shows the majority of phones stolen in London are being reconnected in other countries as far as China and Algeria – a large proportion of which are still able to access Play and Apple cloud services to download apps.
'The Mayor has repeatedly warned it is simply too easy and profitable for criminals to repurpose and sell on stolen phones. This must change.
'City Hall is working closely with the Met to tackle the scourge of phone thefts in London. This includes increasing police patrols and plain-clothed operations in hotspot areas, like the West End and Westminster, where nearly 40 per cent of phone thefts occur.
'But the police can't defeat this industrial scale crime on their own and the Mayor will continue to push the mobile phone industry to go much further in preventing stolen phones being used, sold and repurposed, to build a safer London for all.'
Earlier this week London was revealed as the 15th most dangerous city for crime in Europe – and the 100th worst out of 385 locations around the world, according to Numbeo's Crime Index .
There was also outrage last month after veteran broadcaster Selina Scott, 74, revealed she was viciously attacked and robbed in broad daylight in Piccadilly earlier this month.
The stalwart of British TV was leaving a Waterstones shop on June 17 when she was struck on the back of her right knee, leaving her feeling as if she had been 'stabbed'.
She was set upon by a gang who attempted to grab her backpack. Fighting back, she kept hold of the bag – but one of the thieves unzipped it and took her purse before running off. Ms Scott lost her bank cards, driving licence and cash in the robbery.
And Matt Goodwin, senior visiting professor of politics at the University of Buckingham, wrote in the Daily Mail last week: 'London is over. It's so over.'
He cited data showing that there were 90,000 shoplifting offences in the capital last year, up 54 per cent.
Professor Goodwin added that there is now an alleged rape every hour in London – and reported sexual offences against women and girls has risen 14 per cent in five years, while homelessness and rough sleeping increased 26 per cent in one year.
Meanwhile a policing expert told MailOnline last week that the incident involving Ms Scott showed London had become a 'crime-ridden cesspit'.
Ex-New Scotland Yard detective Peter Bleksley said the force was now so stretched in the West End that private security companies were being deployed to help.
He condemned the 'epidemic of crime' in London from pickpocketing to violence and fare evasion to robbery, adding that it was 'driving people away' from the capital.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Indefinite jail terms ‘not right and not fair', Lords say in call to end IPP injustice
Peers have demanded answers over the government's refusal to resentence prisoners trapped under 'no hope' indefinite jail terms, insisting: 'It is not right and it is not fair.' In an impassioned debate in the House of Lords, peers urged prisons minister James Timpson to take decisive action to end the injustice of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail terms. Successive governments have refused justice committee recommendations to resentence more than 2,500 prisoners still trapped under the abolished jail term. The open-ended sentences were scrapped in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving those already jailed incarcerated indefinitely. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. In a speech as his private members bill to resentence IPP prisoners reached committee stage on Friday, Labour peer Lord Tony Woodley, admitted it will not succeed without government support. Addressing IPP prisoners and their families, he told them not to give up hope, but added: 'Sadly, my Bill by itself will not bring you justice. But it can help build pressure on the government to do the right thing, and it can help build public awareness of this industrial-scale miscarriage of justice. 'So please don't have false hope in my Bill. Hope – but not false hope – is my aim here.' Raising a series of 'probing' amendments designed to 'expose the lack of logic' behind the government's refusal to resentence IPP prisoners, he said it is 'as big a scandal as the Post Office and the infected blood scandal'. 'Almost 100 prisoners have taken their own lives – hundreds more have been driven to insanity, with this no-hope, never-ending sentence,' he said. 'The only difference with IPP is that not enough people know about it.' He reminded the government that almost 700 IPP prisoners have served at least ten years longer than their original minimum tariff. He added: 'How can the government deny resentencing to these people – still inside, over 10 years past their minimum sentence? 'My Lords, let me remind you we are talking about people who have been locked up for over a decade longer than someone else convicted of the exact same crime, but before 2005 or after 2012. 'My Lords, a lot of nonsense is spoken about 'two-tier' justice, but this is one situation where that label seems to apply. It is not right and it is not fair.' His proposals were backed by the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Dr Alice Edwards, who said the jail terms have caused 'unlawful psychological torture' to prisoners. In a statement before the debate, she said: 'It is time to end the perpetual damage caused by the IPP scheme. 'These sentences have caused unlawful psychological torture and ill-treatment to too many prisoners under the care of successive British governments. 'A resentencing court is a promising way forward, in which there could be an initial prioritisation exercise of cases, necessary exclusions and, for those whose mental state requires psychiatric or other intensive treatment, their transfer to a secure mental health facility outside the prison service until such time as they are deemed fit, with regular reviews.' However, prisons minister James Timpson said none of the amendments eased his fears over resentencing, insisting the government's priority is public protection. He said the IPP Action Plan, designed to support each prisoner's progress to release by the parole board, is 'where we will sort this out'. However he vowed to 'pull hard on every operational lever' to address the crisis and said he was carefully considering separate proposals put forward last month by an expert panel convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform. The panel, led by former lord chief justice Lord John Thomas, called for all IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing and for fewer offenders to be recalled.


