
Is Russia's slow, endless grind really a recipe for victory?
Russia would like you to believe it is winning its war of aggression against Ukraine. But let's look at some numbers:
Russia, what exactly do you mean by 'winning'?
These statistics come from strategy analyst Riley McCabe's examination of the terrible price Russia has paid for marginal gains, and they are just the beginning; McCabe also studies the equipment Russia is losing, and the situation there looks no better. It is true Russia remains on the offensive, McCabe says, 'but initiative alone is not victory.'
He writes: 'Ukraine's defense-in-depth strategy, bolstered by U.S. and European support, has transformed the battlefield into a war of attrition that favors defenders and punishes attackers.' McCabe says the West needs to leverage Russia's slow bleed.
But however bruised it is, Russia could yet open another front in the war, Jim Geraghty writes.
'You're forgiven if you haven't spent a lot of time thinking about Moldova's parliamentary elections coming up in September,' he opens his column — but you might want to start. It is in Europe's least-visited country that Russia is meddling with to install a friendlier government, the Moldovan prime minister recently alleged.
Moscow's eye is on Transnistria, the rogue region of Moldova that has pledged fealty to Russia for years. Jim writes that 'few in their right mind would choose to visit a pseudo-country that still has a hammer and sickle on its flag,' so naturally he went to check it out.
Jim's column is both a profile of this strange place (including its through-the-looking-glass Soviet version of a Hard Rock Café) and a warning of how things could go very, very badly if it falls even deeper under Russia's control.
From Karen Tumulty's review of Tuesday's primary elections for New Jersey governor.
All eyes are on the Garden State, Karen notes, one of two 'that hold their gubernatorial contests in the year following presidential elections and are therefore seen as bellwethers of national politics.'
For a state that moved sharply to the right just seven months ago, a surprising number of Democratic voters pulled up to the polls. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D) herself described the turnout as 'unheard of' — and hopefully a peek at 'what's coming in November here' (and, perhaps, everywhere else).
This Father's Day, Los Angeles writer Nick Dothée offers us gentle reflections on his last moments with his dad. Dothée's father was a public defender, who believed 'everyone deserved someone in their corner, even if — especially if — they'd made a mess of things.'
When Dothée made a mess of his own life — the writer experienced addiction in his past — his father made the painful decision to sever ties until his son could recover.
Dothée got sober as his dad's health declined, but in the father's final years, the two reconnected, drawing from the deep reserve of father-son love to hold each other up.
'If he had died without seeing me sober, I would've carried the guilt for a lifetime,' writes Dothée. 'But he saw me. And I saw him. And I got to tell him he did right by me.'
It's a goodbye. It's a haiku. It's … The Bye-Ku.
Conquering a foe
One Delaware at a time
Works on Delaware
***
Have your own newsy haiku? Email it to me, along with any questions/comments/ambiguities. See you tomorrow!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social media ads for Channel crossings to be banned under new offence
Social media ads for Channel crossings to be banned under new offence Anyone who advertises Channel crossings or fake passports on social media could face up to five years in prison under new plans to crack down on smuggling gangs. Ministers are seeking to create a new offence that would also outlaw the promise of illegal working being promoted online and could carry a large fine. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has also said she plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, with the aim to turn around decisions within weeks. The Government is under pressure to speed up asylum processing and bring down small boat crossings, with arrivals passing more than 25,000 for 2025 so far on Wednesday – a record for this point in the year. Assisting illegal immigration to the UK is already a crime, but officials believe a new offence will give more powers to police and other agencies to disrupt criminal gangs. Around 80% of migrants arriving to the UK by small boat told officials they used social media during their journey, including to contact agents linked to people smuggling gangs, according to analysis by the Home Office. 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country – whether on or offline – simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral,' the Home Secretary said. 'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. We are determined to do everything we can to stop them, wherever they operate.' She told The Sunday Times that Labour was planning a 'major overhaul' of the asylum appeal process in the hope it would help to make a significant dent in the numbers. 