Government ‘confident' it can implement US deal in time to protect steel sector
The decision means that British steel exports will continue to face a 25% levy from America, rather than the higher rate, while negotiations continue on bringing the agreement into effect.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'As a result of our landmark deal with the US, UK steel won't be subject to additional tariffs.
'My Government will always protect British businesses and British jobs.'
But the situation could still change again in July, when the US is set to either increase the tariffs to 50% or introduce the quotas in the US-UK agreement, effectively eradicating the tax, depending on whether the deal is implemented.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told the BBC's Today programme on Wednesday she was 'really confident' that her Cabinet colleagues had the 'ability' and 'determination' to 'ensure that we are protecting British businesses and that we can get on and implement the trade deals we have agreed'.
Ms Alexander said the Government would be introducing legislation 'to ensure that that happens', although this could take the form of regulations rather than a full Bill.
Meanwhile, the head of industry body UK Steel, Gareth Stace, urged the Government to 'apply rocket boosters' to negotiations with the US on implementing the deal.
Mr Stace said Mr Trump's decision to keep tariffs on British steel at 25% was a 'welcome pause' but warned that continuing uncertainty was making US customers 'dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders'.
The Government has pledged to keep working with the US to get the agreement up and running and the 25% tariff rate 'removed'.
Those negotiations saw a meeting between Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday at which the two men committed to working closely to implement the deal.
President Trump just signed a proclamation raising tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by 50% to protect U.S. steel and national security.🇺🇸
THE GOLDEN AGE IS HERE! pic.twitter.com/TP32u0M4dR
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 3, 2025
A spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our plan for change.
'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed.'
The Conservatives have said that Labour's 'botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo'.
Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Keir Starmer stood in front of the nation and insisted to the British public that his Labour government had achieved a trade deal with the US – and now one month later our industries face a fresh tariffs blow.
'So once again it seems that Keir Starmer's promise was just like the rest: hollow and broken. Labour's botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo and this country simply cannot afford their continuing failure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C32%2C0%2C31%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu's gameplan for Gaza is in tatters
When the British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour issued his eponymous 'Declaration' in November 1917, it was hailed as a monumental and historic diplomatic achievement by the Zionist movement. When prime minister Keir Starmer announced earlier this week that, barring a ceasefire, Britain will recognise a Palestinian state, it was met with angry tantrums and livid rhetorical spasms by Israeli ministers. The context and circumstances are obviously very different – but the Britain of 1917 that issued the declaration, the Britain of 1947 that relinquished its mandate over Palestine and supported the UN plan for partition, and the Britain of 2025 that is considering recognition of a Palestinian state are all telling the same story: that there is a question that needs to – and can be – resolved. Benjamin Netanyahu should not have been surprised by Starmer's announcement. It has been gradually in the making, with Britain over the last year imploring Israel to end the war in Gaza and prevent further humanitarian catastrophe and starvation. Starmer's bona fides on Israel are unassailable; it is Netanyahu who has chosen to ignore, deride and refuse to entertain any political plans for post-war Gaza. It was Netanyahu who waged a war without clear political objectives, and who was warned by Britain, among several other allies, that this will produce calamity. But it is Netanyahu who has cast himself in the Churchillian mould, that of the wartime prime minister who he alone can remodel the Middle East's geopolitical landscape through military force – and all the while assuming the Palestinian issue will magically disappear. Yet after a few weeks of futile quasi-negotiations over a partial deal, Israel is now again exuding pessimism, threatening to widen the military operation in Gaza as if, short of full military occupation, it can be further widened. It's not just the United Kingdom that has, latterly, taken a stand: the Israeli military is also warning Netanyahu that this is going nowhere. As Donald Trump's patience with Netanyahu frays, he sent US envoy Steve Witkoff to Israel – which was a de facto threat to Israel not to expand the war, and to significantly increase humanitarian aid getting in to Gaza, an endeavour that, to date, has been a colossal failure. The Israeli media is melodramatically calling, first, the French decision to 'recognise Palestine', followed by the British, then Canada and possibly Portugal, too, as a 'tsunami'. This is both misleading and in poor taste. A tsunami is a force of nature, a displacement of the ocean resulting from an earthquake. The diplomatic debacle that Israel is undergoing is man-made – by one man to be precise, Mr Netanyahu. It is the result of nothing but hubris and a reckless lack of policy. Some 147 countries – out of the 193 UN member states – have already announced their recognition of a future Palestine. This wide-scale recognition is largely symbolic, declarative and more a statement of frustration with the lack of a resolution than having any practical meaning. But the symbolic nature of such declarations become substantive since they create an organising policy principle around which many countries coalesce. When four of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council announce their intention, it leaves Israel dependent more than ever not on the US, but on the whims of an increasingly frustrated and erratic Donald Trump. This is not where Israel should be. Starmer, Carney and Macron will not establish a Palestinian state by virtue of declarations. They know that. Nor is it feasible for such a state to be formed in the immediate future. But they have put a mirror in front of Netanyahu. How long can he avoid looking into it? Alon Pinkas is a former Israeli consul general to the US and was a political adviser to two former prime ministers, Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves accuses Jeremy Corbyn of trying to destroy Labour
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has criticised Jeremy Corbyn 's new political party and his "big ego" during a talk at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Ms Reeves said the former Labour leader "tried to destroy my party" during his leadership, which saw two general election losses. She predicted that the public would reject Mr Corbyn's unnamed new party, marketed as "Your Party", just as they rejected him twice before. Ms Reeves dismissed Mr Corbyn's claim of over 500,000 sign-ups for his new movement. The chancellor also said that Reform UK, not the Conservatives, is now Labour's main political rival.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hundreds of children from Gaza to be brought to UK for medical treatment
Up to 300 children could be evacuated from Gaza and given NHS treatment in the UK. The plans are reportedly set to be announced within weeks. A parent or guardian will accompany each child, as well as siblings if necessary, and the Home Office will carry out biometric and security checks before travel, the Sunday Times reported. This will happen 'in parallel' with an initiative by Project Pure Hope, a group set up to bring sick and injured Gazan children to the UK privately for treatment. More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. Sir Keir Starmer said last week that the UK was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. A Government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' The UK and Jordan have been working together to air drop aid amid warnings of widespread malnourishment in Gaza. It comes as the UK seeks to put pressure on Israel to change course with a plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September ahead of the UN General Assembly. Sir Keir has said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Concerns have been raised this could see a Palestinian state recognised by the UK without Hamas releasing the remaining Israeli hostages. British families of hostages say the Government has made clear to them that releases would 'play no part' in the UK's plans to recognise Palestine and that it could see those still held 'rot in Hamas dungeons'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK's demands for Hamas to release all hostages and play no role in the future of Gaza are 'absolute and unconditional'. He told The Sunday Times: 'The UK position on recognition is part of (a) co-ordinated international effort. It must begin with an immediate ceasefire that frees the hostages and ends the agony of their families, and which lifts the inhumane aid restrictions.'
