Stewartstown residents share opposition to MARL transmission line
MORGANTOWN– Stewartstown-area residents gathered at the community building Saturday afternoon to learn about and share their concerns about the NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic Resiliency Link project.
'This is a raising local awareness effort here today,' said Kent Hunter, who lives on the next hill over from the community center. 'We probably can't stop this but we can maybe impact where the route eventually ends up.' Some residents check out the information tables before the meeting while others at their seats talk about the project.
MARL, as it's called, is a proposed transmission project to build a new 105-mile 500-kilovolt transmission line stretching from Greene County, Pa., to Frederick County, Va. Depending on the route selected, it could pass through Monongalia and Preston counties, along with Hampshire County and Mineral counties, Allegany Garrett county in Maryland and Fayette County in Pennsylvania.
The project also consists of building a new 500/138-kV substation in Frederick County, Va.
Hunter was one of four speakers to address the residents. He said he learned about MARL in December after NextEra met with the Monongalia County Commission. He was among the landowners on the possible local routes who received a postcard from NextEra in February. Concerned, he contacted former Delegate Barbara Evans Fleischauer and Delegate Evan Hansen, and they got involved in the awareness-and-opposition effort.
Among the concerns Hunter and others cited is, who pays for this. 'It just takes away our land,' he said. 'It doesn't help us in any way at all that we can find.' And it will likely decrease property values of those whose land it crosses.
At a May open house, NextEra's Kaitlin McCormick answered a question from The Dominion Post about the expected local benefits. She cited three: reliable power; the opportunity for high-demand customers to interconnect; and local tax revenue – $50 million to $100 million over the 40-year life of the project.
Residents remain skeptical, though. Speakers several times cited a study by Cathy Kunkel, energy consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, that indicates West Virginia ratepayers will pay more than $440 million in increased electricity rates over the next 40 years for MARL and the related Valley Link Transmission line that is planned to run from the John Amos plant in Putnam County eastward to Frederick County, Md.
PJM Interconnection, the regional 13-state power grid operator, selected MARL and Valley Link, among a number of projects, based on its long-range Regional Transmission Expansion Plan, to address reliability issues associated with loss of power generation sources, support for new power sources and additional electricity demand in the region.
Public perception – echoed in Kunkel's report – ties much of that new demand to data centers in Virginia.
Fleischauer, one of the speakers, said there's not enough local benefit to justify the rate hikes. 'We don't see the value in being a pass through.'
Speaker Rachel Stevens, who lives just north of Bruceton Mills and whose neighbors are on a potential route, listed several areas of concern about the line. Along with diminished property values and higher electric bills, she cited possible environmental impacts along the route and the impacts on landowners who will be subject to possible eminent domain proceedings for the line's 200-foot right of way.
Speaker Jim Kotcon, a retired WVU professor, explained some of the process ahead. After selecting a route, NextEra is looking to file applications with the state Public Service Commission and other state's regulators early this fall. A project timeline shows expected state regulatory approvals in spring 2027, start of construction in fall 2029, completion by fall 2031 and lines in service by winter 2031.
PSC has 270 days from NextEra's application date to grant or deny approval, he said, and any eminent domain proceedings to gain access to land would begin after that.
He suggested four strategies to respond: take the best possible offer for the right of way (but don't be the first to agree because they get the worst offers); work to get the line moved to another route; make sure the line avoids public lands (though this would affect more private landowners); or simply just oppose the line.
Fleischauer continued that line of thought. 'There's hope that we can do something about this,' she said. The key fight will be when the PSC is considering approval. And 'not in my back yard' won't sway them. They will need clear evidence that the line won't benefit West Virginia.
During a public Q&A session, residents cited some other concerns, including the effects on Cheat Lake recreation and business with new, big, unsightly power lines passing overhead. One lakeside landowner said, 'It's very disturbing.'
There was a general understanding that landowners along all the proposed routes aren't going to want the line in their yards and will be opposing it.
Fleischauer said, 'If we are going to succeed, we are going to have to make the most noise.'
