Opposition reacts to shoplifting crackdown as retailers celebrate overdue changes
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Retailers say the government's crackdown on shoplifters is overdue, despite the opposition blasting the law as confused.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith
announced instant fines and tougher sentences
for shoplifting offences.
It's the latest in a slew of changes to the justice system, this time an instant ticket of up to a $1000 for those caught shoplifting.
Under the proposed law, shoplifters caught stealing lower-value goods could be stung for up to $500.
The maximum punishment for theft would go up to a year in prison for goods worth $2000 or less, or seven years for more serious cases.
On Auckland's Queen Street, Queens Arcade property manager Ian Wright said it was a positive change.
"These recent initiatives that the government's bringing in are what we've been asking for for a long time, and certainly was missing in the last regime," he said.
"It's exciting, it's all about holding people to account, and this is just another step in the right direction."
He had seen his share of crime in the area.
"There are these recidivist offenders, and I think some of these new initiatives are really going to make the difference where, if you can clamp down on those are remove those from our communities, it's going to make the whole place a lot safer and the crime will drop."
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announce the new infringement regime.
Photo:
RNZ / Calvin Samuel
Labour Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb was unconvinced.
"I just think it's hotchpotch and confused," he said.
"I just don't think it's effective. It's making noises and saying 'we're doing something' when, in fact, you've still got to have the police to attend and enforce, we're not seeing that."
Webb thought the government was posturing.
"They're sort of lording it as 'oh, we're going to get tougher on shoplifters,' in fact, between one and two thousand dollar offences, the penalty is going down," he said.
"That's what I mean, it's confused."
Webb said under the new regime, the government had taken what was three bands of offending and turned it into two.
"In doing that, the band between $1000-$2000, which currently is seven years imprisonment maximum, now becomes one year imprisonment maximum."
He said resourcing the police force was vital.
"We need more cops on the street, but also better resourced cops," Webb said.
"It's no good them sitting at their desks, doing emails and filling forms, they've got to be freed up from that so that they can actually do frontline police work."
Police faced a backlash earlier this year after
RNZ revealed an internal memo suggesting lower-level retail crime
- like shoplifting - would not be investigated.
The new regime added an aggravating factor for high-value theft carried out in an "offensive, threatening, insulting, or disorderly" manner.
Sandringham Business Association chair Jithin Chittibomma said the fines would make offenders think twice.
"Yes, surely there will be people that don't care," he said.
"But I'm sure there will be people that do care about their future, and even if it is a 10, 20 percent reduction, I'll take that too."
Legislation for the new infringement regime was expected to be introduced in the next few months.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
One flown to hospital in serious condition following Southbridge incident
Photo: A person has been flown to hospital in a serious condition after an incident in Southbridge, south of Christchurch, on Wednesday evening. Emergency services were called to the scene on Hastings Street just before 8.30pm. A Hato Hone St John spokesperson said an ambulance and first response unit responded, and one patient was flown to Christchurch hospital by helicopter. Police have been approached for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Enraged girlfriend Sharanjit Kaur chases partner's wife in car, crashes, kills innocent man
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Sharanjit Kaur. Photo: Belinda Feek / New Zealand Herald A man's girlfriend became so enraged at seeing him in a recent photo with his family that she waited outside a school for his wife and then followed her in the car. Sharanjit Kaur tried to intimidate the other woman, at one point stopping in the middle of the road and hitting her car windows before following her again at speed. She eventually crashed into an oncoming car, killing an innocent member of the public as she drove on the wrong side of the road. The circumstances of the crash, which claimed Jonathan "Jono" Baker's life on the morning of 27 June last year, have left his family devastated and angry. In a packed Hamilton District Court room this afternoon, nine family and friends read their heartbreaking statements to Judge Arthur Tompkins. Baker's mother-in-law, Colleen White, said the family could make some sense of an angry wife chasing her husband's mistress, but "a mistress chasing down his wife over a legitimate family photograph reads like a bad novel". Kaur's counsel, Anjeet Singh, acknowledged her client was a "deeply troubled woman" but urged the judge not to send the 40-year-old to prison. Kaur and her partner, known only in court proceedings as "R", had been together for eight years and were living together. However, R was still married to his wife, known as "Mrs R", who lives with his parents and children. Mrs R was aware of her husband's relationship with Kaur; however, he had refused to get divorced and often stayed at the familial home, causing "ill-feeling" on behalf of Kaur. Several nights before the crash, R took his wife