PBS, NPR And Public Media Set To Lose Federal Funding As Package Of Spending Cuts Clears Congress
The House voted 216 to 213 early Friday for the so-called rescissions package, which was sent to Congress at the request of President Donald Trump. The $9 billion in cuts also include rollbacks in funding to foreign aid and health programs. The package will now go to the White House for Trump's signature.
More from Deadline
How Public Media Lost The Federal Funding Battle, And What Happens Next To Stations, NPR And PBS
Donald Trump Says He Plans To Sue Rupert Murdoch, And The Wall Street Journal Over Jeffrey Epstein Story - Update
Ken Burns Calls Trump's Federal Funding Cuts To Public Broadcasting "So Shortsighted"
The move will leave the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the entity set up by Congress to distribute funds to public media outlets, with zeroed out federal funding for the first time since it was formed in 1967. The rescinded money had already been allocated by Congress for the next two fiscal years, starting on April 1.
Katherine Maher, the president and CEO of NPR, said that the funding cuts were 'an unwarranted dismantling of beloved local civic institutions, and an act of Congress that disregards the public will.'
'Despite promises from some members of Congress to fix anything the bill breaks, this will be an irreversible loss,' she said. 'If a station doesn't survive this sudden turn by Congress, a vital stitch in our American fabric will be gone for good.'
She said that 'with support from listeners and readers in communities around the nation,' they 'will work to rebuild.'
Public media advocates, PBS producers and personalities, station managers and viewers and listeners have been lobbying congressional representatives in recent weeks to preserve the funding, pointing to the unique mandate of the non-commercial outlets to provide educational, cultural and local programming, among other content.
But Trump has targeted PBS and NPR, and their news programming in particular, as biased toward the left. That has long been a common complaint on the right, but the president this time around threatened to withhold support or endorsements from any lawmakers who did not support the package.
'Here's the truth: If this rescissions packages was not put forth and passed by Congress, taxpayer dollars would still be funneled to ideologues at PBS and NPR,' said Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC).
But Democrats said that funding for public media and foreign aid were being sacrificed after Republicans pushed through the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the tax and spending legislation, which passed earlier this month, will add more than $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
Republicans 'blow up the budget for billionaires and then they nickel and dime everyone else to pretend that they care about the debt and deficit,' said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA). 'It's nuts.'
Advocates had hoped to win over enough Republicans to defeat the measure. Only two, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) joined with all Democrats in voting against it. Two other Republicans, Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV) and Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), voted for the rescissions after voting against them when the bill first came before the House last month.
After the vote, Trump posted on Truth Social, 'HOUSE APPROVES NINE BILLION DOLLAR CUTS PACKAGE, INCLUDING ATROCIOUS NPR AND PUBLIC BROADCASTING, WHERE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR WERE WASTED. REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE. THIS IS BIG!!!'
Best of Deadline
The Movies That Have Made More Than $1 Billion At The Global Box Office
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Everything We Know About 'Stranger Things' Season 5 So Far
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Tomei Consolidated Berhad's (KLSE:TOMEI) investors will be pleased with their splendid 262% return over the last five years
The worst result, after buying shares in a company (assuming no leverage), would be if you lose all the money you put in. But when you pick a company that is really flourishing, you can make more than 100%. For instance, the price of Tomei Consolidated Berhad (KLSE:TOMEI) stock is up an impressive 219% over the last five years. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS). Over half a decade, Tomei Consolidated Berhad managed to grow its earnings per share at 46% a year. The EPS growth is more impressive than the yearly share price gain of 26% over the same period. So one could conclude that the broader market has become more cautious towards the stock. The reasonably low P/E ratio of 3.30 also suggests market apprehension. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Tomei Consolidated Berhad's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for Tomei Consolidated Berhad the TSR over the last 5 years was 262%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective While the broader market lost about 7.2% in the twelve months, Tomei Consolidated Berhad shareholders did even worse, losing 9.5% (even including dividends). Having said that, it's inevitable that some stocks will be oversold in a falling market. The key is to keep your eyes on the fundamental developments. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 29%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Tomei Consolidated Berhad better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Tomei Consolidated Berhad you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored. If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Digital Trends
a minute ago
- Digital Trends
AI browsers are coming for phones, but not from the big players
