PIP cuts mean people with 'invisible conditions' could lose out
Benefits experts fear changes to PIP eligibility could mean people with health conditions that do not always have obvious outward symptoms could lose out on payments under new rules. The eligibility for PIP (Personal Independence Payment) is becoming stricter from next year.
An additional rule will mean you have to score at least one 4 on one of the daily living activities in the PIP scoring system to qualify for the daily living rate, which is currently paid at £73.90 or £110.40 a week, depending on your level of need. This means someone on the higher rate who no longer qualified could lose out on over £5,700 a year in payments while if you lost out on the lower rate, you would lose out on over £3,800 a year.
PIP, overseen by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), is intended to help cover the extra costs of a person who lives with a long-term disability or health condition, and includes a daily living part and a mobility part. Health experts at Medico Digital have warned the changes could have severe consequences for some people.
Oliver Capel, healthcare marketing expert with the group, said: "The potential tightening of PIP eligibility risks disproportionately impacting people with 'invisible' conditions, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and mental health disorders. These individuals often rely on PIP not just for mobility aids or home adjustments, but to fund essential support like therapy, transportation to medical appointments, and help with daily tasks that can otherwise be overwhelming."
PIP applicants often undergo a medical assessment to determine how their condition affects them and so how much they should get in payments. But Ms Capel warned there are risks here that the reality of living with the three health issues she mentioned is not fully understood.
She explained: "Many of these conditions fluctuate and are not easily understood in traditional medical assessments. For example, someone with severe anxiety may be physically able to walk but still unable to navigate a supermarket or attend a job interview.
"Removing PIP in these cases doesn't just cut off financial aid. It strips away a sense of autonomy and stability." She warned that PIP is a lifeline for many people, helping them maintain dignity and quality of life. She warned of major problems that could result from tightening the eligibility rules: "If changes are made without accounting for the lived realities of these conditions, we risk pushing vulnerable people further into poverty, isolation, and worsening health outcomes.
"A more nuanced, case-by-case approach is essential to ensure that we support those who genuinely need it, even if their struggles are not immediately visible."
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in the Commons on June 23 that reforms were needed to preserve the system in the long term. She said: 'This is a vital benefit that makes a crucial contribution towards the extra costs of living with a disability. That is why we want to reform it, to protect it for generations to come because we do not think it's sustainable to have a doubling of the number of people on Pip over this decade from two to more than 4.3 million.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
DWP benefits U-turn leaves £4.8 billion hole in the budget
The concessions, including the last-minute shelving of plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), were enough to head off the Government's first Commons defeat. But they also removed a key plank of Sir Keir Starmer's welfare reform agenda, delaying changes to Pip until after a review of the benefit not due to conclude until autumn 2026. Disability groups have shared their concerns Many disability charities were unhappy with the result," despite some concessions. James Watson-O'Neill, Chief Executive of the national disability charity Sense, said: "Today's vote in Parliament is deeply distressing. By choosing to advance this bill, MPs have voted for measures the government's data say will push 150,000 disabled people into poverty. This is not the right way to reform our welfare system — it's a move that has already caused significant fear and anxiety within the disabled people's community. "We're incredibly grateful to all those who spoke out against the bill. Their efforts helped secure important government concessions, which mean some disabled people will retain the support they rely on. However, this creates a deeply unfair two-tier system — protecting some while leaving new claimants facing serious financial hardship. And the government's latest concession, to delay the tightening of the criteria for PIP, doesn't change the fact that it will eventually become harder for new claimants to access this vital benefit. "Looking ahead, we urge the government to immediately reconsider their proposal to remove the health element of Universal Credit from young people until they turn 22. We also want to work constructively with them to expand the eligibility criteria for additional support for those who will never be able to work, to ensure no one is left behind." PIP IS NOT AN OUT-OF-WORK BENEFIT PIP is an allowance that helps disabled people with the extra costs incurred by having a disability. You can claim it whether you work or not. The media and government narrative about PIP is incorrect and must be challenged KILL THE BILL!… — Atlanta 🦹🏻♀️ #DisabilityRebellion (@areyoflight) June 30, 2025 But Mark Rowland, Chief Executive of the Mental Health Foundation, shared these concerns: 'Tonight's concessions by the UK government are a victory for not just the millions of people across the country who are disabled, but for every single one of us who may find ourselves disabled one day. Removing Clause 5 is clearly the right decision given the lack of evidence these measures would encourage anyone with a mental health problem to return to work, and the very clear risk of pushing people into poverty, worsening their mental health. Despite this, this bill remains deeply flawed. 