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Cannabis-addict father who smoked five joints the day before he shook his baby daughter to death is jailed for life
A cannabis addict who smoked five joints the day before he shook his baby daughter to death has been jailed for life. Thomas Holford, 25, killed his five-week-old daughter Everleigh Stroud by shaking her with such 'excessive and severe' force she was left with 'catastrophic' brain and bone injuries. Everleigh had been left alone in her father's care on the night of April 20, 2021 and was 'only just' breathing when her grandmother, Kelly Stroud, called an ambulance the next morning. Holford was 'under the influence' of cannabis at the time of the shaking, and later lied to police about his drug use, having smoked at least five joints to celebrate '420' the previous day, which the court had heard he agreed was a 'big day for cannabis smokers'. While his baby was rushed to Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent, on April 21, he showed 'little emotion' and continued to download and play games on his phone, jurors heard. Text messages shown to jurors suggested that he tried to buy weed from a contact known as 'Milo' because he knew he was looking after his daughter. He sent a text which read: 'Could you strap me anything, as I've got the little one on my own tonight. Going to be f****** stressful.' On Thursday, Holford, of Ramsgate, was found unanimously guilty of murder and actual bodily harm of his daughter by a Canterbury Crown Court jury. Today, Mr Justice Michael Fordham sentenced Holford to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 16 years and told the court that he had 'robbed' his former partner and her family of 'any type of deep happiness' for the rest of their lives. The judge said: 'Overnight on 20th to 21st of April 2021 when you were just 20 years old you shook your five-week-old baby daughter Everleigh. 'That act of shaking caused severe and irreversible brain injuries, she died 13 months later as a result of those injuries. 'The jury were sure that at the moment of shaking Everleigh you intended to cause her really serious injury.' Along with brain injuries, Everleigh also had bone fractures, bruising to her face, and atrophy to her eyes leading to her going blind, having spent the night before in her father's care, the court heard. Everleigh, who was born on March 13 2021, spent more than a year in hospital before she died aged 14 months on May 27 2022. Mr Justice Fordham continued: 'Kelly Stroud has described in her statement the impacts of what you did, how your actions denied Everleigh a life, how your actions denied a lifetime of hopes and dreams to Casey, a wonderful young mum who never gave up fighting for her daughter.' He added: 'Your actions robbed the Stroud family of any type of deep happiness leaving a grief on all members of the family for the rest of their lives.' While giving evidence, Holford told jurors he had at least five joints on April 20 2021, before being left in charge of Everleigh that evening. 'You were under the influence of cannabis when you injured Everleigh, I am sure that is right,' said Mr Justice Fordham. When police arrived at his address in Ramsgate, where Holford, then 20, lived with his then 16-year-old girlfriend and her parents, they discovered a cannabis grinder and joint butts next to a milk bottle in his bedroom. A witness statement written by Everleigh's grandmother, Ms Stroud, and summarised in court heard how hard it had been to face her death. 'The shock was something that they have not experienced before, albeit they had a short period of denial and desperately searched for answers,' said prosecutor Eloise Marshall KC. The statement read: 'In a blink of an eye our world came crashing down in the most heartbreaking and traumatic way.' Holford also received a two-year concurrent prison sentence for actual bodily harm of Everleigh's anus which happened the same night. In the sentencing hearing, Ms Marshall said: 'The actual bodily harm undermines any suggestion that this was one single act born of one motivation and the motivation was described by the defence as perhaps frustration or flash of anger. 'We say that suggestion is undermined by the actual bodily harm.' During the trial Holford also admitted he had 'manipulated' his girlfriend's family into taking care of his cannabis for him and allowing him to smoke it. While in the witness box, he often answered questions to the effect of being unsure or not remembering what had happened the night he attacked Everleigh. 'The jury were sure that whatever your memory then or now you shook her meaning to cause really serious injury,' said Mr Justice Fordham. Holford will serve at least 16 years of his life sentence in prison before he is eligible to be released, minus the 351 days already served.


