'I saw a woman slap her child on the MRT, what should I do?'
In a Sunday (Jun 14) post on r/askSingapore, under the heading 'Parents being violent towards kids in public,' u/runawaycauli wrote that they were on the MRT when the incident occurred and described t he slap as 'so loud that people around us looked.'
'She wasn't even doing anything disruptive, not that it matters,' the post author added.
Since they felt 'weird' because they did not do anything after the mum slapped her child, they went to the station office after getting off the MRT to tell the staff about it, but wondered if they had overreacted.
'The worker implied it was her child, so she can do whatever she wants (…not really true). He still said he would forward the issue and took down my contact info. I work with children, so maybe I felt it was important to at least say something… think it's tricky, but what would you do in this situation?' See also Another parent claims Kinderland teacher ill-treated her child
Many people have since responded to the post, expressing sympathy toward the child but also saying that it's a complicated situation, since intervening may cause the parent to get angrier and lash out against their child even more.
'Yelled at a mother for slapping and screaming at her kid for not doing well in school. SHE THEN TURNED TO HER KID AND YELLED, 'SEE LA! SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO!' She then scurried away, dragging her kid,' wrote one.
Others, nevertheless, thanked the post author for their concern.
'A couple of years ago in Hong Kong, I saw a dad yank his daughter's ponytail, and I went to the school that I recognised the uniform of. The school knew the man's situation and set up a discussion to see how they could help them. Hoping it made a difference in the girl's life. Your act may seem useless now, but who knows who will come to their aid at one point? Good job,' wrote one.
One reminded the post author of Singaporean law, writing, 'It is illegal in Singapore. You should intervene. You should call the police. You may need to remind them of the laws in Singapore, as many think this is ok.'
'The Children and Young Persons Act (CYPA) defines a child as someone who is below 14 years of age and a young person as someone who is aged 14 years and above, but below 18 years old. Child abuse is defined as any act of commission or omission by a parent or caregiver that would endanger or impair the child's or young person's physical or emotional well-being. Child abuse may be in the form of physical abuse, emotional and psychological abuse, s e x u a l abuse, and neglect,' says the website of the Ministry of Social and Family Development.
Those who have reason to believe a child is being abused may call the National Anti-Violence Helpline at 1800-777-0000.
'Calling the helpline is the first step to prevent or stop any abuse. If the child's life and safety are in imminent danger, please call the Police at 999 immediately,' MSF adds. See also Pornhub rocked by child abuse, rape video claims
More information about reporting possible abuse cases may be found here . /TISG
Read also: Child abuse in S'pore continues to rise following record high cases in a decade in 2020; majority cases of neglect
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Maid says, 'My employer attached a tracking device on me to track my whereabouts during my day off'
SINGAPORE: In a now 'self-destructed' post from the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper Facebook group, one foreign domestic worker spilled the beans about how her employer doesn't just monitor her work — they apparently monitor her entire existence, even on her day off. 'Every day off, my employer keeps tracking me through my spare key. It got a tracking device connected to her phone,' the maid revealed. Looks like her employer has gone full-blown 'Mission: Impossible' instead of the usual suspicious texts or clingy check-in calls. The spare house key — something meant for emergencies — allegedly came with an attached tracking device that's synced to the employer's phone. The maid didn't say if it beeps when she gets near bubble tea shops or if it vibrates every time she steps into a shopping mall, but the implication was clear: freedom of movement is monitored, and personal time isn't entirely… personal. And it doesn't end there. 'Sometimes when I do marketing, she sets me 1 hour for my market time…' So on top of tracking the maid's whereabouts during her day off, she's also reportedly on a literal kitchen timer when sent out for groceries. Go over the 60-minute mark, and she gets a call from her employer to investigate what her helper is up to. This digital leash is enough to raise eyebrows (and hackles). In recent years, debates over the rights and treatment of domestic workers have only intensified, especially with stories like this shining a light on questionable employer behaviour. While many Singaporean households treat their helpers like extended family, stories like this one remind us that others are, well… treating them like state secrets. Breach of personal privacy While the use of tracking devices on pets and children has grown in popularity (GPS collars and smartwatches), placing one on a domestic helper — especially without consent — enters murky ethical waters. Some would argue it's a breach of personal privacy. Singapore's Ministry of Manpower (MOM) doesn't specifically address GPS tracking of helpers in its employment guidelines, but it does encourage employers to respect their helpers' dignity and rest days. Constant surveillance and rigid time limits probably aren't what MOM had in mind when they promoted open communication and mutual respect in employer-helper relationships. Spy tech can backfire! It's no secret that some employers worry about what their helpers do on their day off — whether it's concerns about safety, social circles, or even moonlighting, but placing a tracker on a human being — without full transparency — is likely to backfire. Many in the group suggested that if safety was genuinely a concern, there were better ways to address it: open conversation, mutual agreements, shared location apps — used with consent. However, in this case, it seems the employer skipped the chat and went straight for spy tech. Group members collectively state that: 'This kind of behaviour gives good employers a bad name. Most helpers already live where they work. They deserve trust and autonomy, especially on their day off. Tracking them like this is just not okay.' Humanity must come first It's unclear why the post was deleted. Perhaps the maid feared retaliation from group members or even from her spying employer. Maybe someone advised her to take it down to avoid conflict, or perhaps the tracker started buzzing suspiciously as she typed. Whatever the reason, the conversation it sparked isn't going away anytime soon. Because at the heart of it is a bigger question: How far is too far when it comes to managing domestic helpers? Singapore prides itself on efficiency and order, but even in the most efficient systems, humanity must come first. After all, trust can't be installed with a tracking chip. In other news, another Maid asks, 'Dear employer, how do you just lie on the sofa every day holding your mobile phone? Do you realize that servants are also human and feel tired?' Let's just hope this maid's employer isn't tracking her helper, too.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Ong Beng Seng admits to abetting obstruction of justice
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng has been convicted of abetting former transport minister S Iswaran in obstructing the course of justice. He pleaded guilty, nearly a year after being charged in relation to the corruption case involving Iswaran. Ong's defence has requested a fine, citing his ill health. The prosecution is not objecting. Jeraldine Yap has the details.
