No laughing matter: how Nigel Farage stole the lead in UK politics
The twin guardrails of compulsory and preferential voting raise the barriers to minor parties and insurgents and protect us from the extremes of left and right. Although our politics sometimes seem fraught, among the democracies Australia is a model of stability.
The story is very different elsewhere, where the franchise is exercised under different voting methods. Recent European elections have seen upheavals across the continent, with established postwar parties displaced by new political movements led by charismatic disruptors such as Emmanuel Macron in France, Giorgia Meloni in Italy and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands.
In Britain, a similar fragmentation of the major parties is increasingly evident – originally on the right, but now on the left as well. Although Labour won a smashing victory only a year ago, every major opinion poll finds it would now lose its majority. An average of the 10 leading polls, published on the government's first anniversary, put the Reform party of Brexit leader Nigel Farage ahead with 28.4 per cent. Labour has sunk to 23.9 per cent, while the Tories languish on a derisory 18 per cent. Although it won only five seats last year, Reform's surging support since puts it on the verge of a breakthrough.
Farage is a charismatic populist: a champion of nostalgic patriotism, scourge of political correctness and skilful practitioner of the politics of grievance. His rhetoric is heavily laced with racial dog-whistling. As a communicator, he leaves Keir Starmer for dead.
Loading
Reform has already eaten deeply into the Conservative Party's electoral base. Now Farage is targeting Labour. With a Tory recovery nowhere in sight, Starmer and Farage have both declared that the next election will be fought between Labour and Reform. Former prime minister David Cameron has been saying privately that he expects Reform to win more seats than the Conservatives.
The strategically vital constituency in British politics today is no longer the middle class, but the old industrial working class, particularly in the north of England. These people – older, poorer, marginalised – were once rock-solid Labour. Captured by Boris Johnson in 2019 – they are staunch Brexiteers – they came home to Labour last year. Now, they are stampeding to Farage. His bloke-in-the-pub persona cuts through with them as surely as Starmer, the preachy human rights barrister from north London, does not.
The growing belief among establishment conservatives that Farage is more likely than the Tories to win a large swath of seats from Labour has changed their attitude towards him. While his crude populism still leaves them cold as they despair at their own party's weakness, they increasingly see Reform as the only feasible pathway to ousting Starmer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
8 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
World leaders critical of Israel are ‘encouraging' Hamas
Former British colonel Richard Kemp discusses how the latest criticism of world leaders towards Israel is encouraging Hamas. 'The problem with Mr Albanese and Mr Starmer over here and the other leaders who are lashing out at Israel now, is that it is encouraging Hamas,' Mr Kemp told Sky News Australia. 'Hamas and the Israelis have been involved in peace talks in recent days, Hamas essentially pulled out of those peace talks … this is partly due to encouragement they have been given from international leaders.'

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
US reaches new trade deal with European Union
Global pharmaceutical giants, including Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, are paying a tiny fraction of the billions of dollars they earn from drug sales in local taxes, at a time when they're lobbying US President Donald Trump to force an overhaul of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. An analysis of earnings statements filed with the corporate regulator by five of the biggest US and European drugmakers shows the companies on average pay between 2 per cent and 4 per cent of their Australian sales in income tax. The numbers may make for uncomfortable reading for drug multinationals as they step up efforts to loosen the PBS' grip on the pricing of key medicines.


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
EU and US announce tariff deal to avoid spiralling trade war
The United States struck a framework trade deal with the European Union on Monday AEST, imposing a 15 per cent import tariff on most EU goods, but averting a spiralling battle between two allies which account for almost a third of global trade. The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled for talks with US President Donald Trump at his golf course in western Scotland to push a hard-fought deal over the line. "I think this is the biggest deal ever made," Trump told reporters after an hour-long meeting with von der Leyen, who said the 15 per cent tariff applied "across the board". "We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability," she said. The deal, which also includes US$600 billion ($914.9 billion) of EU investments in the United States and US$750 billion ($1.1 trillion) of EU purchases of US energy over Trump's second term, will indeed bring clarity for EU companies. Even so, the baseline 15 per cent tariff will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared with the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30 per cent rate. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying in a statement that a trade conflict had been averted that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. But Bernd Lange, the German Social Democrat who chair's the trade committee of the European Parliament, said he was "quite critical" because the tariffs were imbalanced and the pledged $600 billion of investment would likely come at the expense of EU industry. The euro rose around 0.2 per cent per cent against the dollar, sterling and yen within an hour of the deal. The deal mirrors key parts of the framework agreement the United States clinched with Japan last week. Shipping containers and cargo ships seen in the port of Barcelona one of the biggest sea ports of Europe. Source: AAP / Davide Bonaldo / SOPA Images "We are agreeing that the tariff ... for automobiles and everything else will be a straight-across tariff of 15 per cent," Trump said. That rate will not, however, apply to steel and aluminium, for which a 50 per cent tariff will remain in place, although von der Leyen said it would be cut and replaced with a quota system. Von der Leyen said the rate also applied to semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, and there would be no tariffs from either side on aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. "We will keep working to add more products to this list," she said, adding that the situation on spirits was still to be established. Eric Winograd, chief economist at AllianceBernstein in New York, noted the similarity with Japan's US deal. "We will need to see how long the sides stick to the deal. From a market perspective, it is reassuring in the sense that having a deal is better than not having a deal," he said. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days." He has periodically railed against the European Union, saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. Arriving in Scotland, Trump said the EU wanted "to make a deal very badly" and said, as he met von der Leyen, that Europe had been "very unfair to the United States". His main bugbear is the US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to US Census Bureau data. The EU points to the US surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance. Trump also talked on Sunday about the "hundreds of billions of dollars" that tariffs were bringing in. On 12 July, Trump threatened to apply a 30 per cent tariff on imports from the EU starting on 1 August, after weeks of negotiations with the major US trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. The EU had prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros of US goods in the event there was no deal, and Trump had pressed ahead with 30 per cent tariffs. Some member states had also pushed for the bloc to use its most powerful trade weapon, the anti-coercion instrument, to target US services in the event of a no-deal.