Macquarie halts offshore wind company sale due to lack of interest, sources say
The decision comes as dealmaking has been shuttered by the global tariff war that has roiled markets.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
Macquarie engaged advisers last year to find a buyer for Corio Generation, which oversees 25 gigawatt (GW) pipeline of offshore wind projects spanning Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Americas, Reuters reported in October. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly.
Instead it will downsize the project. "Given challenging market conditions in the offshore wind sector, Corio Generation is refocusing its global operations to prioritise the development of a smaller portfolio of projects which have the clearest route through to construction," a spokesperson for Corio told Reuters.
"This will also require a restructure of the organisation to reflect that change in strategy. We are discussing this with our project partners and staff who may be affected by these changes," the spokesperson added.
A spokesperson for Macquarie declined to comment.
The offshore wind market has become increasingly challenging with many projects having to be revaluated due to rocketing construction costs, higher interest rates and supply chain snags.
Energy companies have slowed construction of offshore wind farms in the U.S., specially since U.S. President Donald Trump suspended new offshore wind leasing on his first day back in the Oval Office in January.
Headquartered in London, Corio is a portfolio company of Macquarie Asset Management with offshore wind farms in Britain, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, the United States and Brazil.
Most of Corio's projects are in development phase and need billions of dollars in investments to become operational.
Corio Generation changed its CEO earlier this year when Jonathan Cole was replaced by Samuel Leupold.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
32 minutes ago
- NBC News
Retailers avoided a worst case scenario in Vietnam. But executives say Trump's trade deal could still hit consumers.
The retail industry is breathing a sigh of relief after it appeared to avoid the worst case scenario on Vietnam tariffs. But some executives believe the tentative trade deal President Donald Trump announced Wednesday is still bad for business and could have a chilling effect on consumer spending. 'It's a lot better news than where we were on Liberation Day,' one CEO of a popular consumer brand told CNBC after Trump said tariffs on Vietnamese imports would be 20%, down from the 46% levy he proposed on April 2, then later suspended. The new rate would be double the 10% duty currently in place. Another executive called the news 'bad' but agreed that a 20% tariff was better than the 46% duty Trump originally imposed, however unrealistic the proposed rate was. 'I guess Trump needs 'positive' news,' a third executive said. 'I think things are going to evolve. Let's see if this is definitive.' Trump's announcement on Wednesday came only days before the 90-day suspension of the steep tariffs he proposed in April expires next week, and as his administration scrambles to strike agreements with dozens of trading partners. Even so, he did not say when the deal with Vietnam would take effect, or whether both sides have agreed to the tariff rates. In the months between Trump's April 2 tariff rollout and his announcement on Wednesday, retail executives in the apparel and footwear industries fretted over the potential that Vietnam imports could face tariffs nearly as high as the cumulative 55% duties for Chinese imports. Over the last decade, some of America's top retailers, including Gap, American Eagle and Nike, have all reduced their reliance on China to shield themselves from both high tariffs and the region's geopolitical turbulence. Many sought refuge in Vietnam, where the factories, some owned by Chinese businesses, are known to produce products at a similar quality and price as China. They also started manufacturing in other countries in southeast Asia, such as Cambodia, Bangladesh and Malaysia. Those countries were facing tariffs of 49%, 37% and 24%, respectively, under Trump's April plan, but are subject to a 10% duty for now. Vietnam is now the second largest supplier for footwear, apparel and accessories sold into the U.S. market, according to the industry trade group the American Apparel & Footwear Association. It has become an essential part of the footwear supply chain, on pace to become the largest supplier of shoes to the U.S. in 2025, according to the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, another industry trade group. If Trump's proposed 46% tariff on Vietnam had taken effect, it would mean much of the industry's work to leave China would have been for naught. Some companies are relieved the tentative deal would set the levy at 20% and the announcement agreement is also a sign that Cambodia, Malaysia and Bangladesh could reach similar frameworks. 'Twenty percent is a sigh of relief,' said Sonia Lapinsky, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners who advises fashion brands. 'There's some positivity and some optimism that this is manageable. So at least there's that. This isn't business destroying, which is great. However, this does have real implications, right?' Most companies have plenty of tools to offset the impact of tariffs, such as working with their suppliers to share costs. But to avoid major hits to their profit margins, many including Nike are planning to raise prices. It's still unclear how those hikes will affect consumer spending because it will take time for the increases to trickle down in the supply chain. AlixPartners previously created pricing models for CNBC that examined how the price of Vietnamese-made sweaters and shoes could rise under Trump's proposed tariffs — if retailers do not pass any of the cost on to suppliers or shoppers. At a 10% levy, the cost of a $95 pair of men's shoes could rise by $7.42 to $102.42. With a 20% duty in place, the cost increase would be even larger. Many executives worry any tariff hike of this magnitude will be bad for businesses and consumers. Paul Cosaro, the CEO of Picnic Time, a supplier to top retailers like Target, Kohl's and Macy's, said if the clocks were wound back to April and Trump said there'd be a 20% tariff on Vietnamese imports, 'no one would've been happy.' 'There could be threats of a 46% tariff and you come back with 20 and it's going to sound better but… it's just more money coming out of the consumers' pockets at the end of the day and they have less money to spend on picnic baskets and coolers and things like that,' said Cosaro, who raised his prices between 11% and 14% earlier this year to offset the cost of China tariffs. 'It's not good for the consumer. Ultimately, it's just increasing the prices … I don't think that's good news.'
