Decision-Day For Masterton's Water
The council was set to deliberate on submissions at 2pm on Wednesday and decide between the two options.
If the council voted to progress work on the Wairarapa-Tararua water services delivery model, it would enter into a commitment agreement with the participating councils and develop the Water Services Delivery Plan and foundation principles and documents to be carried forward into the plan.
Foundation principles would include: non-standardisation of pricing and debt; share allocation; and decision-making arrangements.
If council chose this option, there would be two further opportunities to exit the arrangement and to submit a Water Services Delivery Plan with a Masterton-only water services delivery model to the Department of Internal Affairs.
The Wairarapa-Tararua option was recommended by council staff because it 'enables council to work through the uncertainties and concerns of the Wairarapa-Tararua model while still providing council with two opportunities to exit the arrangement'.
Alternatively, the council could vote to not progress a Wairarapa Tararua water services delivery model and only progress a Masterton-only water services delivery model.
Analysis of the 139 submissions made to Masterton District Council showed the majority (60%) were in favour of the Wairarapa-Tararua proposal.
Key themes in the submissions from those who supported the proposal were economies of scale, long-term sustainability, support for increased borrowing capacity.
Of those who did not support the proposal, key themes were concerns about price standardisation, affordability, and the desire to have more localised control over water assets and services.
A report to council said that while protections against price standardisation could be put in place, standardisation in the future could not be guaranteed.
A memo from legal firm Morrison Low was also included in the agenda pack for Wednesday's meeting.
It provided advice and guidance to Masterton District Council on the council's desire to 'on establishment, protect Masterton from price standardisation' and 'ensure that there are sufficient protections over key decisions or changes to foundational documents over the longer term that protect Masterton from price standardisation to the extent that is desired'.
It said there was 'a path forward' that would provide council with assurance that price differentiation was possible; shareholding could be determined on a basis that reflected Masterton's position relative to the region; and decision making could be structured in a way that promoted regional focus and recognised Masterton's position relative to the region at the current time.
It also said protections could be enshrined in the series of foundational documents required to establish and then control and govern the council-controlled organisation.
It recommended voting mechanism provisions in both the shareholders agreement and constitution which ensured no single council had positive or negative control but which required 75% of the shareholders to agree to any changes to foundational documents.
'A super majority or similar threshold requires not just Masterton District Council but other councils to agree as well, giving a perception and reality that is more consistent with consensus decision making while preserving Masterton District Council's ability to protect the interests of its ratepayers," the memo said.
It recommended commencing with local pricing but having a review point for standardisation.
This could be a point in time, such as five years, or an 'identified cost differential', for example, when local prices were within 10% of each other.
South Wairarapa District Council has already voted to pursue the Wairarapa-Tararua option.
Carterton District Council were set to meet at 9am Thursday to deliberate on submissions and decide a path forward.
Tararua District Council would meet on May 28 to deliberate on submissions and would decide on the future of water management at an extraordinary meeting on June 11.
-LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Christchurch Casino agrees to pay $5.06m over compliance issues
A settlement has been reached in civil proceedings against Christchurch Casinos Limited. In December 2024, 1News reported the casino faced legal action over alleged compliance issues with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009. As part of the settlement announced today, the casino has agreed to the High Court imposing a $5.06m penalty, as recommended by the Department of Internal Affairs. The casino also admitted seven causes of action in the department's amended state of claim, which stretched from December 2018 and December 2023. In a statement, the department said Christchurch Casino had failed to establish, implement and maintain a programme compliant with the Act, adequately monitor accounts, conduct complaint-enhanced customer due diligence, terminate existing business relationships when required, and keep records as required by the Act. ADVERTISEMENT Christchurch Casino was not alleged to have been directly involved in money laundering or the financing of terrorism. Internal Affairs' director of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism group, Serge Sablyak, said the agreement was a "significant and positive outcome". "It's encouraging to achieve our intended result without the time and expense of court proceedings," Sablyak said. "While the regulatory breaches were serious, we acknowledge Christchurch Casino's decision to admit to the breaches and take responsibility for what were substantial failings. "We're proud that our work has strengthened the integrity of New Zealand's financial system and has helped build public confidence in the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing." The Department of Internal Affairs and the casino recommended the High Court proceed to a penalty hearing, to determine the appropriate penalty to be imposed.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Christchurch Casino money laundering case: Internal Affairs settlement reached, casino chief apologises
Christchurch Casino's boss has apologised for "substantial" anti-money laundering failures after it was investigated. Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Christchurch Casino's boss has apologised for "substantial" anti-money laundering failures after it was investigated. Christchurch Casino says it takes responsibility for major anti-money laundering failures and apologises to the community. The casino will pay more than $5 million after it and the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) reached a settlement in civil proceedings. Casino chief executive Brett Anderson told the Herald he was sorry for 'substantial anti-money laundering failings'. 'Christchurch Casino was not directly involved in money laundering or the financing of terrorism, but we failed where we should have succeeded in meeting our responsibilities under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act.' On behalf of the casino board and management, he apologised to the Christchurch community and casino stakeholders.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Major rates increase forecast for district
It was a case of more bad news for Waitaki ratepayers this week, with suggestions big rates rises could be coming sooner and more often than first thought, as the district tries to fund a financially sustainable in-house water services unit. There was also bad news for those who might be elected to Waitaki District Council in the October elections. As part of the government's Local Water Done Well reforms, councils throughout New Zealand must submit a Water Services Delivery Plan (WSDP) to the Department of Internal Affairs by September 3. The Waitaki District Council last month voted that would be done through an in-house business unit, rejecting three other options including a joint council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Central Otago, Clutha and Gore district councils. On Tuesday, it held a second weekly workshop to refine a draft plan to be put to Internal Affairs for initial feedback this week. Following the first workshop, councillors heard a rates rise of 25.61% in the 2028 LTP year would be needed to fund the in-house plan (it might also rise to about 30% if depreciation of water assets was included in the WSDP). This week, the council's chief financial officer Amanda Nicholls told the meeting if depreciation was included the 2028 rates rise would need to be 42.55%, with another "significant" increase needed in 2035. However, Mayor Gary Kircher suggested including the depreciation earlier than 2028. Doing so would ease the needed rates rise but bring it forward, Ms Nicholls said. Mr Kircher said he did not think there was a choice. It would mean a 25% rates increase for next year, followed by a 30% hike the following year. He recognised that also meant leaving it to the new council (following the local body elections in October) to redo the long-term plan and try to reduce the rates rise by cutting capital projects. "There's a lot of stuff that council has to do between now and agreeing on that annual plan to cut costs elsewhere," Mr Kircher said. The existing long-term plan was put together under the understanding that the council would adopt a joint CCO water services model, as it had previously said that was its preferred choice of model.
