Heinz 'upgrades' classic sauce as shoppers brand the move 'revolutionary'
Fish and chips is a staple dish across the UK. Whether it be by the seaside or a Friday night takeaway, it's a go-to order that has become synonymous with British cuisine.
It's also quite versatile, as it pairs well with virtually any condiment, with some loyalists preferring ketchup, while others tend to just stick to salt and vinegar. However, many will know that the OG is Tartare sauce.
Fans of the classic sauce will be pleased to hear that there is a brand new bottle on the market, as this week Heinz unveiled its Fish and Chips Sauce that they have branded as "Tartare 2.0."
The beloved food manufacturer often cooks up an assortment of unique-flavoured sauces for fans to try out, with its latest offering already going down quite a treat with fans on social media who have branded it as "revolutionary."
Hailed by Heinz as the "new companion for fish and chips", its herby and creamy sauce combines a few similar ingredients to the OG condiment such as gherkins, parsley, and dill.
Those who are keen to give Heinz's Fish and Chips Sauce a try out the next time they order the staple dish will be able to find a 400ml bottle for £3.40 at Tesco, or on the firm's website for just £2.90.
Based on the product description on the Heinz website, the sauce isn't just perfect for pairing with fish and chips, as it can bring a "refreshing twist to any dish".
This includes a dip for fries, or for adding a herby flavour to vegetables and potato salad.
After announcing the sauce on Instagram earlier this week, fans were quick to share their positive thoughts, as one responded with: "Now this is revolutionary!"
A second Heinz fan wrote: "Ooooft! Hello!!!!" While someone else said: "Wow! its amazing!"
A few shoppers on Facebook were a little more sceptical, as they thought the rebrand was just the exact same sauce but in a different bottle. One such user wrote: "It's Tartare Sauce for god sake."
However, it is worth mentioning that, despite some comments, the Heinz Fish and Chips sauce is slightly different, as it does not contain capers which is one of the key ingredients in tartare sauce.
The firm also responded to a customer saying it "added herbs and onions."
Thiago Rapp, Director of Taste Elevation at Heinz said: "At Heinz, we're always exploring bold and exciting flavours, inspired by the latest food trends and what people across the nation are really craving.
"We want to give fans endless flavour possibilities and unexpected pairings that elevate every bite. And when it comes to British classics, nothing quite compares to fish and chips.
"It's a national treasure, whether enjoyed as a seaside staple, a proper chippy tea on a Friday, or a comforting midweek meal. We've created a sauce that pays homage to this beloved British dish, crafted to be the perfect companion for every fish-filled occasion."
The Heinz Fish and Chips sauce (400ml) is available to buy for £3.40 at Tesco and £2.90 on the Heinz website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
14 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Dragon's Den star & gold medal-winning athlete took out £100k in fraud loans despite £75k show investment
None of the money he applied for went towards his business STAR JAILED Dragon's Den star & gold medal-winning athlete took out £100k in fraud loans despite £75k show investment Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A DRAGON'S Den winner and former Team GB gold medallist fraudulently used Covid loans to buy himself a £1.8million mansion. Rick Beardsell illegally pocketed £100,000 worth of taxpayers cash to purchase his home - despite receiving a £75,000 investment during his stint on the BBC show. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 6 Beardsell received £75,000 in investments after appearing on Dragon's Den Credit: Cavendish 6 The British world sprinting champion illegally pocketed two Covid Bounce Back business loans to buy himself a £1.8m mansion Credit: Cavendish 6 Beardsell was only entitled to apply for one loan worth £50,000, but fraudulently applied for two Credit: Cavendish The 46-year-old fiddled two Covid Bounce Back loans to buy himself five-bed Holly House in the exclusive village of Prestbury, Cheshire. Dad-of-two Beardsell was only entitled to apply for one loan worth £50,000, but fraudulently applied for two and greatly exaggerated his annual turnover by up to 23 times. It came after the world champion sprinter had successfully secured investments from TV Dragons Tej Lalvani and Deborah Meaden for his successful protein shake bottle business, ShakeSphere. Chester Crown Court heard he applied for the loan to prop up his other company, Sports Creative Ltd, but none of the money went towards the sportswear business. Prosecutor Geoff Whealan told the court Beardsell made the fraudulent applications to HSBC in December 2020 and then to NatWest in January 2021. He said: ''The defendant stated on the HSBC form that the turnover of Sports Creative was £485,000 and on the NatWest form said it was £320,000. "But unaudited financial statements showed turnover for