From legislative secrecy to Constitutional sunlight
Only a handful of us who served in the legislature under the old 1889 Montana Constitution still survive. That constitution reflected the dominant power of the copper mining industry when Montana achieved statehood. It was also ridiculously verbose and prescriptive, and by the late 1960s a consensus had developed that the time had come for our 1889 Constitution to be replaced. Among the people's major concerns was the secrecy by which laws were made within the Legislature.
It was 1971 when, at 23, I took my seat in the Montana House of Representatives – the youngest member. The House chamber was overwhelming in its grandeur. What I didn't know then was that what went on in that grand place was far less grand than its setting.
Legislative bodies are organized around committees. One of my earliest experiences in a Montana Legislative committee was having the committee chair excuse all nonmembers from the committee room except two gentlemen whom I soon learned were lobbyists. They were hired by a special interest to protect that interest's affairs in the legislative process. Behind those doors, closed to citizens, these selected lobbyists freely interacted with committee members as they voted on the bills before the committee. With no experience, I simply assumed this was fine. Certainly, as the legislature's greenest newbie, I wasn't going to question it.
Fortunately, a few legislators were starting openly do so. One, was Flathead Representative James E. Murphy. Murphy had served in the Missouri legislature before relocating to Montana after World War II. He led the Montana House Judiciary Committee and was also Montana's representative on the Republican National Committee. I greatly admired Jim Murphy.
Murphy thought the 1889 Constitution was far outdated and needed to be replaced. A prime example of what needed changing was my first experiences with the public's lack of access to legislative decision-making and the open role of lobbyists in orchestrating law-making decisions behind closed doors.
Well, the committee procedure I witnessed in the 1971 legislative session could not happen in the Montana legislature of today, thanks to Montana's 1972 Constitution. It requires legislative meetings as well as other government meetings to be open to the public. No longer can lobbyists, but not the public, be allowed to meet with and impact decisions of committees behind closed doors.
Under the 1889 Constitution, legislation was routinely passed or killed by either the Montana House or Senate, with few recorded votes and no way for the folks at home to really know how their legislators had voted. Since 1972 they always can. It is constitutionally required.
Once in 1971, we house members were startled by a camera flash from the back balcony of the chamber. A photographer had taken a picture of the voting board of a vote that the 1889 Constitution allowed to be non-recorded, 'off the record,' even though that vote essentially determined the outcome of an important bill. The Speaker immediately called for the Sergeant-at-Arms to apprehend the photographer's film. But the photographer was too fast and escaped, film intact, from the capitol building. When the state papers carried the picture of the voting board the following day, the votes of all legislators on that bill were revealed.
Such a dramatic act to inform the people is not needed now, thanks to the 1972 Constitution, which stipulates that any vote in the House or Senate, including committees, that could result in a bill being passed or killed must be publicly recorded.
These true-life examples directly show how much more open to the people the Montana legislature is since the adoption of our 1972 Constitution.
Bob Brown is a retired Whitefish history teacher who also serves as a Board Member of Friends of the Montana Constitution. A member of the Montana Legislature for nearly 30 years, he was also Senate President, Montana Secretary of State and Candidate for Governor. Bob also served on the Board of Trustees for the Montana Historical Society. This column on the Montana Constitution produced for this publication by the 'Friends' organization.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Schools and counties begin to see payment delays as Pennsylvania's budget stalemate hits a month
Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration says billions of dollars in aid to Pennsylvania's schools and human services will be delayed, as he and the politically divided Legislature struggle to end what is now a monthlong budget stalemate. State-supported universities, libraries, early-childhood education programs and county health departments also will see delays in payments, Shapiro's administration said in letters sent Tuesday to providers. "I recognize this information is concerning, and it is equally concerning to both me and the governor," Budget Secretary Uri Monson said in the letters. "Our administration continues to work diligently to find agreement between the House and Senate and we will work to support you and your organization as you manage the current situation." Borrowing isn't widespread by counties and school districts to cover for late state payments, and some have reserves they can tap. But borrowing may grow if the stalemate drags well into August. Budget stalemates are also playing out in Michigan and North Carolina, where Democratic governors are sharing power with Republican legislators. Without the governor's signature on a new spending plan, the Pennsylvania state government lost some of its spending authority starting July 1. Pennsylvania school districts, which received more than $11 billion last year from the state for operations, will see delays on more than $2 billion in payments through August, Shapiro's administration said. District officials have said the poorest districts might have to borrow money if aid is delayed in August, and the Pennsylvania School Boards Association says the stalemate is causing districts to reconsider how they spend, such as leaving teaching positions unfilled or putting off purchases of student laptops. A school board's official, Andy Christ, said the state didn't reimburse districts for the cost of borrowing during past stalemates. Universities, such as Penn State and state-run system schools, will see delays on more than $200 million in aid, and counties will not get on-time payments of $390 million to child welfare agencies, the Shapiro administration said. The County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania said its members are "growing more and more concerned about the consequences" of the stalemate, particularly on human services such as mental health counseling, child welfare, and drug and alcohol treatment. More than $100 million in payments to a range of other agencies, nonprofits and programs will also be delayed, according to the administration, and it said it cannot distribute money to early childhood education providers. For weeks, Shapiro and top Republican lawmakers have said they are engaged in closed-door discussions to try to find a compromise. The state House and Senate have not scheduled voting sessions for this week. The biggest issues for Republicans are curbing Shapiro's $51.5 billion spending proposal — driven by a massive increase in Medicaid costs — and their push to regulate and tax tens of thousands of slot-machine-like cash-paying "skill" games that are popping up everywhere. Top priorities for Shapiro and Democrats are boosting funding for public schools and public