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Nike, other retailer stocks rise on Trump's trade deal with Vietnam to reduce tariffs
July 2 (Reuters) - Shares of Nike and other apparel makers rose on Wednesday after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had struck a trade deal with Vietnam that would impose a lower than initially expected tariff rate on many imports from the Southeast Asian country. After months of negotiations, Trump's trade deal with Vietnam includes a 20% tariff on imports from Vietnam, lower than an initial 46% rate he had announced in April. Apparel makers have been diversifying production out of China to Vietnam, Cambodia and Indonesia, as Trump's reciprocal tariffs on imports from these countries proposed in April raised concerns over supply chain costs as well as higher product prices. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policy has also forced companies to withdraw or cut their financial targets, and analysts believe some clarity on the issue would allow companies to chalk out their strategy for the year. "The tariff dance has clearly been a dominant focus point for retailers and investors, with its uncertainty perhaps creating greater problems than its actual severity," BMO Capital Markets analyst Simeon Siegel said. The deal also includes a 40% levy on trans-shipments from third countries, and Vietnam would provide the U.S. with more market access, with no tariffs on U.S. exports into Vietnam, Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Nike's (NKE.N), opens new tab shares were up 4%, Under Armour (UAA.N), opens new tab rose 2%, and Levi Strauss (LEVI.N), opens new tab gained nearly 2%. Shares in Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF.N), opens new tab were up less than 1%, while Roger Federer-backed On Holding stock was up 3%. "Investors may be looking at this as a sign that many of the threatened tariffs (on Vietnam and other countries) will be rescinded," Morningstar Research analyst David Swartz said. Still, Vietnam accounted for over half of all athletic footwear imports by volume and value in 2024 and Trump's agreement with the Southeast Asian country would hit the footwear industry hard, said Matt Priest, CEO of trade group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America. "Many of these shoes already carry a 20% tariff, particularly popular athletic styles. Piling new tariffs on top of that isn't just unnecessary — it's bad economics. The administration should acknowledge the steep footwear duties already in place and avoid adding more strain to American families and businesses," Priest said. Shares of electronics retailer Best Buy (BBY.N), opens new tab were up marginally. The company had factored in Trump's base tariff rate of 10% in its annual forecast in May. "The transshipping aspect is an important wrinkle, but I'd expect suppliers will quickly move to adjust supply chains to avoid paying that hefty duty," said Matthew McCartney, analyst at Wedbush Securities. "Bigger picture, this deal brings clarity to the industry for a critical consumer electronics hub and eliminates some downside risk to Best Buy's outlook." The companies — including Nike, Adidas, Puma and Levi — did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump tries to sell rice to the Japanese
Japan's attempt to strike a deal with the US before Donald Trump's deadline next week has hit an unlikely sticking point: rice. As part of the negotiations, Mr Trump has revealed he wants Tokyo to buy more American rice. 'Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' the president posted on Truth Social this week. In a later briefing to journalists on Air Force One, he branded the Japanese as 'spoilt' for eschewing American rice, even though 'they need rice so badly'. The issue has become a major sticking point, jeopardising the prospect of a US-Japan deal ahead of Mr Trump's self-imposed deadline to strike a deal by next week. 'I'm not sure if we're going going to make a deal, I doubt it, with Japan,' Mr Trump said. 'What I'm going to do is, I'll write them a letter saying, 'We thank you very much and we know you can't do the kind of things that we need. And therefore you'll pay 30pc, 35pc', or whatever the number is that we determined.' America and Japan, which is the world's fifth-largest economy, share around £140bn of two-way trade. Japan is one of the world's top 10 consumers of rice, but the country has faced a domestic crisis after the cost of the crop surged over the past year. 'I have repeatedly stated that agriculture is the foundation of the nation,' Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's economy minister, told a press conference this week. 'In negotiations with the United States, our stance remains unchanged. We will not engage in talks that would sacrifice the agricultural sector.' As Japan's lead negotiator, Mr Akazawa is tipped to make another flying visit to Washington this weekend – his eighth – as the two sides try to emulate Britain, China and Vietnam in striking an agreement with Mr Trump's administration. India, South Korea, the European Union and several south-east Asian countries are also trying to get a deal over the line before the 90-day pause on US tariffs ends on July 9. Rice prices have jumped fourfold in the past year. Heatwaves have hit the harvest, a tourist boom has fuelled demand from restaurants, and there have been bouts of typhoon or earthquake-related panic buying. Since March, the Japanese government has released 300,000 tonnes of rice from its stockpile. But supply chain bottlenecks have prevented buyers from feeling the full benefit. The issue has caused anger, which has put politicians under pressure ahead of an upper house election this month. In May, Taku Eto was forced to resign as farm minister over the issue, after admitting he never buys rice because his supporters give it to him for free. Japan has steep barriers to imported rice. Only the first 100,000 tonnes of imported 'staple rice' – the most popular variety for Japanese consumers – can enter Japan tariff-free. After that, the rice attracts a levy of 341 yen (£1.73) per kilogram. Another 670,000 tonnes is allowed for use in processed foods or animal feed, a tiny fraction of Japan's annual domestic harvest, which is typically almost 7m tonnes. Half of its tariff-free imports already come from the US. At a government tender for tariff-free shipments held last week, US producers grabbed more than 80pc of the available quota. 'Rice imports from abroad, including from the US, have increased 120 times from a year earlier,' Shinjiro Koizumi, Japan's agriculture minister, said this week. The rice negotiations could stall because Americans produce long-grain rice, and the Japanese prefer short-grain. Aeon, a major Japanese retailer, is trying to woo the Japanese with California-grown rice, and some Japanese restaurants are blending domestic and imported rice.
