The jobs and tax credits that could disappear if the ‘big, beautiful' House GOP bill passes
Sustainability
Taxes
Congressional newsFacebookTweetLink
Follow
House Republicans are proposing to gut energy savings and clean energy tax credits in President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill — funds that are creating thousands of jobs in GOP states and saving homeowners money on their bills.
It's all on the chopping block. The House GOP is moving closer to a final vote on Trump's tax package, before it heads to the Senate.
If Congress passes the tax bill as it stands, it could cost the US more than 830,000 jobs that would otherwise be created in the coming years, the think tank Energy Innovation found. The impacted jobs are mostly in construction and manufacturing, building factories and components for EVs, wind turbines, solar panels, batteries and other clean energy products — the vast majority of which are in GOP states and districts.
It also threatens an eye-popping amount of investment from companies that piggybacked on the passage of the 2022 clean energy bill, also known as the Inflation Reduction Act.
'We're talking about an awful lot of money — approaching a trillion dollars in private sector investment that's either been made or has been planned — that is at risk,' said Robbie Orvis, Energy Innovation's senior director of modeling and analysis.
The threatened funds are in the same places the jobs are at risk; nearly 80% of the investment sparked by the law is in Republican areas, according to data from the Rhodium Group and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bottom line, that's what the new tax bill is, essentially: a repeal of the clean energy provisions in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, according to independent analysis from the two nonpartisan think tanks.
'It's functionally equivalent to a full-out repeal,' Orvis said, adding the current bill proposed by House Republicans is a 'sledgehammer on steroids.'
It would hurt Republicans the most.
Republicans represent 14 of the top 20 congressional districts that are on the cusp of gaining the most jobs from the law, which was championed by former President Joe Biden.
Tennessee, Georgia and the Carolinas, among others, have gained most of the new jobs in electric vehicle and battery manufacturing and could stand to lose the most if tax credits disappear.
Rep. Mark Amodei, whose Nevada district alone is poised to gain more than 20,000 jobs in mining, refining and processing lithium for EVs and batteries, previously told CNN that continuing to fund these facilities in his district is 'fundamental.'
Orvis said the Republican tax bill could not only hurt future projects, it will likely hurt existing manufacturing facilities as well.
'Some of the proposed language in the (bill) text actually puts existing facilities at risk because they will no longer qualify to receive some of the tax credits that they got financing on,' Orvis said.
The cost of electricity for everyday Americans and businesses would also go up; Energy Innovation found wholesale electricity prices would increase by 50% by 2035. This is in large part because solar and wind energy are cheaper than fossil fuels.
Rhodium's analysis found the GOP bill would slash the amount of new clean energy on the US electric grid by 57-72% through 2035.
Cutting cheaper wind and solar will raise American's energy bills, analysts said.
'You don't worry about (price volatility) with wind and solar; the sun is still free,' Rhodium analyst Ben King told CNN. 'By shifting away from renewables and back to natural gas, you are exposing yourself to price volatility as well.'
Some Republican lawmakers have voiced concerns that repealing the tax credits could hurt electricity generation at a time when the US needs more power than ever. The AI boom is gobbling up electricity for data centers, and companies are on the hunt for electrons wherever they can find them.
That's the central argument solar CEOs have been making to Republican lawmakers as they've pleaded with them to keep the credits intact.