The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Moment man ‘headbutted passenger at Manchester airport before he & brother attacked cops with high level of violence'
THIS is the moment a man headbutted a passenger at Manchester Airport before he and his brother attacked armed cops with a "high level of violence" , a court heard. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, and Muhammad Amaad, 26, allegedly lashed out at three officers - leaving one with a broken nose. 6 6 Jurors heard cops had been scrambled to deal with the pair following an earlier altercation at a Starbucks in the airport. Footage played to the court showed Amaaz headbutting a passenger and punching him on July 23. Liverpool Crown Court heard the man, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, had some sort of incident with Amaaz and Amaad's mum while they either on the same flight or shortly after it. Paul Greaney KC said: "The defendants met their mother in the arrivals area of Terminal 2 and began to walk to the car park with her and the child that was with them. As they did so, they passed a Starbucks coffee house. "Abdulkareem Ismaeil was in there with his wife and children. The defendants' mother spotted Abdulkareem Ismaeil and pointed him out to her sons. "At just after 8.20pm, the defendants entered Starbucks and confronted Abdulkareem Ismaeil. During that confrontation, Mohammed Fahir Amaaz delivered a headbutt to the face of Abdulkareem Ismaeil and punched him, then attempted to deliver other blows, all in front of a number of children. "The prosecution case is that this was obviously unlawful conduct." The court heard PC Zachary Marsden and PC Ellie Cook - both armed - and PC Lydia Ward, who was unarmed, were in the airport at the time. They approached the brothers in the Terminal 2 car park and attempted to move Amaaz away from a pay machine to arrest him. But Amaaz "resisted" - causing his sibling to then intervene before the pair assaulted PC Marsden, it was said. Mr Greaney said: "In the moments that followed, the first defendant also assaulted PC Cook and then PC Ward too, breaking her nose. "The defendants used a high level of violence." Jurors were played CCTV footage that showed Amaaz holding PC Marsden "round the neck" before he dragged the officer to the ground with him. He then "raised and moved his head" towards PC Marsden, who responded by kicking him in the face. The footage showed what appeared to be a stamp aimed by the cop at Amaaz as he lay on the ground. 6 6 Mr Greaney said: "We recognise those actions look rather shocking in the cold light of day but we suggest they need to be judged in the context of the very serious level of threat posed by the defendants to an officer who was concerned that his firearm might be taken from him at an airport. "In any event, those actions all occurred after the violence of the defendants. "The position of the prosecution is that they are logically irrelevant to the lawfulness of the conduct of Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad as charged in the indictment. "What you have seen is the two defendants acting offensively, not defensively. The position of the prosecution is that their apparent defence of self-defence is false." Jurors heard PC Marsden suffered "post-concussion syndrome" and was left with a "severe headache" for three days, dizziness, forgetfulness and bruising and swelling. PC Ward was captured in bodycam footage sobbing with her mouth filled with blood moments after the horror. She was left with a broken nose and needed surgery under general anaesthetic, it was said. Mr Greaney said "given the number of punches thrown by the first defendant at PC Cook's head and face, she was fortunate only to receive relatively minor injuries to her forehead and jaw.' He told jurors the prosecution's position was this was "not a complicated case". He also said the violence was entirely unlawful and delivered out of "anger" and not in self-defence. The prosecutor added: "The events you are concerned with were captured by CCTV cameras and, in relation to the events in the payment area on the body-worn cameras of police officers as well. "So you will not have to depend only on the recollections of witnesses. You will also be able to see with your own eyes what happened. "The two defendants assert, as we understand it, that at all stages they were acting in lawful self-defence or in defence of the other. "Our prediction is that you will readily conclude that the defendants were not acting in lawful self-defence and that their conduct was unlawful." Amaaz denies assaulting PC Marsden and PC Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of PC Cook and the earlier assault of Abdulkareem Ismaeil at Starbucks. Amaad has pleaded not guilty to assaulting PC Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. The trial continues. 6 6