Five things you need to know, and the first woman's sub-4 mile
Good morning, Boston. Today is National Take Your Children to Work Day, and here are the five things you need to know in local business news to start your busy Thursday.
1. Metro Boston homebuilding off to slowest start in 12 years
Homebuilding in Greater Boston is reaching lows not seen in more than a decade, Greg Ryan reports.
2. Thermo Fisher invests $2B in US to counter tariffs, funding cuts
Hannah Green reports that Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is taking steps — including a $2 billion R&D investment — to mitigate macroeconomic challenges such as the Trump administration's tariffs and government funding cuts.
3. Wound-care biotech seeks bankruptcy protection
Green also reports that Arch Therapeutics Inc. has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing 'capital market challenges' as a major factor leading up to the decision.
Do you like Five Things? Make sure to subscribe — free — to our Morning Edition emails so you have it in your inbox each day.
4. Needham Bank profit drops as it navigates post-IPO growth
Little more than a year after going public, the parent company of Needham Bank posted a 19% drop in quarterly earnings, and William Hall reports that much of the drop is driven by economic uncertainty.
5. SBA ditches Biden-era loan-underwriting standards
The Small Business Administration is getting rid of Biden-era underwriting standards that let lenders use their own criteria to make SBA loans — the latest in a series of loan-program changes made by the agency under the Trump administration.
What else you need to know
Today in history
On this day in 1990, the 75th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, the Massachusetts Legislature officially designated April 24 as a Day of Remembrance for the million-and-a-half Armenians killed in the first genocide of the 20th century. (Read more at MassMoments.org)
What's good on WERS-FM
Little Talks, by Of Monsters and Men
What I'm reading
Erasure, by Percival Everett
What I'm watching
Andor, on Disney Plus
The first woman to break a sub-4 minute mile
While running is still on everyone's mind following this week's Boston Marathon, I'm just wondering if you saw the news that Faith Kipyegon, the world-record holder for the women's mile, will attempt to become the first woman to break the four-minute mile.
Kipyegon, 31, set the world record of 4:07.64 for the women's mile in July 2023, nearly five seconds faster than the prior record, which stood for four years, according to ESPN. She won the past three Olympic gold medals and holds the world record in the 1,500 meters and previously held the world record in the 5,000 meters. She plans to attempt a sub-four-minute mile on June 26 at Stade Charléty in Paris, the culmination of a yearlong Nike project dubbed "Breaking 4."
To pull it off, she will have to drop almost 8 seconds from her current world record — an amount of time that has taken women more than 30 years to accomplish. But if she does achieve it, the time will not be accepted by the sport as an official record because the race conditions will not meet the sport's official standards. It is akin to Eliud Kipchoge's 2019 marathon in under two hours, at 1:59:40.2, which was not recognized as a world record because his run included rotating pace-setters to help shield Kipchoge from wind, among other conditions.
Still, a sub-four-minute mile has never been done by a woman runner. Kipyegon had this to say about her reason why: "I'm a three-time Olympic champion. I've achieved world championship titles. I thought: What else? Why not dream outside the box?"
PARTING SHOT
If you don't follow GBH Archives on social media, you may have missed this one posted this week, from April 1987, in which passersby were asked why they weren't running the Boston Marathon:
"Why aren't you running in the Boston Marathon this year?" MOS interviews from @gbhnews in April, 1987. Reporter, Hope Kelly. pic.twitter.com/avhucr0Gf7 — GBH Archives (@GBHArchives) April 21, 2025
Subscribe to the Morning Edition or Afternoon Edition for the business news you need to know, all free.
Largest Women-Owned Businesses in Massachusetts
Total 2024 revenue
Rank Prior Rank Firm/Prior ranked (*unranked in 2024)/
1
1
Continental Resources Inc.
2
3
Atlas Travel & Technology Group
3
2
Granite City Electric Supply Co. Inc. View this list
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs sweeping domestic policy bill at White House ceremony
It was a victorious moment for President Trump, signing his tax and spending bill during a White House July 4th celebration. Democrats are poised to highlight the bill in the upcoming midterm elections given its cuts to social safety net programs but Republicans are touting its tax cuts and funding for Trump's immigration policies. NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell reports.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Your kid is getting a ‘Trump account.' Should you put your money in it?
Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' includes a gift to millions of families: $1,000 in an investment account for every eligible newborn. The new savings vehicles, akin to Individual Retirement Accounts, are designated for children who are U.S. citizens born from 2025 through 2028. In addition to the one-time government contribution, parents and others can chip in as much as $5,000 a year to the accounts, which beneficiaries can access at 18, with some constraints. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The seed money is a boon for recipients and will grow tax-deferred. Financial planners say parents and guardians might do better putting their money into existing investment vehicles such as a 529 plan, a savings plan designed to cover college expenses. But 529s are limited to education, while backers say the new accounts can help their recipients beyond college. Republican lawmakers call the accounts 'Trump accounts,' though the Senate's plan to officially name them after the president did not make it to the final version of the legislation, which was signed Friday. They deliver on an idea that both Democrats and Republicans have floated for years: to invest money for all children at birth. Withdrawals from a 529 are not subject to state or federal taxes as long as the funds go toward qualified education expenses - a feature the new investment accounts don't share. And in the new accounts, parents' deposits don't qualify for a tax deduction, notes Greg Leiserson, a senior fellow at the Tax Law Center at New York University. 'You have this very slight or minimal-to-nonexistent tax benefit,' he said. 'What is the point here?' Financial adviser Amy Spalding of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, said she will continue to steer her clients to 529s. 'It's better from a tax standpoint,' Spalding said. 'And there are more investment options. And then there's a higher contribution limit.' (For 2025, a single person can deposit as much as $19,000 a year into a beneficiary's 529, while married couples can contribute as much $38,000.) Jeremiah Barlow, a financial planner in Santa Barbara, California, said the new accounts could benefit a family that has hit the maximum on their child's 529 and wants to save more, or who like the idea of setting up a fund for their child's first home or as an economic safety net. 'It would likely appeal to our families who want more flexibility for more general-purpose savings for their child's future,' Barlow said. 'You shouldn't rush to just use it because it's out there.' Leiserson cautioned that account holders should understand the tax implications, noting that withdrawals will be taxed at typical income rates, not at the capital gains rate of a taxable brokerage account. 'For most people, this is going to be worse than what they could do in a taxable account,' he said. Though parents don't get a tax deduction when they contribute to a new account, employers can claim a tax break for contributions on behalf of their workers' children or their teenage employees. Nonprofits also can contribute to they accounts. The law requires the new investment accounts to track a U.S. stock index, which means account holders have fewer options than they would in a brokerage account or a 529 plan, which generally offer a range of investment options with varying levels of risk, including stocks, bonds and mutual funds. Leiserson noted that all-stock portfolios come with their own risks, because they're tethered to market conditions. 'If you're saying, 'Okay, I'm going to start school in the fall' - if the market falls over the summer, the planning you were doing about how you were going to pay for college is totally messed up, because the money you thought would be there, isn't." The White House said the accounts 'will afford a generation of children the chance to experience the miracle of compounded growth and set them on a course for prosperity from the very beginning.' While some experts appreciate the premise of the accounts, they also see flaws in the design, such as the requirement that parents opt-in to the account on their tax return, which means people who don't know this might miss out. In addition, the law includes a penalty of at least $500 if a parent mistakenly claims an account, which could scare off some parents. During the grinding process of crafting the massive tax and spending legislation, the accounts changed both superficially - they were renamed from MAGA accounts to Trump accounts to a yet-to-be-determined name - and in substance. Legislators dropped plans to give account withdrawals favorable tax treatment similar to a brokerage account. Account withdrawals will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates, not capital gains rates. Congress also discarded rules that would have prescribed how beneficiaries could spend the money - on college at 18, on starting a business at 25, on buying a house at 30. Instead, account holders cannot touch the funds until they turn 18. After that, the rules are the same as those of an individual retirement account - withdrawals are taxed like income, plus an additional 10 percent tax penalty on any withdrawals before age 59½ except for certain qualified uses. Those uses include paying for college, supporting themselves if they become disabled, or recovering from domestic abuse or a natural disaster. Beneficiaries also can withdraw as much as $10,000 to buy their first home, and up to $5,000 when they have a new baby themselves. Even one of the Trump accounts' biggest proponents in Congress, Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), said in an interview that for many parents, the new account design offers more benefits for retirement than for college expenses. 'I would argue that the tax implications of a 529 are far more favorable,' he said, but noted that most families don't have the disposable income to invest in a 529, and the new accounts' $1,000 from the government can benefit people at all income levels. If the account saw a 6 percent rate of return for 18 years, it would be worth $2,854; if the stock market does well, it could be worth even more. 'The most beneficial thing in my opinion about these is that … you're investing from birth into an IRA,' Moore said. 'Most people start investing in an IRA at 30 …. We're talking at birth or at 30. The benefits of investing early into that IRA are significant.' Moore has four sons, and while none will qualify for the government's $1,000 seed money contribution for newborns, the law allows him to open a Trump account as a parent. He says he'll be putting money in it: 'I want my kids having a Trump account so they can take it out when they're 50 or 60 years old.' - - - Jacob Bogage contributed to this report. Related Content Arthur Ashe's knack for reinvention led him to history at Wimbledon Newlywed detained by ICE freed after 141 days and two deportation attempts The Met opens a dazzling wing of non-European art Sign in to access your portfolio
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Tariffs return to April rates on August 1 without deals, Bessent says
Countries that don't make trade deals with the U.S. by August 1 can expect tariff rates to return to the levels announced in April, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday. Why it matters: It's effectively a new deadline for the biggest U.S. trading partners to negotiate an alternative to President Trump 's sweeping global tariffs — even as Bessent insists nothing had changed. Catch up quick: On Friday, Trump said about a dozen countries would receive letters Monday unilaterally setting a tariff rate, with more to come in the following days. Trump has said he preferred those letters to negotiations, after a three-month pause on his most sweeping tariffs netted three deals, rather than the 90 his administration promised. That pause expires this coming Wednesday. What they're saying: Bessent, in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union," said the letters would make clear that absent a deal, the rates would return to the levels Trump announced April 2. "It's not a new deadline. We are saying, this is when it's happening, if you want to speed things up, have at it, if you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice," he said. The intrigue: Even with the new date in play, Bessent said there will be significant activity in the coming hours, as countries scramble to get something done before the original deadline. "We are close to several deals. As always, there's a lot of foot-dragging on the other side," he said. "I would expect to see several big announcements over the next couple of days." What to watch: Trump's letter threat risks re-igniting the tariff chaos that crushed CEO and consumer confidence earlier this year and sent financial markets plunging.
