Maine Senate approves farmworker minimum wage bill
The Maine Senate supported a measure to guarantee agricultural workers state minimum wage.
On Monday, the upper chamber voted 22-12 with a couple Republicans joining the majority party in the initial passage of LD 589. The legislation will next go to the House of Representatives for an initial vote and will need enactment votes from both chambers before it could be sent to Gov. Janet Mills for approval.
Granting minimum wage to farmworkers has been a years-long effort in Maine. Last year, Mills put forward a proposal that she ended up vetoing after the Labor Committee made changes to the bill. The bill this year mirrors the proposal Mills proposed last session.
'With this legislation, we send a clear message, Madam President, to those who harvest our food, nourish our families and sustain our communities,' said Sen. Rachel Talbot Ross (D-Cumberland). 'We say today: 'Your work matters, your dignity is recognized, your contributions are invaluable and the state of Maine will no longer tolerate a system built on exclusion and inequity.''
Talbot Ross, who sponsored the bill, also described the legislation as a way to 'turn the page on a painful history,' referring to the historic exclusion of agricultural workers from labor rights. Later in the discussion, Talbot Ross clarified that she was not calling any individuals 'racist' or 'second-class,' but referring to a pattern of discrimination throughout history that excluded Black and brown workers from certain labor protections.
The version of the bill supported by the Senate is pared back from the original proposal that also included overtime protections and a phased in overtime wage. Those were removed during the committee process.
Multiple Republicans who spoke in opposition to the bill emphasized the importance of piecework for some farms in the state, such as the blueberry industry, which pay people based on how much they pick.
Sen. Scott Cyrway (R-Kennebec) said that system encourages people to take pride in their work, while Sen. Joseph Martin (R-Oxford) said, 'piecework is not evil.' Both voted against the legislation.
However, Sen. Mike Tipping (D-Penobscot), who co-chairs the Labor Committee, clarified that the bill does not prohibit piecework.
The other issue raised on the floor stems from broader concerns about automatically updating the state's minimum wage with inflation, as is already the case in state law.
Though he said he was 'reluctantly' voting in favor of the bill, Sen. Dick Bradstreet (R-Kennebec) reminded his colleagues that he believes automatic increases to the state minimum wage are hurting the economy. However, he noted that LD 589 doesn't pertain to such cost-of-living increases.
Bradstreet said there were components in the original draft of the bill that he did not support, but he backed the amended version because members of the agriculture industry expressed their approval to the committee.
Tipping also noted during floor discussion that many agricultural employers in the state told the committee they already pay more than the state's minimum wage of $14.65 an hour.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's approval on his top issue slips: new poll
President Trump appears to be losing some ground with the overall public on his top issue — immigration — even as his base remains steadfastly behind him, a new poll shows. More Americans are souring on Trump's handling of the situation, with now 44% approving and 56% disapproving, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey. That approval rating is down significantly from March, when he had 54% backing him and 46% disapproving of his administration's actions. Even in June, his rating on the issue stood at a dead even 50%. Immigration and border security were top concerns during the 2024 campaign cycle, and Trump had rapidly moved to restore order to the border after winning re-election. Last month, there were a paltry 9,306 encounters between federal agents and migrants at the southwest land border, down dramatically from a peak of 301,981 encounters during the Biden administration in December 2023, according to data from US Customs and Border Protection. 3 President Trump has earned a solid approval rating among Republicans but is faltering among the general public when it comes to immigration. AP 3 The Trump administration has pursued an aggressive deportation policy. AFP via Getty Images More than 64% of the latest respondents concluded that Trump's policies resulted in illegal border crossings plummeting. But there appear to be lingering concerns about his aggressive approach to deportation. Now that Trump has quickly stemmed the border crisis, the public appears to think his tactics are going too far, with 54% describing his approach as too tough, compared to 18% who said it's not tough enough and 29% seeing it as about right. Former President Joe Biden had long been dogged by abysmal ratings from voters for being too soft on immigration. Additionally, there has been a growing perception that the Trump administration has been prioritizing the deportation of people who aren't dangerous criminals (56%) rather than dangerous criminals (44%). Polls have long pegged immigration and border security to be Trump's crucial political issue. CBS News/YouGov is one of several polls that has indicated Trump's ratings on immigration are softening. 3 The poll's respondents said immigration policy remains the top issue they use to evaluate President Trump's performance. AP Still, the US adults sampled said immigration matters 'a lot' to them in their assessment of his performance, eclipsing inflation (56%), the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (56%) and the Jeffrey Epstein case (36%). Trump has signaled plans to recalibrate his approach to immigration and work to mitigate the impact of his deportation policies on farms and the service sector. This reportedly includes plans to fast-track visas for foreign laborers. Despite the lower marks from the public on immigration, Trump's approval from Republicans remains very strong. A whopping 89% of Republicans approve of his presidency overall. The CBS News/YouGov survey sampled 2,343 US adults from July 16-18 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats seek to fight fire with fire on redistricting