the year end February 2020 was £20,622. ''The turnover was clearly exaggerated to secure the maximum bounce back loan. "Subsequent transactions showed the bounce back loan funds were not being used for the economic benefit or business purposes of Sports Creative at this time.'' The money arrived in Sports Creative's account in January 2021, but then almost £400,000 was transferred to Beardsell's personal Santander account in the space of six months. Then £431,160.80, including the remaining bounce back loan funds, was transferred to a firm of solicitors for the purchase of Holly House he bought with his wife Ezster. Mr Whelan added: ''In effect the bounce back loan funds had been used for this purchase. Shocking moment Dragons' Den winner Ross Mendham smashes £100k Ferrari after ploughing into bike racks in city centre "It can be inferred from the defendant's conduct that it was his intention to use the bounce back loans for this purpose at the time he made the application for it." Beardsell, who won two World Records for sprinting, faced three years in jail after he admitted two charges of fraud. In October 2024, he attended an interview under caution at the Insolvency Services offices. In a statement he said: ''The guidance pertaining to Bounce Back Loans indicated that the proceeds of such loans may be utilised for any purpose that yields a direct benefit to the company. ''At that juncture, I sought professional advice and was advised that such purposes include, but are not limited to, the coverage of overhead expenses or outstanding liabilities, as well as the investment in company assets or property. "The funds that were transferred to my personal account constituted a director's loan and other economical overheads for the business.'' Mitigating, his counsel Nichola Cafferkey explained that the loans had been repaid in full to the banks. She said: ''The loss of his good character is of some significance in respect of a man who has dedicated his life to his family, his professional entities and also his sporting endeavours. "These offences were out of character and were committed four years ago. "He has taken responsibility and repaid the money back. He knows that it's his own fault. "He has brought shame on his family and brought shame on himself. ''His wife is also his business partner and concerns that they have had about the ability to provide financially for their young children have been significant." The court also heard that Beardsell had suffered a series of medical issues both before and after securing the loans. Ms Cafferkey continued: "A year prior to the submission of the first loan application, the defendant was diagnosed with an aggressive form of testicular cancer and required surgery and extensive chemotherapy. "The chemotherapy was successful but led to some significant side effects. ''One of those being vertigo, of which he had a severe episode which required hospitalisation and thereafter there are ongoing long-term issues as a result of that. 6 Beardsell was sentenced to 18 months in prison, suspended for two years Credit: Cavendish 6 Hundreds of thousands of pounds were transferred to a firm of solicitors for the purchase of Holly House Credit: Cavendish "The investigations brought on by the defendant's own actions has had an impact on his family which has led to a situation where he has been experiencing significant stress over the past few years. "On top of that there are ongoing knee pains associated with his athletic success at national and international level. "He has been running a business for many years without issue and it is plain he is extremely remorseful and regretful for his actions. "The impact on his wife's physical health in terms of stress and strain has been significant. There has been significant weight loss and insomnia. "This will be the only time that Richard Beardsell appears before the court." Beardsell was sentenced to 18 months in prison, suspended for two years. He was also ordered to complete 250 hours of unpaid work and pay costs of £11,142.70. Judge Simon Berkson told Beardsell: "You fraudulently lied and lied again in your applications for these loans. "They were supposed to be for use in keeping your business running but the money was used for your own personal needs and the needs of your family. "This is not a victimless crime. The government was trying to help struggling businesses at the time of national crisis. "People were in lock down, people were dying and people were very ill at the time when people required their public services. "You used fraudulently obtained public funds for your own use, depriving honest people of the scheme's funds when the country was in crisis. "You are a generally successful man both in business and in sports, particularly your involvement with athletics. "You continue to run your business and it was on the TV programme Dragons' Den. "You are a married person with two children and they are young children. You have survived an aggressive form of cancer. "I have concluded that an immediate custodial sentence would have a significant harmful impact on your wife and children.''
