Pennsylvania men lost hundreds of thousands gambling on DraftKings. Now they're suing.
Five Pennsylvania men are trying to launch a class action lawsuit against DraftKings, the online sports betting behemoth that they say used predatory tactics and deceptive marketing to fuel their gambling addictions.
The federal lawsuit claims that, instead of trying to help people in the throes of compulsive gambling, DraftKings targets and exploits these individuals. The company also extends promotional deals that offer "no sweat" bets or deposit matches, while hiding convoluted conditions in the fine print, according to the lawsuit.
More: Pennsylvania gaming revenues hit record high in 2024 for one main reason
DraftKings 'uses these tactics to identify and cultivate the people it wants on its platform: those who are most susceptible to these sorts of promotions and most likely to lose a lot of money betting,' the complaint filed in late April contends. 'In other words, marks.'
The suit notes that online sportsbooks such as DraftKings have exploded in popularity since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 decision opening the door to this betting. DraftKings is Pennsylvania's second-highest grossing sports betting platform through a partnership with Hollywood Casino at the Meadows, according to state data. It also owns an online casino.
More: As sports betting skyrockets, more Americans search for addiction help, study finds
DraftKings as of May 20 had not filed a court response to the complaint, and its spokespeople did not immediately answer a request for comment.
One of the plaintiffs, a Pittsburgh teacher who earned about $50,000 a year, borrowed money from his loved ones to keep gambling after he'd drained his own bank account. In total, he lost $134,000 on DraftKings, the lawsuit states.
After recognizing his gambling had become a problem, an Allentown man asked DraftKings to shut down his account permanently. Instead, the man was able to access it again and lost more than $350,000 on DraftKings as a result, the suit alleges.
The lawsuit said this man's 'life was ruined gambling on DraftKings,' reporting that he'd lost friends and a job and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety.
Another plaintiff continued to gamble on the app even after adding himself to a state self-exclusion list, which should have locked him out of gaming sites, according to the complaint.
A Chicago-based civil rights law firm filed the lawsuit on behalf of the five men. The office, Loevy + Loevy, has also sued DraftKings in Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey and New York.
More: Inside the high-stakes, high-risk world of sports betting and how it's gripping young men
If you or someone you know is struggling with gambling, call or text 1-800-GAMBLER, operated by the National Council on Problem Gambling.
Bethany Rodgers is a USA TODAY Network Pennsylvania investigative journalist.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: PA men sue DraftKings, alleging deceptive promotions
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
20 minutes ago
Senators prep for a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
WASHINGTON -- The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senators prep for a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.
Miami Herald
30 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
DirecTV cuts back a major service as consumers switch gears
It is no secret that consumers across the country have been ditching traditional cable TV for streaming services such as Netflix, HBO Max, Hulu, and Paramount+ over the past few years. These services offer access to a wide variety of TV shows and films at significantly lower prices than cable. According to a recent survey from digital security firm All About Cookies, only 46% of Americans still use traditional cable or satellite TV services, and only 14% of cord-cutters regret cutting their cable. Also, 76% of Americans watch shows through paid streaming services. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Amid this growing trend, a recent report from MoffettNathanson found that traditional pay-TV providers saw a 12.6% decrease in subscribers during the second quarter of 2024. Cable providers lost 1.03 million subscribers, while satellite services, such as DirecTV and Dish, lost 495,000. Related: Comcast raises red flag about unexpected customer behavior In response to this major shift, DirecTV has recently ramped up its efforts to win back customers. Last year, the cable giant leaned further into the streaming business by offering them access to over 90 channels, such as MovieSphere, Fox Weather, Court TV, etc., for free through its MyFree DirecTV app. In January, it also launched its MySports streaming package, which offers access to over 40 sports and broadcast channels for $70 a month. The following month, DirecTV even introduced three new streaming bundles called Genre Packs. These bundles include MyEntertainment, MiEspañol, and MyNews, which all offer customers channels for under $50 a month, a cheaper option than DirecTV's traditional cable bundles. Image source: Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images While DirecTV is increasing its investment in streaming, it appears to be slowly phasing out its satellite TV service. According to a new message on DirecTV's website, the cable giant warns new customers looking to sign up for satellite TV that the service is no longer available in all areas. It encourages them to sign up for its paid streaming services instead. "DIRECTV Satellite is not currently available in all areas," said DirecTV on its website. "Check your service address by entering the ZIP Code of the address where you want DIRECTV service. Want the same package without the Satellite? Switch to DIRECTV Streaming App now by selecting that option below." Related: Spectrum struggles to reverse alarming customer behavior In a statement to TheStreet, a DirecTV spokesperson said this change is a "limited-time trial." "In select markets, this limited-time trial will increase awareness and adoption of our satellite-free streaming service, which has quickly become the preferred solution for new customers," said the spokesperson in the statement. According to a recent report from Cordcutter News, the areas that appear to be impacted by this change include large cities with solid high-speed internet access, which are great areas for DirecTV to push its streaming services. New customers in rural areas that have limited internet availability may, however, still have access to DirecTV satellite services. The move from DirecTV comes at a time when some Americans are starting to change their tune about paid streaming services, as a few recently raised their prices amid increased demand. According to a survey from digital security firm All About Cookies, 84% of respondents have canceled a streaming subscription in the past, and 44% said price hikes pushed them to make this decision. More media and entertainment: Disney makes major theme park announcement after startling lossComcast raises red flag about unexpected customer behaviorDisney CEO offers unexpected response to tariff concerns Amid this budding trend, free streaming platforms are becoming more popular among consumers. For example, Paramount, which owns PlutoTV, revealed during an earnings call in May that PlutoTV "delivered its highest consumption ever" during the first quarter of 2025. That same month, Fox also revealed during an earnings call that its free ad-supported streaming platform Tubi faced "accelerating growth" during the same quarter. Related: Paramount makes a harsh decision amid declining sales The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
