logo
'Survivor' 48, Episode 9 recap: Paranoia sets in for an alliance. Who goes home?

'Survivor' 48, Episode 9 recap: Paranoia sets in for an alliance. Who goes home?

USA Today24-04-2025
'Survivor' 48, Episode 9 recap: Paranoia sets in for an alliance. Who goes home?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Need a show to binge? These are the must watch shows this spring.
USA TODAY's TV critic Kelly Lawler breaks down the best TV shows you don't to want to miss this spring.
Although they tried to retain a united front, the strong majority alliance began to let infighting break them apart during the latest episode of "Survivor" Season 48.
The ninth episode, titled "Welcome to the Party," saw the majority alliance of six members begin to turn on each other as paranoia crept in. Even after the majority group promised to play the game of "Survivor" with integrity and honor, deception and lies remained the real name of the game as allies turned on one another to vote out a castaway.
At the start of the episode, there were nine players left and two members on the jury who will help cast votes for the $1 million winner and "sole survivor" of Season 48 of the long-running reality competition show. After this episode, only eight remain in the game, with three on the jury.
Here's who was voted off this week.
Who went home on 'Survivor' Season 48, Episode 9?
The majority alliance, consisting of David Kinne, Kyle Fraser, Joe Hunter, Shauhin Davari, Eva Erickson and Mary Zheng, valued their physical strength and promised each other to play with honesty and integrity.
But all is not as it seems, as Kyle has a secret alliance with Kamilla Karthigesu and was forming a side alliance with Shauhin, as both players distrust David.
Eva was also holding onto her own secret after finding an advantage clue in the last episode. She snuck away from camp at night and earned a very useful safety-without-power advantage, allowing her to leave a future tribal council before votes are read, therefore saving herself from being voted out.
At the immunity and reward challenge, players had to stand on a small platform holding onto a bar holding a ball up on a metal chute. Should they step off the platform or move their arms, therefore moving the ball, they would be out of the challenge.
As has often been the case this season, the challenge became a showdown between the physically stronger players, and David and Joe battled it out for immunity. David eventually dropped out unexpectedly, letting Joe win and allowing him to take three others on a food reward.
Joe chose Eva, Shauhin and Mitch Guerra, who had not yet been on a reward challenge and was very hungry after days with low to no food.
Two names emerged as possibilities to go home as tribal council approached: David and Mitch. Feeling suspicious of fellow alliance members Shauhin and Kyle and a possible immunity idol that could be played on Kamilla, David urged players to vote for Mitch. Frustrated by David's gameplay and possible knowledge of his secret alliance with Kamilla, Kyle urged players to vote for David.
It was a fairly close vote at tribal council between David and Mitch, but in the end, David, a 39-year-old stunt performer living in Buena Park, California, became the latest person voted out and the third member of the jury.
'Survivor' Season 48 cast: Meet the 18 castaways hoping to win $1 million in Fiji
Who went home last week on 'Survivor' Season 48?
During the challenge, five pairs worked as a team, moving through several stages of an obstacle course. Only three teams would make it to the second stage, and only two teams would make it to the third and final stage, where they would compete for individual immunity.
The first two teams eliminated didn't get the reward of tacos and had to take a "journey," where they stood to lose their vote in the night's immunity challenge.
Immunity came in a survivor classic challenge: "Get a Grip," where players must hold onto a narrow, tall pole for as long as possible.
Eva Erickson, Joe Hunter, Mary Zheng and David Kinne competed in the immunity challenge, with Eva taking home her first individual immunity of the season.
Going on the journey were Kamilla Karthigesu, Shauhin Davari, Star Toomey and Mitch Guerra. They had to compete in their own challenge that involved strategically picking up red and grey balls from a chute. The first player with three red balls lost their vote, and after a secret strategy between Mitch and Kamilla, Star was unable to cast a vote in the night's tribal council.
Luckily for Star, her name wasn't on the chopping block. Players quickly honed in on sending either Kamilla, Shauhin or Chrissy Sarnowsky home. Panicked at the thought of Kamilla, his closest (and secret) ally leaving the game, Kyle desperately tried to convince others to vote for Chrissy instead, raising David's eyebrows and planting suspicion of an undercover alliance.
But at tribal council, Chrissy expressed her frustration at the so-called strong player alliance between David, Eva, Joe and Shauhin, calling out Eva and Joe's close alliance and pleading for other players to recognize their gameplay.
Her outburst was enough for a near-unanimous vote against Chrissy, and the 55-year-old fire lieutenant from Chicago became the latest person voted out of Season 48 and the second member of the jury.
How to watch 'Survivor' Season 48
Season 48 of "Survivor" airs Wednesdays at 8 p.m. ET / PT on CBS and streams on Paramount+ for subscribers of the Paramount+ with Showtime plan.
Episodes can be streamed the next day for subscribers of any Paramount+ plan.
The previous 47 seasons of the show are all available to stream with a Paramount+ subscription.
Watch every season of Survivor on Paramount+
Who is the host of 'Survivor'?
Jeff Probst has hosted all 48 seasons of the show, which has been on the air since 2000. He also serves as an executive producer.
'Survivor' 50: Jeff Probst talks casting all-stars season, whether he'd play 'Traitors'
Who won 'Survivor' Season 47?
Rachel Lamont won Season 47 of "Survivor," in a 7-1-0 vote against Sam Phalen, who got one vote, and Sue Smey.
Lamont, a 34-year-old graphic designer from Southfield, Michigan, was originally on the Gata tribe and became the fifth woman ever to win four individual Immunity Challenges in a season.
Where is 'Survivor' filmed?
While "Survivor" previously took contestants to remote locations around the world, from the Pearl Islands to the Philippines and Guatemala, the show has been filmed in the Mamanuca Islands in Fiji for the past 15 seasons.
We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn't influence our coverage.
Our team of savvy editors independently handpicks all recommendations. If you make a purchase through our links, we may earn a commission. Prices were accurate at the time of publication but may change.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This '70s pop band has won over Gen Z (again) with 1 billion Spotify streams.
This '70s pop band has won over Gen Z (again) with 1 billion Spotify streams.

