logo
'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg

'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg

SBS Australiaa day ago
The final increase to the superannuation guarantee has taken effect, meaning employers are now required to pay a minimum contribution of 12 per cent into their employees' super funds. But around a third of people are unaware where their retirement funds are invested — a similar proportion don't know their super balance, and one in 10 have never checked. These were the findings of a survey of 3,146 Australians conducted by the Commonwealth Bank, which suggested the knowledge gap about how super is invested was higher among gen Z and women, at 43 per cent. Jessica Irvine, the bank's personal finance expert, said people have more confidence in managing their day-to-day finances, but need more assistance to understand retirement options.
Echoing her views, Wayne Swan, the former federal treasurer who oversaw the legislation guaranteeing the increase from nine to 12 per cent, told SBS News that more needed to be done to engage Australians with their retirement planning.
Swan, now chair of Cbus, an industry super fund, said: "I think that all superannuation funds acknowledge and do their best to achieve [that], and there's always more that can be done."
What is happening with superannuation? Thirty-four years ago, former prime minister Paul Keating shared his vision of an Australian future that included a 12 per cent target for compulsory super contributions.
Now, he said, that system "finally matures".
The superannuation guarantee has risen since 2012 to reach 12 per cent. In a statement to mark the 1 July increase to 12 per cent, Keating said it "will guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3 million at retirement" for someone entering the workforce today.
"Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place," he said.
How did we get here? Superannuation in Australia stretches back to the early 20th century, but there were no attempts to institutionalise universal compulsory contributions before the mid-1980s.
In 1985, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, with the support of the then-Hawke government, presented a National Wage Case to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission about a 3 per cent compulsory contribution for all Australian workers.
The tribunal sided with the union in 1986 but ruled it as optional — subject to agreement between employers and employees. Five years later, in Keating's final federal budget as treasurer, the 3 per cent superannuation guarantee levy was made compulsory. It came into effect the following year, when Keating was prime minister, with the introduction of a superannuation guarantee charge to penalise employers who don't meet their contribution obligations. The mandatory rate then gradually increased to 9 per cent by 2002. It was supposed to reach 12 per cent by 2000, but, under the Howard government, there were no further increases until 1 July 2013. In 2010, two years after the Global Financial Crisis and in response to the findings of the Henry Tax Review, then-treasurer Swan unveiled a plan to incrementally lift the superannuation guarantee levy to 12 per cent.
He said it would increase by 0.5 per cent each year between 2013 and 2019.
In 2010, then-treasurer Wayne Swan (pictured right) announced a plan to gradually increase the superannuation guarantee levy from 9 per cent to 12 per cent. Source: AAP / Alan Porritt But two months after it rose to 9.25 per cent in 2013, Tony Abbott stormed to a landslide election victory — and followed through on an election promise to delay increases to the guarantee due to cost pressures on small businesses. The government failed to legislate the delay the following year, and the rate was lifted to 9.5 per cent — a level it remained at for seven years. It wasn't until Australia was in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic that the incremental increases began.
Starting in 2021, it rose by 0.5 per cent each year.
LISTEN TO
SBS News
30/06/2025 08:22 English The 12 per cent milestone Australia's superannuation system now manages over $4 trillion in assets, ranking as the fourth-largest pension market in the world. The 12 per cent milestone is expected to propel Australia to second place within a decade — just behind the United States — despite its relatively small population. Swan said the superannuation guarantee levy not only delivers a secure retirement for all Australians, but "fundamentally alters the distribution of wealth in our community".
"It gives access to growth assets to everyone in the community. From a building worker through to a professional in the office tower, everyone in Australia gets to own a piece of the wealth of this great country in a way that's never before been possible," he said.
Swan said he's "absolutely proud to have been part of this story". "I always think of those pioneers, particularly the unionists, who fought to establish this scheme 40 years ago. What it really shows is that ordinary working people can effect change in a society like ours," he said.
"What visionaries they were, and what they have done to make our country not only a bigger and more successful economy, but a fairer one as well."
What is a 'comfortable retirement'? Swan said while the six-year delay in achieving a 12 per cent increase came at a cost to Australian superannuation balances, the benefits are greater from having finally reached that milestone. "For someone who's, say, 30 years old now, it's going to mean an extra $130,000 in their retirement," he said. That follows recent modelling by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). The super peak body's retirement standard for June 2025 projects a 30-year-old today on the median wage of $75,000 and a $30,000 super balance would witness that figure rise to $610,000 by the retirement age of 67.
This amount exceeds ASFA's estimate of the $595,000 needed to afford a comfortable retirement for singles and $690,000 for couples.
ASFA defines a 'comfortable' retirement as someone who owns their home outright, is in good health, can afford top-level private health insurance, has a good car, and engages in a range of leisure and recreational activities, including taking one domestic trip a year and one international trip every seven years.
Business concerns There are concerns that a string of 1 July changes , including the increase to the superannuation guarantee levy, could hit businesses and place further pressure on cash flow.
Luke Achterstraat, CEO, Council of Small Business Organisations Australia, said: "The increase of the superannuation guarantee comes at a time when award rates have also increased 3.5 per cent, national productivity is in decline, and payroll tax and workers' compensation insurance will also increase."
There are concerns that an increase to the superannuation guarantee levy and other changes that took effect on 1 July could negatively impact small businesses and further pressure their cash flow. Source: AAP "This puts small businesses between a rock and a hard place, needing to either absorb or pass on these costs to consumers," Achterstraat said.
Beyond 12 per cent: Where to from here? The 0.5 per cent increase to 12 per cent is the last one legislated by the Australian government. However, with life expectancy improving, would we need more in our nest egg, and is there a case for raising the superannuation guarantee even further? "I think there's going to be a debate about whether we need to go above 12 per cent," Swan said. "I think 12 per cent can certainly guarantee quite a dignified retirement for all Australians, but that will be a discussion that will be had in the years ahead."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Buy, hold or sell CBA? The decision's not simple
Buy, hold or sell CBA? The decision's not simple

