logo
The naked billboard that shocked the establishment – and blazed a trail in the art world

The naked billboard that shocked the establishment – and blazed a trail in the art world

BBC News31-05-2025
It's been 40 years since the controversial activist group Guerrilla Girls formed. Their most powerful campaign, the "naked poster", broke new ground – and has had a lasting influence.
On a Sunday morning in New York in 1989, a few women perused the permanent collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Hidden among the regular punters, the anonymous feminist art collective, the Guerrilla Girls, went unnoticed as they carefully counted the number of female artists versus the number of naked women depicted in the artworks. They were on a secret mission to make people care about the racial and gender unfairness of the art world.
"The idea always was to find that kernel that was unforgettable," one of the founding members of the Guerrilla Girls, who uses the alias Käthe Kollwitz, tells the BBC at the National Museum of Women in the Arts, ahead of an exhibition that celebrates 40 years of their work.
They made their way through the different rooms – past the male nudes of ancient Greece and the near absence of nudity in the early Christian sections – but it was when they hit the early modern era that they found the statistics that would lead to their biting criticism of the art world. They posed the question of who was allowed to be subject and object in the lofty corridors of the world's most prestigious art institutions.
"Less than 5% of the artists in the Modern Art Sections are women, but 85% of the nudes are female," reads the poster, next to a female nude whose head is covered by the group's trademark gorilla mask.
To this day, the group remains anonymous, and when the BBC interviews Kollwitz, she is wearing the mask. "I don't think anyone who actually looks at that poster can go into a museum and not think about what is on the walls and why," she says.
The Do Women Have to Be Naked to Get into the Met Museum? poster was meant to have been a commission from the New York Public Art Fund, but on seeing the final result, the funding was pulled. The Guerrilla Girls committed to their message and put it on billboards and buses themselves. "We decided to buy space on NYC buses. We also pasted it up ourselves on NYC streets."
The poster threw the collective into the spotlight and cemented their style with a mass audience. The mix of humour, statistics and bold advertising slogans was the culmination of several years of working out how to tackle gender and racial inequality. The group's initial two posters – What Do These Artists Have in Common? and These Galleries Show No More Than 10% Women Artists or None at All – were plastered on walls, street lamps and telephone booths in New York, with no need for permission from the decisions of those who ran the powerful art institutions.
The Guerrilla Girls' decision to adopt the language of advertising was in reaction to what they saw as the ineffectiveness of traditional protests. The group formed in 1985 after attending a protest outside the Museum of Modern Art in New York the previous year. The International Survey of Recent Painting and Sculpture had only featured 17 women and eight artists of colour out of 169 artists.
"A couple of us went to this protest, and it was so clear nobody cared. Everyone just went inside the museum. You know, all these signs about women's art. They didn't believe it for a minute. And that was really the 'aha' moment."
The "Naked" poster, as Kollwitz refers to it, was a game-changer. "We often have crazy visuals, facts, and humour – things to draw them in – and if you actually look at our posters, you'll never see art quite the same way again."
'Undeniable change'
Author and podcaster Katy Hessel, in her book The Story of Art Without Men, points to how artists coming up through the '80s had all grown up with televisions in their homes. "Playing with the media (and art history's) stereotypes of women, they took back control of the gaze and turned it upon themselves."
"The Guerrilla Girls brought public attention to the inequalities and systematic discrimination in the art world, and ultimately asked – just how did museums get away with celebrating the history of patriarchy instead of the history of art?"
From being an outside force pushing for space, their text-based work now often hangs in the very places they once sought to provoke. Their continued anonymity is another invitation to remember women artists who struggled in their time. All the founding members are art professionals in their own right, but as the Guerrilla Girls, they carry the pseudonyms of deceased artists like Frida Kahlo and Zubeida Agha.
More like this:• The masterpiece full of coded messages about WW1• Nine striking rare photos of 19th-Century America• The meaning behind Cannes' 'naked dress' ban
"More than being anonymous, it's the way they do it that is also really clever," says Michael Wellen, a senior curator at Tate Modern in London, which has an ongoing free collection of their work on display. "There's a moment of education every time you're figuring out who you're talking to." Since their original counting of nudes in the Met, the art world has changed. But inequity between artists of colour and women in comparison to white men still exists. This can be seen not just in who hangs on the walls but in other areas of the art market. For example, artwork by women only accounts for 39% of gallery sales, according to a report by Art Basel in 2024. Recent studies also point out that permanent collections in major US galleries are 85% white and 87% male. In the UK, it was only in 2023 that the Royal Academy in London displayed Marina Abramović's lifetime of work – making her the first woman to have a major solo exhibition in their main galleries.
"I think that there's undeniable change in how museums represent the history of art and contemporary art – and in large part, it's due to the light that the Guerrilla Girls have shone on these inequalities," says Wellen.
While the poster protest was originally critiquing who was allowed to hang on the walls of museums and galleries, this focus has evolved for the Guerrilla Girls as well as for other artist activists, who are now scrutinising how funding is secured and where donors earn their money. In 2019, US art photographer and activist Nan Goldin staged a protest at the Guggenheim, dropping thousands of prescriptions into the atrium in protest against the museum accepting donations from the Sackler family, who own Purdue Pharma, the makers of prescription painkiller OxyContin, which has been blamed for fuelling the US opioid crisis. The protest featured in the documentary The Beauty and the Bloodshed.
The Guerrilla Girls' work has also evolved to take on broader issues, tackling environmental concerns and expanding their signature style globally over the years. The founding members operate like a cell and have collaborated internationally, with approximately 60 contributors across Asia, Latin America and Europe. In March this year, they created a poster with the Bulgarian Women's Fund. Don't They Deserve More Than a Thin Slice of Government? criticised the lack of women's representation in the country's government.
Tracking progress is difficult. Over the years, the Guerrilla Girls have revisited the poster that threw them into the spotlight, conducting recounts. It's a jarring commentary on how little things can change despite public pressure. Between 1989, 2005, and 2012, the number of female nudes in the Met decreased – but the number of women artists actually shrank. Of course, this isn't indicative of every institution, but as always with their work, the message is clear: there is still more to be done.
"I chose her because she was a political artist, and that's what I consider the Guerrilla Girls and myself as well," says Kollwitz, when asked why she named herself after the German artist. Born in 1867, the real Käthe Kollwitz's work focused on women, and was profoundly anti-war. Stylistically her work is very different from the Guerrilla Girls, but the thematic content overlaps.
The Guerrilla Girls remain active, and crossing the 40-year threshold is a moment for reflection – but also a time to look ahead. You might expect someone who has been battling injustices for decades with snail-like progress to be exhausted, but Kollwitz says the challenge of progress is what inspires the collective. In November, they will exhibit at the Getty Research Institute in Los Angeles, and a graphic novel is in the works. 'We will never stop making trouble,' she says. "Our fight is not over."
Guerrilla Girls: Making Trouble is at the National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington DC until 28 September.
--
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump-supporting soccer fan kicked out of MLS stadium for wearing a MAGA cap
Donald Trump-supporting soccer fan kicked out of MLS stadium for wearing a MAGA cap

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump-supporting soccer fan kicked out of MLS stadium for wearing a MAGA cap

Shocking footage has emerged showing a soccer fan getting kicked out of a St. Louis City game for wearing a 'Make America Great Again' cap in the stands. The clip, first shared by reporter Greg Keller on X, shows a man named Michael Weitzel filming himself as police escort him out of the team's stadium because of his clothing. 'I am being evicted from the premises because of Donald Trump - because we can't wear Donald Trump hats in public,' Weizel says. 'Now I am being evicted from the premises. Trump is not welcome at St. Louis City SC club. Trump is not welcome here. 'I'm being asked to leave by the police. I am being threatened with arrest. They are asking me to leave.' A police officer escorting Weitzel out of the stadium can be heard explaining that he is a Trump supporter too but has to carry out the club's rules banning political statements at the stadium. Booing and jeering can also be heard in the background. 'He gets it, he's just following the rules,' Weitzel says of the officer dealing with him. 'It's not his fault. This is the stadium's rules here.' It is unclear precisely when the incident happened. Keller posted the video on August 2, saying that it occurred 'last night' but the most recent St. Louis City game was held on July 30 - a friendly game against Premier League team Aston Villa. Major League Soccer fan code of conduct rules state on their website that supporters are not allowed to make political gestures through their clothing at games. Listed in the prohibited section of the MLS website, the rule says: 'Displaying signs, symbols or images for commercial purposes or for electioneering, campaigning or advocating for or against any candidate, political party, legislative issue, or government action.' St. Louis City SC, when contacted for comment, directed Daily Mail to those guidelines and offered no further statement. The fan appears to be told by security that his ban only covers the game in question and that he would be allowed back in the future. Keller, meanwhile, later said that the the video is being reviewed by the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, who Daily Mail has contacted for comment. MLS has also been offered the chance to speak about the video. The same issue has arisen in other sports across the United States. Last October, San Francisco 49ers fans said they were stopped from bringing Trump merchandise into Levi's Stadium before an NFL game. The fans in question shared video to TikTok showing stadium security telling them to throw their hat away or to leave the stadium. It was the same game where Nick Bosa gatecrashed an interview with a 'MAGA' cap The woman who uploaded the footage said it caused a 45-minute dispute before security eventually relented and let the family in - although they missed the beginning of the game. Ironically, after the 49ers beat the Dallas Cowboys on October 27, San Francisco guard Nick Bosa gatecrashed a post-game interview wearing a white MAGA cap. He was fined $11,255 by the NFL. According to league rules, players are prohibited from displaying a personal message or non-sponsored branding 'at any point throughout a game day when visible at the stadium and TV audience, including postgame interviews in the locker room or on the field.' Bosa was unapologetic, telling reporters: 'I haven't got one (a fine) yet, but if it comes, it comes. It was well worth it.' After Trump won last November's election, Bosa largely stayed silent aside from saying: 'Clearly, the nation spoke. And we got what we got what we want.'

