Rep. Lauren Underwood won't be running for Dick Durbin's Senate seat
Underwood explained her decision on CNN Monday afternoon.
"So when I reflected on the way I could best serve families in Illinois and around the country, I really decided to stay in the House of Representatives and in leadership, and to help the D-Trip [DCCC, or Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] as we seek to reclaim the majority," Underwood said in an interview with CNN political correspondent Kasie Hunt.
Already, two of Underwood's U.S. House colleagues, Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi and Robin Kelly (D-Illinois) have each announced they are running for Durbin's seat — as has Illinois Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paul Krugman on what some Republicans get wrong about the Fed
President Trump has made no secret of his desire for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. But as Paul Krugman, a Nobel Laureate in Economics and author of the substack "Paul Krugman," explains, some in the Republican party may have lost sight of what the Fed actually does. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Related videos Europe's most expensive city revealed, as living costs near £3,500 per month Britain's gas imports surge as Miliband abandons North Sea How much do you need in an ISA to target a £5,000 monthly passive income? How will the Lloyds share price be affected by today's Supreme Court ruling? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trade War Is Stealing Your Lunch Money — Here's Why (Explained Like We're 12)
The term 'trade war' seems more pervasive these days — on everything from TV pundits to TikTok experts. Oh, and that one uncle who always has an opinion? He's chiming in with his take, too. Yet for all the 'shots fired in the trade war' headlines you've seen, you might still not know what a trade war really is — or if your wallet could end up as collateral. Read More: Find Out: If you want a simple explanation, you could always turn to ChatGPT. That's exactly what I did on your behalf–only I wanted an easy-to-understand, jargon-free approach. So I asked ChatGPT to explain trade wars and their impact on my wallet, like I was 12 years old. As always, you'll want to fact-check — since ChatGPT is far from perfect — but it gave me a solid baseline of information to guide my own research. A Definition Even a Kid Could Understand When asked what constitutes a trade war, ChatGPT gave me a succinct answer. In essence, a trade war involves countries fighting by charging each other extra money — in this case, tariffs — for the goods they buy and sell to one another. To double-check this response, I hopped on ye olde internet and visited the website for international publication Deutsche Welle, where I found an article about a potential trade war between the U.S. and China. In that article, writer Arthur Sullivan described a trade war simply: 'A trade war is an economic conflict in which countries implement and increase tariffs and other nontariff barriers against each other,' he wrote. 'It typically arises from extreme economic protectionism and usually features so-called tit-for-tat measures, where each side increases tariffs in response to each other.' So far, so good in terms of accuracy. Discover Next: How the Trade War Stole My Lunch Money Sullivan's article broke down the trade beef between the U.S. and China, but I wanted a much simpler example. Treating me like a 12-year-old, ChatGPT brought me back to the schoolyard. It asked me to imagine myself and another student trading lunch items. I gave him $2 to buy his cookie (I'm a sucker for a good peanut butter cookie, it's true), and he gave me $3 for my juice box. Initially, we're both happy. We feel the arrangement is fair. But one day, I realized his cookies were a little stale. I decided he'd have to pay an extra dollar for my juice box. That, ChatGPT explained, is like a tariff — because I asked for extra money just to make the trade. Infuriated, my classmate told me I'd now have to pay an extra $1.50 for his cookie. 'Now you're both just charging each other more for the same stuff,' ChatGPT said. 'That's a trade war.' How It Hits My Wallet ChatGPT explained that the impact of this lunchbox battle will show up in my piggy bank at home. I'm basically paying more for the same cookie — or, if my allowance doesn't cover it, I can't afford the cookie at all. But my money woes don't stop there. According to ChatGPT, my lunch could get smaller because I'm spending more on fewer things, and I'm saving less overall — which might mean no more candy after school. On top of that, my classmate and I are annoyed with each other, and we might stop trading altogether. ChatGPT knows I'm curious about the real-world implications of an actual trade war, and it offers this summary: 'Countries are like you and the other kid. When they get in a trade war, you (and your parents) end up paying more for stuff like food, clothes, phones — even toys.' Bottom Line: Trade Wars Are Far From Child's Play As ChatGPT puts it: 'A trade war is when countries fight over money and trading, and it makes your lunch cost more … even if you didn't start the fight.' More From GOBankingRates Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On This article originally appeared on The Trade War Is Stealing Your Lunch Money — Here's Why (Explained Like We're 12) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's latest trade salvo revealed a new approach to setting his tariffs: tiers
