Are people protesting more than usual? 'Jaw-dropping' number planned on Trump's birthday
Show Caption
Hide Caption
'Hands Off' anti-Trump protests organize across US - - and the world
The 'Hands Off' protests across the country are expected to be the largest anti-Trump demonstrations since he began his second term. This video misspelled the White House press secretary's name. The correct spelling is Karoline Leavitt.
Around 2,000 communities nationwide plan to protest against the Trump administration on June 14th, coinciding with Trump's birthday and the Army's 250th anniversary.
Data suggests protests in 2025 have increased compared to previous presidencies, with a notable focus on immigration.
Trump's deployment of the military in Los Angeles is a 'wild card' in American protests.
June 14 may be President Donald Trump's birthday and the 250th Army anniversary parade. But for those wanting to demonstrate distaste for the president, it will be "No Kings" day.
Approximately 2,000 communities across the U.S. plan to hold protests or demonstrations to oppose what they consider a power grab by the Trump administration. This is the third round of major nationwide protests in three months under Trump's second presidency, following the 50501 movement and the "Hands Off!" protests.
Organizers are expecting this to be the biggest yet, and crowds could be bolstered by Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles.
Trump's first few months back in office have brought an onslaught of controversial directives, but are people actually protesting more than usual? Here is what we know.
'No Kings' protest locations: See where demonstrations are planned
Protests in 2025 compared to previous presidencies
The Crowd Counting Consortium is a joint project between the Harvard Kennedy School and the University of Connecticut. (Harvard and the Trump administration are in a fierce legal battle; this project was started long before that.) The consortium project collects publicly available information from political crowds in the U.S. at marches, protests, riots and more.
Here is how 2025 compares to Trump's first year in office and Biden's first year in office, by the number of gatherings:
Jan. 1, 2017 - May 31, 2017: 4,641 protests
Jan. 1, 2021 - May 31, 2021: 10,933 protests
Jan. 1, 2025 - May 31, 2021: 14,713 protests
The Crowd Counting Consortium has not published movements since May 31. USA TODAY reached out to a researcher for this story.
Protests shift to focus on immigration this year
"The number of protests that they're saying they're going to have is absolutely jaw-dropping," says Dave Clark of the No Kings protests. Clark is a professor of political science at Binghamton University who collected global mass mobilization data funded by the Political Instability Task Force. (His research did not cover the U.S., which he says is hard to track due to the country's size and political diversity.)
But Clark said the consortium data suggests protests this year have intensified in frequency, in how nationalized they are and in their focus on pro-immigrant sentiment.
"To the extent that we could call the protest regarding immigration as a movement ... it has the hallmarks of success," Clark said. "Where success really means that it's not going away. It's going to persist, it's going to stay in the public eye and remain in our public dialog, whether that will have policy consequences or not remains to be seen."
Anti-immigrant protests were uncommon under the Biden administration and nearly non-existent under the Trump administration, Clark said.
'Using the military for civil control is the wild card here'
On June 8, Trump sent in the California National Guard to quell largely peaceful protests over immigration enforcement raids in Los Angeles, without the governor's consent or invitation. He later sent 700 Marines to the city, some of whom are set to guard federal property and personnel. "No Kings" organizers believe these moves may prompt even more people to show up on Saturday, and Clark said it could change how the country reacts to the protests.
"I would say that using the military for civil control is the wild card here," he said, explaining there is little relevant precedent for it in the U.S. "In many cases, the move to authoritarian kinds of tactics will actually bring out more protesters."
Trump had said that any protester may be "met with very heavy force," though the White House later walked it back to say he is fine with peaceful protests. The "No Kings" movement does not have a planned event for Washington, D.C.
But Clark said that a review of news reports from protests over the last week, after the last reported consortium data was released, shows a much higher number of arrests than usual.
"We don't usually see huge numbers of arrests in protests in Western democracies, particularly in the U.S.," Clark said. "And God knows we have a lot of protests in the U.S."