Things to know about legislator walkouts as Texas Democrats flee state over a high-stakes map vote
Things to know about legislator walkouts as Texas Democrats flee state over a high-stakes map vote

The Independent

time38 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Things to know about legislator walkouts as Texas Democrats flee state over a high-stakes map vote

Texas Democrats are fleeing the state Sunday in an effort to hinder Republicans from approving a new U.S. House map that could boost their slim congressional majority in 2026. The walkout lets the minority party keep Republicans in charge from having enough votes for maps that would add five new Republican-leaning congressional districts. The proposed boundaries slice up Democratic-leaning urban centers where most of the state's 30 million people live. Though such theatrics are uncommon, both parties have used walkouts to deny quorum in state Legislatures from Oregon to New Hampshire. In some places, walking off the job, whether for a day or months at a time, has led to punishments like fines, arrest threats or being booted from the ballot. 'We're leaving Texas to fight for Texans,' Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement Sunday. 'We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent.' Here's a closer look at how lawmakers around the country have used walkouts. Texas Four years ago, Texas Democrats walked off the job over a proposal for voting restrictions and fled to Washington D.C. While initially successful in killing the measure, they couldn't block the plan again during a special session when Republicans had law enforcement issue civil arrest warrants to bring Democrats back. The stalemate lasted more than a month. The bill prohibited 24-hour polling sites, banned drive-through voting and gave more access to partisan poll watchers. Democrats in the state used the same tactic in 2003, when House members went to Oklahoma and senators traveled to New Mexico. They failed to thwart a Republican congressional redistricting plan. Oregon Oregon legislators in both parties have boycotted daily sessions to halt work in one or both chambers since the 1970s. After several GOP walkouts, voters in 2022 approved an amendment to the state constitution barring lawmakers from seeking reelection if they have more than 10 unexcused absences in a single annual legislative session. In 2023, Republicans staged a six-week boycott — the longest in the Oregon Legislature's history — over measures protecting abortion rights and gender-affirming care for transgender people. Ten lawmakers were barred from seeking reelection the following year. New Hampshire In 2021, New Hampshire Democrats walked out when an anti-abortion bill came up for a vote, protesting what they saw as a partisan manipulation of the calendar. That prompted the Republican House speaker to lock the doors to maintain a quorum. 'I'm locking the doors right now so everybody in the chamber will stay in the chamber!' shouted House Speaker Sherman Packard, who later refused to let Democrats back in to vote on the bill. Wisconsin Democratic state senators from Wisconsin fled to neighboring Illinois in 2011, blocking a vote on GOP Gov. Scott Walker's plan to strip most public workers of their union rights. At the same time, pro-union protesters descended on the state Capitol. The stalemate ended several weeks later after Republicans weakened their legislation. Indiana Indiana Democrats left the state for Illinois in 2011 to prevent a Republican bill prohibiting mandatory labor union fees. The absence of Democrats left the House short of the two-thirds needed for a quorum. Democrats threatened to stay in Illinois until they received assurances from top leaders that the bills would not be called, while Republican leaders said they wouldn't negotiate with legislators who didn't show up to their jobs. Republicans successfully passed the bill the following year.

Trump confessed ear injury was ‘not too bad' at RNC despite wearing oversized bandage, Congressman says
Trump confessed ear injury was ‘not too bad' at RNC despite wearing oversized bandage, Congressman says

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Trump confessed ear injury was ‘not too bad' at RNC despite wearing oversized bandage, Congressman says

Donald Trump allegedly confessed to GOP colleagues that his ear injury was 'not too bad' at the Republican National Convention, despite wearing his infamous oversized bandage. The then-presidential nominee told Byron Donalds that doctors had advised him to keep the bandage on, the Florida Congressman said, speaking at a GOP conference over the weekend. Trump arrived at the convention in July 2024 wearing the bandage, two days after surviving an attempted assassination while out campaigning in Butler, Pennsylvania, during which a bullet clipped his right ear. Many convention goers decided to mimic the look in solidarity, also sporting bandages of their own. However, Donalds recalled, Trump himself was unenthused about his medical head accessory when the pair met shortly after his convention speech. "I see the bandage, and the second thing [Trump says] is 'what do you think of the bandage?'" Donalds said. "I said, 'I don't like it. Take it off.' That's what I said. 'I don't like it. Take it off.' I said 'let everybody see the ear.'' "He was like, 'you know, it's not too bad. It's not too bad'..."Doc Ronny [Jackson] says, I gotta wear the bandage." 'I'm like 'so what? You're the president just take the thing off,' Donalds added. The president's bandage became the inspiration for many at the RNC, with one Arizona delegate Joe Neglia describing it at the time as 'the newest fashion trend.' 'Everybody in the world is going to be wearing these pretty soon,' Neglia told CBS, while sporting a piece of white tape over his own ear. 'When he came in [to the convention], and there was that eruption of love in the room, I thought, 'what can I do to honor the truth? What can I possibly do?'' 'And then I saw the bandage and I thought, I can do that. So, I put it on simply to honor Trump and to express sympathy with him and unity with him.' At a rally shortly after the convention, Trump appeared to have downgraded his ear bandage, instead sporting a skin-colored band-aid covering the top part of his right ear.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store