
Appalling secrets of couple who 'bought' 21 surrogate children including 17 toddlers for nanny-filled mansion
A couple who had 21 surrogate children including 17 toddlers in their mansion didn't tell surrogates about the huge army of youngsters they were building, it is claimed.
Guojun Xuan, 65, and Silvia Zhang, 38, who were arrested and charged in May, also hired a fleet of abusive nannies to care for their mega-brood, it was alleged Wednesday.
The age-gap pair, who lived in an enormous $4.1 million mansion in Arcadia, just north of Los Angeles, are said to have sought the help of a huge fleet of surrogates because Silvia wanted a huge family.
Details of their astonishing family emerged this week after all 21 of the children were taken into custody by social services.
And a haunting photo of one of the babies emerged online after the infant's surrogate mother Kayla Elliot, 27, launched a bid to get the baby back.
Elliott says she was told the baby was going to a loving family who only had one child.
But CBS Los Angeles said the huge brood of children kept secret by Xuan and Zhang were aged between two months-old and 13 years-old, with seventeen aged three or under.
One of the surrogate mothers who gave up her child to the couple, Kayle Elliot, 27, said she was heartbroken to discover that her baby girl was not given to a loving family with only one child, as she had been told
A California couple who acquired 21 surrogate-born children kept them in a hotel-style $4.1 million mansion where they were abused, police say
Investigators believe the couple solicited babies from surrogate mothers from around the country, none of whom knew they were carrying embryos for the same couple at the same time.
They were busted after security cameras in the home allegedly showed their nanny Chunmei Li, 56, 'physically and verbally' abusing the children, and a warrant has been issued for her arrest.
Neighbors said the sprawling nine-bedroom mansion is set up like a hotel, with a 'hotel desk and a gentleman sitting behind it like a clerk', local Art Romero told CBS News.
Despite Zhang's alleged claim that she just wanted a large family, one expert fears the mega-family may have been connected to trafficking.
Guojun Xuan, 65, (pictured) and his partner Silvia Zhang, 38, were arrested for felony child endangerment this week after cops found they had 21 children from surrogate mothers
Zhang (pictured) and Xuan allegedly had 15 children in their home aged between two months and 13-years-old, and six other children had also been moved to other homes
In a GoFundMe set up by Kayla Elliot as she tries to regain custody of her baby girl, she wrote that her child 'deserves stability, love, and a safe home.'
All of the children were taken into the custody of Department of Children and Family Services, with Elliot saying she wants to take her home to Texas to be 'in a nurturing environment rather than staying in foster care.'
Elliot told ABC7 that she believed the couple were clients of a surrogate agency, however cops now believe they were allegedly running the agency themselves.
'It's horrific, it's disturbing, it's damaging emotionally,' she said.
Elliot said the couple told her they only had one other child, and is now hoping to get custody of the child she bore for them.
'These agencies, we're supposed to trust them and follow their guidance and come to find out this whole thing was a scam, and the parents own the agency - that was not disclosed at all beforehand,' she added.
Elliot said she is now hoping to regain custody of the child she bore for the couple, and described the allegations as 'horrific, disturbing, (and) damaging emotionally'
Neighbors said the couple's lavish mansion was set up 'like a hotel', with a lobby and nine bedrooms
Xuan and Zhang were released following their arrest in May, but Arcadia police say they are still searching for Li, the nanny, who allegedly abused the children in the home.
Detectives told CBS News that other nannies employed by the couple were also seen abusing the children in home security cameras.
Although having dozens of children through surrogates is not illegal, officials said they are investigating the startling find inside the home.
The sheer number of children involved and the fact many are so close in age to one another has raised alarm bells.
Kallie Fell, executive director of the nonprofit Center of Bioethics and Culture, told ABC7 that while the couple may not have broken the law by having so many surrogate children, the situation made her fear they were part of a human trafficking ring.
Fell, who is working with Elliot, said that the surrogacy industry is unregulated, and oftentimes, 'anything goes.'
'And these clinics, these agencies are not regulated by any governing body,' she said.
'That to me smells of trafficking... What are the intentions of having that many children at home through these assisted reproductive technologies?'
Officials issued an arrest warrant for their nanny Chunmei Li, 56, (pictured), who allegedly abused the children 'verbally and physically'
It is unclear what the couple do for work or how they acquired their considerable wealth, with public records showing they are connected to a number of investment firms.
