What eating bread every day actually does to your body and health
But in an increasingly 'low-carb diet' society and differing viewpoints about its health benefits, bread has become somewhat of a divisive topic - particularly on the topic of whether you should eat it every day.
And with many different options available in supermarkets: white, wholemeal, sourdough, rye, but to name just a few, it can be overwhelming knowing which - if any - is the right one to choose.
But amid this rise in options, experts have now explained exactly happens to your body and the health benefits when you consume the fibre-packed food every day, and their tailored recommendations for if doing so.
Bread is full of nutrients like fibre, natural sugars, proteins, B vitamins such as thiamin, niacin and folate, as well as minerals like iron and zinc - but its high concentration of carbohydrates can sometimes leave you feeling hungry after eating a slice or two.
To beat that hunger, dietitian Kristi Ruth recommends wholegrain bread to help you feel full for longer, as just one slice contains around 7 per cent of the recommended daily fibre intake.
She told EatingWell: 'As dietitians, we often recommend whole-grain bread because it traditionally contains more fibre, which aids in digestion and will help you feel full longer.'
If combined with high protein offerings such as sprouted grain breads, this is seen as the best way to stay full for longer and to stop reaching back into the bread bin.
Multi-grain breads also contain even more fibre than standard wholemeal, offering between five to seven grams per slice, compared to wholemeal's two grams per slice.
And with high fibre intake associated with lowering the risk of heart disease, stroke, type two diabetes and bowel cancer, this is seen as an ideal way to improve your health.
Elana Natker from the Grain Foods Foundation explained: '40 per cent of dietary fiber intake comes from grain foods. Cutting out grains [like bread] would take out fiber that people are needing and getting from grains.'
Ms Natker also told the website how it may support healthy pregnancies, with folate seen as an essential vitamin when bearing a child - with women recommended to have at least 400 micrograms per day.
She added: '[Child-bearing] women restricting carbohydrates are 30 per cent more likely to have babies with neural tube defects because they aren't getting enough folic aid.'
For those looking to for energy if incorporating exercise in addition to their diets, official NHS guidance also recommends bread for those who don't have an intolerance or wheat allergies.
The health service says bread is a 'healthy choice to eat as part of a balanced diet' and cites wholegrain, wholemeal and brown breads as the best sources of energy.
An extract from their website reads: 'White bread also contains a range of vitamins and minerals, but it has less fibre than wholegrain, wholemeal or brown bread. If you prefer white bread, look for higher fibre options.'
In their guidance for heart attack prevention, the NHS also recommends including bread in your diet.
They say: 'You should aim to follow a Mediterranean-style diet. This means eating more wholegrain bread, rice and pasta, and fruit, vegetables and fish, and less meat.
'Eating a low-fat diet that includes lots of fibre – such as wholegrain rice, bread, pasta and plenty of fruit and vegetables – has been proven to help lower blood pressure. Fruit and vegetables also contain vital vitamins and minerals and help keep your body healthy.'
Despite these positives, nutritionists at EatingWell also warned of the risks of consuming bread as part of a daily diet, saying that many foods packed with fibre can cause uncomfortable pains such as bloating, passing wind and cramping.
One recommendation to beat such issues is to try white or sourdough bread as a way to ease into a high-fibre diet as these typically contain less dietary fibres than the alternatives.
It was also highlighted that high carbohydrate foods such as bread also cause spikes in blood sugar, which for those with diabetes, may need to be offset with synthetic insulin.
Concluding her recommendations, Ms Ruth said she does not like labelling foods as 'good or bad' and encouraged consumers to read the nutrition labels to decide what works best for each individual person.
It was also added on the healthy eating site that bread is not a food that should be seen as being 'bad for you'.
Instead, it should be viewed as a vehicle to provide your body with essential nutrients and can be used as a base for healthy fats such as avocado, or for proteins such as lean turkey and eggs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
Delaying payouts for blood and Post Office victims is scandalous
Tens of thousands of people are thought to have received contaminated blood in the 1970s and 1980s LEON NEAL/GETTY IMAGES The familiar truism that justice delayed is justice denied has taken on a morbid sense of urgency for the many victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals. Thanks to the courageous persistence of campaigners, public officials have been forced to face up to the moral enormity of these past wrongs: respectively, the most widespread miscarriage of justice, and gravest case of medical malpractice, in recent memory. Yet, those charged with remedying these injustices are continuing to drag their feet in awarding victims due redress. It has been estimated that at least 100 further victims of the infected blood scandal have died in the protracted interim between the conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff's inquiry last year and being invited to apply for compensation. Likewise, some 345 former sub-postmasters are thought to have died before securing any financial restitution. Those still pursuing claims now find themselves caught in an interminable, tortuous, legalistic wrangle: one that seems cynically designed to delay and minimise the total amount of compensation that will eventually have to be paid out. • Keir Starmer: infected blood victims deserve justice now A report published last week into the human toll of the prosecutions made on the basis of the Post Office's defective Horizon IT system was unsparing in its grim detail. Its author, Sir Wyn Williams, concluded that the scandal had driven 13 people to suicide. Many other lives were blighted by addiction, divorce and financial ruin. Yet, the government's declared determination to correct these wrongs is belied by the gross deficiencies Sir Wyn identifies in the remuneration of those harmed. The Post Office compensation programme is byzantine in its complexity, with four separate schemes running in parallel. 