transit agencies. During a stalemate, the state is legally bound to make debt payments, cover Medicaid costs for millions of Pennsylvanians, issue unemployment compensation payments, keep prisons open and ensure state police are on patrol. All state employees under a governor's jurisdiction are typically expected to report to work and be paid as scheduled. Michigan's Democratic-controlled Senate and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives remain far apart on numerous proposals, including funding for schools and roads. The chambers' leaders have accused each other of refusing to negotiate. If lawmakers and Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer don't pass a budget by the Oct. 1 start of the state's fiscal year, they risk a government shutdown. In North Carolina, where Republicans control the Legislature, a budget deal likely isn't expected until late August at the earliest. Teacher and state employee salary raises, tax cuts and eliminating vacant government positions have been among the leading differences in competing spending plans. State government is in no danger of a shutdown, and the Legislature sent Democratic Gov. Josh Stein a stopgap spending plan on Wednesday. ___ Associated Press reporters Gary D. Robertson in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed. Follow Marc Levy on X at:
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Florida GOP, DeSantis may follow Texas's lead
Florida Republicans are increasingly pushing to redraw the state's congressional lines following a similar move by the Texas GOP. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Wednesday he is 'very seriously' looking at asking the state Legislature to redraw the state's congressional map, arguing the 2020 census is flawed. Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.) came out in favor of redistricting in a post on social platform X, writing that 'Texas can do it, the Free State of Florida can do it 10X better.' Florida Republicans say they were already headed in this direction following a state Supreme Court decision that upheld a congressional map supported by DeSantis and state Republicans. But the plan is gaining even more traction in the wake of Texas Republicans' unveiling of a new congressional map. 'It's picking up steam,' Florida GOP Chair Evan Power told The Hill. 'We were probably heading there with the court decision, but Texas made it top news.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The state has also become solidly Republican over the past decade, with Republicans growing their representation in Congress and once-Democratic strongholds like Miami-Dade and Osceola counties flipping from blue to red. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in south Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel. Rep. Kathy Castor (D) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Florida Republicans already hold a 20 to 8 advantage over Democrats in the congressional delegation. Republicans were boosted last month when the state's Supreme Court ruled to uphold a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of a majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. But DeSantis is not stopping there. The governor has argued that Florida got a 'raw deal' in the 2020 census when the state only gained one congressional seat. The governor said last month he had relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year and that the Trump administration could be pursuing redoing the census. Additionally, the governor said he believes Florida's Fair District amendments, which a majority of voters approved of in 2010, could conflict with the U.S. Constitution. The amendments say that districts cannot be drawn in a way that hinders minorities voting for their choice of elected representatives. 'There's a lot of people who believe that the Fair District Amendments is unconstitutional, because what it does is, it mandates having race predominate,' DeSantis said this week. 'Whereas, neutrality should really be the constitutional standard.' Patronis also said in his X post that he believes the Fair District Amendments are unconstitutional 'because it violates freedom of speech AND elections are a states rights issue.' 'Time to add more conservatives to Congress, so we can better deliver on President Trump's agenda, finally win the war against woke, cut government waste, and create an economy that moves our country into a new age of prosperity,' Patronis said. Republicans argue that DeSantis and the state's Republicans could be setting an example for other red states to follow. 'DeSantis here sees an opportunity to be a trailblazer for the Republican Party in this sense in that he could be setting up a pilot program that Texas and some of the other states can actually follow,' a Florida Republican strategist said. 'Let's not disillusion ourselves, if he pulls this off, he will be a fan favorite of one person who sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,' the strategist added, referring to Trump. So far, Republicans in the Florida state Legislature have remained publicly quiet about the prospect of pursuing redistricting. This year's state legislative session was extended from 60 days to 105 days and saw tensions emerge between DeSantis and members of his own party. State Rep. Alex Andrade, a vocal Republican critic of DeSantis, said he has not spoken to his colleagues about redistricting. The state lawmaker noted he would support the effort only if the census was redone. 'I get the partisan argument,' Andrade told The Hill. 'I understand we could make hay right now and benefit Republicans but at some point do I care more about my party or the Constitution?' 'If the census were redone, I'd jump all over it,' he said. Florida Democrats warn that a move by DeSantis and the state's Republicans would set a negative precedent. 'It would mean that the governor and the state legislative branch would completely capitulate under Donald Trump,' state House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell (D) said. 'It's not supposed to be that the president gets to act like a king and say 'do this on my behalf.'' In a Facebook video posted by Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), Soto accused Republicans of wanting to cheat in the election. 'They want to pick their voters rather than voters picking their representatives,' he said. 'You'll see us do whatever we can in the courts to make sure that the Fair Districts Amendments are enforced.' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Madison Andrus dismissed the effort from Florida Republicans as 'a bold-faced attempt to save their flailing midterm performance by rigging the game.' The effort comes as the nationwide redistricting war heats up and both parties seek to gain seats ahead of next year's midterm elections. In addition to Republicans in Texas and potentially Florida taking a look at redistricting, Democrats in states like California and New Jersey are also exploring their options. 'There's an opportunity and if it better reflects the makeup of a state whether that's Texas or Florida, or to Gavin Newsom's point even California, then you should do it,' a national Republican strategist said. 'These redistricting efforts, if they comply with the law and meet all of the various federal thresholds to get mapped through, if you do that and do it quickly, you're going to increase the likelihood that the president and Republicans in Washington and going to be able to keep pushing things forward,' the strategist continued.