Arcadia police Lt. Kollin Cieadlo said that the couple 'took legal guardianship of those kids' after they were born through surrogates, before Li allegedly abused the children as their nanny.
'The discipline, both verbally and physical, was severe to the point where it supported the beliefs that child abuse was occurring inside the home Cieadlo said.
The Arcadia police said the FBI has joined its investigation into a suspected mass-surrogacy operation owned and ran by Xuan and Zhang.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Volunteers flock to immigration courts to support migrants arrested in the hallways
After a Seattle immigration judge dismissed the deportation case against a Colombian man — exposing him to expedited removal — three people sat with him in the back of the courtroom, taking his car keys for safe-keeping, helping him memorize phone numbers and gathering the names of family members who needed to be notified. When Judge Brett Parchert asked why they were doing that in court, the volunteers said Immigration and Custom Enforcement officers were outside the door, waiting to take the man into custody, so this was their only chance to help him get his things in order. "ICE is in the waiting room?" the judge asked. As the mass deportation campaign of President Donald Trump focuses on cities and states led by Democrats and unleashes fear among asylum-seekers and immigrants, their legal defenders sued this week, seeking class-action protections against the arrests outside immigration court hearings. Meanwhile, these volunteers are taking action. A diverse group — faith leaders, college students, grandmothers, retired lawyers and professors — has been showing up at immigration courts across the nation to escort immigrants at risk of being detained for deportation by masked ICE officials. They're giving families moral and logistical support, and bearing witness as the people are taken away. The Northwest Immigrant Rights Project was inundated by so many community members wanting to help that they made a volunteer training video, created 'Know Your Rights' sheets in several languages and started a Google sheet where people sign up for shifts, said Stephanie Gai, a staff attorney with the Seattle-based legal services non-profit. 'We could not do it without them," Gai said. 'Some volunteers request time off work so they can come in and help.' Robby Rohr, a retired non-profit director said she volunteers regularly. 'Being here makes people feel they are remembered and recognized,' she said 'It's such a bureaucratic and confusing process. We try to help them through it.' Recording videos of detentions to post online online Volunteers and legal aid groups have long provided free legal orientation in immigration court but the arrests have posed new challenges. Since May, the government has been asking judges to dismiss deportation cases. Once the judge agrees, ICE officials arrest them in the hallways and put them in fast-track deportation proceedings, no matter which legal immigration pathway they may have been pursuing. Once in custody, it's often harder to find or afford a lawyer. Immigration judges are executive branch employees, and while some have resisted Homeland Security lawyers' dismissal orders in some cases, many are granted. Masked ICE agents grabbed the Colombian man and led him into the hallway. A volunteer took his backpack to give to his family as he was taken away. Other cases on the day's docket involved immigrants who didn't show up. Parchert granted 'removal in absentia' orders, enabling ICE to arrest them later. When asked about these arrests and the volunteers at immigration courts, a senior spokesperson with the Department of Homeland Security said ICE is once again implementing the rule of law by reversing 'Biden's catch and release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets." Some volunteers have recorded arrests in courtroom hallways, traumatic scenes that are proliferating online. How many similar scenes are happening nationwide remains unclear. The Executive Office for Immigration Review has not released numbers of cases dismissed or arrests made at or near immigration courts. While most volunteers have done this work without incident, some have been arrested for interfering with ICE agents. New York City Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested after locking arms with a person in a failed attempt to prevent his detention. Lander's wife, attorney Meg Barnette, had just joined him in walking migrants from a courtroom to the elevator. Helping families find their relatives as they disappear The volunteers' act of witnessing has proven to be important as people disappear into a detention system that can seem chaotic, leaving families without any information about their whereabouts for days on end. In a waiting room serving New York City immigration courtrooms, a Spanish-speaking woman with long dark curly hair was sitting anxiously with her daughter after she and her husband had separate hearings. Now he was nowhere to be found. The Rev. Fabián Arias, a volunteer court observer, said the woman whose first name is Alva approached him asking 'Where is my husband?' She showed him his photo. 'ICE detained him,' Arias told her, and tried to comfort her as she trembled, later welling up with tears. A judge had not dismissed the husband's case, giving him until October to find a lawyer. But that didn't stop ICE agents from handcuffing him and taking him away as soon as he stepped out of court. The news sparked an outcry by immigration advocates, city officials and a congressman. At a news conference, she gave only her first name and asked that her daughter's be withheld. Brianna Garcia, a college student in El Paso, Texas, said she's been attending immigration court hearings for weeks where she informs people of their rights and then records ICE agents taking people into custody. 'We escort people so they're not harassed and help people memorize important phone numbers, since their belongings are confiscated by ICE," she said. Paris Thomas began volunteering at the Denver immigration court after hearing about the effort through a network of churches. Wearing a straw hat, he recently waited in the midday heat for people to arrive for afternoon hearings. Thomas handed people a small paper flyer listing their rights in Spanish on one side and English on the other. One man walking with a woman told him 'thank you. Thank you.' Another man gave him a hug. Denver volunteer Don Marsh said they offer to walk people to their cars after court appearances, so they can contact attorneys and family if ICE arrests them. Marsh said he's never done anything like this before, but wants to do something to preserve the nation's 'rule of law' now that unidentifiable government agents are 'snatching' people off the streets. 'If we're not all safe, no one's safe,' he said. Attanasio reported from New York City and Slevin from Denver.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Nearly 300 pages of Atlanta's ‘Cop City' records released after first-of-its-kind ruling
