logo
'Coldplaygate' is a stark reminder that cameras are everywhere

'Coldplaygate' is a stark reminder that cameras are everywhere

The Star4 days ago
The Internet's latest obsession occurred at, of all places, a Coldplay concert in Foxborough, Massachusetts.
During the concert July 16, Chris Martin, the band's frontman, announced that he would be singing to a select few fans in the crowd. 'The way we're going to do that is using our cameras,' he said. 'So, if you look at the screens, we're going to come looking and see who's out there to say hello to.'
After Martin sang a happy birthday song to one ecstatic fan while playing mellow guitar, a giant screen in the stadium showed a couple embracing. The man, who the Internet quickly identified as Andy Byron, the married CEO of a tech company called Astronomer, held his arms around Kristin Cabot, the company's chief people officer who is not his wife.
'Oh, look at these two,' Martin said, prepared to sing another sweet song. Then things became awkward.
When Cabot noticed her face on the screen, she immediately jumped out of Byron's arms, covered her face and turned around. He ducked out of view. A woman standing beside them was seen cupping her face in disbelief, her mouth wide open.
Martin, realising what was happening, said: 'Wow, what? Either they're having an affair, or they're just very shy. I'm not quite sure what to do.'
The identities of Byron and Cabot were confirmed by a spokesperson for Astronomer on Friday night (July 18) after the company issued a statement saying Byron had been placed on leave and that the company's chief product officer, Peter DeJoy, would serve as interim CEO.
Saturday afternoon (July 19), Astronomer issued another statement saying that Byron had resigned and that the board of directors would begin a search for his replacement.
Astronomer, a data infrastructure company that works with companies to manage and automate data, had previously said it was launching an investigation of the incident and that 'our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability'.
The incident, which has dominated social media, was a stark reminder of how quickly things can spread thanks to social media and how cameras are surrounding people at all times. That is especially true at large concerts where fans are often recording snippets or streaming them on social media. Case in point: The video of Wednesday's interaction was posted by a concertgoer with a modest TikTok following. But thanks to the power of that app's algorithm, it had more than 77 million views as of Friday evening.
It took only a few seconds of video for Byron and Cabot to thoroughly dominate Internet discourse and become an instant meme, which many have called 'Coldplaygate'.
As the video circulated, some shared their advice for the couple, suggesting they could have covered themselves in a blanket or thrown on a pair of shades. Others pointed out how awkward things would be at their office the next day.
The moment proceeded to be shared, and joked about, by politicians, corporations and even New York City's sanitation department.
From there, it turned into a broader discussion of privacy and why they had been wrong to assume they would not be seen and, potentially, recorded.
'If you're in a public place, there is absolutely no expectation of privacy,' said Charles Lindsey, an associate professor of marketing at University at Buffalo School of Management. 'When you're in a public place, whether it be a public park, a store, a concert, there are cameras, and if it's on camera, you can't take it back.'
That lesson had been learned by plenty of people before this incident.
There was the time in May when the door of a plane carrying French President Emmanuel Macron had just been opened by staff in Hanoi, Vietnam, when his wife, Brigitte Macron, pushed him in the face. When he looked up and noticed a camera filming the scene from outside, he waved. The video quickly gained traction online, leading to a flurry of interpretations.
In 2024, there was a great deal of debate over a woman posting videos on TikTok in which she assumed she was witnessing an extramarital affair taking place on a plane.
And there was the infamous Met Gala elevator incident in 2014, where Solange Knowles was seen attacking Jay-Z while her sister, Beyoncé, stood watching and a bodyguard tried to restore order. The security-cam footage leaked to TMZ, and it became fodder for the public.
'We live in a very intrusive world, in terms of cameras and digital footprints,' Lindsey said. 'It can take 10 or 20 years to build a reputation, and you can lose it in a moment.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge
Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge

New Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge

WALL Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself? The growing concentration in United States equities instantly brings to mind the Internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65 per cent over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years. It seems unlikely that we will see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe. The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-"Liberation Day" tariff slump in early April — one of the fastest on record — or its rally during the Covid-19 pandemic. But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind. The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in US equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34 per cent of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33 per cent set in March 2000. Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — as well as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan. By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric, Citi, Exxon, Walmart and Home Depot. Plus, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost US$22 trillion, or 40 per cent of the index's total, significantly higher than the comparable 25 per cent in 1999. This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the US economy today. By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI), is more extreme than the information technology bubble of the late 1990s. As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago. However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterised by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today. While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively. With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect. AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centres, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run. According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly US$2.9 trillion of global data centre spending through 2028, comprising US$1.6 trillion on hardware like chips and servers and US$1.3 trillion on infrastructure. That means investment needs of over US$900 billion in 2028, they reckon. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around US$950 billion. Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek?) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, like US$4-trillion chipmaker Nvidia? Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go.

#SHOWBIZ: Diana Danielle wows fans with her unique voice on TikTok
#SHOWBIZ: Diana Danielle wows fans with her unique voice on TikTok

New Straits Times

time9 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

#SHOWBIZ: Diana Danielle wows fans with her unique voice on TikTok

KUALA LUMPUR: Actress Diana Danielle has been receiving widespread praise online for her distinctive and soothing singing voice. In a recent TikTok post, Diana, full name Diana Danielle Danny Beeson, shared a recording of herself performing 'Wildflower,' a song made popular by international star Billie Eilish. The nearly four-minute video quickly garnered attention, with many admiring her melodic and heartfelt delivery. Viewers flooded the comments section with praise, noting how perfectly her voice suits ballads. Many encouraged the 33-year-old actress to produce more song covers in a similar style. "Your voice is beautiful. You should definitely do more songs like this," one fan commented, while another wrote: "This is so much better, no more shouting needed." Other comments included, "Absolutely perfect." Diana's performance has unveiled a new facet of her talent, proving her artistry extends beyond acting and into music, showcasing a calm and captivating vocal presence that resonates deeply with listeners.

#SHOWBIZ: Ameera Khan's pricey birthday gift watch from father
#SHOWBIZ: Ameera Khan's pricey birthday gift watch from father

New Straits Times

time13 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

#SHOWBIZ: Ameera Khan's pricey birthday gift watch from father

KUALA LUMPUR: Social media influencer Ameera Khan recently captured widespread attention after sharing an Instagram photo of her opulent Cartier Panthère de Cartier watch. The timepiece was a birthday gift from her father, accompanied by a heartfelt message that read: "For my lovely girl. Your tennis watch is here. Love, Dad." Based on the watch's model and design, online commentators estimated its value to be between RM20,000 and RM25,000. However, it wasn't the watch's hefty price tag that raised eyebrows among netizens. Instead, the discussion quickly turned to her boyfriend, Indonesian actor Jefri Nichol, and his potential to match such lavish gifts once they are married. While most wished Ameera a happy birthday, some playfully teased Jefri, expressing hope that he could afford even more expensive and luxurious presents for her in the future. One comment read: "Good luck Jefri, the money for this tennis watch alone could cover a car's down payment." Last June, Jefri revealed the story of how he and Ameera met in a TikTok video. The 26-year-old actor explained that he first encountered Ameera's name in 2021 when she was featured on the X platform's "Top 10 Most Beautiful Women in Malaysia" list. Given the long-distance nature of their initial interactions, their connection was primarily nurtured through social media and phone calls. "We only met in 2023," Jefri said, adding that by January 2024, they were officially a couple.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store