'We need a major overhaul of the appeal [process] and that's what we are going to do in the autumn… If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper said. The aim would be to compress the process so decisions and returns could happen 'within weeks', the newspaper reported, citing a source familiar with the plans. Ms Cooper had previously said she wanted to put a 'fast-track' system for decisions and appeals in place so that people from countries considered safe would not sit in the asylum system for a long time. 'That would mean a fast-track system alongside the main asylum system, I think that would be really important in terms of making sure that the system is fair,' she told the Home Affairs committee in June. 'That will require legislation in order to be able to do that, as well as a new system design.' The plans to tackle the online promotion of Channel crossings would see a new offence created under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill already going through Parliament. The National Crime Agency (NCA) already works with social media companies to remove posts promoting crossings, with more than 8,000 taken offline in 2024. But the proposed new offence will give them more options of how to target gangs and their business models, NCA director general of operations Rob Jones said. The case of a Preston-based smuggler jailed for 17 years for posting videos of migrants thanking him for his help could have been targeted under the proposed offence. Albanian smugglers who used social media to promote £12,000 'package deals' for accommodation and a job in the UK on arrival would also be in scope. The Conservatives said it was 'too little, too late' and that only their proposal to automatically deport people who enter Britain via unauthorised routes can tackle small boat crossings. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour still has no clear plan to deter illegal entry, no effective enforcement and no strategy to speed up removals. This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing. 'The only clear and enforceable plan is the Conservative Deportation Bill, a no-nonsense strategy that allows us to detain illegal arrivals immediately and remove them without delay. The British public deserve focused action, not more of Labour's dithering.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Countries under pressure to finalise UN plastic pollution treaty as talks resume
Negotiators looking to secure the world's first treaty to combat plastic pollution are under pressure to secure an ambitious deal this week after previous talks ended without consensus. Countries will gather in Geneva, Switzerland, on Tuesday for another attempt to reach a legally binding international agreement on plastics. The 10-day conference has been organised after negotiators failed to adopt a treaty in November during what was meant to be the final round of talks in South Korea. Since negotiations began in 2022, countries have struggled to resolve some key issues, resulting in a deadlock that has stalled global efforts to tackle the pollution crisis. Going into Geneva, the rift between countries persists, with some continuing to push for a less ambitious deal that solely focuses on reducing plastic waste while others want a treaty that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics, including limiting production. The UK has been part of a 'high ambition coalition' of countries which are calling for binding obligations on reducing production and consumption, sustainable product design, environmentally sound management of plastic waste and clean-up of pollution. Environment minister Emma Hardy, who will be attending the conference, said: 'Millions of tonnes of plastic flow into our ocean, rivers and lakes each year, washing up on our beaches and littering the seabed; threatening precious habitats and wildlife. 'We urgently need a bold and ambitious global agreement that will end plastic pollution by 2040. 'The UK is continuing to play a leading role in pushing for an effective treaty that ensures the sustainable consumption and production of plastics, tackles problematic plastic products, and paves the way to a circular economy.' The high ambition coalition includes more than 60 members, such as Canada, France, Germany, Chile, New Zealand and Rwanda. But Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Kazakhstan have questioned the most ambitious proposals for limiting production, arguing they are incompatible with the treaty's core agenda and could interfere with global trade. Environmental campaigners have said that progress on tackling pollution has been mired by both obstructions from petrostates as well as lobbying by plastics and petrochemical companies. Christina Dixon, ocean campaign leader for the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), said: 'This is the make-or-break moment to determine whether countries are capable of coming together, overcoming the pressure to compromise on a weak agreement and stand firm on the level of ambition required. 'The biggest obstacles remain the fact that a small group of countries either don't want a treaty or don't want one that meaningfully addresses the problem of plastic pollution.' Rudy Schulkind, political campaigner with Greenpeace UK, called the treaty 'our best opportunity to turn off the tap on unnecessary plastic production'. 