'We remain concerned by the measures in this bill which both reduce the amount paid to recipients of the health element of Universal Credit, and limits its eligibility to those over the age of 22. These measures are discriminatory, and will do little to support people back into the workplace. The UK government should drop the implementation of these measures too." What will happen next? Ahead of a crucial vote on cuts to disability benefits, our new evidence casts doubt on whether jobs are even available for disabled people facing cuts 📢 The analysis found that the parts of the country among the hardest hit by the cuts have fewer job opportunities 1/3 — Joseph Rowntree Foundation (@jrf_uk) June 24, 2025 With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn. On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected. I am going into the Commons Chamber to speak against & vote against the Government's appalling Bill to cut disability benefits. I urge all Labour MPs to do so. I was elected to protect disabled people not harm them. — John McDonnell (@johnmcdonnellMP) July 1, 2025 Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.' The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term. On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments. In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?' Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. Recommended reading: But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30. Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers. The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
DWP to pay out £441 payment - full list of health conditions that qualify
DWP to pay out £441 payment - full list of health conditions that qualify Attendance Allowance is a payment for people who have a physical or mental disability or illness that makes it difficult for them to look after themselves Pensioners dealing with certain health conditions may qualify for additional financial assistance worth up to £441 monthly through Attendance Allowance. This benefit, provided by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), is intended to assist those who have reached State Pension age and are living with a disability, long-term illness, or physical or mental health condition that impacts their daily routine. DWP statistics show that nearly 1.7 million older people were claiming Attendance Allowance as of August 2024. The payment comes in two tiers based on the level of care required: £73.90 or £110.40 weekly, equivalent to £295.60 or £441.60 monthly. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here The weekly sum depends on how much care is needed. According to the DWP, individuals requiring "frequent help or constant supervision during the day, or supervision at night" may qualify for the lower rate of £73.90. Meanwhile, those who need "help or supervision throughout both day and night, or a medical professional has said you're nearing the end of life" are entitled to the higher rate of £110.40. As highlighted by the Daily Record, Attendance Allowance is designed to help people of State Pension age cover the additional daily expenses linked to their condition. Article continues below Figures show that 563,746 claimants (36%) have been receiving Attendance Allowance for more than five years, according to the Daily Star. Attendance Allowance serves as a vital lifeline for individuals dealing with disabilities, chronic illnesses, or mental or physical health conditions. The most commonly claimed condition is arthritis, providing support to 483,376 people across Great Britain. Data from the DWP reveals that roughly 47% of those claiming Attendance Allowance for arthritis receive an award that lasts five years or more. The following statistics demonstrate the number of claimants per condition and the percentage receiving payments for five years or longer. Those with lifelong, degenerative conditions unlikely to improve typically receive a longer award. Shorter awards are given where an improvement is anticipated. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. The figure below represents all claimants up until the end of August 2024. Attendance Allowance is a benefit designed to assist with additional costs if you have a physical or mental disability or illness that makes self-care challenging. It does not cater for mobility needs. Having a carer is not a prerequisite for making a claim. Who is eligible? You should apply for Attendance Allowance if you have a disability or illness and require help or supervision throughout the day or at times during the night - even if you're not currently receiving this help. The DWP provides a list of common health issues that might qualify you for attendance allowance. They are as follows: Arthritis Spondylosis Back pain – other/precise diagnosis not specified Disease of the muscles, bones or joints Trauma to limbs Visual disorders and diseases Hearing disorders Heart disease Respiratory disorders and diseases Asthma Cystic fibrosis Cerebrovascular disease Peripheral vascular disease Epilepsy Neurological diseases Multiple sclerosis Parkinson's disease Motor neurone disease Chronic pain syndromes Diabetes mellitus Metabolic disease Traumatic paraplegia/tetraplegia Major trauma other than traumatic paraplegia/tetraplegia Learning difficulties Psychosis Psychoneurosis Personality Disorder Dementia Behavioural disorder Alcohol and drug abuse Hyperkinetic syndrome Renal disorders Inflammatory bowel disease Bowel and stomach disease Blood disorders Haemophilia Multi system disorders Multiple allergy syndrome Skin disease Malignant disease Severely mentally impaired Double amputee Deaf/blind Haemodialysis Frailty Total parenteral nutrition AIDS Infectious diseases: viral disease - Covid-19 Infectious diseases: viral disease - precise diagnosis not specified Infectious diseases: bacterial disease – tuberculosis Infectious diseases: bacterial disease – precise diagnosis not specified Infectious diseases: protozoal disease – malaria Infectious diseases: protozoal disease – other/precise diagnosis not specified Infectious diseases - other / precise diagnosis not specified Cognitive disorder - other / precise diagnosis not specified Terminally Ill Unknown If you struggle with everyday tasks, whether they take a long time, cause discomfort or require physical support like leaning on furniture, it might be worth considering applying for Attendance Allowance. It's not just for those with a physical disability or illness. You should also consider applying if you need help or supervision throughout the day or night and have: The money can be used in any way you choose and it could assist in maintaining your independence at home for a longer period. Applying for Attendance Allowance may seem daunting due to the lengthy claim form. However, assistance is readily available from Citizens Advice and Independent Age. Detailed instructions on how to obtain the application form by post or phone can be found on the website. Article continues below
