Iranian Trump Supporter Detained By ICE, Wife Shocked
'We believed in his [Trump's] immigration policies and were completely blindsided and truly believed that only criminals were being detained,' Morgan Gardner told Newsweek.
Gardner's husband, Ribvar Karimi, was one of 11 Iranian nationals arrested Sunday and taken into the custody of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security claimed the arrests reflect its 'commitment to keeping known and suspected terrorists out of American communities.'
DHS has painted Karimi as a threat to national security, saying he served as a sniper in the Iranian army from 2018 to 2021 and had an Islamic Republic of Iran army identification card.
Military service is compulsory in Iran for all men aged 18–49. Draft evaders face prosecution and may lose their social benefits and civil rights, including employment, education, and the ability to leave the country. Deserters face imprisonment.
'We have been saying we are getting the worst of the worst out—and we are. We don't wait until a military operation to execute; we proactively deliver on President Trump's mandate to secure the homeland,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.
Gardner told CBS affiliate WIAT that her husband 'never fought any American forces or our allies,' and said 'he actually fought ISIS himself and was captured at one point' during his service.
According to the couple's wedding website, they first met online playing the video game Call of Duty: Mobile.
'He brought happiness back to me, and taught me what it is like to be loved correctly,' Gardner wrote on the site. 'He encouraged me, and still encourages me each and every day. He sees the best in me, and never has given up, despite how difficult I can be sometimes.'
Gardner's cousin Cyndi Edwards wrote in a GoFundMe set up to offset legal fees that the couple spent years 'meeting in Turkey while navigating the complex immigration process.'
'Ribvar quickly became a beloved member of Morgan's rural Alabama community, supporting her family and friends, and caring for Morgan's father during a health crisis,' Edwards wrote. 'Most importantly, Ribvar helped Morgan find her self-worth and guided her toward a healthier, happier life.'
DHS said Karimi entered the US legally in October 2024 under a K-1 marriage visa reserved for people engaged to American citizens. However, he never adjusted his status, which is a legal requirement, and not doing so can trigger a removal order.
Gardner told WIAT that her attorney said previous administrations would not have let her husband be taken away and that he should have been protected because he is married to a US citizen. She added that she and Karimi put his green card application on hold after she found out she was pregnant and had pregnancy complications.
'I understand that they've got a job to do, immigration, but I just feel like he was specifically targeted because of what's going on where he's from, his home country,' Gardner told WIAT.
Gardner is seven months pregnant, but remains hopeful that her husband will be with her when she gives birth.
'My heart is broken,' Gardner told the outlet. 'Our baby shower is going to be next weekend, and he's not going to be at home to go to that with me.'
Giving birth alone is not Gardner's only fear. She told Newsweek that Karimi's family worries that if he were to be deported back to Iran, the government would kill him due to his open support for the US and opposition to the Iranian regime.
'My husband himself, even being from Iran, supported Trump, his immigration policies, and understood he was trying to protect the American people and was praying he helped free the Iranian people,' Gardner told Newsweek.
While Morgan told the outlet she did not vote in the previous presidential election, her family has supported Trump in the past and now feels betrayed.
'Everyone feels like a fool and regrets the decision. I personally didn't vote in the last election, and neither did my parents. At this point, I believe there are bad people on the left and the right,' Gardner said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Announces Preliminary Trade Pact With Vietnam
President Trump said on Wednesday that the United States had reached a trade deal with Vietnam, one that would roll back some of the punishing tariffs he had issued on Vietnamese products in return for that nation agreeing to open its market to American goods. The preliminary deal will also indirectly affect China, an important trading partner of Vietnam. 'It will be a Great Deal of Cooperation between our two Countries,' Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social announcing the deal. According to Mr. Trump, the deal imposes a 20 percent tariff on all imports from Vietnam and a 40 percent tariff on any 'transshipping.' That provision is aimed at addressing Trump administration criticisms that countries like Vietnam have become a channel for Chinese manufacturers to bypass U.S. tariffs and funnel goods into the United States. Which products would fall under the higher tariff rate is unclear. It could refer to goods imported to the United States from Vietnam that actually originated in China. But it could also apply to Vietnamese products that use a certain amount of Chinese parts. The deal could include a lower tariff on goods that are made in Vietnam with fewer Chinese parts and materials, and a higher tariff rate for Vietnamese goods that contain many Chinese components. Vietnam was soon scheduled to face a 46 percent tariff rate as part of the 'reciprocal' tariffs that the Trump administration unveiled on April 2. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Associated Press
8 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Air defense missiles among weaponry US is withholding from Ukraine, AP sources say
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration will hold back delivering to Ukraine some air defense missiles, precision-guided artillery and other weapons as part of its announced pause to some arms shipments amid U.S. concerns that its own stockpiles have declined too much, officials said. The details on the weapons in some of the paused deliveries were confirmed by a U.S. official and former national security official familiar with the matter. They both requested anonymity to discuss what is are being held up as the Pentagon has yet to provide details. The pause includes some shipments of Patriot missiles, precision-guided GMLRS, Hellfire missiles and Howitzer rounds. Elbridge Colby, Defense Department undersecretary for policy, said the decision to halt some weapons comes as Pentagon officials have aimed to provide Trump 'with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end.' 'At the same time, the department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving U.S. forces' readiness for administration defense priorities,' Colby added in a statement. Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur, co-chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus, blasted the move that came just days after Russians forces launched one of the biggest air assaults on Ukraine since it launched the war more than three years ago. 'U.S. made air defense systems, including the Patriot platform, are the centerpiece of Ukraine's defenses against Russian strikes. They work. They save lives every day,' the Ohio Democrat said. 'But there are no parallel defensive alternatives for Ukraine if the U.S. stops supplying these vital munitions.' One of the officials said other weaponry being held up includes the AIM-7 Sparrow — a medium-range radar homing air-to-air missile — as well as shorter-range Stinger missiles and AT-4 grenade launchers. The Pentagon review that determined that stocks were too low on some weapons previously pledged comes just over a week after Trump helped forge a ceasefire between Israel and Iran to end their 12-day conflict. The U.S. has provided provided air defense support to Israel, Qatar and other Mideast neighbors. It's unclear if that conflict had any impact on the Trump's move in Ukraine. The U.S. deployed air defenses systems as it knocked down an Iranian ballistic missile assault last month launched on the Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The retaliatory strike from Tehran against the U.S. military installation came days after Trump ordered a barrage of strikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites.
