Ziploc facing class action lawsuit over alleged undisclosed microplastics
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Apple agrees to pay $95 million over Siri eavesdropping lawsuit
Apple reached a settlement a $95 million over a lawsuit accusing the company of eavesdropping and recording users' conversations with Siri.
Straight Arrow News
A California woman is suing S.C. Johnson, the maker of Ziploc, because she says some of its products contain undisclosed microplastics that mislead and harm consumers.
Linda Cheslow of Santa Rosa, California, filed a class action complaint in U.S. District Court for Northern California on April 25, according to court records.
Cheslow's complaint alleges that some Ziploc products marketed as microwave or freezer safe release microplastics when they are microwaved or frozen, making them "fundamentally unfit" for their advertised use.
It called S.C. Johnson's alleged misrepresentation "unfair, unlawful, deceptive and misleading."
The lawsuit is a class action, meaning it has been filed on behalf of anyone around the country who has purchased the products.
USA TODAY has reached out to S.C. Johnson for comment.
Lawsuit against Ziploc raises concern over possible microplastics
The lawsuit alleges Ziploc's bags and containers labeled "microwave safe" and "freezer" imply that they are safe to use in those appliances.
However, the lawsuit claims the products are made from materials that release microplastics when used in the microwave or freezer, which are "then leached into consumers' food."
"The Material Omission is meaningful to consumers as studies show that the ingestion of microplastics poses serious health risks, including potential harm to the digestive tract, immune system and reproductive system," the lawsuit says.
What are microplastics? Are they harmful?
Microplastics are small plastic particles that come from broken down plastics, according to a study in the National Library of Medicine.
Research shows that microwave heating of plastic containers releases a high amount of microplastics into the food inside, according to a 2023 study in the Environmental Science & Technology journal. The same study found that refrigeration in plastic containers releases high amounts of microplastics over the course of six months.
Over time, ingesting a lot of microplastics can cause a variety of health issues, according to the Environmental Working Group.
Which products are included in the Ziploc class action lawsuit?
The products included in the lawsuit are Ziploc bags and containers labeled "microwave safe," "freezer" or both.
According to the initial complaint, they include but are not limited to:
Ziploc Freezer Bags Pint/Small
Ziploc Freezer Bags Quart/Medium
Ziploc Freezer Bags Gallon/Large
Ziploc Slider Freezer Bags Quart/Medium
Ziploc Slider Freezer Gallon/Large Bags
Ziploc Slider Storage Bags Quart/Medium
Ziploc Slider Storage Bags Gallon/Large
Ziploc Container
Apple class action lawsuit: Did Siri eavesdrop on your call? Find out if eligible for part of $95M settlement
What could happen in the case against Ziploc?
A class action is a type of civil lawsuit brought on behalf of a group of people who have been harmed in the same way by the same entity, according to Harvard Law School. A court has to certify a lawsuit as a class action before it proceeds as one.
In a class action lawsuit where a settlement is reached, members of the class who opt into the case receive an equal portion of the money.
The plaintiff in the lawsuit against S.C. Johnson is pushing for the class in the case to be defined as all consumers nationwide who have purchased the products within an applicable statute of limitations period.
For consumers in California, the complaint requested the statute of limitations to be defined as the last four years.
Melina Khan is a trending reporter covering national news for USA TODAY. She can be reached at MKhan@gannett.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
Forget Price Comparisons, Walmart Drops Fitbit Charge 6 With Premium Membership to All-Time Low
It may have gotten a little lost under the avalanche of smartwatch health trackers, but the Fitbit was first, and it's still very much here and very much an excellent fitness wearable. The latest iteration of this lightweight exercise and sleep tracker, the Fitbit Charge 6, is the best one yet, and now it's bundled with six free months of Fitbit Premium membership for just $111 at Walmart. The Fitbit may look very as it has for several years, and it has the same lightweight almost-forget-it's-there comfort, but the Fitbit Charge 6 has advanced features that would seem completely alien to the early Fitbits (remember the clip-on model with no screen?) and a price tag that will make all of those high-end fitness smartwatches blush. It's still compatible with both Apple (iOS 15 or higher) and Android (OS 9.0 or higher) devices, which just adds to its universal appeal. See at Walmart One of the Fitbit's longtime best features, its crazy long battery life, is still very much present in the Charge 6 model. No matter how hard or how often you work out (or don't), the Fitbit Charge 6 gets roughly 6 full days and nights of battery life, which is key if you're also taking advantage of its outstanding Nightly Sleep Score feature. It's also now collaborating with Google, so it comes with great apps like Google Maps and Google Wallet preloaded. The other improvements are all for your health. The Fitbit Charge 6's heart rate tracking is up to 60% more accurate than previous models, a key feature when you're doing some serious cardio like HIIT workout or long runs. It has an accurate GPS system that pairs nicely with Google Maps, and the colorful display screen is customizable with different faces, along with timer and stopwatch features. With such a long battery life, the Fitbit Charge 6 keeps an eye on your essential health metrics all day and all night for accurate readouts. It can connect to several workout machines via Bluetooth at the gym, and it measures your active zone time, cardio fitness level, and workout intensity, along with oxygen saturation (SpO2), and 24/7 heart rate monitoring. The Fitbit Charge 6 gives you a daily readiness score to help you decide whether or not to hit the gym, along with gentle reminders to get up and move and a Smart Wake alarm clock feature. Not to fear, it also has Sleep and Do Not Disturb modes if that seems like a lot of notifications. All those features and the ones we didn't have room for could very easily be the product description of one of those high-end fitness smartwatches, but when you get to the bottom line, things change dramatically. Rather than fork over hundreds of dollars and sometimes even more for a smartwatch, the Fitbit Charge 6 bundled with six free months of Fitbit Premium membership is barely over $100 — just $111 right now at Walmart thanks to a deal cutting nearly $50 from the price. See at Walmart
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump, tech giants want to make it easier to share health records: What it means for you
President Donald Trump and his top health officials are pursuing a new initiative that will allow people to share their personal health and medical records with doctors and hospitals. Technology giants Apple, Amazon, Google and Open AI as well as health industries companies UnitedHealth Group and CVS Health are among more than 60 companies that have agreed to develop standards to share health information across computer systems. Trump touted the idea of eliminating redundancies such as filling out paperwork at multiple health providers offices. "This will allow patients to easily transmit information from one doctor to another," Trump said during a July 30 briefing with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. Trump emphasized the initiative will be voluntary and require patients to opt in. He added there will be no centralized, government-run database storing patients' personal records. "People are very concerned about the personal records," Trump said. "That's their choice ... it will be absolutely quiet." Large hospital systems and some doctors allow patients to share health information, fill out forms and schedule appointments through websites and mobile apps. And health tech companies have developed apps that allow people to track their health information, but these apps often can't access medical records from health providers, said Amy Gleason, acting administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Companies operating 21 networks have agreed to an "interoperability framework" to meet Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services criteria, according to the Trump administration. Hospital systems and electronic health records vendors have agreed to cooperate in the effort, according to CMS. Participating apps would help people manage obesity and diabetes, including the use of AI assistants to help check symptoms or schedule appointments, CMS said. Privacy, data security remain top worries The health care industry and tech companies have been attempting to reduce paperwork and seamlessly share electronic health records for three decades, said Chris Pierson, CEO of BlackCloak, an Orlando, Florida-based cybersecurity company. Hospitals, doctors, labs and vendors that directly handle such sensitive medical records are subject to a federal privacy law, called the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA. To make health information and records more portable and accessible, consumers need to be guaranteed strong privacy protections and granted control over what information is shared, Pierson said. A consumer might be willing to share their sensitive information with doctors, hospitals