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Passenger is rude to the driver… So entitled!' — Netizens say after passenger scolded driver for driving off despite him waving ‘in front of the bus'
SINGAPORE: A heated video posted on Instagram by @thesgdaily, featuring a fiery encounter between a passenger and a Tower Transit bus driver, has left most netizens rallying behind the bus driver. The incident, which took place at night, was captured by the passenger himself: 'I was running towards you for such a long time, and I waved at you for super long,' the passenger insisted, claiming he was right in front of the bus when the bus driver drove off without stopping. The passenger continued pressing the issue, accusing the driver of ignoring him intentionally. The driver then lost his patience, and his voice went up: 'You listen first! If there is nobody at the bus stop, I won't stop; I will just go!' he retorted. View this post on Instagram A post shared by SG Daily 🇸🇬 (@thesgdaily) When the passenger refused to back down, the driver snapped, repeating his question three times before justifying his loss of composure: 'What did you scold me now? What did you scold me now? What did you scold me now? You scold my mother, you know. Who the hell are you, man? You want me to call the police?' The confrontation quickly escalated into a shouting match, and when the driver, noticing he was being recorded on video via the passenger's mobile phone, appeared to reach for the phone and asked, 'Why you take photo?' 'The passenger is rude to the driver… So entitled!' The video lit up social media, but instead of sympathy for the out-of-breath passenger, most viewers threw their support behind the driver. 'The passenger is rude to the driver… So entitled!' one commenter wrote. 'He could have missed seeing you. He's driving and must also see who is running in the nighttime?' Another commenter dropped a truth bomb with comedic flair: 'It's called BUS STOP for a reason, not BUS RUNNING. Come on, bro, everyone must wait for you running, eh?' Many were quick to remind that bus drivers have schedules to follow — and obligations to everyone onboard. 'If you [run] not at the bus stop, it's not my [business] problem,' one quoted the driver, praising his response. 'He thinks the driver is his personal chauffeur?' another quipped while one more schooled him with: 'Go get your own car or take a cab, lah!' 'Both are wrong!' A few commenters pointed out that while the commuter was out of line, the driver's reaction could've been more measured. 'Both are wrong!' one commented. 'The passenger is too self-entitled, and the driver's aggressive behaviour is unacceptable. Just a small problem becomes a big problem,' another commented. Still, others rebutted that the driver only lost his temper after being insulted. 'He wasn't aggressive at first,' someone clarified. 'He got angry because the guy scolded his mother. Anybody would have reacted that way,' another chimed in. Also, perhaps one of the most pointed comments of all: 'You missed the bus, you just wait la. You miss the flight, you can run after the plane, meh?' Chasing a moving bus from a distance is a gamble According to SBS Transit and Go-Ahead Singapore's FAQs, bus captains should stop for approaching passengers, but only if they are clearly within the bus stop bay. Once the bus starts to pull away, the driver's attention is on traffic. Chasing a moving bus from a distance is a gamble. In this case, it remains unclear whether the commuter reached the bus stop in time or was sprinting from afar. What's certain is that he managed to board eventually — and instead of taking the win, chose to confront the driver with a phone in hand and entitlement turned up to the max! Respect goes both ways… This viral episode isn't just about a missed bus. It's also about public civility, boundaries, and how not to act when things don't go your way. As one netizen put it for the passenger: 'The bus driver is NOT your personal chauffeur. This is public transport, not a private service.' And for the driver, another concluded with refreshing clarity: 'There is always a better way to resolve this. When both sides are on fire, look at it objectively.' If there's one thing this saga taught us, it's that being on time saves more than your seat — it might just save your dignity too. In other news, in Singapore's ever-evolving saga of ride-hailing dramas, another video surfaced — this time starring a Tada driver vs passenger whose simple request for cooler air ended with a chilling command: 'Get out!' You can read about their fiery encounter over here: 'Get out! Get out! This is my car, I'm asking you to get out!' — Tada driver ejects passenger for asking to 'increase air-con speed'