Over the past few days, I've tested a new AI-first browser called Comet, developed by Perplexity. The browser is still in an invite-only stage, and preference is given to users with a Perplexity subscription. The company, however, already has grand plans for the mobile platform. Perplexity is already working on a mobile version of the Comet browser and talking with smartphone brands to pre-install it on their devices. In a conversation with The Verge, CEO Aravind Srinivas mentioned that a mobile version of the browser was in development and will co-exist alongside the Perplexity mobile app. What's coming? 'Some people are going to use the standalone Comet app, just like how they use Chrome or Safari, and it's okay,' Srinivas said on the Decoder podcast. He mentioned that users will be able to interact with any webpage using AI, and that voice-based interactions will be a part of the package. The Perplexity co-founder also revealed that the app will be available for both Android and iOS, mentioning Google's Chromium and Apple's WebKit foundations for web browsers. On the desktop version, Perplexity's Comet browser is built atop the Chromium engine, which powers Chrome and Edge among other web browsers. Recommended Videos But developing a web browser is only one part of the equation. Wrangling a share out of Chrome's massive user base is an entirely different ballgame. And that's where Perplexity is hoping some brand partnerships will yield positive results. A big chess move The company is planning to join hands with smartphone brands so that the Comet app will come pre-installed on their hardware. 'It's not easy to convince mobile OEMs to change the default browser to Comet from Chrome,' Srinivas told Reuters. Perplexity already has a similar deal in place with Motorola, which entails pre-installation of the Perplexity mobile app on smartphones. The AI company also created custom system-level optimizations that allow users to directly summon Perplexity using the Moto AI bundle, handle emails, control music playback, and make restaurant bookings. Srinivas admitted that the road ahead won't be easy. Google already has deals in place with Android smartphone brands that involve pre-installation and the setting up of Chrome as the default browser out of the box. Some of these stipulations are under antitrust scrutiny. The browser landscape, however, is shifting rapidly. Google has already integrated AI mode within Search to do essentially what Perplexity's answering engine does. Additionally, my experiments with Dia and Opera browser tell me that browsers with AI agents, or AI-powered action skills, are the next big frontier. In the meantime, OpenAI — the maker of ChatGPT and one of the biggest AI players in the world — is reportedly working on its web browser, as well. The company already has agentic products such as Operator and ChatGPT agent out there. Moreover, it also has a deal in place with Apple that deeply integrates ChatGPT capabilities with Siri and across the Apple Intelligence stack.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal excise tax changes fall short in Congress
This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. Industry stakeholders are renewing pushes to reduce the federal excise tax. The tax is 12% on most new trucks and trailers and certain instances of chassis, based on the first retail sale. The American Trucking Associations President and CEO Chris Spear has railed against it, calling it an 'antiquated tax' that 'imposes an enormous hardship.' The American Trucking Associations has long objected to regulations that unfairly burden truckers. Advocates seeking to change the measure highlight that the tax started at 3% in 1917 before reaching its current rate in 1983, according to an April report by the American Transportation Research Institute, the research arm of the ATA. The ATRI report also highlighted that the tax can exceed $20,000 for new trucks and extend beyond $52,000 for a zero-emission truck, which comes as vehicle costs have skyrocketed in recent years. Legislators attempted to change the tax this year. In March, U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, of California, introduced a bill seeking to repeal the tax, but the bill has never gotten past the House Committee on Ways and Means. In late June, the 'big, beautiful' tax policy bill drew a proposed amendment from U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno, of Ohio, seeking to reduce the tax to 2%. That didn't make the cut for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that became law. He still plans to include the 2% provision in future legislation, according to his communications director, Reagan McCarthy. 'Senator Moreno is committed to fighting for American truckers, the backbone of America's economy, and fought to include critical tax relief for truckers in President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' McCarthy said in an email. 'He will continue to look for avenues to get this provision included in future legislation.' The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has expressed reservations on changing the excise tax. The organization's leadership has argued that significant changes to the tax could drain funding from the Highway Trust Fund, which covers transportation projects. Without a replacement, the Highway Trust Fund could be stressed and adversely affect truckers, OOIDA officials say. The group says another revenue source would be needed to cover those highway costs. The ATRI report suggested that if the excise tax were repealed, one solution could be a diesel tax increase of 11.2 cents per gallon to cover the costs. 'This increase is much lower than an inflation-adjusted increase of the diesel tax, which would have risen by $0.286 since its last adjustment in 1994 to a total of $0.527 per gallon,' the report said. Recommended Reading Trump tax law draws praise, criticism from industry groups Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data