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

This '70s pop band has won over Gen Z (again) with 1 billion Spotify streams.

It's not 1979, but ABBA is bewitching a whole new generation with its disco magic. The iconic Swedish pop group, beloved for its infectious blend of Europop and danceable grooves, has made Spotify history with its late-'70s hit "Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight)." The song, cowritten and coproduced by members Benny Andersson and Björn Ulvaeus, entered Spotify's Billions Club on Sunday, July 20, after surpassing one billion streams on the music platform, Spotify exclusively confirmed to USA TODAY. This isn't the first time ABBA has dominated the streaming universe with its timeless tunes. The band's enduring anthem, "Dancing Queen," entered the Billions Club in July 2023. Released in October 1979 as part of the group's compilation album "Greatest Hits Vol. 2," "Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!" peaked at No. 1 in several territories, including Europe, Denmark, Japan and Switzerland, and cracked the top 20 in ABBA's native Sweden. The song has received a number of revivals over the years thanks to various covers and samples. '80s diva and "Queen of Pop" Madonna featured the track's opening synth line in her 2005 song "Hung Up," which peaked at No. 7 on the Billboard Hot 100. ABBA book revelations: AC/DC connection, the unlikely inspiration for 'Mamma Mia!', more Additionally, the 2008 film "Mamma Mia!" — a musical based on ABBA's hits-heavy catalog — included a version sung by stars Amanda Seyfried, Ashley Lilley and Rachel McDowall. More recently, "Gimme!" has enjoyed a digital resurgence with Gen Z, as seen on the social media platform TikTok. Several clips show young fans embracing the song's disco sound with lively, choreographed routines. (dc: ??) am I too late for this trend?😆🪩 #fyp #xyzbca ABBA racks up Gen Z fans by the millions on Spotify ABBA's streaming dominance is in part due to the group's sizable Gen Z audience. Globally, Gen Zers have accounted for 50% of ABBA's total streams on Spotify in 2025, according to the streaming service. Additionally, there have been over 11 million ABBA discoveries by Gen Z listeners on Spotify, which makes up half of the band's discoveries from all users worldwide. See the photos: A 'very emotional' ABBA reunites to receive Swedish royal honors The top 10 most-streamed ABBA tracks among Gen Z listeners in 2025 are as follows:

James Gunn recalls booting Henry Cavill from Superman role: 'Poor guy'
James Gunn recalls booting Henry Cavill from Superman role: 'Poor guy'

USA Today

time7 hours ago

  • USA Today

James Gunn recalls booting Henry Cavill from Superman role: 'Poor guy'