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Who is accountable in privatised Britain?
Illustration by Andy Carter / Ikon Images 'New, unadopted estate.' The Hitchin MP, Alistair Strathern, pointed. Then he gestured to a building site where diggers were enthusiastically getting to work. 'New estate that will be unadopted… Unadopted estate… Unadopted estate.' During the 20-minute drive from Shefford town centre to Hitchin Station, we passed at least six examples of the phenomenon Strathern had invited me to his constituency, which straddles the Bedfordshire-Hertfordshire border, to explore: new-build housing estates their councils have refused to adopt. Much has been written about leasehold, the peculiarly British 'feudal' system in which homebuyers own a property but not the land it sits on, leaving them liable for spiralling ground rent and management fees. After decades of advocacy, some improvements were made under the Conservatives in last year's Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act, and Labour has promised to go further with protections for leaseholders in this parliament. But even when new-build homes are sold with the freehold, hidden costs can sneak in. Known as 'fleecehold' housing, the estates Strathern pointed out are those where the responsibility for maintaining the roads, street lighting, drainage and communal areas has not been adopted by the council, as it deems development not to have been completed to a high enough standard. Until a development is adopted, the residents must pay for the services the council would usually provide, in addition to council tax, via yearly fees paid to private management companies. The fees themselves may not sound large – £200-£300 a year. Or, at least, that's the level at which they start out. At a new estate I visited, fees had been hiked by 41 per cent in a year, with vague explanations. Calls and emails to the management company went largely unanswered; correspondence was limited to scarily worded 'final demand' letters. If owners refuse to pay, management companies can go direct to their lender to have the charges added to their mortgage, tanking the owner's credit rating. Residents I met spoke of finding it impossible to determine what they were paying for, or to hold the management company accountable for the work it was – or wasn't – carrying out. Fleecehold is now the norm across the country. Whereas councils used to adopt new estates, the Competition and Markets Authority has found that 80 per cent of new homes built by the 11 largest developers in 2021-22 were sold under the fleecehold system, with £260m in estate management charges paid out in 2022 alone. There are stories of owners being assured their estate would be adopted as a formality, only to still be paying fees a decade on. Meanwhile, the government is pushing through planning reform to meet its target of 1.5 million new homes by the end of this parliament. The problem may not be as visceral as the issues with build quality that owners of new-builds often face: cracked walls, dodgy plumbing, damp and mould. But the two are inextricably linked. Every owner I spoke to about fleecehold charges also had a horror story of how their 'dream home' had turned into a nightmare of construction faults that developers were reluctant to rectify. One showed me a brimming lever-arch folder of his correspondence with the developer – 200 pages in 20 months. The question is one of accountability. When things go wrong, whose job is it to fix them? What happens if they fail to do so? And how are they seemingly able to charge what they like, with no cap on costs or any obligation to show how the money is spent? Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe You might imagine the council would step in. But, as I found out in Hitchin, cash-strapped local authorities have little incentive to ensure developments are built to standard, as adopting them means adopting additional costs. The developers, meanwhile, have little incentive to come back to complete repairs once the houses have been sold. Strathern, who worked on the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill committee, is hoping to change this and has introduced a debate in parliament on ensuring new estates are adopted on schedule. But it's hard to fix a problem most people don't even know exists until after they've bought their homes. Passing the accountability buck can be an art form. In Shefford, I visited Old Bridge Way: a 220m stretch of road through an industrial park connecting an estate of some 1,000 homes to the centre of town and a Morrisons. I stood there for ten minutes watching non-stop traffic navigate a maze of potholes six inches deep. Central Bedfordshire Council says this is not its responsibility, as it doesn't actually own that part of the road. Who does own it is an open question: the company responsible for it was liquidated in 2024, leaving it effectively ownerless. But I noticed