More than a year after a digital news outlet and a research group sued the Atlanta Police Foundation for allegedly violating Georgia's open records law, the foundation has sent plaintiffs nearly 300 pages of records linked to its role as the driving force behind the police training center known as 'Cop City'. The outcome 'opens the door to what we want; it's a guide stone for getting records from police foundations, so they can't be a black box', said Matt Scott, executive director of Atlanta Community Press Collective (ACPC), an Atlanta-based digital news outlet and one of two plaintiffs in the case. 'A city can't use police foundations as a way of getting around providing public records,' Scott added. The APF did not reply to an email from the Guardian seeking comment. ACPC and Lucy Parsons Labs, the two plaintiffs, got the records after Jane Barwick, the Fulton county superior court judge, concluded a bench trial by ruling that the foundation was 'under a duty to provide [the] records [...] pursuant to the Open Records Act'. The lawsuit was probably the first of its kind nationwide, Robert Vargas, a sociology professor at the University of Chicago, told the Guardian last year. Although the case centered on the Atlanta police foundation, observers said last year they were closely watching to see if its outcome had implications for police foundations in general and whether they might be subject to open records laws. Every major US city has a private foundation supporting police, with more than 250 nationwide, according to a 2021 report by research and activist groups Little Sis and Color of Change. The foundations have been used to pay for surveillance technologies in cities like Baltimore and Los Angeles without being subject to public scrutiny, according to the report. Vargas said the ruling, and the records provided, 'sets a precedent'. But he added that the results are a 'mixed bag', since Barwick did not offer an opinion about whether all the APF's records should be available to the public, or whether police foundations in general should be considered public agencies. 'The ruling doesn't come down hard on the bigger issue,' Vargas noted. This means police foundations could continue to assert they have a right to withhold records and invite further litigation. The 287-page document the APF sent to plaintiffs on 1 July offers insight into how the foundation actively lobbied Atlanta city council members to squash activist efforts to put Cop City's construction to a citywide vote in a referendum, among other issues. In a 17 September 2023 email, Rob Baskin, an APF spokesperson, said the foundation would speak to 'the mayor's key folks' and members of the city council about how allowing a referendum on Cop City to go before Atlanta voters 'would, at best, delay and could derail the project's financing', according to a document he attached. Letting the city's residents decide on the project would 'almost certainly [result] in the loss of credibility of City Council and its members', the document warns. Activists behind the referendum 'seek to override their elected representatives who conceived, debated and twice overwhelmingly approved the project in fully transparent public forums', the document says. The foundation omits that the city council meetings he refers to, in which the training center's funding was approved, included record-breaking numbers of Atlanta residents attending and dozens of hours of public testimony against the project. When the city council approved the training center funding anyway, the referendum effort was born. Cop City Vote organizers then spent months gathering 116,000 signatures in late 2023 in order to reach a required threshold of about half that number of verified, registered voters. A coalition of voting rights and pro-democracy law firms across the US drew up an ordinance to codify how the city could verify and count voter signatures on petitions to place questions on ballots in general, and offered it to Atlanta city council. This was needed because the Cop City referendum was the first such local democracy effort in the capital of Georgia's 176-year history – and no such process existed. But in the end, the city council scuttled the ordinance behind closed doors, as the Guardian reported at the time; the referendum never took place, mired in legal disputes. 'If we had known, and gotten these documents when we asked, there was a potential for immediate impact on public opinion,' Scott said, referring to the foundation's role in squashing the referendum. Also revealed in the document: the foundation posted 40 officers and installed eight cameras at the training center's 171-acre (70-hectare) footprint in a forest south-east of Atlanta in late 2023, to protect it from any vandalism by activists. Opposition to the $109-million center has come from a wide range of local and national organizations and protesters, and is centered on concerns such as unchecked police militarization and clearing forests in an era of climate crisis. Atlanta police, and the foundation, say the center is needed for 'world-class' training and to attract new officers. The last eight pages of the document include redacted emails, which appears to violate the judge's order to leave all records un-redacted. Plaintiffs plan to file a motion to obtain those records. After receiving the document several weeks ago, ACPC has not waited to test the ruling, and filed an open records request last week for minutes from the foundation's board meetings going back to 2005, Scott said. He has yet to receive a reply. 'We're going to keep going for transparency,' he said.


BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
What you need to know about Trump, Epstein and the MAGA controversy
The 2019 suicide of disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a New York jail cell generated conspiracy theories, fuelled by US president Donald Trump's conservative MAGA movement, that he was killed by one of his famous connections. Here are some facts about Epstein and the current controversy: Advertisement Who is Jeffrey Epstein? The Brooklyn-born Epstein, a former high school math teacher who later founded consulting and financial management firms, cultivated the rich and famous. He was known for socializing with politicians and royalty, including Mr Trump, Democratic president Bill Clinton, Microsoft MSFT.O co-founder Bill Gates and Britain's Prince Andrew. Some friends and clients flew on his private plane and visited his Caribbean islands. Mr Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s. During the 2021 trial of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, the financier's longtime pilot, Lawrence Visoski, testified that Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private plane multiple times. Mr Trump has denied being on the plane. What was Epstein charged with? In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to a Florida state felony prostitution charge, after federal prosecutors agreed not to charge him with sex trafficking of minors. He served 13 months in jail and was required to register as a sex offender. That punishment is now widely regarded as too lenient. Advertisement In July 2019, the US Justice Department charged Epstein with sex trafficking minors, including sexually exploiting and abusing dozens of girls, in New York and Florida between 2002 and 2005. He pleaded not guilty. Epstein died on August 10th, 2019, at age 66 by hanging himself in a Manhattan jail cell, an autopsy concluded. He was never tried on the 2019 charges. What is the current controversy over Epstein? Though the New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging, Epstein's ties to wealthy and powerful people prompted speculation that one or more of them wanted him silenced. In several interviews, Mr Trump left open the possibility that Epstein may not have died by suicide. During the 2024 presidential campaign, when asked on Fox News if he would declassify the Epstein files, Mr Trump said: "Yeah, yeah I would." Advertisement In February, Fox News asked attorney general Pam Bondi whether the Justice Department would be releasing Epstein's client list, and she said: "It's sitting on my desk right now to review." The 2019 suicide of disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a New York jail cell generated conspiracy theories. Photo:Some of Mr Trump's most loyal followers became furious after his administration reversed course on its promise. A Justice Department memo released on July 7th concluded that Epstein killed himself and said there was "no incriminating client list" or evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent people. The demands by Trump supporters for more Epstein-related documents have caused a rare fracture within the president's base. Supporters, inspired by conservative talk show hosts and podcasters, have said the federal government is concealing records to protect wealthy and influential people with ties to Epstein. Advertisement Trying to contain the fallout, Mr Trump defended Ms Bondi and accused his supporters in a Truth Social post of falling for a hoax, calling them "weaklings" who were helping Democrats. With backlash from his base not abating, Mr Trump on July 17th requested that Ms Bondi ask a federal judge to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein's 2019 indictment. The government on Friday filed a motion in Manhattan federal court to unseal the transcripts. What happens next? Ultimately, a judge will decide whether to release the transcripts. Transcripts of grand jury proceedings are generally kept secret under federal criminal procedure rules, with limited exceptions. If a judge agrees to release the transcripts, it is likely that some material would be redacted, or blacked out because of privacy or security concerns.