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's ... not Henry Cavill. In an episode of the "Happy Sad Confused" podcast released on Friday, July 18, "Superman" director James Gunn reflected on the "terrible" experience of telling Cavill he was being replaced as Superman by David Corenswet for the new movie. Gunn said he sat down with the actor to break the news in 2022. At the time, Cavill had recently returned as Superman for a surprise cameo in the DC movie "Black Adam," starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. After that film was released in October 2022, Cavill announced on social media that he was "back as Superman" and would reprise the role in future movies. But on "Happy Sad Confused," Gunn revealed that the same day Cavill's return was announced, he and producer Peter Safran closed a deal to take over as the heads of DC Studios. Behind the scenes, the pair had already been planning to reboot Superman and replace Cavill, who had played the character going back to 2013's "Man of Steel." "The day our deal closed, all of a sudden, they were announcing that Henry was back, and I'm like, 'What is going on? We know what the plan is.' The plan was to come in and do 'Superman,' " Gunn said. "So it was really unfair to him, and it was a total bummer." Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox He added, "That was really unfortunate. I'm like, 'This poor guy.' " Gunn noted that bringing back Cavill was "never a part of the equation" for David Zaslav, CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, DC Studios' parent company. But Gunn said there was a "vacuum" in leadership at DC, and "a lot of people" were "trying to force" through their vision for the future of the franchise. He did not name names, though, noting he was trying to be "as diplomatic as possible." During his 2022 meeting with Cavill, Gunn said the actor was an "absolute gentleman" and a "great guy about it," only asking that he be able to share the news that he was being replaced as Superman himself. Cavill did so in December 2022, when he posted a statement on Instagram revealing that he "will, after all, not be returning as Superman." "After being told by the studio to announce my return back in October, prior to (Gunn and Safran's) hire, this news isn't the easiest, but that's life," Cavill told fans. "The changing of the guard is something that happens. I respect that." In posts on X at the time, Gunn said that Cavill would not star in the next "Superman" movie because the film would focus on "an earlier part of" the character's life. Corenswet, who at 32 is 10 years younger than Cavill, was ultimately cast in the lead role of "Superman." The movie is positioned as the start of a relaunched DC universe, set in a world separate from the one that Cavill's Superman occupied. Johnson, the star of "Black Adam," has previously said he played a major role in bringing Cavill back for his cameo in the 2022 film. "At the end of the day, the studio was not bringing Henry Cavill back, inexplicably and inexcusably," the actor said in a video on social media in 2022. "But we weren't going to take no for an answer." But just because Cavill is out as Superman doesn't mean his time with DC is over. Gunn said on "Happy Sad Confused" that Cavill could play another character in the new DC universe − just as "Aquaman" star Jason Momoa will play a new character, Lobo, in 2026's "Supergirl." "I talked to him about it on that day," Gunn said. "I would love to put Henry in something."

Canceling ‘The Late Show' Is Bad News for Late-Night TV, not for Stephen Colbert
Canceling ‘The Late Show' Is Bad News for Late-Night TV, not for Stephen Colbert