Another community informational meeting is set for 1 p.m. June 29 at Rexroad Auction in Bruceton Mills.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Vacaville neighbors push back on proposed battery plant as energy company works to win favor
An open house meeting was held on Wednesday night in Vacaville for NextEra Energy to tell the community more about its proposed battery energy storage system facility in Solano County. Developers on the Corby Project website call it an innovative project that features batteries with a capacity of up to 300 megawatts. The proposed location is on 40 acres of land owned by the company near the intersection of Kilkenny Road and Byrnes Road in Solano County. NextEra says in its project description online: "It will provide California with additional flexibility in managing the energy grid, helping keep the lights on even during the hottest months of the year, when demand for electricity is at its peak. It will also help balance the diverse renewable energy resources on the grid minute by minute, filling in the gaps even when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining. The Corby Project is more than batteries — it represents a significant capital investment in California. It will create good-paying jobs and millions in additional revenue for the local community." Stephen Anh, the project developer, told CBS13 at Wednesday's meeting that the project is expected to have minimal environmental impact and should bring in around 200 new jobs. "The project is also expected to generate over $70 million in property tax revenue to support local initiatives," said Anh. Some neighbors are sounding the alarm on the project, saying the public safety risks outweigh the benefits, and organizing a campaign against it. "They do have an inherent risk that they can catch fire in a process called thermal runaway. During that fire, they could burn for multiple days and cause residents to evacuate and emit toxic fumes into the air," said Sarah Dunn, a Vacaville resident volunteering on the county's Technical Working Group researching battery energy storage systems. "Also, particulate matter that could be toxic and potentially contaminate the area surrounding them. So it's really important that they're sited in appropriate locations so they don't pose a hazard to the people that live around them." For example, in February, a battery storage facility near Monterey caught fire and prompted evacuations due to the unknown hazards in the smoke. Dunn says Solano County is working to adopt a new ordinance and better safety regulations for these types of battery storage facilities. Right now, there is a countywide moratorium against them. "The purpose of that is to research and adopt regulations that would allow for safe siting of these facilities within our county. We want to identify purposeful and thoughtful locations for them. We don't want to have them in places that could pose a hazard," said Dunn. Neighbor Michael Geller says he lives less than 1,000 feet from where developers want to break ground on the new facility. The criticism is that the proposed site is too close to existing homes, I-80 and a hospital. "Solano County has a moratorium on these facilities. They've chosen to go directly to the state energy commission for approval rather than the typical land use process," said Geller. NextEra Energy took the Corby Project to the California Energy Commission to approve their application, saying that it would overrule the county moratorium in light of Assembly Bill 205. Neighbors, unhappy with the company bypassing the local ordinances, showed up at the open house meeting in protest of the project. "It's always good to have the support of your neighbors. But it's gonna take much more than that for us to stop this," said Geller. Anh recognized there was a mixed reaction at the meeting, but said the company wants community input and hoped to educate neighbors about the project. "These battery storage systems are very safe. We work with reputable vendors that go through very rigorous industry testing and certification," said Anh. "It's the same battery chemistry used in your iPhone." Anh says the facility would also bring grid reliability for the county and attract new business. "I am glad we are doing this. We just wanted to get public feedback, incorporate that into our design," said Anh. The next step is for the California Energy Commission to approve the project. After, a state public hearing would be held where neighbors are already planning to voice their concerns. For Dunn, the decision should be at the local level. "It's very disheartening and discouraging and extremely frustrating that the county is doing a phenomenal job researching this and trying to put in best practices in place, and then we have a company that's trying to back door and work around it and put their project where it makes sense for them, but not necessarily makes sense for our county," said Dunn. A decision by the CEC is expected in the next few months. NextEra Energy is hoping to start construction next summer and be online by 2027.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
This Magnificent Dividend Stock Continues to Deliver Powerful Growth
Key Points NextEra Energy delivered strong earnings growth in the second quarter, powered by robust renewable energy demand. The company remains on track to deliver high-end earnings growth through 2027. It should have plenty of power to continue growing beyond that time frame. 10 stocks we like better than NextEra Energy › NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE) has done a magnificent job paying dividends over the years. The utility has raised its payout every year for more than three decades, growing it at a 10% compound annual rate since 2007. The company should have plenty of power to continue increasing its nearly 3%-yielding dividend. That's evident from its strong second-quarter results and visible growth outlook. Another quarter of powerful growth "NextEra Energy delivered strong second-quarter results, with adjusted earnings per share increasing by 9.4% year over year," stated CEO John Ketchum in the second-quarter earnings press release. The company delivered robust operating and financial performance at both its electric utility (FPL) and energy resources segment. FPL generated $1.3 billion ($0.62 per share) of net income in the second quarter, a 3.3% increase year over year. The Florida-based utility benefited from continued investment in its business, including $2 billion in capital spending during the second quarter. FPL is investing heavily to install solar panels to capitalize on the state's abundant sunshine. NextEra's energy resources segment posted nearly $1.1 billion ($0.53 per share) of adjusted net income, rising more than 25% year over year. New investments in renewable energy helped drive growth during the quarter. Over the past three months, the company placed 1.1 gigawatts (GW) of new wind, solar, and storage capacity into service. The powerful growth should continue NextEra's strong second quarter gave it the confidence to reaffirm its long-term outlook. It still targets 6% to 8% annual adjusted earnings per share growth from 2024 through 2027. It also expects to deliver about 10% annual dividend growth through at least next year. Ketchum said he would be "disappointed" if the company's financial results did not meet or exceed the top end of its expectations through 2027 while maintaining its strong balance sheet and credit ratings. Strong, growing demand for renewable energy underpins the company's confidence in its long-term growth outlook. NextEra's energy resources segment added 3.2 GW of new projects to its backlog during the second quarter, increasing it to nearly 30 GW of projects. That's a massive backlog, considering that this segment had 38 GW of operating capacity at the end of March. Technology and data center customers are major drivers of renewable energy demand. NextEra's energy resources segment added more than 1 GW of projects in the second quarter to support growing power demand from large data center operators. It now has about 6 GW of projects underway tied to technology and data center customers. When combined with its existing capacity serving this customer group, the company will eventually produce more than 10.5 GW of renewable power solely to support the technology sector. That's more than the generating capacity of many large power companies, and enough to support the energy needs of millions of U.S. homes. NextEra's growth likely won't slow after 2027. Forecasters expect U.S. electricity demand to surge in the coming decades, accelerating significantly from the modest growth rate of the past couple of decades. As a leader in renewable energy development, NextEra Energy is in a strong position to capitalize on this surge. Few companies can match NextEra's combination of scale, expertise, and financial strength, which it can leverage to deliver the low-cost renewable power its customers need to support their growing energy demand. A great dividend growth stock NextEra Energy's earnings are growing rapidly, a trend that should continue in the coming years, driven by strong demand for renewable energy. The company's earnings growth should give it ample fuel to continue increasing its high-yield dividend. That compelling combination of growth and income makes NextEra look like an excellent stock to buy and hold for the long term. Should you invest $1,000 in NextEra Energy right now? Before you buy stock in NextEra Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and NextEra Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $641,800!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,023,813!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,034% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Matt DiLallo has positions in NextEra Energy. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends NextEra Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Magnificent Dividend Stock Continues to Deliver Powerful Growth was originally published by The Motley Fool
E&E News
3 days ago
- E&E News
What clean energy bosses say about Trump's attacks on renewables
Renewable energy developers downplayed President Donald Trump's moves to eliminate clean energy subsidies during a series of earnings calls on Wednesday, expressing confidence they could advance projects already in development despite political headwinds in Washington. But the calls, the first since Congress passed the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier this month, also underlined the growing toll that Trump's policies are having on the clean tech sector. Equinor, the Norwegian oil and gas giant, announced a $955 million write-down due to its bleak outlook for future offshore wind projects. GE Vernova said sales of its wind turbines were down while orders for gas turbines were rising. And executives at NextEra Energy, the country's largest renewable developer, walked a tightrope by saying wind, solar and batteries represented the fastest and cheapest way to meet rising electricity demand, even as they praised Trump's policies. Advertisement 'We are firmly aligned with the administration's goal to unleash American energy dominance, and to do so we need all of the electrons we can get on the grid,' NextEra CEO John Ketchum told investors. 