double yellow lines along the kerbside. I asked the council if it was issuing parking fines for a road it claimed it had no responsibility for, but it did not offer an answer. A council that won't adopt a thoroughfare used by thousands of people is unlikely to adopt estates full of new homes. Strathern described both situations as 'hollowed-out councils retreating from the public realm'. To me, they resembled what the satirical science-fiction author Douglas Adams once termed a Somebody Else's Problem field, a way of concealing inconvenient things that utilises 'people's natural predisposition not to see anything they don't want to, weren't expecting, or can't explain'. For residents placed in fleecehold limbo the issues of rising fees and the lack of accountability are impossible to ignore. For everyone else, they are Somebody Else's Problem. [See also: GMB chief Gary Smith: 'Oil and gas is not the enemy'] Related
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Struggling major carmaker to axe 500 jobs in ‘difficult decision' just 3 months after bombshell merger
The merger is hoped to establish the company as a global competitor HIT THE BRAKES Struggling major carmaker to axe 500 jobs in 'difficult decision' just 3 months after bombshell merger Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR carmaker is set to axe up to 500 jobs just three months after a shock merger. Back in April, the merger between a luxury supercar maker and an electric car start-up came as a shock. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 McLaren announced its merger with Forseven in April 2025 Credit: AFP The merger between McLaren and Forseven could result in up to 500 job losses as part of a cost reduction process. It comes after several years of financial difficulty for the supercar company. After the pandemic it faced near bankruptcy in 2020, leading to significant restructuring. Sales continued to plummet in 2023, with the merger hoping to restore its financial position. A spokesperson said that they were proposing "a potential workforce reduction of up to 500 roles across the combined organisation". They added: "The realignment of roles and responsibilities is a necessary step in preparing for the coming together of our two businesses and will ensure that our operations are streamlined to enable resilience and success over the long term." The company said they would provide "comprehensive support and guidance to all those affected" while they try to minimise the impact on employees. "Looking ahead, we remain dedicated to expanding our portfolio of luxury vehicles and delivering the exceptional customer experiences that honour the McLaren legacy," the company said. A consultation process with its 2,500 employee workforce is already underway according to The Evening Standard. It reported that roles are expected to be cut in departments like design and engineering, IT, legal and HR. All UK car dealerships will STOP selling 10,000s of iconic brand's used models impacted by lethal airbag flaw Jobs that are duplicated across the two companies are most at risk. The cuts could affect employees at McLaren's main base in Woking, in addition to its Bicester, Leamington and Surrey sites. McLaren merged with Forseven in April to form McLaren Group Holdings, with Forseven CEO Nick Collins leading. While McLaren has a long-standing history as a leader in the supercar market, Forseven is still relatively new. The British start-up includes more than 700 industry professionals who are working to launch a luxury range by 2030. An announcement on the Forseven website reads: "Forseven has merged with McLaren Automotive with one clear vision: to become a world-beating automotive business." Abu Dhabi investment company CYVN Holdings is set to finance the new company. As part of the merger, an estimated 300 roles have been created which could reduce the impact of redundancies. Jassem Mohamed Bu Ataba Al Zaabi, Chairman of CYVN hopes to redefine the high-performance and luxury sectors. In a press release announcing the merger, the company said it hoped to "transform McLaren into a high-performing British automotive business on the global stage." Jassem Al Zaabi said: 'I'm personally committed to making this vision a reality. It isn't just about investing, it is about shaping the future of McLaren as a brand, as a business and its place on the global automotive map. "We want to - and we will - push boundaries and deliver groundbreaking innovations that drive real progress in the sector. 'This is the start of an exciting new era for McLaren as a car brand and an automotive business." In addition to McLaren's Automotive business, he also promised to continue working on McLaren Racing's long-term success. This includes "supporting the team in building on their successes, winning more podiums, and inspiring fans worldwide." They added that more details about the vision and strategy going forward will be announced later this year.