or labs. But the same person might want to block an app from sharing records with third parties such as exercise equipment vendors or nutritional supplement retailers. Pierson said such apps would likely still need to comply with HIPAA and other federal and state laws. Given that the apps are voluntary and require consent, they likely would comply with privacy laws, Pierson said. Companies also would need to safeguard information technology security to protect the sensitive information from data breaches. Hackers target health records Digital medical records are a popular target for hackers seeking sensitive health information, bank records and a person's identifiable information such as dates of birth and Social Security numbers. The number of attacks has surged in recent years and are often carried out by organized hackers, often operating overseas, who target the computer systems of health providers and the vendors and companies that serve them. HHS investigates whether breaches involve violations of health information privacy and security laws and publicly reports attacks that affect 500 or more on its website. In July alone, more than two dozen data breaches compromised the records of more than 3 million people, HHS records show. The largest hack in recent years involved the February 2024 attack on UnitedHealth-owned subsidiary Change Healthcare. The attack disrupted the health care industry because doctors and hospitals were unable to collect payments for weeks when computer systems went down. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump plan eases sharing of computerized health records Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
Trump, tech giants want to make it easier to share health records: What it means for you
President Donald Trump and his top health officials are pursuing a new initiative that will allow people to share their personal health and medical records with doctors and hospitals. Technology giants Apple, Amazon, Google and Open AI as well as health industries companies UnitedHealth Group and CVS Health are among more than 60 companies that have agreed to develop standards to share health information across computer systems. Trump touted the idea of eliminating redundancies such as filling out paperwork at multiple health providers offices. "This will allow patients to easily transmit information from one doctor to another," Trump said during a July 30 briefing with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. Trump emphasized the initiative will be voluntary and require patients to opt in. He added there will be no centralized, government-run database storing patients' personal records. "People are very concerned about the personal records," Trump said. "That's their choice ... it will be absolutely quiet." Large hospital systems and some doctors allow patients to share health information, fill out forms and schedule appointments through websites and mobile apps. And health tech companies have developed apps that allow people to track their health information, but these apps often can't access medical records from health providers, said Amy Gleason, acting administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Companies operating 21 networks have agreed to an "interoperability framework" to meet Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services criteria, according to the Trump administration. Hospital systems and electronic health records vendors have agreed to cooperate in the effort, according to CMS. Participating apps would help people manage obesity and diabetes, including the use of AI assistants to help check symptoms or schedule appointments, CMS said. Privacy, data security remain top worries The health care industry and tech companies have been attempting to reduce paperwork and seamlessly share electronic health records for three decades, said Chris Pierson, CEO of BlackCloak, an Orlando, Florida-based cybersecurity company. Hospitals, doctors, labs and vendors that directly handle such sensitive medical records are subject to a federal privacy law, called the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA. To make health information and records more portable and accessible, consumers need to be guaranteed strong privacy protections and granted control over what information is shared, Pierson said. A consumer might be willing to share their sensitive information with doctors, hospitals or labs. But the same person might want to block an app from sharing records with third parties such as exercise equipment vendors or nutritional supplement retailers. Pierson said such apps would likely still need to comply with HIPAA and other federal and state laws. Given that the apps are voluntary and require consent, they likely would comply with privacy laws, Pierson said. Companies also would need to safeguard information technology security to protect the sensitive information from data breaches. Hackers target health records Digital medical records are a popular target for hackers seeking sensitive health information, bank records and a person's identifiable information such as dates of birth and Social Security numbers. The number of attacks has surged in recent years and are often carried out by organized hackers, often operating overseas, who target the computer systems of health providers and the vendors and companies that serve them. HHS investigates whether breaches involve violations of health information privacy and security laws and publicly reports attacks that affect 500 or more on its website. In July alone, more than two dozen data breaches compromised the records of more than 3 million people, HHS records show. The largest hack in recent years involved the February 2024 attack on UnitedHealth-owned subsidiary Change Healthcare. The attack disrupted the health care industry because doctors and hospitals were unable to collect payments for weeks when computer systems went down.
