Education Secretary Linda McMahon struggles with basic math when trying to add up proposed budget cuts
Sitting before the appropriations subcommittee that focuses on education, McMahon nodded her head along as Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana mistakenly claimed that the U.S. spends '$1,580,000' on federal grant programs, known as TRIO and GEAR UP, per year and that after 10 years, that adds up to be 'over a trillion dollars.'
The U.S. actually spends $1.58 billion per year on the programs, which does not add up to more than a trillion after 10 years. But, McMahon did not correct Kennedy's math error.
However, Reed, the senator from Rhode Island, did.
'I'm not a great mathematician, but I think you were talking about a trillion dollars? I believe $1.5 billion times 10 is $15 billion, that's a little bit off from a trillion dollars,' Reed said.
McMahon responded, 'I think the budget cuts $1.2 billion for TRIO.'
'Well, $1.2 billion that would be $12 billion, not a trillion dollars,' Reed replied.
'Ok,' McMahon said.
The math blunder was part of McMahon's testimony about President Donald Trump's 2026 budget proposal, which includes sweeping cuts to the Department of Education – drastically impacting education grants such as TRIO or GEAR UP.
The Independent has asked the Department of Education for comment.
TRIO, a federal program comprised of various grants, are some of the Education Department's largest investments aimed at assisting low-income or first-generation college students or individuals with disabilities to advance through the academic pipeline. In 2024, the Education Department provided $1.191 billion for the program.
GEAR UP, a federal grant program, assists low-income students preparing to enter postsecondary education. In 2024, the Education Department provided $388 million for the program.
But under Trump's proposed 'skinny budget,' essentially all of the TRIO and GEAR UP grants would be eliminated. It's part of his efforts to shutter the Education Department.
During the hearing, Senator Susan Collins of Maine aired concerns about the cuts to TRIO, saying she had 'seen the lives of countless first-generation and low-income students, not only in Maine, but across the country… changed by the TRIO program.'
Education advocacy groups such as the Council for Opportunity in Education and the Institute for College Access & Success have condemned the proposed budget, saying it would negatively impact millions of students – particularly those of low-income households.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Taliban are remaking Afghanistan in their image. It should have us all worried
This article first appeared on our partner site, Independent Persian Since returning to power, the Taliban has made spreading its ideology a key priority. From prisons and rehab facilities to military bases, 'religious education' is becoming a cornerstone of Afghanistan's institutions. By introducing courses in Quranic recitation and exegesis, as well as broader religious instruction, the group aims to bring more Afghans closer to its strict interpretation of Islam and convince them of the merits of its fundamentalist approach. Recently, images of the 'graduation ceremony' of 100 people undergoing treatment for drug addiction at a rehab centre in the western province of Herat were widely promoted in media outlets affiliated with the group. The 'graduands' had completed courses in the correct recitation and pronunciation of the Quran. The ceremony, which also marked the end of their time at the facility, featured white clothing, traditional caps and Taliban flags. Syed Asif, one of the participants on the course who was a patient at the centre, told Independent Persian: 'I'm currently undergoing treatment and have now been able to quit drugs. During this time, I started reading the Holy Quran and memorised many of its parts.' Hayatullah Rouhani, the anti-narcotics chief in the city of Herat, said authorities aim to provide opportunities for religious learning in the rehabilitation process for those struggling with addiction. In addition to offering Quranic instruction, the Taliban also held singing sessions for some of the patients. They were instructed to sign anthems that glorified the group's 20-year war against the former Afghan government and Western forces, recounting bombings, suicide attacks and bloody battles. These songs serve to promote the Taliban's 'jihadist narrative' and legitimise violence. What's concerning is not the introduction of religious education in itself, but the content and nature of what is taught. It is a curriculum designed to push society towards extremism and create fertile ground for Taliban recruitment. During the group's insurgency against the previous government, religious schools were key recruiting hubs. These institutions distort Islamic teachings and glorify violence, preparing students for war and carrying out suicide missions. Their goal is to build a society not just politically dominated by the Taliban, but intellectually and ideologically shaped by its worldview Now that the Taliban have full control of public schools, religious institutions, universities, prisons and rehab centres across Afghanistan, their primary focus has been imposing a rigid, hardline interpretation of Islam. Their goal is to build a society not just politically dominated by their organisation, but intellectually and ideologically shaped by its worldview. The Taliban's expansion of religious education isn't confined to prisons and rehab centres. There has been a sharp increase in the number of mosques and religious schools across the country. The presence of senior Taliban officials at graduation ceremonies, both in religious schools and for religious courses in detention or rehab centres, makes it clear that spreading their version of Islam through 'religious education' is a top priority. These officials have repeatedly called on people to study religion, but with the proviso that this is done according to the Taliban's own interpretation of Islam, which diverges significantly from mainstream Islamic teachings in much of the Muslim world. The growing emphasis on this specific brand of religious education, centred on the Taliban's radical interpretation of Islam, raises serious concerns about the normalisation of religious extremism. By promoting slogans like 'implementing sharia law' and 'establishing an Islamic system', the Taliban is trying to win over more Afghan citizens to its radical ideology and expand the social base it needs to sustain its political and military power. Reviewed by Tooba Khokhar and Celine Assaf