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
U.S. Should Confront Non-Tariff Attacks Against American Tech Firms
I recently explained in Forbes that Trump trade negotiators could leverage the planned TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump smiles during a phone conversation with Mexico's President ... More Enrique Pena Nieto on trade in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on August 27, 2018. President Donald Trump said Monday the US had reached a "really good deal" with Mexico and talks with Canada would begin shortly on a new regional free trade pact."It's a big day for trade. It's a really good deal for both countries," Trump said."Canada, we will start negotiations shortly. I'll be calling their prime minister very soon," Trump and Mexican negotiators have been working for weeks to iron out differences in order to revise the nearly 25-year old North American Free Trade Agreement, while Canada was waiting to rejoin the negotiations. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) withdrawal of anticompetitive federal regulations to obtain a cutback in foreign anticompetitive market distortions (ACMDs) that harm American firms and consumers. A July 2 nonpartisan letter to senior Administration officials from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), joined by senior policy scholars, strikes a similar theme in calling on the Administration to target foreign governments' non-tariff attacks (NTAs) on America's leading technology companies. The letter recommends a 3-pronged negotiating approach to counteract NTAs. Administration initiatives along the lines suggested by the letter could bestow substantial benefits on U.S. producers, workers, and consumers. The NTA Problem As the letter explains, a new form of trade restriction is emerging that existing legal frameworks fail to address: non-tariff attacks (NTAs). NTAs are a specific type of ACMD that is growing in significance. Unlike traditional tariffs or known non-tariff barriers (NTBs), NTAs are disguised as legitimate domestic policies. Their true purpose is to target leading U.S. technology firms, undermine innovation, extract financial and intellectual assets, and weaken America's strategic position in the global tech race. Three features distinguish NTAs from traditional NTBs: As the U.S. seeks to rebalance trade relations, rolling back these unfair practices should be a top priority in negotiations. The ITIF has documented over 100 cases where U.S. trading partners have adopted policies aimed at limiting American tech firms' operations or siphoning their revenues. The European Union led this effort with its Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA), which targeted major U.S. firms while largely sparing local competitors. In 2024 alone, regulatory fines on American companies in the EU totaled nearly $6.7 billion. Other countries are following suit: Brazil with similar regulations, India targeting U.S. firms under its data protection law, and Japan restricting dominant U.S. smartphone platforms. Although often framed as consumer protection, privacy, or digital sovereignty, these policies impose selective burdens that disadvantage American firms and empower foreign rivals. They also often harm the enacting countries themselves by disrupting ecosystems that support small and medium-sized businesses dependent on global platforms. These attacks also pose national security risks. U.S. tech firms are vital to innovation and defense sector competitiveness. By diverting investment from R&D, mandating tech transfers, or exposing sensitive capabilities, NTAs erode the strength needed to compete with China's state-led technology push. The consequences are severe: This problem is most pressing in the U.S.-China context. While America applies overt targeted measures like export controls, other nations exploit NTAs to undermine U.S. firms more subtly and effectively. These tactics distort markets far more powerfully than tariffs and shift global leadership toward China just as the U.S. needs unity and strength. Policy Recommendations Addressing NTAs is essential for preserving U.S. technological strength, protecting national interests, and maintaining U.S. leadership in the global digital economy. Current trade negotiations present a golden opportunity to confront the growing NTA threat and reinforce the foundations of American innovation and security. Keep in mind that NTAs do more than just harm American industry and national security – by harming our high tech companies, they present broad threats to overall American welfare. High tech firms are hugely beneficial to the American consumer. They provide high-quality, low-cost services to Americans (think Google or YouTube), are a huge sector in our economy, create jobs and wealth for Americans at large, and drive innovation that improves lives and the American consumer experience. In sum, countering NTAs is key to maintaining a dynamic, innovative U.S. economy. Appropriately, the ITIF letter highlights 3 vital criteria for confronting the NTA problem: 1. Make NTAs a top agenda item in all trade negotiations. 2. Secure binding agreements to block discriminatory digital regulations. 3. Set up systems to detect and respond to emerging NTAs. The Trump administration may wish to consider making these suggestions key features of its trade negotiating strategy. Success in rooting out NTAs would be a 'win-win-win' for American firms, workers, and consumers.
