
Tail lodged in mess wall, left engine stuck in hostel building: 5 structures that bore brunt of AI 171 crash
A major part of the crash site, located around 1.6 kms from the runway, and surrounded by a number of key government institutions, comprises the hostel buildings and mess of the Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College – said to be the oldest medical college in the state.
As per the report, the elongated wreckage site covers an area of roughly nine acres (1000 ft x 400 ft), all of it located on the medical college premises.
The exact crash site comprises seven buildings — two buildings of a Mess Hall complex and five residential hostel buildings – of which five were impacted. These accommodated more than 150 medical students and doctors, who have since been moved to other accommodations. The crash site, technically, also includes the road outside the hostel premises since a few people lost their lives while passing through the area at the time of the disaster.
Just behind the crash site is the compound of the Military Hospital (Armed Medical Corps) and a residential neighbourhood comprising 52 buildings of the Government Housing Board. To the right of the crash site is the State Reserve Police's (SRP) Ghoda Camp. Exactly next to the crash site lies the National Institute of Occupational Health (ICMR-NIOH) whose compound wall was breached by parts of the aircraft. And just 500 metres ahead in the flight path lies the 1,200-bed Woman, Child and Super-specialty Hospital inside the Medicity campus, which also houses the Mortuary Complex that became the site of grief for the families of the deceased in the days following the crash.
Here is a breakdown of the AAIB report on the layout of the crash site and the debris field:
In Point 5, titled 'Damages', the report stated, 'The Aircraft was destroyed due to impact with the buildings on the ground and subsequent fire. A total of five buildings were impacted and suffered major structural and fire damages.'
These buildings, from North to South, are the Mess Building, and four residential hostel buildings viz. Atulyam-4, Atulyam-3, Atulyam-2 and Atulyam-1.
There was no damage to the sixth building on the same premises, Atulyam-8, which is located next to the mess building. This building was declared habitable and handed over to the medical college. It was also used as a base of operations of teams of the 6th Battalion of the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) during the rescue and retrieval operations in the aftermath of the plane crash.
Point 6 of the report, titled 'Wreckage and Impact', stated, 'After takeoff, the aircraft impacted the BJ Medical College hostel which is 0.9 nautical miles (NM) from the departure end of Runway 23. The Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) was not activated during this event.'
The report said, 'As the aircraft was losing altitude, it initially made contact with a series of trees and an incineration chimney inside the Army Medical Corps compound before impacting the northeast wall of the Building A. The distance between the tree on which the aircraft made its initial contact and the point on the Building A where the aircraft impacted is 293 ft.
The tree and chimney mentioned in the report can be seen clearly from this area, which the Indian Express reported about earlier.
These are the Government Housing Board apartments in Meghaninagar, located behind the IGP compound in which the hostels are located. The terrace of the society, especially Block-1, located just behind the BJMC's Mess Hall, has a clear view of the fag end of the crash site.
The wings of the aircraft shaved off the tops of the trees right next to the building, hit a chimney stack on the military hospital premises located next door, and then hit the hostel building (mess). This was corroborated by several residents who were among the first to witness the crash.
'As the aircraft moved forward, it continued fragmenting and collided with other structures and vegetation. The impact witness marks on the building and airplane indicated a likely nose-up attitude (about 8°) and wings level. The vertical stabiliser separated from the aft fuselage and came to rest about 200 feet south of the initial point of contact with the Building A. The tail section and the RH Main Landing Gear (MLG) of the aircraft were found embedded in the northeast wall of the Building A while the rest of the airplane continued its forward movement,' said the AAIB's preliminary report.
It further added, 'As the airplane continued its path across the roof of the Building A, the right engine struck the concrete water tank structure, separated from the airplane and rested underneath the water tank structure facing a heading of approx. 226 degrees near the southwest wall of the Building A.'
The top floor of the mess hall behind the water tank, visible from the Housing Board apartments, was reduced to a gaping hole from where the tail section had later been removed from its embedded position.
According to the report, the right hand side main landing gear was also found on top of the mess hall. The Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) was also found from the terrace of the mess hall. Notably, the body of a female crew member was discovered in the section of the aircraft.
The vertical stabiliser and rudder of the aircraft, painted with the logo of Air India, was found detached from the tail section and lying on the ground next to the mess hall.
Of those who died on the ground, while 13 people were either doctors, medical students, visiting relatives or staff in the Atulyam hostels, six others lost their lives outside the compound.
'The inboard (IB) parts of the right wing were found in Buildings A & B and the areas surrounding the buildings. The right-wing mid-section and the outboard section was about 280 feet and 520 feet southwest respectively from the initial point of contact with the Building A,' said the report.
Parts of the right wing were spread over a large area — from the mess hall complex buildings right to the campus located opposite the Atulyam hostels — and slammed into the compound wall of the National Institute of Occupational Health (ICMR-NIOH).
Scientists at the institute, who witnessed the crash first hand, said three of them were standing in the shaded grove on the front left corner of their campus and moved back when they heard and saw the explosion. Moments later, part of what they later learned was a wing, had crashed through the wall of the campus.
The AAIB report said, 'The left main landing gear (LH MLG) and left wing outboard and middle section struck building C, came to rest approx. 345 feet south from the initial point of contact. The left wing middle section of the wing was stuck in the north corner of the fourth floor of the Building C while the left wing inboard section was lying about 670 feet southwest of the initial point of contact with the Building A.'