'Solar is the most effective form of energy going forward; it's the fastest and cheapest to market,' said Zaid Ashai, CEO of solar company Nexamp. 'The reality is we're in this economic competition with China. The only way to win the technology and AI race is to be energy independent, and solar is a really key component of that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
On GPS: Nvidia CEO on whether AI will lead to job losses
Fareed speaks with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about the productivity gains from the AI revolution — and whether people should be concerned about job losses.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Investor's $6K Bitcoin Gift Is Now Worth $13K—But Should They Cash Out Or Double Down?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A Reddit debate reveals the eternal crypto dilemma: Is understanding the technology essential for investment success, or can faith in digital scarcity be enough? When a Reddit user recently shared their dilemma about a gifted Bitcoin investment that had more than doubled in value, the response illuminated one of the most fundamental debates in modern investing: Do you need to understand an asset to profit from it? The investor received $6,000 worth of Bitcoin several years ago, watched it grow to over $13,000, but admits they 'don't understand the monetary value of crypto.' Now they're considering cashing out to cover living expenses or maximize retirement contributions—a decision that sparked hundreds of responses revealing the deep philosophical divide in the crypto community. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. The 'hold' camp presented compelling arguments beyond mere speculation. Bitcoin's hard cap of 21 million coins creates genuine scarcity, with an estimated 5 million-6 million coins already lost forever. This scarcity model stands in stark contrast to traditional fiat currencies, where central banks can increase supply at will. Multiple commenters positioned Bitcoin as 'digital gold'—a decentralized savings account operating independently of government monetary policy. The network effects and security of what supporters call 'the most decentralized, powerful, and secure network ever created' only strengthen as adoption increases. The historical performance argument is hard to ignore: Bitcoin has consistently outperformed traditional asset classes over extended periods, leading many to argue that selling early often results in missed opportunities for significant future gains. Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. The 'sell' advocates presented equally valid reasoning. Conventional wisdom suggests maxing out retirement accounts before pursuing higher-risk investments. With tax-advantaged accounts offering guaranteed benefits, the opportunity cost of holding volatile crypto assets deserves consideration. The high volatility of cryptocurrencies can create 'sleepless nights' for investors who don't fully understand the asset. The 'invest in what you understand' principle remains a cornerstone of sound investing—if you can't articulate why you own an asset beyond price appreciation, you may be speculating rather than investing. Perhaps the most intriguing debate centered on whether understanding Bitcoin's technology is necessary for investment success. The 'you don't need to know' camp argued that most people don't fully understand how traditional money or electricity work, yet benefit from these systems daily. They suggested focusing on economic principles rather than technical details. The 'know what you own' advocates emphasized that investment success requires understanding value propositions and fundamental price drivers—knowledge extending beyond technical Reddit debate offers actionable insights: Assess Your Risk Tolerance: If cryptocurrency volatility causes anxiety, consider reducing exposure regardless of potential returns. Prioritize Tax-Advantaged Accounts: For most investors, maximizing 401k and IRA contributions provides guaranteed benefits that often outweigh speculative gains. Consider Partial Liquidation: Rather than all-or-nothing, selling a portion to fund retirement accounts while maintaining crypto exposure offers balanced risk management. Beware of Echo Chambers: Seeking advice from crypto-specific communities may yield biased perspectives. The Bitcoin investment dilemma reflects broader questions about modern portfolio construction and risk management. While Bitcoin's scarcity model and network effects present compelling arguments for long-term appreciation, the fundamental principle of investing within one's understanding and risk tolerance remains paramount. For investors facing similar decisions, the key lies in honest self-assessment: Can you sleep soundly with assets you don't fully understand? Are you prepared for speculative investment volatility? Most importantly, does your strategy align with your broader financial goals? The answer to these questions—rather than Bitcoin's price action—should ultimately guide your decision. Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . Image: Shutterstock This article This Investor's $6K Bitcoin Gift Is Now Worth $13K—But Should They Cash Out Or Double Down? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump allies open new front with Powell over building rehab
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump and his allies have seized upon a new way to criticize the head of the US central bank: his handling of an expensive renovation of the Federal Reserve's headquarters. Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of? How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis Philadelphia Reaches Pact With Workers to End Garbage Strike The construction project offers the clearest example yet of how Trump and those in his orbit are looking for every opportunity to scrutinize Jerome Powell's leadership at the central bank, even beyond his economic stewardship. Some administration officials also appear to be building a case that the renovation is the opportunity Trump needs to meet the high legal standard required to remove Powell from the Fed's Board of Governors. The heightened pressure coincides with Trump's relentless calls for the Fed to lower interest rates — which Powell and fellow policymakers have so far ignored this year. Trump has lambasted the Fed chief in turn and made clear he'll replace Powell when his term as chair expires in May 2026 with someone who wants lower rates. 'I think what we need is regime change at the Fed, and that's not just about the chairman, it's about a range of people,' former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh said on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures. 'It's about breaking some heads, because the way they've been doing business is not working.' Warsh, who also called for rate cuts, has been widely mentioned as a possible replacement for Powell. In recent days, administration officials and some congressional Republicans have zeroed in on the renovation project, taking issue with its rising costs, what they consider extravagant design features and Powell's recent testimony about the construction before Congress. Kathryn Judge, a law professor at Columbia University who studies the Fed, said the questions 'could feed a negative stereotype that the Fed is too far removed from the realities that most people are facing.' That dynamic, she said, could 'undermine its credibility with the broader public and potentially actually serve President Trump's claims that what we need is a Federal Reserve who is more accountable to the president and to the people that elected him.' Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council at the White House, said Powell's future depends on how the Fed chair answers questions about the renovation costs. 'It was never envisioned by the people that voted for the construction of the Fed, that the Fed could print money and toss it around willy nilly,' Hassett said on ABC's This Week. The Fed has said its renovations of two historic buildings at its Washington headquarters are designed to reduce costs over time by consolidating its operations. But Powell's critics have homed in on the growing costs, along with media reports that have characterized several of the renovation's design features as lavish. 'It's outrageous,' Warsh said on Fox. 'Maybe a new paint job, maybe some fresh computer terminals, maybe some brand new models at the Fed so we can improve the conduct of monetary policy.' Fed budget documents show cost estimates for the project have risen to $2.5 billion this year, compared with $1.9 billion in 2023. The project's 'construction cost estimates have continued to increase, particularly within the mechanical, electrical and plumbing trades, due to competitive bid pricing,' the Fed's 2025 budget says. In a July 10 letter addressed to Powell, Russ Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, demanded Powell provide more details. 'Instead of attempting to right the Fed's fiscal ship, you have plowed ahead with an ostentatious overhaul of your Washington DC headquarters,' Vought said in the letter posted to social media. In the post, Vought also asserted that Powell had 'grossly mismanaged the Fed.' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement that the president 'can both call out the Fed for failing to do its job by its own stated objectives and ensure that taxpayer money is not wasted on things that do not benefit the American people.' This specific line of criticism comes as Powell has declined to answer questions about whether he will depart the central bank when his chairmanship is over. His underlying term as a governor extends into 2028. With one exception, past Fed chairs have exited when they surrender their leadership role. Should Powell stay on, it could pose a roadblock to Trump's ambition to exert more influence over monetary policy once he installs a new chair. That will already prove difficult given that interest rates are set by a majority vote of the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee. If Powell remains, he'll deny Trump the opportunity to fill another open governor seat. It would also introduce the possibility that Powell retains more influence over the committee than its new chair, who may lack credibility among Fed officials. The drama developing around the Fed also follows a May Supreme Court ruling that signaled it would likely shield the Fed in any decision that allows Trump to oust top officials at two other independent federal agencies. Although legal challenges in that case continue, the decision suggested that the removal of any Fed governor would still require cause, which has been interpreted by the courts to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. Trump has continued to say he won't fire Powell but said the Fed chief should resign if allegations that he lied to lawmakers prove true. 'What they're trying to manufacture is some 'cause' not related to monetary policy disagreements,' said Scott Alvarez, a former general counsel at the Fed, who added he did not believe the renovation rose to the level of cause for dismissal. Powell and the Fed have sought to counter the criticisms leveled over the renovations. On Friday, the central bank added a 'Frequently Asked Questions' page about the project to its website. It describes why costs have increased and disputes some of the design features that critics have targeted. 'The Federal Reserve takes seriously the responsibility to be a good steward of public resources,' the page says. A Fed official said that Powell had been truthful during last month's Senate Banking Committee hearing where he discussed the project. Powell acknowledged cost overruns for the renovations in response to Republicans' questions, but pushed back on the notion the project is extravagant. 'There's no VIP dining room, there's no new marble,' Powell said. 'There are no special elevators — there's just, there are old elevators that have been there — there are no new water features, there's no beehives and there's no roof terrace gardens.' Powell added that the project has 'continued to evolve' and that some earlier features 'are no longer in the plans.' He also agreed that Fed staff would brief Senate Republicans' staff about the project. That briefing is expected to happen later this month. The OMB's Vought, in his letter to Powell, said the testimony raised 'serious questions' about whether the project is in compliance with a law governing such construction. 'Although minor deviations from approved plans may be inevitable, your testimony appears to reveal that the project is out of compliance with the approved plan with regard to major design elements,' Vought wrote. A 2021 document from the National Capital Planning Commission – the federal agency that reviews and approves projects like the Fed's – is the most recent, publicly available review of the full scope of the renovation. The Fed official said an external architect and engineering firm had not advised that the planned changes needed to be resubmitted to the NCPC. Meanwhile, Trump recently appointed three White House officials to serve on the NCPC. One of them, James Blair, a White House deputy chief of staff, said recently on social media he would request a review of the project and a site visit immediately. 'At a time when the Fed is running an operating deficit, maintains high interest rates and is receiving significant public scrutiny, one has to wonder whether the so-called 'Taj Mahal near the National Mall' project is in the best interests of the board & the public it serves,' Blair wrote. Judge, the Columbia professor, said it is appropriate for the White House to scrutinize the Fed's spending to ensure accountability. But in this case, the context is relevant, she said. 'It's very hard to believe that that is what the administration is doing, given how hard the administration has fought to get Powell to lower rates and to lower rates more quickly, and to get Powell out of office more quickly,' Judge said. 'It makes the concerns about the cost of renovation look like a pretense and that's not a healthy way to ensure ongoing credibility.' —With assistance from María Paula Mijares Torres. 'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear Soccer Players Are Being Seriously Overworked Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