Contributing: Kathryn Palmer, Joey Garrison, Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY
Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@gannett.com. Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @kinseycrowley.bsky.social.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Federal judge defers ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority
A federal judge on Friday deferred ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority as a prosecutor after President Trump tapped her to lead the U.S. attorney's office for New Jersey. The big picture: A lawyer sought to get a criminal case in New Jersey dismissed by questioning Habba's legitimacy to lead the U.S. attorney's office in the state and arguing that the way the Trump administration restored her authority over the office was "unconstitutional." Catch up quick: In March, Trump appointed his then-presidential counselor Habba to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey. That allowed her to work in an acting capacity for 120 days while awaiting Senate confirmation. With Habba's confirmation stalled, the local district court appointed a new prosecutor to serve until the vacancy was filled. Attorney General Pam Bondi terminated the appointment hours later. Trump then withdrew Habba's nomination as the U.S. attorney so that she could be appointed to the position of first assistant U.S. attorney, making her the acting leader of the office. Driving the news: Judge Matthew Brann of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania wrote in the opinion that the motion to dismiss the case is both denied in part and deferred in part. The defendant, Julien Giraud Jr. who is facing charges in a drug and gun-related case, is entitled to injunctive relief "precluding Ms. Habba from participating in their prosecution if they are correct that she was appointed in violation of statute or the Constitution." That injunctive relief, the judge wrote, should extend to Assistant United States Attorneys "purporting to operate pursuant to Ms. Habba's authority." The judge added, "Because relief will be available to them if they are correct, the court should reach the merits of the Girauds' claims," Brann added. Context: Attorney Thomas Mirigliano asked the court to dismiss the indictment or stop Habba and any other attorney acting under "her purported authority" from prosecuting the case.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the agency that compiles the closely watched monthly jobs report usually toils in obscurity, but on Friday, the current holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of the United States. Erika McEntarfer, a longtime government employee, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump's unhappiness with Friday's jobs report, which showed that hiring had slowed in July and was much less in May and June that previously estimated. He accused her without evidence of manipulating the job numbers and noted she was an appointee of President Joe Biden. McEntarfer, a longtime government worker who had served as BLS head for a year and a half, did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. But her predecessor overseeing the jobs agency, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her role. Here's what to know about Erika McEntarfer: McEntarfer has a strong background on economics McEntarfer, whose research focuses on job loss, retirement, worker mobility, and wage rigidity, had previously worked at the Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies, the Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the White House Council of Economic Advisers in a nonpolitical role. She has a bachelor's degree in Social Science from Bard College and a doctoral degree in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to serve as BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions recommended that her nomination go to the full Senate for a vote. She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the Republican senators who voted to confirm her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who is now Trump's vice president, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is now Trump's secretary of state. Before her confirmation hearing, a group called the Friends of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, said McEntarfer's background made her a great choice for the job. 'The many reasons to quickly confirm Dr. McEntarfer as the new BLS Commissioner all boil down to this: the agency, like the entire statistical system, is undergoing an intense, significant period of change and Dr. McEntarfer's wealth of research and statistical experience have equipped her to be the strong leader that BLS needs to meet these challenges,' Friends of the BLS wrote. Her former associates and co-workers decry her firing William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served until 2023 during President Joe Biden's administration, called McEntarfer's firing 'groundless' and said in an X post that it 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Former Labor Department chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who received regular briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, said McEntarfer was generous with her time explaining what conclusions could or couldn't be reached from the data. If the data didn't support something an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn said. She also never weighed in on how the administration should present or interpret the data, Glynn said — she would simply answer questions about the data. 'She had a sterling reputation as someone who is concerned about the accuracy of the data and not someone who puts a political spin on her work,' Glynn said. Heather Boushey, a senior research fellow at Harvard University, served with McEntarfer on the White House Council of Economic Advisers and said McEntarfer never talked politics at work. 'She showed up every day to focus on the best analysis and the best approach to her field and not get political. That is what I saw from her time and again. She is brilliant and well-respected among labor economists generally,' Boushey said. 'She wasn't coming into my office to talk politics or the political implications of something. She definitely wasn't engaging on that side of things.'
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Businesses got some clarity on Trump's trade deal. They aren't reassured.
That's a reference to the fact that Trump's much-hyped trade agreements were verbal — there hasn't been any documentation backing up what the two sides agreed to. Already, major trading partners like the European Union and Japan have cast doubt on whether they could meet their investment and purchasing pledges, and Vietnam has not even publicly confirmed it agreed to the terms Trump announced in their supposed deal inked in early July. 'I think the lens has become a little clearer' in terms of tariff rates, said Stephen Lamar, the president of American Apparel and Footwear association, which represents brands like J Crew and L.L. Bean that rely heavily on imports from countries like China and Vietnam. Lamar predicted that many of those duties 'are probably going to be it for a while,' but added, 'We don't yet have enough information to make the kinds of long term decisions that need to be made right now, and even the shorter term decisions of, 'how I'm going to price my spring collection?'' The White House has largely dismissed complaints from business warnings that the tariffs will drive up costs for importers and, ultimately, American consumers. Trump has singled out specific companies, like Wal-Mart, demanding that they 'eat the tariffs' and has repeatedly suggested to business leaders that they should avoid the duties by shifting production to the U.S. 'President Trump's trade deals have unlocked unprecedented market access for American exports to economies that in total are worth over $32 trillion with 1.2 billion people,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. 'As these historic trade deals and the Administration's pro-growth domestic agenda of deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts take effect, American businesses and families alike have the certainty that the best is yet to come.' The administration also claims economists overestimated how much the tariffs would affect the economy, pointing to the fact that inflation is still largely meeting its targets and that there has yet to be a recession, like some economists predicted. 'I think they are looking at the current numbers as support for the lack of impact of these tariffs,' said Greg Ahearn, the president and CEO of the Toy Association, whose members are largely small and mid-sized businesses that have a harder time absorbing higher duties. 'But I think most people believe wholeheartedly that the impact of these tariffs is going to be felt in the months ahead. And the reason why is that production and manufacturing and the goods as they flow through the supply chain takes time.' Ahearn pointed to Friday's weak jobs report, including signs that there were actually fewer new jobs created in May and June than previously estimated, as evidence the impact of Trump's trade policies are just starting to show up in the data. There are already signs that the tariffs have begun driving up prices on purchases such as furniture, apparel and toys, which helped push up the inflation rate in June. And Lamar warned that, 'Once those prices go up, they have a hard time coming down.' Many business leaders fear that this week's worrying economic numbers are only the beginning of a more sustained downturn. 'Inflation and price increases are coming,' Ahearn said. 'Layoffs have already been occurring. And supply is going to be lower as we head into the holiday season. These are all happening.'