New York Times

time8 hours ago

  • New York Times

Canceling ‘The Late Show' Is Bad News for Late-Night TV, not for Stephen Colbert

Getting canceled may end up being the best thing that ever happened to Stephen Colbert. The same cannot be said for its impact on late night television. Consider that Conan O'Brien turned into a folk hero after NBC took away his time slot and that David Letterman hit the height of his popularity after he didn't get the job as host of 'The Tonight Show.' Until last week, Colbert, host of 'The Late Show,' was the ratings leader of an art form in decline. Then CBS, citing economic issues, announced that his program would go off the air next May, news that came at a time when its corporate parent, Paramount, needs the government's approval for a merger with the Skydance company. Now Colbert, one of the most prominent critics of President Trump, seems to many like a comedic martyr. For the next 10 months, his show will have a spotlight in a way it never has before. He will not only have a chance to continue to make fun of the president, but he also will be setting himself up for his next act. Marrying a pugilistic comedic streak with courtly manners, Colbert became the finest conversationalist of the current hosts and his political monologues helped him become a ratings leader. He respected the history and conventions of late-night television, perhaps to a fault. But you also got the sense that 'The Late Show' wasn't always the perfect showcase for his myriad talents. His quick, improv-honed wit and intellectual depth could feel hamstrung by the show's short segments. And sometimes when he got on a good riff or dug into an area of major interest (Tolkien, faith, the history of comedy), you wondered if it would fit better on a podcast. Before taking the job, Colbert developed an elite reputation in comedy circles as a Second City performer, a comedy writer and a correspondent on 'The Daily Show.' But mostly he was known for 'The Colbert Report,' an inspired and singular reinvention of the late-night form whose greatness has already been overshadowed by his later work. Satirizing a blowhard conservative pundit through entire episodes, he somehow managed to lead guests nimbly into arguments, making jokes and serious points at the same time. He conveyed a clear point of view while often saying the opposite. Improvising multiple layers of meaning, he pulled off one of the great comedic feats of this century. There was an impressive degree of difficulty to that show that exceeds all the other current network late-night shows — and it's why, right before he took the job as the host of 'The Late Show,' I wrote a column worrying about what would be lost with this new, more mainstream position. Something was, and while his current, more conventional role is less virtuosic, he succeeded in this transition. DURING A 'LATE SHOW' MONOLOGUE last week, Colbert described Paramount's $16 million payment to settle Trump's lawsuit over the editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris as a 'big, fat bribe.' In that moment, the host belonged to a venerable history of late-night hosts biting the hand that feeds them. But the cancellation three days later made one wonder about a related late-night tradition: network bosses' taking abuse in stride. Rick Ludwin, longtime head of late-night programming at NBC, once told me that insults from hosts like David Letterman, who regularly called executives 'pinheads' and 'weasels,' were great for business. 'The audience loves it. They wish they could say it to their own bosses,' he said, adding, 'Executives come and go but these franchises roll on.' Not anymore. Late-night television is not finished. In fact, you could say we are reverting to the era before the early '90s when NBC dominated and there were occasionally network alternatives. The loss of 'The Late Show' is not the death knell, but it is a death knell. The other late-night network hosts Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers and Jimmy Kimmel each have their strengths, but they weren't comic supernovas the way Colbert was when he took the job. They don't define the sensibilities of young viewers and future comedians the way Letterman or O'Brien did. And the success of the current crop of hosts — and some of their most interesting work — is built for an online audience. If video killed the radio star, who did in the network late-night superstar? The internet is the primary suspect, increasing competition, chipping away at advertising dollars and transforming the time at which we watch these shows, making the term 'late night' itself a misnomer. The growing politicization of nightly talk shows, starting with Jon Stewart on 'The Daily Show' on Comedy Central, played a part, balkanizing the audience and crowding out some comedic ambition. But if there's an autopsy of late-night television, Paramount's suspiciously timed decision deserves some attention. Announcing the cancellation, the CBS President George Cheeks argued that it was 'a purely financial decision.' The current debate over whether Colbert's cancellation was the result of politics or the struggling economics of the show misses the point. It can be (and probably is) both. OF COURSE, MONEY MATTERS, but so does the climate in which it's allocated. Late night used to be, among other things, a prestige business. The hosts were some of the key faces of the network. On top of profits, the shows generated press attention, in-house promotion and buzz. Now media bosses seem more willing to cut a check for millions of dollars to make a political problem go away rather than spend that money to keep a late-night show. In trying to take control of the narrative, sources inside CBS have said that 'The Late Show' lost $40 million last year, which happens to be the same amount Jeff Bezos' Amazon is reportedly paying for a Melania Trump documentary. Just as news organizations depend on trust, entertainment companies rely on credibility. Comedians should (and must) make fun of the powerful. It's part of the job. And they need producers and executives to support them, financially and otherwise. What young comedian would now feel entirely comfortable satirizing the current administration on CBS? It's worth recalling that Letterman's comic attacks on network executives in the mid-1980s proliferated because of a merger, when General Electric bought NBC. Letterman was not just appealing to viewers' annoyance with their bosses; he was also making a point about the dangers of corporate consolidation. He was revolted that people in the business of selling toasters and lightbulbs thought they understood broadcasting. This issue has only become more urgent as tech titans have taken over the news media and Hollywood. Even if you think politics played no role, canceling this franchise now seems like the move of someone who doesn't understand or care about late-night comedy. — just as the '60 Minutes' settlement seems like the decision of someone far too cavalier about the importance of an independent press. These moves don't just threaten to chill speech. They hasten the demise of network TV. Many people found solace in watching Colbert poke fun at the news every night. That audience will probably go elsewhere. It might be to Fallon on NBC or more likely Kimmel on ABC, but an increasing number of viewers will flock to YouTube or a podcast. When they seek out these platforms, I would not be surprised if they eventually find a new version of Stephen Colbert there.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store