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
DWP benefits U-turn leaves £4.8 billion hole in the budget
The concessions, including the last-minute shelving of plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), were enough to head off the Government's first Commons defeat. But they also removed a key plank of Sir Keir Starmer's welfare reform agenda, delaying changes to Pip until after a review of the benefit not due to conclude until autumn 2026. Many disability charities were unhappy with the result," despite some concessions. James Watson-O'Neill, Chief Executive of the national disability charity Sense, said: "Today's vote in Parliament is deeply distressing. By choosing to advance this bill, MPs have voted for measures the government's data say will push 150,000 disabled people into poverty. This is not the right way to reform our welfare system — it's a move that has already caused significant fear and anxiety within the disabled people's community. "We're incredibly grateful to all those who spoke out against the bill. Their efforts helped secure important government concessions, which mean some disabled people will retain the support they rely on. However, this creates a deeply unfair two-tier system — protecting some while leaving new claimants facing serious financial hardship. And the government's latest concession, to delay the tightening of the criteria for PIP, doesn't change the fact that it will eventually become harder for new claimants to access this vital benefit. "Looking ahead, we urge the government to immediately reconsider their proposal to remove the health element of Universal Credit from young people until they turn 22. We also want to work constructively with them to expand the eligibility criteria for additional support for those who will never be able to work, to ensure no one is left behind." PIP IS NOT AN OUT-OF-WORK BENEFIT PIP is an allowance that helps disabled people with the extra costs incurred by having a disability. You can claim it whether you work or not. The media and government narrative about PIP is incorrect and must be challenged KILL THE BILL!… But Mark Rowland, Chief Executive of the Mental Health Foundation, shared these concerns: 'Tonight's concessions by the UK government are a victory for not just the millions of people across the country who are disabled, but for every single one of us who may find ourselves disabled one day. Removing Clause 5 is clearly the right decision given the lack of evidence these measures would encourage anyone with a mental health problem to return to work, and the very clear risk of pushing people into poverty, worsening their mental health. Despite this, this bill remains deeply flawed. 'We remain concerned by the measures in this bill which both reduce the amount paid to recipients of the health element of Universal Credit, and limits its eligibility to those over the age of 22. These measures are discriminatory, and will do little to support people back into the workplace. The UK government should drop the implementation of these measures too." Ahead of a crucial vote on cuts to disability benefits, our new evidence casts doubt on whether jobs are even available for disabled people facing cuts 📢 The analysis found that the parts of the country among the hardest hit by the cuts have fewer job opportunities 1/3 With no clarity on when the changes will be enacted or what they might entail, the Chancellor now faces a fiscal headache as a forecast £4.8 billion in welfare savings have been whittled away to nothing. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. IFS deputy director Helen Miller said the move had effectively halved the Chancellor's 'margin of error' against her main fiscal rule, once again raising the possibility of tax rises in the autumn. On top of that, a stuttering economy and global instability could mean she has even less room for manoeuvre than expected. I am going into the Commons Chamber to speak against & vote against the Government's appalling Bill to cut disability benefits. I urge all Labour MPs to do so. I was elected to protect disabled people not harm them. Ms Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.' The Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice agreed that there would be no savings in 2029/30, but suggested changes to universal credit – almost the only part of the Government's proposals still standing – could save money in the longer term. On Wednesday morning, the Conservatives accused Labour of making billions in unfunded spending commitments, including both the U-turns on welfare and the partial reinstatement of winter fuel payments. In a letter to Ms Reeves, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride demanded to know where the money was coming from, asking: 'Will you raise tax or increase borrowing?' Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. Recommended reading: But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30. Meanwhile, Sir Keir himself will face a grilling from MPs on Wednesday as he attempts to repair relations with his backbenchers. The weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions comes just a day after 49 of his own MPs voted against his welfare reforms – the biggest rebellion of his premiership so far – while several backbenchers described the Government's handling of the issue as 'chaotic' and 'a shambles'.