President Trump is moving forward on a new suite of tariff rates with an approach increasingly focused on grouping countries into tiers, as opposed to a previous approach of simply looking at the trade balance. The new approach remains heavily influenced by either a trade surplus or a deficit but has grown more complex — some might say more subjective — leading to some consolidation in rate levels and the lowering of rates for many countries to a key new standard of 15%. The new landscape was reflected in Thursday night's executive action announcing rates, which centered around the 15% rate set to be in place next week in about 40 countries. Countries facing that rate include major trading partners that recently struck deals, such as Europe and Japan, as well as smaller nations, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. More than 100 countries were excluded altogether from this week's announcement, meaning their rate will stay at 10%. Meanwhile, a third group of about 30 countries will see higher rates ranging from 18% to 50%. Trump and his team are taking an approach that could simplify future negotiations and be more in line with global trade dynamics. Recent months have seen America's trading partners focused on their potential rate and how they stack up with direct competitors in nearly equal measure. A White House official confirmed the tiered approach to Yahoo Finance on Friday, suggesting that the 10% rate is largely but not exclusively reserved for countries with a trade surplus, the 15% rate is for those with a deal or a "small deficit," and that higher "bespoke" rates are further up the chain. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Those 'bespoke' rates Those countries facing rates above 15% offer a wider array, but even some clear tiers are there. Ten nations with a 19%-20% rate all have one thing in common: a location in South or Southeast Asia. These are trading partners often in focus for their role in China's orbit and the target of Trump's keen focus on issues like transshipping. Prior deals with Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines put those nations in that rate range, with other nations, from Thailand to Taiwan, now set to join them. India is now an outlier in the region, facing a 25% rate as trade talks there have grown contentious but continue. Thursday's order focused on the transshipping issues. Trump threatened an extra 40% tariff on any product deemed "to have been transshipped to evade applicable duties," without providing a further definition on what would meet that standard. In addition to India, five countries, including Mexico, face 25% tariff rates at least for the next 90 days. Even more punitive tariffs include 30% rates on nations like South Africa, 35% on Canada, 39% on Switzerland, and 50% on Brazil to top it off. A more complex formula this time around The White House official said the rates were determined using an array of factors, such as the trade deficit, existing non-tariff barriers, and how talks are going. They noted, for example, that Switzerland is a wealthy country more able to absorb tariffs. That contributed to the 39% rate applied by Trump, which shocked officials there and led to a scramble Friday. That account of how things were decided tracks with how the president himself described his approach in recent weeks. He told reporters he was considering a range of factors when setting rates, from hard numbers like the trade deficit to his own instincts. The contrast is notable when compared with early April, when Trump's team came up with his "reciprocal" tariff formula much more simply. Trump's trade representative at the time acknowledged that those rates were set using a calculation that, once parts that cancel each other out were removed, determined a rate based only on any given country's trade surplus with the US. Meanwhile, other details of this week's rollout — most notably a seven-day delay on tariffs going into effect — mean things could continue to change in the days and weeks ahead. As Capital Economics put it in a note Friday, "this is unlikely to be the final word," noting the chances for new deals and the legal challenges — with some importers looking to strike down these tariffs — could continue to change rates. For his part, Trump told NBC News on Thursday evening that he views his tariff rollout as going "very smooth," adding that it's "too late" for other countries to avoid the rates now set to take effect in seven days but that he's always willing to negotiate. "It doesn't mean that somebody doesn't come along in four weeks and say we can make some kind of a deal," he said. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