Daily Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Buy, hold or sell CBA? The decision's not simple

Don't miss out on the headlines from Stockhead. Followed categories will be added to My News. The CBA clearly is overvalued on conventional metrics, but selling is not as simple as that 'Expensive' stocks can remain so for months – or even years The CBA's worthy peers could be cheaper alternatives Happy New Financial Year (NFY) – a time of quiet reflection on the next fiscal stanza between scrambling for receipts to justify Netflix as a tax deduction. As part of their soul searching, investors may resolve to take profits on shares that have done well. Like the New Year's resolution to drink only on weekends rather than days ending with a 'y', NFY intentions dissipate just as quickly. But there's one decision that won't go away – and its got nothing to do with joining a gym. Should they sell their shares in the Commonwealth Bank (ASX:CBA) after last financial year's shock 48% share romp? With the stock down about 5% over the last week, some investors already have lightened up on the bank, rather than with the barbells. Trapped in a 'virtuous cycle' A chorus of expert voices has decried the CBA is chronically overvalued: mainly the fund managers who sold too soon and trashed their 2024-25 performance. In summary, the world's most expensive bank is such because overseas institutions like Australia. The CBA – also the biggest ASX stock- is the obvious proxy for our great nation. As more instos pile into the CBA, there's more buying because of the need to maintain index weighting. The CBA now accounts for 10% of the ASX200 index. This is all very well until a typical bank-like event – such a housing downturn – disrupts this self-reinforcing loop. In the words of Atlas Funds Management's Hugh Dive: 'it's a virtuous cycle until it isn't'. One pillar, three 'stumps' CBA's $300 billion valuation makes its Four Pillars peers look more like three 'stumps'. On Morgan Stanley's numbers, the CBA trades on an estimated current-year earnings multiple of 29 times, compared with 20.4 times for its Westpac (ASX:WBC) , National Australia Bank (ASX:NAB) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ASX:ANZ) . This compares with a sector average multiple of 12.5 times over the last decade. Of course, most retail investors hold the banks for their franked dividends. On this note, the banks trade on an average forward yield of 4.8%, or 5.8% grossed up (accounting for the franking). The CBA's yield has declined to a mediocre 2.7% (3.9% grossed up). Put in context, a risk-free 12-month CBA term deposit pays 4%. The case for buying To be fair, the CBA has kept its nose out of trouble – and inarguably it's one of the world's best managed banks. Our 'stronger for longer' housing boom sure does help. 'Expensive' shares can remain so for years. This is evidenced by this year's record-breaking run of radiology imaging play ProMedicus (ASX:PME) . Or, globally, AI hero Nvidia. So is the next stop for CBA is $200 per share. Or why not $300? The CBA's valuation could be supported if the Goldilocks economy thesis pans out, with tempering inflation enabling more rate cuts (as is expected). Meanwhile, the other three 'Four Pillars' have taken in turns to court disaster and controversy or lose share in the key home mortgage market. Banking on better returns elsewhere That said, the 'three stumps' are excellent banks by global standards. They also have a solid track record of recovering from despite their whoopsies. For those seeking consistent income, they work on a September balance date so pay their divs at a different time to the June-balancing CBA. Still unconvinced? The non-Big Four banks could be a credible alternative. That said, they may lack the relative prudential strength and have a higher cost of capital. Investors in the out-of-sorts Bank of Queensland (ASX:BOQ) enjoyed a 40% bounce share bounce last financial year, secondly only to the CBA's 49% surge. MyState (ASX:MYS) is an exposure to the gentrifying Tasmania market, as well as the Rockhampton and Bundaberg regions. A pure-play business lender Judo Capital Holdings (ASX:JDO) enjoys higher interest margins than on a mortgage, but its risk managers need to be on top of their game. So far, they have been. PNG bank Kina Securities (ASX:KSL) trades on a PE of eight times and an 8% yield. Perversely for the impoverished island nation, Kina has capital adequacy that would put the Big Four to shame. This story does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decision. Originally published as Criterion: Buy, hold or sell CBA? Investors face their NFY resolution