3,700 former subpostmasters are yet to receive any payout. Many are locked in a legal limbo while their claims are subjected to excessively bureaucratic and adversarial scrutiny. Claimants are disadvantaged if they can't produce decades-old forms, often long lost. One sub-postmistress claims to have received a compensation offer worth just 0.5 per cent of her original claim. Sir Alan Bates, who championed his fellow sub-postmasters' cause, has fallen victim to what he describes as a 'quasi-kangaroo court', receiving a 'take it or leave it' quote amounting to less than half his submitted claim. Similarly shameful treatment has been meted out to those survivors among the 30,000 NHS patients infected with HIV and hepatitis by contaminated blood products. Last week, Sir Brian Langstaff warned that this compensation system too is creating 'obvious injustice'. Only 460 people have received full payouts, the result of a dilatory process forcing victims to be invited to make a claim rather than initiate one themselves. • Infected blood victims 'left suicidal' by compensation delays It is clear that government officials and civil servants tasked with disbursing payouts are subjecting comparatively powerless individuals to a level of rigoristic penny-pinching they would not dream of applying elsewhere. When set alongside the kind of financial waste casually tolerated within government, from the eye-watering sums sunk into HS2 to the near £2 billion in 'bounce back loan' fraud complacently written off by the very same department of business overseeing appeals by victims of the Post Office, the contrast is galling. Victims of the infected blood and Post Office scandals have had their right to restitution established by due process. Obstructionist officials should not be allowed to deny them justice.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour accused of 'crocodile tears' over junior doctors strike as ministers criticise medical union for low turnout in ballot - but Rayner's flagship Bill will make walkouts even EASIER
Labour was last night accused of crying 'crocodile tears' over planned strikes by junior doctors as it prepares to make walkouts even easier. Angela Rayner 's radical workers' rights Bill will soon scrap the 50 per cent turnout threshold which unions must meet to hold legal strike action. Yet the Government has repeatedly criticised the British Medical Association for achieving only a 55 per cent turnout in its ballot to trigger walkouts this month. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said that the 'majority' of BMA resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – did not vote to strike and has called the forthcoming action 'completely unreasonable'. But Labour's Employment Rights Bill repeals the minimum turnout requirement in trade union law which was introduced under the Tories – making future strike action even easier. Last night Conservative business spokesman Andrew Griffith told the Mail the Government's comments were 'totally hypocritical'. He said: 'The unions are already licking their lips at the Employment Bill, which will unleash waves of low threshold strikes. By reducing the turnout required to trigger a strike, Labour are guaranteeing even more strikes. They are effectively giving unions the whip hand at the worst possible time. 'Labour is crying crocodile tears over the BMA strike action, given what Angela Rayner has planned. It is totally hypocritical. 'Rayner will grind this country to a halt and take us back to the 1970s. If they remotely cared about growth or our public services and the people that use them, they would rip up this extreme union charter at once.' Cabinet ministers are divided over the workers' rights Bill, with the Department for Health and the Treasury said to be 'quite worried' about the impact on public services. But Ms Rayner's department for Housing, Communities and Local Government believes that the threshold requirement makes it harder for unions to engage to settle disputes. The Department for Health has been at pains to point out that only around one third of resident doctors voted for strike action. The BMA, which announced last week that resident doctors in England would walk out for five consecutive days from 7am on July 25 over pay, has seen turnout fall in the past couple of years. Some 90 per cent of voting resident doctors backed the fresh strike action, with the BMA reporting a turnout of 55 per cent. But this is down from 61.9 per cent in 2024, 71.3 per cent in June-August 2023, and 77.5 per cent in January-February 2023. The union is demanding a 29.2 per cent rise for resident doctors to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008-09. In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3 per cent on average over two years. The strike action lays bare a growing rift between Labour and its union paymasters, with Unite last week suspending Ms Rayner's membership. General secretary Sharon Graham said members 'don't believe that Labour defends workers in the way we thought they would'. But allies of Ms Rayner point to the Employment Rights Bill, which returns to Parliament today, as evidence of the Government seeking to 'make work pay'. Research by the Mail identified more than a dozen instances when the law now being repealed prevented strikes going ahead. Unions in the public and private sectors held ballots which found support for industrial action – but they could not take place because turnout was below the 50 per cent required by the now-doomed Trade Union Act 2016. A Government spokesman said: 'The old strike laws clearly didn't work, with the UK losing more days to industrial action than any year since the 1980s. 'Our Employment Rights Bill is fundamental to delivering our Plan for Change, with the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation and ensuring people get a fair wage for their hard work. 'Instead of confrontation, we are ushering in a new era of partnership that sees employers, unions and government work together in cooperation and through negotiation.' Analysis of previous NHS walkouts suggests the strikes will send waiting lists soaring, with backlogs predicted to rise by up to 10,000 a day to 7.4 million. A Whitehall source told the Telegraph, which carried out the analysis, that the strike risks 'sending a wrecking ball through the NHS' and will be a major blow to Labour's pledge to turn the health service around. And hospitals will find it harder to plan to cover the strikes after Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-leader of the BMA's resident doctors committee, reminded members that they do not have a legal responsibility to tell their NHS trust whether they are striking. Mr Streeting will meet BMA representatives this week in an effort to avoid strike action.
Times
7 hours ago
- Times
NHS needs to return to whole-patient care
I t's almost a month since my elderly mother broke her hip and was taken into the care of the NHS. Like many of us, I am simultaneously grateful for her immediate treatment but disheartened and bewildered by the NHS's destructive inefficiencies. Far too frequently its ponderous systems end up serving the process, not the person. My first surprise was ringing the ambulance service back after an initial call. They had told me to ring again if the patient's situation deteriorated, and it had. What was incredible was discovering that the dispatcher on the end of the line had, as a matter of routine, no record of the earlier call, no access to the ambulance list and no way of knowing whether one was on the way. It was as if databases had never been invented.