The flight path of the aircraft took it between the four residential blocks of the hostel and the IGP compound wall, which is why the left hand side wing, engine and main landing gear were all found clustered around the Atulyam-4 building (C), which was the second significant ground structure to be hit by the aircraft during the crash after the Mess Hall (A).
The report said, 'The left engine got separated from the airplane and struck the north corner of Building D at the ground level where it remained and was roughly perpendicular to the right engine resting position, at heading of approx. 326 degrees. The wall was pushed into the building and the northwest building column was damaged such that portions of the concrete were missing and exposing the internal metal rebar. The engine, remaining portions of attached cowling, and the surrounding area were heavily damaged by fire.'
Firefighters of the Ahmedabad Fire and Emergency Services (AFES), who were on the scene immediately after the crash, had described how they had found the left engine of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner embedded near the corner of the hostel building Atulyam-3 (D), and had immediately cordoned off that area.
'The nose landing gear (NLG) was found on the ground about 307 feet southwest from the initial point of contact with Building A,' said the report.
This shows that the front landing gear had separated from the aircraft right next to Atulyam-4 while the rest of the plane kept moving forward till Atulyam-1.
The report said, 'After the tail section was brought down, the APU was inspected and found intact inside the APU compartment. The APU air inlet door, which was intact, was found open.'
The Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) is a self-contained engine that helps power up the internal systems, start up of main engines and is used as a backup power generator for the aircraft.
'The fuselage fragmented and sustained thermal damage as it traveled along the northwest faces of Buildings C, D, E, and F with the furthest debris observed at about 765 feet southwest from the initial point of contact with building A. The flight deck area and windshield support structure came to rest at about 650 feet southwest from the initial point of contact with Building A,' said the report on the main body of the Dreamliner.
The report suggests that the aircraft had travelled more than 233 metres from the Mess Hall Building (A) till the last building in the campus (F), which is Atulyam-1. The area of devastation, though, was much larger.
First responders had earlier described the state of the fuselage in these words, 'It was only from the direction of the tail portion embedded in the mess building that we figured out the placement of each portion of the completely destroyed plane. There was literally no other way to get a vantage point to know the direction of the aircraft because all other flights had been cancelled by that time.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
30 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The 10-second mystery: Did the Air India crash report hide more than what it revealed?
The country has been in mourning for three months now. First, a brutal terror attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam killed several innocent tourists. And then the devastating crash of an Air India Boeing 787 in Ahmedabad that claimed 260 lives. While the first tragedy prompted a swift military response, some sense of closure emerged for the second late Friday night with the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) releasing its preliminary report.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
The 10-second mystery: Did the Air India crash report hide more than what it revealed?
The country has been in mourning for three months now. First, a brutal terror attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam killed several innocent tourists. And then the devastating crash of an Air India Boeing 787 in Ahmedabad that claimed 260 lives. While the first tragedy prompted a swift military response, some sense of closure emerged for the second late Friday night with the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) releasing its preliminary report.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
AAIB preliminary report: Air India pilots' association lashes out at 'insinuation of suicide'
NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: A day after Airline Pilots' Association of India said Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary report on the Air India 171 crash led to the promoting of a "presumption of pilot guilt" even before the probe was complete, Indian Commercial Pilots' Association (ICPA), one of the Air India pilots' unions, on Sunday slammed the "reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide" that has been doing the rounds since the report was made public on Saturday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now AAIB had stated that both fuel switches on the Boeing 787 transitioned from "run" to "cut-off" three seconds after it took off from the runway, cutting off fuel supply to the engines. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other, 'Why did you cut off (the fuel supply)?' The other responded he did not do so," according to the report. However, it didn't elucidate why the fuel control switches were cut off. Soon after the report's release, pilots and aviation experts, in interviews and posts on social media, claimed one of the pilots had knowingly cut off the fuel supply switch. Until final report is out, any speculation unacceptable: Union The pilots of AI 171, which crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12 killing 270 people, acted in line with their training and responsibilities under challenging conditions, ICPA, one of the AI pilots' unions, said, adding the crew should not be vilified based on conjecture. Referring to a 2018 safety bulletin issued by the US aviation regulator that instructed airlines to look out for a possible mechanical fault with the fuel control switches — which could cut off fuel supply to the engines without pilot input — the report said that Air India did not carry out the inspection as it was not deemed mandatory. 'In the aftermath of this incident, we are deeply disturbed by speculative narratives emerging in sections of the media and public discourse — particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Let us be unequivocally clear: there is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage, and invoking such a serious allegation based on incomplete or preliminary information is not only irresponsible — it is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved,' said ICPA. 'Pilots undergo extensive psychological and professional screening, recurrent training, and operate under the highest standards of safety, responsibility, and mental fitness. To casually suggest pilot suicide in the absence of verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession,' it added. 'As aviation professionals, we trust and respect the rigorous investigative protocols established by competent authorities. These inquiries are designed to uncover facts methodically and without bias. Until the official investigation is concluded and the final report is published, any speculation — especially of such a grave nature — is unacceptable and must be condemned,' ICPA said, calling on media and public commentators to act with restraint, empathy, and respect for due process.