logo
Mahmood Mamdani education and career path: How Zohran Mamdani's father built a legacy of revolution through ideas and exile

Mahmood Mamdani education and career path: How Zohran Mamdani's father built a legacy of revolution through ideas and exile

Time of India3 days ago

Zohran Mamdani
As Zohran Mamdani positions himself for one of the most consequential roles in American municipal governance, the mayoralty of New York City, his political philosophy is being examined not only for its content but also for the intellectual tradition from which it emerges.
A democratic socialist with deep grassroots ties and a precise policy instinct, Zohran's approach to power is shaped not just by conviction but by inheritance. This inheritance is not merely biological; it is profoundly intellectual. At the heart of that legacy stands his father, Mahmood Mamdani, a political thinker shaped by exile, rooted in anti-colonial critique, and internationally renowned for reshaping how the world understands state authority and postcolonial governance.
Here is the story of his education and career—the foundation that has indelibly shaped his son's political consciousness.
Mahmood Mamdani's academic journey: How a student of struggle became a scholar of power
Mahmood Mamdani's academic journey is as compelling as his scholarship. Born in 1946 in Bombay and raised in Kampala by Gujarati Muslim parents, his early years were marked by constant movement across East Africa and growing political awareness. Selected as part of the historic Kennedy Airlift initiative in the 1960s, he joined a select cohort of East African students who studied in North America during the decolonisation period.
He earned his undergraduate degree in political science from the University of Pittsburgh, where his commitment to justice took root through civil rights activism. After participating in protests in Montgomery, Alabama, and facing imprisonment for his stance, Mamdani deepened his engagement with revolutionary thought. He went on to complete a Master's at Tufts University and later obtained a PhD in Government from Harvard, where his dissertation on class and politics in Uganda laid the intellectual foundation for his future work.
Mahmood Mamdani's career: A life of scholarship forged in struggle
Mamdani's academic and personal life has been shaped by political upheaval. Shortly after returning to Uganda to conduct doctoral research, he was expelled by Idi Amin for his ethnicity and forced into exile. From the United Kingdom, he moved to Tanzania, joining the University of Dar es Salaam — a crucible for postcolonial thought.
Despite being rendered stateless in the 1980s due to his criticism of Milton Obote's regime, Mamdani continued his work with unrelenting conviction.
He returned to Uganda after Obote's fall and became the founding director of the Centre for Basic Research, one of the country's first independent think tanks. His academic career spanned institutions across the globe, including the University of Cape Town, Princeton, and Columbia University, where he currently teaches in the departments of Government, Anthropology, and African Studies.
His scholarship remains foundational in the study of colonialism, authoritarianism, and the politics of knowledge.
In his landmark work Citizen and Subject, Mamdani argued that the colonial state in Africa operated through a bifurcated system — one that simultaneously created urban civil power for citizens and rural authoritarian rule over subjects. This analytical framework challenged the conventional understanding of apartheid and extended far beyond South Africa.
His writings continue to inform how academics and policymakers understand the enduring legacies of colonial governance and state violence.
For Zohran Mamdani, these were not distant theories, but lived realities, discussed, debated, and dissected within his own home.
Mahmood Mamdani's legacy finds its voice in Zohran's politics
Where Mira Nair offered her son a global lens for storytelling and empathy, Mahmood Mamdani provided him with the intellectual tools to interrogate power and structure. Zohran's political style — principled yet strategic, radical yet methodical — carries clear echoes of his father's analytical discipline.
In his advocacy for housing justice, immigrant rights, and racial equity, Zohran channels not only the urgency of social movements but also the clarity of postcolonial critique.
His is a politics informed not just by protest, but by a lifetime immersed in theory, history, and the study of systems that marginalise and exclude.
In a political age often defined by spectacle and short-termism, Zohran Mamdani's approach stands apart. It is grounded in an education shaped by two of the most dynamic thinkers of their generation. Mahmood Mamdani did not simply shape academic discourse — he cultivated a worldview in his son that merges scholarship with service, resistance with reform, and vision with action. The intellectual lineage that Zohran carries into public life is not just an inheritance; it is a compass.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clearing the fog on the state of India-US relations
Clearing the fog on the state of India-US relations

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Clearing the fog on the state of India-US relations