'Allowing fossil fuels lobbyists and their dirty tactics anywhere near the treaty negotiations is a recipe for disaster – their sole aim is to derail and sabotage the talks on behalf of their profit hungry paymasters,' he said. 'UN member states must stand firm for a strong Global Plastics Treaty.' Elsewhere, nearly 300 businesses, financial institutions and campaign groups, including Coca-Cola, Mars, Nestle, PepsiCo, SC Johnson, Unilever and Walmart signed an open letter to lead negotiators in June, calling for a robust plastic pollution treaty that includes strong obligations in phase-out, product design and a level playing field for international regulation. According to Our World in Data, plastic production has increased sharply over the last 70 years and has more than doubled in the last two decades. The world has gone from producing two million tonnes in 1950 to more than 450 million tonnes today, with its use for daily items such as home appliances and food packaging soaring. But just 9% of the world's plastic waste is recycled, while 43% is landfilled, 19% is burned and 22% is mismanaged – with the risk it ends up in the countryside, rivers, lakes and oceans, figures from the OECD show. Once in the environment, plastic waste can entangle, choke or be eaten by wildlife and livestock, clog up waterways and litter beaches, while bigger items break down into microplastics entering food chains. And producing plastic, primarily from fossil fuel oil, has a climate impact, with the World in Data and OECD saying 3.3% of global emissions is down to the production and management of global plastics.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump signals break with Netanyahu on Gaza hunger crisis
President Trump on Monday signaled a break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the unfolding humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where Trump acknowledged there was 'real starvation' happening. Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he did 'not particularly' agree with Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation happening in Gaza, which has been devastated by Israel's war against Hamas. The president also said the U.S. would take a more active role in getting food into the region. Still, Trump has not gone as far as some European leaders in calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state. And he has largely stopped short of outright criticizing Israel for its role in preventing aid from getting to Palestinians. 'I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry,' Trump told reporters when asked about Netanyahu's claim. Starmer, standing beside Trump after the two greeted each other in Scotland, called the situation in Gaza, in which photos of malnourished children amid reports of 1 in 3 people going multiple days without eating show a crisis coming to a head, 'absolutely intolerable' and 'revolting.' Trump and his administration have been involved in ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, but so far no agreements have stuck. Trump recently put the blame on Hamas as the obstacle to a deal. But the president has also routinely shown frustration with Netanyahu, with their bond being tested before over the continued fighting with the two leaders' opposing assessments of starvation in the enclave as the latest example. 'He certainly seemed to have a different view of what's happening on the ground in Gaza with respect to starvation or massive hunger,' said Mona Yacoubian, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'He also seemed to open the door for potential increase in funding or maybe a new approach,' Yacoubian added. 'But whether that actually translates into something is a whole other question because we've certainly seen the president state a position then within 24 hours take a completely different view.' Trump did succeed in getting Netanyahu to pull back fighter jets heading for Iran after he claimed success in a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Trump also went around Netanyahu to free an American-Israeli hostage held by Hamas and came to a deal with the Houthis in Yemen to halt attacks on ships in the Red Sea. In May, Trump's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, announced the U.S. would take the lead in getting aid into Gaza amid an Israeli blockade. Israel came around in supporting the American-founded Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as the sole distributor of aid in the strip. But the GHF has come under intense scrutiny as contributing to the chaos and instability around aid distribution: Hungry Palestinians report being shot at by the Israeli military, there are accusations that GHF contractors are using live ammunition, and the crowded and unsafe conditions have led to injuries and death. 'Since this GHF scheme began, public reports have found that more than 700 starving people have been killed and nearly 5,000 injured while desperately seeking food at or near often chaotic GHF distribution sites,' a group of Senate Democrats wrote Monday, calling for the administration to answer questions about the group's funding and operations. 