Democrats on Capitol Hill are pressing blue-state governors to redraw their House lines in response to a similar push by Texas Republicans, warning it's the party's only chance to flip control of the lower chamber — and provide a check on President Trump — after next year's midterms. The Democrats are quick to maintain that mid-decade redistricting — a rare move defying the traditional decennial process — is a rotten trend to emulate and a bad precedent to set. But the urgency in what Democrats see as an existential fight against Trump demands a bending of the rules, they say, to fight fire with fire. 'If the Republicans are going to redistrict in the middle of the decade, then we have no choice but to do the same,' said Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.). 'Because to do otherwise would be unilateral disarmament.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is already heading in that direction, saying he's weighing multiple options for how the state can redraw its lines to counter the Texas GOP. And there's speculation that Democratic leaders in several other blue states, including Illinois and New York, are assessing whether to follow suit. As those discussions evolve, House Democrats say they're facing two bad options: Either they stick to their favored tradition of once-a-decade redistricting and watch Republicans, with a boost from Texas, keep control of the House in 2027, or they hold their noses and adopt the mid-decade re-mapping to neutralize the changes coming from Austin. Given the stakes, many are leaning toward the latter. 'It's a race to the bottom, and I wish we weren't in this place,' said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'But they have sort of forced the conversation, and I think you can understand why California and some other places feel like they've got no choice but to consider something like that.' 'I mean, are we just going to sit back and take it?' Trump fired off the first salvo this month when he said he was vying to pick up five seats in Texas as Gov. Greg Abbott (R) holds a special session next week to consider redistricting, among other priorities. Republicans in Washington are bracing for the traditional headwinds that accompany the president's party in power during midterm seasons, and a mid-cycle redraw in deep-red Texas could help blunt the Republicans' losses next year. The move quickly infuriated Democrats, who saw Trump and Republicans as trying to game the system and preserve their slim House majority before Democrats decided to change their tune and try to offset potential Republican gains by considering mid-cycle redistricting in blue states. 'We can act holier than thou. We can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom told reporters during a press conference on Wednesday, 'or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment.' California uses an independent redistricting commission to draw the state's maps, a body that was initially borne out of a ballot measure that state voters approved in 2008, and that was later updated in 2010. Newsom has floated several ideas over how Democrats could tackle mid-cycle redistricting around the independent commission: One would be to create a constitutional amendment to go before voters, which would likely address the independent redistricting body, so that lawmakers could redraw the House maps. Another would be what he described as a 'novel legal question,' which would ultimately end in lawmakers crafting the lines themselves on the idea that the state constitution doesn't say anything about what happens during mid-cycle redistricting. Members of California's congressional delegation have signaled they're on board even if their initial preference is to adhere to the independent redistricting commission. 'It's out of my hands, it's not really my choice or my process, but I do think that Democrats need to stop bringing [a] butter knife to a gunfight,' said Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.), who represents a competitive House seat. 'All of us want to see a fair process, but if Republicans are going to try to cheat and redistrict, I think Democratic states need to consider all options,' he added. Huffman said Democrats in California could 'easily' pick up three or four seats through redistricting — and 'maybe more.' As Newsom plots his next move, some Democrats say other blue states should jump on board. Torres said New York laws would make the process tricky, but he's pushing for it just the same, 'to the extent that we can legally.' 'New York is more complicated because of the state constitution,' he said. 'But if Republicans are going to exhaust every means of building political power, then we should reciprocate.' Asked if New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is considering a mid-cycle redistricting push, her senior communications adviser Jerrel Harvey told The Hill in a statement: 'Governor Hochul is closely monitoring the redistricting developments in Texas and any potential implications they may have.' In Illinois, some Democrats are singing a similar tune, arguing that Texas' moves demand a retaliatory response that might include new maps in Springfield. 