'The administration is bullish on India' is how a senior US official put it to me last week in Washington D.C. This sentiment would seem at odds with the broader reporting on the US-India relationship. In a Financial Times newsletter on India, one writer argued that the Indian Prime Minister (PM) 'made the mistake of counting on his warm personal connection with Trump'. The general assertion being that the Indian government has mortgaged this crucial relationship to 'personal friendships' alone. Others suggest that the US President's recent luncheon with Asim Munir, the recently decorated Pakistani Field Marshal, and his 'sneaky attempt' to bring PM Narendra Modi and Munir into the same room in the White House is 'threatening the future of US-India partnership'. Structures like TRUST were created for top political leaders to monitor progress on crucial initiatives. (REUTERS) Between social media and popular reporting, it would seem as though this relationship has been iced. Yet, in meetings with over 30 officials, experts, think tankers, and industry representatives last week, the story that emerged was diametrically opposed to the one that has been paraphrased above. Modi's engagements with Trump matter more than it is perhaps realised. It clearly provides a political basis of what can be achieved between the two countries, even at this time of shrinking administrative capacities in the US, and the many unplanned shifts in the bureaucratic body politic. To be sure, you could start the week with a meeting with official X and end up receiving a phone call from his/her successor the next day. Yet, what was clear to me was that the vision laid out by the two leaders in a lengthy joint statement following PM Modi's meeting with President Trump in February, guides the different contours of the relationship at the functional level. Notwithstanding the game of political catch between outlandish tweets and measured official responses, the guidelines for those moving the relationship across government and the private sector are more or less clear. First, there is a concerted effort to realise outcomes in the strategic technology partnership between the two sides. Under the banner of TRUST (Transforming the Relationship Utilising Strategic Technology), the administrative State and technology companies between the two countries are working towards outcomes to do more on pharmaceuticals with the view to de-risk the production of key ingredients from China; fuse infrastructure partnerships between firms invested in the present and the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI); and actively looking for ways to cooperate on extracting and processing critical minerals. The latter needs work, but the zest to find the right compact is real. Second, American private sector actors are preparing the ground to sell different kinds of reactors to meet India's nuclear energy needs. They are, at this time, hoping that the proposed legislative changes to the Indian Civil Nuclear Liability Act 2010 streamline liability clauses in consonance with global standards — delinking liabilities on suppliers and operators. Further, they remain hopeful that changes to India's Atomic Energy Act would allow private sector participation to meet India's nuclear energy needs. This is a top priority for the White House and the US President. This was made clear in several exchanges. This is 'unfinished business' following the conclusion of the 2008 US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement, as one Washington insider put it. My own sense is that progress on this front is almost as important as the conclusion of the first tranche of the trade deal between the two countries. The first tranche of this deal needs to be completed by July 9, when the US President's 90-day pause on 'reciprocal tariffs' ends. Officials suggested that there is a fair chance that the first tranche of the deal with India will be completed by this deadline. 'The trickier parts will come later,' they made plain. Third, efforts across bureaucracies in Washington D.C. that deal with India are almost uniformly focussed on the Quad Leader's Summit in October or November, which provides an opportunity for another bilateral between the two leaders. 'Deliverables' is the name of the game. Yet, at least some of the deliverables need to be real. The ongoing process is less about padding a joint statement and more about searching for right-sized deals. There is a fire in the system to make something happen by the time the leaders meet, including a considerable push to realise new AI infrastructure partnerships. 'India and Brazil are the two most important countries for the US when it comes to data centres,' as one technocrat stated. 'We need to get this right on both sides', the official made plain. In the US, this would mean producing revised rules for export controls that make it easier to access chips from the US into India. In turn, India will possibly need to negotiate certain guarantees to make sure that the chips are not off-shored. Moreover, there is a significant push to deregulate the data centre market in India, and streamline processes to encourage the expansion of AI infrastructure in India. None of this will be easy. Deregulation takes time. Negotiating guarantees can be cumbersome and is a process that cuts across several administrative buildings in and across New Delhi and other Indian states. If Indian officials conclude that data centre investments are an advantage for India, this is the bureaucratic work that will be required to realise this unique moment. It is exactly why structures like TRUST were created, for top political leaders to monitor progress on crucial initiatives. The enthusiasm for investments and partnerships will not last long. This also might be kept in mind. This is a zero-sum play. In sum, while there is little doubt that Munir, Pakistan, Twitter exchanges, and the politics that shape these expressions and incidents to an extent inform the current state of US-India ties, at times exercising officials on both sides, it is also plainly clear that the functional relationship — which produces material results — is one that is working to produce outcomes, and not without the direction of the political leadership. Rudra Chaudhuri is director, Carnegie India. The views expressed are personal.

'Good Luck With That': Trump's Border Chief Slams NYC Candidate Mamdani Over Vow To Expel ICE
'Good Luck With That': Trump's Border Chief Slams NYC Candidate Mamdani Over Vow To Expel ICE

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

'Good Luck With That': Trump's Border Chief Slams NYC Candidate Mamdani Over Vow To Expel ICE

Last Updated: Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has made immigration justice a cornerstone of his political mission. US President Donald Trump's Border Czar, Tom Homan, has sharply reacted to NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's vow to 'kick the fascist ICE out of New York City." A day after Mamdani's victory, Homan told Fox News, 'Good luck with that. Federal law trumps him every day, every hour of every minute." He added, 'We're going to be in New York City, matter of fact, because it's a sanctuary city and President Trump made it clear a week and a half ago, we're going to double down and triple down on sanctuary cities." Homan, who is an ex-ICE director, highlighted, 'We're going to concentrate in sanctuary cities because we know they're releasing public safety threats and national security threats back to the street. So we know we've got a problem there." At 33, Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has made immigration justice a cornerstone of his political mission. Aligned with democratic socialist ideals, Mamdani advocates for severing ties between New York authorities and federal immigration enforcement. His proposals aim to shield immigrant communities by eliminating local cooperation with ICE, enhancing access to legal representation, and implementing stronger safeguards for sensitive immigrant data. It further adds, 'He'll ensure our immigrant New Yorkers are protected by strengthening our sanctuary city apparatus: getting ICE out of all city facilities and ending any cooperation, increasing legal support, and protecting all personal data." First Published: June 28, 2025, 20:24 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store