'The U.S. government must stop facilitating the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation operations and use U.S. leverage to urge the Netanyahu government to revert to the UN-led mechanism, both for the safety and well-being of Palestinians in Gaza and to preserve humanitarian principles that have existed for decades.' Trump's criticism of the humanitarian situation in Gaza came after Israel announced over the weekend it would take more steps to improve Palestinians' access to food, responding to growing international outrage blaming Israel for the food crisis. Israel in March imposed a blockade on Gaza, blocking humanitarian supplies and other goods from getting into the strip. Still, Jerusalem focused blame on the United Nations and other international organizations as failing to pick up pallets of food and Hamas as bearing sole responsibility for the suffering in the strip. U.N. officials and aid organizations argue that food distribution efforts are too dangerous without meaningful coordination with Israel inside the strip. 'When bureaucratic and political hurdles are lifted, the humanitarian community has demonstrated it can deliver assistance at scale, in a dignified way, without diversion. During the ceasefire fire in earlier this year, we succeeded to reverse the deepening hunger,' Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of UNRWA, the U.N. refugee agency for Palestinians, posted Friday on social platform X. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Saturday it would begin airdrops of food, temporarily halt fighting and open up designated humanitarian corridors 'to enable the safe movement of UN convoys delivering food and medicine to the population.' 'We call on the UN and its affiliated organizations to cooperate with this IDF effort and cease forthwith its tendentious policy of boycotting any effort that reverses its traditional mechanism of allowing the massive diversion of aid into the hands of Hamas,' Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said in a statement Sunday. Trump last Friday largely did not engage with questions about the crisis playing out in Gaza, instead repeatedly blaming Hamas for peace talks faltering and suggesting Israel would have to 'finish the job.' But his tone changed Monday when he met with Starmer, who much more forcefully called the situation in Gaza 'absolutely intolerable.' Trump told reporters while sitting next to Starmer during a meeting that the U.S. would work to set up 'food centers' in Gaza. He did not provide specifics on whether the U.S. would be involved on the ground or if a third party organization would assist, but he indicated it would be a joint effort with other nations. 'I know your nation's joining us, and we have all of the European nations joining us, and others also called and they want to be helpful. So we're going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We're not going to have fences,' Trump said. 'It's going to be working with the United States. We'll be helping with the food … and we're going to bring it over there, and we're also going to make sure they don't have barriers stopping people,' Trump said when asked how the food centers would work. Pressed on whether Israel, which has placed restrictions on aid getting into Gaza for months, can do more to get food to Palestinians, Trump said he thought Israel 'can do a lot' before accusing Iran of derailing ceasefire talks despite his administration touting Tehran's weakening following attacks by Israel. Trump and Netanyahu have generally had a strong relationship despite the occasional hiccup. Trump has called for the corruption trial against Netanyahu to be canceled, while the Israeli leader presented Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize during a recent White House visit. Swaths of the Republican Party are also staunchly pro-Israel, and it's unclear if there will be a sustained break between Trump and Netanyahu that would lead to a dramatic change in U.S. policy. But there are signs parts of Trump's base are growing frustrated with Israel, with the images coming out of Gaza adding to their calls for change. Theo Von, who hosts one of the most popular podcasts in the country and has hosted both Trump and Vice President Vance on his show, posted a plea on social media Sunday asking the president and other leaders to do more to get aid into Gaza. 'Children are starving to death!! We are America. This isnt about politics. This is about humanity,' Von posted on X. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday called the situation in Gaza 'horrific.' 'I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th was horrific,' Greene posted on X, referring to the date of Hamas's deadly terrorist attacks against Israel in 2023. 'Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific,' she added. 'This war and humanitarian crisis must end!' Matt Gaetz, the former Republican congressman from Florida who withdrew as Trump's nominee for attorney general, on Friday hosted on his show on One America News Network an Israeli father of a hostage held by Hamas. The father was calling for the U.S. to condition aid to Israel to get to a ceasefire with Hamas and criticized Netanyahu as 'not acting in a responsible way' 'Incredible statement,' Gaetz wrote on X accompanying a clip of the interview. Gaetz had earlier criticized Israel for failing to investigate the death of an American Palestinian allegedly killed in a confrontation with Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword