logo
Trump visits Texas: US President in flood-ravaged state; gets briefed by emergency responders

Trump visits Texas: US President in flood-ravaged state; gets briefed by emergency responders

Time of India4 days ago
US President
arrived in central Texas on Friday to survey the catastrophic damage caused by flash floods that have killed at least 120 people, including dozens of children, and left over 170 missing.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Touching down in Kerrville - the heart of the disaster zone- Trump was accompanied by First Lady Melania Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott. The president could be seen meeting with first responders, local officials, and grieving families at a briefing site near uprooted trees and emergency vehicles.
Wearing a white 'USA' ballcap, Trump received situational updates from emergency personnel alongside Governor Abbott, as reported by Associated Press.
The First Lady, dressed in a khaki jacket, olive pants, and Converse sneakers, joined him in meeting rescue crews and posing for photos with hardhat-clad officials.
'I'm going to be with some of the great families,' Trump had told reporters before departing Washington, calling the floods a 'terrible thing' and a '100-year catastrophe.'
Trump will also reportedly conduct an aerial tour of the worst-affected areas later today (local time) aboard Marine One.
The flyover is expected to give him a firsthand view of the flood's toll, particularly along the Guadalupe River, which surged rapidly on July 4, sweeping away summer camps, homes, and vehicles.
At least 36 children were among the dead, with 27 fatalities at Camp Mystic alone. Officials fear the toll may still rise as search efforts continue into their eighth day.
While Trump has expressed support for installing improved flood warning systems, he brushed aside criticism that federal agency cuts may have hampered the response.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'The local officials were hit by this just like everybody else,' he told NBC News.
Kerr County Commissioner Jeff Holt, who met the president Friday, said the visit sends an important signal. 'He's here to pledge federal support, like he already has with FEMA. That's what a leader does,' said Holt who also serves in the local fire department, as quoted by AP.
Trump's visit comes as the response- including delayed evacuation alerts- faces scrutiny.
A House Oversight Committee inquiry is underway, and lawmakers have requested records from FEMA and other agencies to assess whether staffing cuts or internal changes contributed to the crisis.
The president has not directly addressed the future of FEMA, despite his administration's broader push to devolve disaster management to states. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the federal response as 'swift and efficient.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump team to deny hearings in new bid to keep migrants detained, memo shows
Trump team to deny hearings in new bid to keep migrants detained, memo shows

India Today

time35 minutes ago

  • India Today

Trump team to deny hearings in new bid to keep migrants detained, memo shows

The Trump administration is launching a new effort to keep immigrants who entered the US illegally detained by denying them bond hearings, an internal memo showed, a change that could further swell the numbers of those guidance by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a portion of which Reuters reviewed, could be applied to millions of people who crossed the border illegally and are contesting their Donald Trump has vowed mass deportations, which he says are needed after high levels of illegal immigration under his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden. Congress passed a spending law this month that provides funding to detain at least 100,000 people, a steep increase over the record 58,000 in custody by late Washington Post first reported the new ICE policy limiting bond hearing eligibility, citing a July 8 memo by its acting director, Todd guidance shared with Reuters called for ICE to interpret several immigration law provisions as "prohibitions on release" after an arrest, adding the shift in policy was "likely to be litigated."It encouraged ICE prosecutors "to make alternative arguments in support of continued detention" during immigration court new policy appeared to reverse legal standards governing detention for decades, said Tom Jawetz, a former homeland security official in the Biden administration, calling it "a radical departure that could explode the detention population."The US Department of Homeland Security and ICE did not immediately respond to requests for comment.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Donald Trump

Why Supreme Court's approval of 1,400 US Education Department layoffs is called 'willfully blind' and 'naive'
Why Supreme Court's approval of 1,400 US Education Department layoffs is called 'willfully blind' and 'naive'

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Why Supreme Court's approval of 1,400 US Education Department layoffs is called 'willfully blind' and 'naive'