New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
CT teacher put on leave for refusing to remove crucifix has still not settled lawsuit
A Connecticut teacher put in a 'rubber room' for refusing to remove a cross from her desk says she is still being crucified. Marisol Arroyo-Castro's case is being closely watched by both advocates of religious freedom and those seeking strict separation of church and state. On Wednesday, the grade-school educator and her lawyers participated in a three-hour mediation with the New Britain district's lawyers, superintendent and a judge, but weren't able to come to an agreement. Advertisement Her fate now rests in the hands of a judge, and Castro fears she could be fired or remain in a rubber room when the school year begins on Aug. 19. 'It's a little bit nerve-wracking, especially when school is starting again soon,' Castro, 62, told The Post on Thursday. 6 Marisol Arroyo-Castro has been teaching at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School since 2003. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro Advertisement The 33-year veteran teacher was taken out of her seventh-grade classroom at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School in mid-December for refusing to remove the 12-inch wooden crucifix on a classroom wall by the side of her desk. Castro, a devout Catholic, had the cross displayed there for a decade. 'I had it for 10 years and never a problem . . . And then one day I got a message [from the vice principal] saying that I needed to take it down,' Castro said. 'He said that it was against the Constitution when I asked why.' Advertisement 6 Castro, a devout Catholic, had the cross displayed in her classroom for a decade. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro The vice principal said he got a complaint from two people — never revealing who — and she was asked to move the crucifix to a new location under her desk. She did this for one day. 'I went home and cried for the whole night. And then I came back in the morning and I moved it' back to the classroom wall, she recalled. Advertisement The principal then told her she had until the end of the day to put it back under the desk, but she refused. 'When I came back the next day, somebody else removed it and put it in a box, and they told me not to return to the classroom,' she said. 'A representative from the union escorted me out of the building.' 6 Castro was asked to move the cross to a location below her desk. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro In March, after over two months of being on paid administrative leave, she was sent to an administrative office, where she is assigned demeaning clerical tasks under the title 'curriculum information teacher.' 'They assigned me some work related to developing curriculum, which I'm not trained in. They gave me a computer and a cubicle and told me to sit down. They didn't introduce me to anybody or anything. No one talked to me,' she said. Castro has been working at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School since 2003 — and has seen gay pride flags proudly displayed in the building, as well as personal items around other teachers' desks, including a photo of the Virgin Mary and a mug decorated with a Bible quote. 'They have pictures of their family, and to me, Jesus is my father,' she said. 'Pictures of their dogs. The Patriots sign. The Yankees sign. They even have Christmas trees. 'Somebody had a Baby Yoda. I think there's a Wonder Woman somewhere. All kinds of things,' added attorney Keisha Russell of the nonprofit First Liberty Institute, who is representing Castro. Advertisement 6 In Castro's complaint, she cites the Virgin Mary photo displayed by another teacher at the school. Obtained by the New York Post Russell cited the case Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Washington high school football coach Joe Kennedy praying on the field after games, as precedent for free religious expression in schools. Castro got emotional when she spoke about the support she's received from other teachers at the school as well as her former students. 6 Even if reinstated to her old job, the veteran teacher will have mixed feelings about it. 'Part of me is happy to go back and be with the students. Part of me is sad because those seventh graders didn't have me that year,' Castro said. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro Advertisement 'I have had a lot of teachers get in touch with me secretly because they were told not to. And they have just said that they're praying for me. And even students have contacted me in church. They say they're praying for me.' She hopes President Trump weighs in on the situation. 'That would be wonderful because we know that our president is fully committed to religious liberty,' Russell added. Advertisement 6 DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School in New Britain, CT, serves grades K through 8. DiLoreto Elementary & Middle School/ Facebook The New Britain School District says it's just following laws separating church and state. 'Since last fall, the district has attempted to reach an accommodation with Ms. Castro that respects her personal religious faith, the diverse religious beliefs of our many middle-school students, and the commands of the Constitution,' Dr. Tony Gasper, district superintendent, said. 'From the start, this teacher has insisted on displaying a crucifix on a classroom wall, visible to children in class, during instructional time. 'While we regret the spectacle that this situation has caused, we look forward to a ruling from the court. Meanwhile, the district will continue to focus on providing an effective learning environment in which all students and staff feel respected and valued.'