New York Times
7 hours ago
- New York Times
Inside a Gathering of America's Growing Home-School Movement
Paper planes whizzed and dipped and careened into the audience while parents gleefully ducked for cover. At the front of the drab hotel conference room, a man deadpanned, 'You all signed a waiver before you came in here?' The speaker, Chris Cardiff, was urging the room of parents to take control over their children's understanding of American history. His presentation raced through the 'competing narratives' that young children faced: 'celebrate 'diversity,'' it went, versus 'e pluribus unum.' 'Why would you have targeting of young children?' Mr. Cardiff said. 'Because, first of all, people on the left side of the political spectrum are targeting preschoolers with their version of history.' It was the start of a gathering, one of several run across the country by a group called the Great Homeschool Conventions, which brings together families who are part of America's fast ballooning and politically forceful home-schooling movement. In July, these families descended on a water park resort in Round Rock, Texas, where conference rooms were steps away from colorful mega-slides and plaster hippopotami. The children hit the lazy river while their parents attended sessions about designing bible-driven curricula and helping their offspring 'safely navigate our hypersexual culture.' They discussed how to install patriotic values in their children and whether to send them off to college, where some speakers worried they would be exposed to left-wing values. 'At this point, I'm generally advocating people not going to college, unless you're going into STEM,' one speaker, Lisa Nehring, told the room, later adding, 'I sound like 'Oh my gosh, the world is going to end' — and it is!' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Black America Web
15 hours ago
- Black America Web
Trump Signs EO On College Sports: But What Does It Mean?
On Thursday, President Trump exercised his writing hand and signed an executive order titled 'Saving College Sports,' mandating federal authorities like the Department of Education to have more involvement with universities, especially those public colleges that receive federal funds, to ensure that athletic scholarships and NIL deals remain above board. The order demands that larger universities with massive athletic departments maintain a certain number of scholarships for less lucrative sports. The hope is that this executive order will help quell the massive influx of money for schools to attract big names under the recently created name, image, and likeness deals — known as NIL. 'The future of college sports is under unprecedented threat,' the order says, NPR reports. 'A national solution is urgently needed to prevent this situation from deteriorating beyond repair and to protect non-revenue sports, including many women's sports, that comprise the backbone of intercollegiate athletics, drive American superiority at the Olympics and other international competitions, and catalyze hundreds of thousands of student-athletes to fuel American success in myriad ways.' Here's the problem: An executive order is not the law. Think of it as a sternly worded email from the CEO of a company. Yes, it means something, but what really? There is no guarantee that the order will be made a law, but many legal experts believe that it does shine a light on the president's growing interest in sticking his nose in matters that don't concern him. 'This may not be a binding legal framework — but it's absolutely a signal: that the federal government, and now presidential politics, are increasingly willing to intervene in the future of college sports,' Noah Henderson, a professor of sports management at Loyola University Chicago, told NPR. Trump's order comes just one month after a class action settlement called House v. NCAA allowed Division I college athletic departments to pay players directly. 'Absent guardrails to stop the madness and ensure a reasonable, balanced use of resources across collegiate athletic programs that preserves their educational and developmental benefits, many college sports will soon cease to exist,' the order reads. Many believed that the president was planning on creating a college sports commission to sort through some of the more difficult issues facing college sports, (like is all of the player money coming from the universities?) But Trump's order chose to try and add 'guardrails' to 'an out-of-control, rudderless system in which competing university donors engage in bidding wars for the best players, who can change teams each season,' the order reads. From AP News: There has been a dramatic increase in money flowing into and around college athletics, and a sense of chaos. Key court victories won by athletes angry that they were barred for decades from earning income based on their celebrity and from sharing in the billions of revenue they helped generate have gutted the amateurism model long at the heart of college sports. Facing a growing number of state laws undercutting its authority, the NCAA in July 2021 cleared the way for athletes to cash in with NIL deals with brands and sponsors — deals now worth millions. That came mere days after a 9-0 decision from the Supreme Court that found the NCAA cannot impose caps on education-related benefits schools provide to their athletes because such limits violate antitrust law. The NCAA's embrace of NIL deals set the stage for another massive change that took effect July 1: The ability of schools to begin paying millions of dollars to their own athletes, up to $20.5 million per school over the next year. The $2.8 billion House settlement shifts even more power to athletes, who have also won the ability to transfer from school to school without waiting to play. 'We've gotten to the point where government is involved,' Purdue coach Barry Odom said when asked about the Trump order, AP reports. 'Obviously, there's belief it needs to be involved. We'll get it all worked out. The game's been around for a hundred years and it's going to be around 100 more.' Trump Signed An Executive Order On College Sports, But What Does It Mean? was originally published on 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.