US Education Department layoffs: Why Supreme Court's decision to allow 1,400 cuts is 'willfully blind' and 'naive,' judges warn US Education Department layoffs 2025: The US Supreme Court has allowed President Trump to proceed with his plan to lay off nearly 1,400 employees from the US Department of Education, effectively enabling a large-scale downsizing of the agency. This ruling reverses a preliminary injunction issued by Boston's Judge Myong Joun, who had blocked the layoffs, citing concerns that the cuts would cripple the department's operations. The decision has sparked sharp criticism from three liberal justices, who dissented, branding the Supreme Court's ruling as "willfully blind" and "naive." The dissenters argue that the ruling threatens the constitutional principle of separation of powers by allowing the executive branch to effectively dismantle a federal agency by firing its employees. Supreme Court backs Trump's plan despite legal challenges The Supreme Court's order permits the Trump administration to move forward with the mass layoffs, pausing Judge Joun's injunction that had prevented the terminations. The Education Department staff affected by the layoffs had been on paid leave since March, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without the injunction, these employees would have been terminated in early June. The case involves two consolidated lawsuits, one filed by several school districts in Massachusetts and education groups including the American Federation of Teachers, and another by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. Both suits argue that the layoffs amount to an illegal closure of the Education Department, leaving it unable to fulfil its statutory duties such as supporting special education, distributing financial aid, and enforcing civil rights laws. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, wrote that the majority was "either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive," warning of a "grave" threat to the US Constitution's separation of powers, as reported by the Associated Press. Department of Education response and ongoing disputes Education Secretary Linda McMahon criticised the delay caused by the lower court's injunction and welcomed the Supreme Court's intervention, calling it "a shame" it took the highest court to confirm the president's authority over federal staffing and agency operations, as reported by the Associated Press. Meanwhile, more than 20 US states have filed lawsuits against the administration over billions of dollars in frozen education funding that support after-school care, summer programmes and other initiatives. The department has indicated it is "actively assessing how to reintegrate" the affected employees, requesting updates on their employment status to ensure a smooth return to duty if possible. Summary of key details Issue Detail Number of layoffs Nearly 1,400 employees Initial court action Judge Myong Joun issued an injunction blocking layoffs Supreme Court ruling Allowed layoffs to proceed in a 6–3 decision Dissenting justices Sotomayor, Jackson, Kagan Lawsuits Filed by Massachusetts school districts, education groups, and 21 Democratic attorneys general Department duties affected Special education, financial aid distribution, civil rights enforcement Employee status On paid leave since March; no full return to work during injunction The Supreme Court ruling thus permits the Trump administration's controversial downsizing plan to continue despite ongoing legal challenges and warnings from dissenting justices about the potential damage to the Education Department's capacity and constitutional governance. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America
Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America

Mint

time39 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America

US President Donald Trump's proposed 50% tariff on copper imports is emblematic of his administration's incoherent approach to economic policy: Soaked in nostalgia for America's industrial past, it pursues strategies that will make it harder for US manufacturers to succeed now and in the future. Trump noted that copper 'is necessary for Semiconductors, Aircraft, Ships, Ammunition, Data Centers, Lithium-ion Batteries, Radar Systems, Missile Defense Systems, and even, Hypersonic Weapons, of which we are building many." So why would you then want to raise taxes on copper? Increasing the price Americans pay for copper makes the US a less desirable location for building aircraft, ceding advantage to competing producers in Europe, Brazil and Canada. It makes it harder to establish a domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry. It exacerbates the already dire state of the US shipbuilding industry, which is wholly reliant on protectionist policies. Also Read: Copper offers India a glowing hot opportunity: Now for a strategy The strategic value of copper might be a basis for protectionism if the US were getting its copper from hostile or unstable countries. But copper is not a rare earth mineral for which the US must rely on Chinese suppliers, nor is it like oil in the pre-fracking era, when the US had to import it from questionable regimes in the Middle East. The majority of US copper imports come from Chile, and the next two major suppliers are Canada and Peru. Meanwhile, America also has a robust domestic copper industry, which accounts for about half the copper used in the US. The majority of this copper comes from the swing state of Arizona, which may offer a narrow partisan rationale for copper protectionism. But there is no strategic problem with importing copper from friendly countries in the Western Hemisphere— and every reason to worry that deliberately raising the price of a widely used production input will hamper US competitiveness in crucial industries. This is, unfortunately, not an unusual consequence of Trump's trade policy: By applying taxes on intermediate goods, he is encouraging the US to specialize in resource extraction and primary commodities at the expense of complicated manufactured goods. Also Read: American puzzle: Trump's tariffs have resulted in an inflation paradox 'Industrial policy' functions by moving a nation's economy up the value chain. In the early days of the American Republic, for example, Alexander Hamilton worried that the US would continue to be a de facto economic colony of Europe. As a sparsely populated nation with abundant natural resources, a totally unregulated market might have caused America to specialize in exporting raw materials to Europe, which would in turn export manufactured goods back to America. As an alternative, he proposed protective tariffs to promote the growth of US industry. Trump borrows his own tariffs from the Hamiltonian tradition, but completely misses the larger logic of the programme and the altered nature of the modern economy. Over time, as the world has become richer and shipping has become cheaper, the cutting edge of manufacturing has become increasingly complicated. These days it's common to assemble a finished product from parts made in countries all around the world, with each part itself containing a staggering array of raw materials. Countries get richer by specializing at the more complex end of the spectrum. To the extent that you can boost US natural-resource production by eliminating low-benefit regulatory barriers, that's a win. But boosting the US copper-extraction industry at the expense of US copper-using industries is a recipe for de-industrialization. And much the same applies to Trump's obsession with protectionism for industries like steel and aluminium. For the US to be a manufacturing powerhouse, its industries need access to the cheapest possible inputs. Also Read: Chinese history shows how a closed economy could squander a nation's greatness It's also worth considering that even though 19th-century pro-industrialization politicians favoured tariffs, Trump is likely overrating their importance in promoting the growth of factories. One important manufacturing input, after all, is workers. The kind of quasi-open borders of the Gilded Age would probably not be a major boost to US manufacturing today. But a serious industrial policy would consider the case for a visa programme for skilled workers with experience in fields such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding. At a minimum, the goal should be to avoid actions that make things worse. Copper is important because it's used to make other stuff. The goal of US trade policy, not to say industrial policy, should be to help America become a better place to make stuff that the world wants. Trump's nostalgia economics is pushing the US further from that goal. ©Bloomberg The author is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store