'Given the extremity of what Texas is considering, it can't be ruled out,' said Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.). 'They're dismantling the Voting Rights Act and disenfranchising communities that have been protected in the past, given their historic disenfranchisement.' 'We need to look at all possible recourse to keep the playing field as level as possible,' he added. The official justification for the Texas redistricting was provided by Trump's Justice Department, which sent a July 7 letter to Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton saying the district lines are illegal because race was a factor in how they were drawn. The suggestion was that the process discriminated against white voters. Four districts in particular 'currently constitute unconstitutional 'coalition districts' and we urge the State of Texas to rectify these race-based considerations,' Harmeet Dhillon, assistant Attorney General of the DOJ's civil rights division, wrote to the Texas officials. Democrats say that argument strains credulity, since it was Abbott and GOP legislators who drew the current lines just four years ago. They're accusing Republicans of abusing their authority — and diluting the minority vote — in a brazen effort to 'rig' the map to stay in power because they couldn't win otherwise. 'It's painfully clear why Republicans are doing this. They know they are going to lose the majority next year,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), the head of the House Democrats' campaign arm. While Democrats believe it's a needed avenue to counteract Republicans' redistricting push in Texas, the party faces several hurdles of its own. For one, some members of the party have expressed qualms over the idea to redistrict mid-cycle, suggesting it's anti-democratic. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), however, countered those concerns by saying that voters were 'pissed' that many 'lost their health care under the president's reconciliation bill.' 'They're also pissed that their neighbors are being apprehended by people wearing masks and indefinitely being detained, and these are non-violent people that it's happening to,' Swalwell added. 'So right now, they're saying, 'Protect us,' and this is one break-glass way to protect it.' A more serious hurdle, though, could be how the maps are drawn and whether they violate the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), said that shaving down majority-minority seats 'runs the danger of violating the Voting Rights Act.' Saenz said that MALDEF would sue if either party engaged in mid-cycle redistricting that violated the VRA as it pertained to Latino communities. Meanwhile, Democrats across the board say the stakes are high. 'This is not just about Texas or California or any other blue state — this is really the moment where we decide as a country whether our democracy succeeds or fails, because it is about something so much bigger,' said Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas).
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
O'Rourke urges Democrats to fight ‘fire with fire' in redistricting battle
Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas) called on his fellow Democrats to fight 'fire with fire' as Republicans in his state move forward with an effort to alter Texas's congressional lines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union,' O'Rourke said Democrats need to start playing the same game as Republicans and stop worrying only about doing what is right. 'I think it's time that we match fire with fire. I think Democrats in the past too often have been more concerned with being right than being in power. And we have seen Republicans only care about being in power, regardless of what is right,' O'Rourke said in the interview. In a rare mid-decade redistricting effort, Texas state lawmakers are expected to consider new congressional lines during a special session of the Texas legislature, which GOP Gov. Greg Abbott called. The effort to redraw the Texas map has been made at the request of President Trump, who aims to bolster the GOP's slim House majority to ensure that Republicans maintain control of the lower chamber during his final two years of his second term. In a call to Texas Republicans on Tuesday morning, the president urged lawmakers to draw the districts in a way that would allow Republicans to flip five Democratic seats to the GOP. Trump also said that he would be 'OK' with blue-leaning states, such as New York and California, potentially doing the same to increase the number of seats for Democrats. 'I think we'll get five. And there could be some other states we're going to get another three, or four or five in addition,' Trump said Tuesday. 'Texas would be the biggest one.' O'Rourke — who unsuccessfully ran for senator, governor and president — praised California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting that he could pursue a similar approach in his state. 'I think that Democrats have been so scared of being branded as hypocrites or coloring outside of the lines that it has absolutely paralyzed them in this struggle for power in America. You don't see the other side worrying about any of that at all, Donald Trump defying the Constitution, the rule of law, the courts, trying to dismantle our very democracy in front of our eyes right now where we sit,' O'Rourke said. 'We have got to fight back. We cannot roll over. We cannot play dead. We cannot submit to them, as Democrats for far too long have done.'
