Trump uses antisemitism slur ‘Shylock' in rally, denies knowing it's offensive
'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases a fine banker, and in some cases Shylocks and bad people,' Trump told the crowd on Thursday at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines.
The term 'Shylock' is borrowed from William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The tale features a Jewish character, who is portrayed as a ruthless moneylender demanding 'a pound of flesh' from a merchant unable to repay a loan.
The word refers to loan sharks and has long been considered offensive, playing on stereotypes of Jews and greed.
The Trump controversy echoes a similar incident in 2014 when then-Vice-President Joe Biden used the term while describing exploitative lenders. Biden later apologised, calling it 'a poor choice of words'.
03:02
US House passes Trump's bill, sending it to White House for president to sign
US House passes Trump's bill, sending it to White House for president to sign
'We see once again how deeply embedded this stereotype about Jews is in society,' Abraham Foxman, then-director of a Jewish activist group, the Anti-Defamation League, said at the time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Multilateral banks must raise the alarm on Trump's actions more clearly
With a few honourable exceptions, such as in the cases of Japan and China, political and business leaders seem desperate to appease US President Donald Trump over his many trade demands. More worrying is that multilateral financial institutions also seem to be running scared of his bullying tactics. From the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank downwards – or perhaps 'outwards' would be a better term – these institutions appear to be falling down on the job when it comes to alerting the world to the dangers of Trumponomics Yet while the impact of the tariffs is almost universal, the global family of multilateral institutions is not raising the alarm clearly enough. In the case of the IMF, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, the fact that they have their headquarters in Washington – just a stone's throw away from the White House – might help explain their apparent reluctance to be more critical. However, that is by no means the whole story.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Multilateral banks must raise the alarm on Trump's actions more clearly
With a few honourable exceptions, such as in the cases of Japan and China, political and business leaders seem desperate to appease US President Donald Trump over his many trade demands. More worrying is that multilateral financial institutions also seem to be running scared of his bullying tactics. Advertisement From the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank downwards – or perhaps 'outwards' would be a better term – these institutions appear to be falling down on the job when it comes to alerting the world to the dangers of Trumponomics Yet while the impact of the tariffs is almost universal, the global family of multilateral institutions is not raising the alarm clearly enough. In the case of the IMF, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, the fact that they have their headquarters in Washington – just a stone's throw away from the White House – might help explain their apparent reluctance to be more critical. However, that is by no means the whole story. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Think Trump ‘obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme? Don't be so sure
Two weeks after the United States launched air strikes on three of Iran's key nuclear sites, mounting evidence is puncturing President Donald Trump 's boasts that the facilities were ' obliterated '. Advertisement From the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog to leading American non-proliferation experts, scepticism is growing over Washington's assertions that the strikes set back Tehran's nuclear weapons ambitions 'by years'. Trump 'appears to have already lost interest', according to Barbara Slavin, a distinguished Middle East fellow at the Washington-based Stimson Centre think tank – apparently believing that a public declaration of victory renders negotiations with Iran unnecessary. But nuclear experts agree: no one outside Iran can say with any certainty what has become of the country's 900lb (409kg) stockpile of 60 per cent-enriched uranium. While this enrichment level falls one step short of weapons-grade, it is – by the UN's reckoning – enough to produce as many as nine nuclear warheads were Tehran to take that final leap. Instead of halting Iran's progress, the US and Israeli attacks have triggered a retaliatory ban on International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors, cutting off the UN Security Council's oversight of the country's nuclear sites and, crucially, its cache of highly enriched uranium (HEU). Advertisement Before the strikes, the IAEA had what it described as a 'comprehensive' picture of Iran's HEU reserves and the centrifuges spinning to enrich uranium. But now, as Director General Rafael Grossi told US news network CBS last Sunday, 'there is nothing'.