'New gas and nuclear are on the way and will be critical to meeting demand over the long term. Renewables and storage can bridge the gap and will play an important role in an all-of-the-above future.' The comment underscored just how much has changed in Washington since Trump took office six months ago. 'All of the above' and 'bridge fuel' were once terms that signaled a continued role for fossil fuels in a rapidly greening energy sector. Now, the clean energy industry has flipped the meaning to promote wind and solar at a time when Trump is demanding more fossil fuel production. The rhetorical shift comes as Trump's megalaw dramatically curtailed clean energy tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act, the pillar of former President Joe Biden's climate legacy. The administration has also called for additional rounds of review for renewable projects planned on federal land and proposed rolling back a series of pollution regulations for power plants. Ketchum called the megalaw 'tough, but constructive.' He said his company is well-positioned to survive the policy turbulence, thanks to its access to transmission lines, a robust supply chain and strong balance sheet. He signaled that NextEra could acquire projects that have been planned by smaller developers who might not weather Trump's policy shifts. 'I see some natural breaking points that could create significant opportunities for us,' Ketchum said. He also sought to interpret 'safe harbor' provisions within the megalaw that determine when a project began construction and whether it can qualify for tax credits. Trump recently signed an executive order directing the Treasury Department to tighten that definition, potentially making it harder for companies to qualify for the credits. 'The 'begin construction' term has been around for well over a decade,' Ketchum told investors. 'It has a settled meaning within the industry. That meaning is informed by long-standing Treasury Department guidance.' Headwinds for Vineyard Wind Across the Atlantic, executives at the Spanish power giant Iberdrola S.A. predicted the law would have little impact on the company's 1,800 megawatts of onshore wind and solar projects under construction in the U.S. They ventured to say that an offshore wind project that has not yet started construction, New England Wind 1, could receive federal tax credits if it moves forward within 12 months. Iberdrola's negotiations with Massachusetts over a power contract for the development have been repeatedly delayed amid the policy uncertainty emanating from Washington. Much of the company's focus has been on finishing Vineyard Wind 1, an 800MW project off Massachusetts that its building with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners. The project suffered a serious setback last year when a turbine blade detached and crashed into the ocean, delaying construction that was supposed to be completed last year. Construction appears to be picking up. Iberdrola officials said Wednesday that 17 turbines are now sending power to the New England electric grid, up from four turbines at its last earnings call in April, and that 23 turbines are now fully installed. 'Vineyard Wind continues to progress through its construction and commissioning program, with safety as the highest priority,' Craig Gilvarg, a spokesperson for the project, said in a statement. Equinor company executives said construction of Empire Wind 1 was progressing after Trump lifted a stop-work order in May that had halted construction on the 810MW project for a month. But even as work moves forward, Equinor signaled it was scaling back its offshore wind ambitions in the U.S. The $955 million write-down was largely based on projections that there will be fewer offshore wind projects completed after Empire Wind 1. Equinor is building a port in Brooklyn that it had hoped would serve other projects in the New York area. But with the Trump administration tightening the rules around offshore wind, and plans for a second phase of Empire Wind on hold, the company said the port will be used less than Equinor had hoped, undermining its value. Equinor's chief financial officer, Torgrim Reitan, said the company expects lower profits from Empire Wind, but added that 'the best way to protect value in the current situation was clearly to move forward with the project.' Question marks around projects like New England Wind 1 and Empire Wind 2 help explain why companies like GE Vernova are booking fewer orders for new wind turbines. GE Vernova's wind segment, which includes onshore and offshore, reported orders of $2.7 billion through the first six months of 2025, compared with $3.3 billion over the same period last year. That makes GE Vernova's wind division a laggard among the company's otherwise bustling business. Its power division, which includes gas, saw revenues increase from $10 billion in the first half of 2024 to $13 billion this year. In the second quarter of 2025, the power division reported selling 21 gas turbines and booking orders for 47 more. Passage of Trump's megalaw produced an 'acceleration of activity' for wind, solar and grid equipment, as companies race to qualify for federal tax credits, said GE Vernova CEO Scott Strazik. But he said the law's passage produced a clear shift in the U.S. from renewables to gas over the longer term, as customers who were planning to add wind and solar in the last years of the decade are increasingly moving to gas. 'I would say our pipeline of activity for gas demand is only growing,' Strazik said. This story also appears in Energywire.