and family to an Indian restaurant and Botany Downs, East Auckland, and took a photograph, with Mrs R's hand on her husband's shoulder, and also showing her wedding ring. About 8.40am on 27 June, when at Horsham Downs School for her children's school assembly, Mrs R got a call from R that Kaur had seen the photo and wanted her to say the photo was historic. She wouldn't and instead confirmed it was recent, and then heard Kaur "shouting angrily" in the background. Kaur stormed off, and R went to work. After the assembly finished, Mrs R began driving home, and as she passed Resolution Drive spotted Kaur's vehicle parked on the roadside. Kaur then pulled out and followed Mrs R on to Henderson Rd and overtook her before pulling in front of her and travelling alongside her. Kaur would slow down then speed up as Mrs R travelled behind her, in what Judge Tompkins found was an attempt to intimidate or scare her. She then drove ahead and stopped her Toyota in the middle of both lanes, forcing Mrs R to also stop. Kaur got out and began "hammering" her driver's window. Fearing for her safety, Mrs R drove around her on to the grass to get away. Kaur got back in her Toyota and chased her, as Mrs R went around 120km/h to try and get away. After turning right on to Boyd Rd, Kaur pulled up alongside Mrs R's vehicle as she travelled 120km/h. That stretch of road is straight but leads to a steep incline towards the intersection with Williamson Rd. Kaur remained travelling on the wrong side of the road, driving at between 125km/h and 136km/h, and as she reached the crest of the hill, collided with Baker's vehicle, which was coming the other way. Kaur braked, reducing her speed to around 109km/h at the point of impact. Baker suffered a ruptured aorta and was killed instantly. Kaur suffered minor injuries, while Mrs R called emergency services. Jonathan Baker. Photo: Supplied / New Zealand Herald Baker, 49, was a respected staff member at the Department of Corrections and worked as a team leader at community probation. On the morning of the crash, he'd just visited a team member who was off work with an injury, and after leaving was going to drop off his vehicle for a service before heading back to work in central Hamilton. Baker's wife, Andrea, described the last time seeing her beloved husband on the morning of the crash; how he'd made her a coffee, said "I love you", before giving her a cheeky smile and left for the day. She then recalled being given the devastating news that he'd been killed in a crash. "I cried ... I yelled. My heart is almost constantly consumed by [his] loss and trying to work out my new normal." Devout Christians, she knew her husband would want her to forgive Kaur, "but that's something I don't feel like doing". "But as I know, with forgiveness comes freedom. You took a man out of this world whose heart was all about making a difference and trying to help others," she told Kaur. Crown solicitor Kasey Dillon said Kaur "became enraged" after seeing the family photo, and saw her involved in "a persistent course of bad driving ... and brake-checking" Mrs R. She had also accumulated 65 demerit points due to speeding in the past, in one case between 120-130km/h. When Kaur was questioned by a pre-sentence report writer, she told them she was "running late for work". Kaur's actions had "irrevocably impacted" the lives of Baker's family, friends and associates. He urged the judge to take a starting point of five years' jail but not to issue any discounts for remorse, rehabilitation or plea. "There was no defence to this charge. A conviction was inevitable." Singh took the opportunity to give Baker's family a bit more context around her client's actions and labelled her as "deeply troubled". "The photo she found on the day of the accident was the inciting incident that led to a psychological collapse. "Years of mental health decline precipitated the offending, and this has been given clinical context and may explain Kaur's behaviour as something significantly more than rage." A clinical psychologist found Kaur's driving occurred during a "convergence of a chronic psychological deterioration", with the argument with her prior to the crash acting as an "acute stressor". The specialist found Kaur reached a "psychological breaking point". Singh accepted with White's comments that Kaur's behaviour made "no sense at all", but she explained that R had constantly reassured Kaur that he no longer maintained any relationship with his wife. He had also promised her that once she divorced her husband, he would divorce his wife. "These assurances led Kaur to believe that R intended to stay with her and for them to have a committed relationship. "The discovery of the photograph... shattered these assurances and brought to the forefront years of accumulated anxiety, uncertainty and emotional turmoil that simmered for years. "It was an eight-year-long relationship." Singh urged the judge to hand down a home detention sentence. Judge Tompkins agreed with Dillon's submissions and after taking a five-year starting point, allowed a 20 percent discount for her guilty plea, jailing Kaur for four years. - This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Immigration visit law change doesn't go far enough
Pacific advocates say a proposed law change for out-of-hours immigration visits, like dawn raids, doesn't go far enough. The contentious enforcement practice involves immigration officers searching homes for people they have reasonable grounds to believe are liable for deportation between 6pm and 8am. It has been criticised for targeting Pacific people, particularly in the wake of the dawn raids era. Teuila Fuatai reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.