Anthony Albanese pays tribute to former Labor prime minister John Curtin for standing up to US, UK
Anthony Albanese pays tribute to former Labor prime minister John Curtin for standing up to US, UK

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Anthony Albanese pays tribute to former Labor prime minister John Curtin for standing up to US, UK

Anthony Albanese will pay homage to former Labor prime minister John Curtin as not just the leader who founded Australia's alliance with the US, but one who stood up against allied super powers, in pointed comments amid concerns over Australia's relationship with America. Mr Curtin's leadership, which lasted between 1941 to 1945, lasted during the Pacific War and the bombing of Darwin and Broome by the Japanese. He died while in office, before peace was declared. In a speech to mark the 80th anniversary of Mr Curtin's death on Saturday, the Prime Minister will credit the Labor figure with forging Australia's long-held alliance with the United States. However Mr Albanese will also note Mr Curtin's decision to stand up to the US and the United Kingdom, then led by Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill his decision not to send Australian troops to then Burma, now Myanmar, in what would have been days before it fell to the Japanese. 'Hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner. It would have been a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore,' Mr Albanese is expected to tell attendees at Sydney's John Curtin Research Centre. Mr Albanese will note that while the Australian-US alliance 'ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin's leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it'. Instead, he will say that Mr Curtin had the 'confidence and determination to think and act for ourselves'. 'Because Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another. Or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,' he will say. 'It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region. It followed the decision Curtin had made in 1941 that Australia would issue its own declaration of war with Japan. 'Speaking for ourselves, as a sovereign nation.' His remarks come as the Albanese government is currently under pressure by the Trump administration to amp up defence spending to 3.5 per cent, comes amid concerns of fragile global stability and claims from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that China would imminently invade Beijing. Mr Albanese has frequently rejected US pressure to amp up defence spending, stating that investment will be calculated according to Australia's needs. Labor is also under pressure to negotiate a tariff carveout, however on Friday he said he believed the levy applied to non steel and aluminium imports would remain at 10 per cent after Donald Trump's July 9 deadline. Mr Albanese is also set to champion to 'rights and the role of middle powers and smaller nations' and speak to the importance of collective responsibility in the Indo-Pacific, despite fears of China's increasing aggression in the area. Ensuring that the 'sovereignty of every nation is respected and the dignity of every individual is upheld' is another priority. He will say his government will continue to rebuild Australia 'standing as a leader and partner in the Pacific,' deepen economic engagement in South East Asia, while 'patiently and deliberately working to stabilise our relationship with China'.

Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance
Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance

Anthony Albanese will use a speech lionising Labor Prime Minister John Curtin to champion Australian independence within the US alliance, saying the legendary wartime leader is remembered 'not just because he looked to America' but because he 'spoke for Australia'. The speech comes at a delicate moment in Australia's key strategic relationship, as the federal government grapples with an unpredictable White House, along with uncertainties over the Administration's tariffs, the AUKUS pact, and America's trajectory under Donald Trump. On Saturday night the Prime Minister will deliver a speech at the John Curtin Research centre marking the 80th anniversary of the former Prime Minister, who is often called the 'father' of the Australia-US alliance. Successive Labor Prime Ministers have claimed the Alliance as a signature achievement for ALP foreign policy, and have lavished praise on Curtin for turning to America in the wake of the United Kingdom's catastrophic defeat in Singapore in 1942. While Mr Albanese will praise the Alliance as a 'pillar' of Australian foreign policy and the nation's 'most important defence and security partnership' he will also say that it was 'product' of Curtin's leadership and 'not the extent of it.' "Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,' he's expected to say. 'It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region." The Prime Minister will also say that Curtin recognised that Australia realised that its security 'could not be outsourced to London, or trusted to vague assurances from Britain.' 'We needed an Australian foreign policy anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition,' he will say. The Prime Minister will also praise Curtin for withstanding pressure from both Roosevelt and Churchill to send Australian troops returning from the Middle East to Burma, rather than back home to defend Australia. He'll say if the US and UK had got their way 'hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner' as Japanese forces took Burma, and John Curtin's assertion of sovereignty prevented 'a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore.' The Prime Minister will also seek to frame his government as the inheritor of Curtin's economic agenda, comparing the government's moves to bolster manufacturing to Curtin's wartime industrial program. While the Albanese government has doubled down on the AUKUS pact and its ambitious plan to develop nuclear powered submarines with the United States, it has also expressed deep frustration over the Trump Administration's Liberation Day tariffs, pushed back against Washington's demand that Australia radically increase defence spending and fretted privately about the impact of the massive cuts to US aid programs. And while Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Donald Trump he is yet to have a face-to-face meeting with the US President after Mr Trump departed the G7 in Canada early ahead of US strikes on Iran. Professor James Curran from the University of Sydney told the ABC the speech was 'easily the most significant' one Mr Albanese had delivered in office. 'It's significant not just for the way in which Albanese invokes the Curtin legend, but the time in which he is doing it – when Australia is again under significant pressure from a great power to adopt policy courses not necessarily in Australia's interests,' he said. 'He says Curtin's wartime leadership was fundamentally about the defence of Australian sovereignty, that it was about safeguarding Australia's security in the Pacific, and that Curtin, like other Australia leaders before him, was all too aware that great powers can play fast and loose with Australian interests. That it was simply not an option to rely on assurances from London or Washington as the basis for making Australian policy.' Professor Curran said Mr Albanese was using the Curtin story to send a signal to both Washington and to Australians that 'being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard.' '(Also) that leadership is as much about tending to the domestic hearth and what we have built here as it is in safeguarding the continent's security,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store