Illinois debates Clean Slate Act to seal or expunge eligible criminal records
'We talked to over 100 legislators and every one of us that we've talked to so far has been really excited about passing clean slate legislation,' said Rev. Ciera Bates-Chamberlain, the executive director of Live Free.
'The system is problematic,' she continued. 'If everyone who was eligible to have their records sealed went down to the courthouse, it will take 154 years for them to actually seal all of those cases because of the backlog.'
Advocates for the Clean Slate Initiative say that a criminal record creates barriers to employment, housing, and other opportunities.
The plan would automate the process, automatically clearing an offender's record once they become eligible for relief.
Rev. Violet Johnicker, pastor of Brooke Road United Methodist Church, said, 'So, people think, 'oh, well, they've served their time. Why don't they just go get a job?' Because we unfortunately, as a society, and particularly Illinois, continue to place obstacles in the way of those folks who are working to better themselves and be meaningful, doing good contributions back to society So we want to remove those barriers and get themselves back on their feet.'
The Clean Slate Act has been passed in 12 states.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Vanuatu Wins Landmark Legal Battle Over Climate Change Impact
One of the world's most vulnerable countries to the fallout from climate change has just won a landmark legal battle. The International Court of Justice has sided with the South Pacific island of Vanuatu in a case brought two years ago via the United Nations General Assembly. In its advisory opinion, delivered on Wednesday, the ICJ said countries have a responsibility to do what they can to limit global warming to the critical threshold of 1.5C, saying that failure to do so may violate international law.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Maryland rep calls out redistricting ‘cheats,' files bill asking for new map
Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon (D) called out redistricting 'cheats' on Tuesday and pledged to redraw the state's district lines if others are allowed to do so outside of the traditional census period. 'I'm introducing legislation to redraw Maryland congressional districts if any other state cheats & draws new maps outside of the census period,' Moon wrote in a Tuesday post on X. 'Seems Trump has convinced Texas, Missouri & others, and FWIW TX did it years ago & got away with it because nobody responded,' he added. In addition to the statement, Moon posted a screenshot of his bill request form seeking to draft legislation that would be enacted 'upon any other US State adopting a new congressional district map outside of the regular decennial census period, would require the Maryland Governor to propose a new congressional district map.' 'If the Governor declines to propose a new map within a certain time frame, the General Assembly has the option to propose and adopt a map of their own development,' he wrote. The move comes after Texas Republicans proposed redistricting the Lone Star state in an effort to maintain a GOP majority in Congress. President Trump has backed the effort with fierce criticism from Democrats. 'If the Republicans are going to redistrict in the middle of the decade, then we have no choice but to do the same,' said Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.). 'Because to do otherwise would be unilateral disarmament.' Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) will hold a special session this week to consider redistricting, among other priorities. Redistricting across the country was originally slated for 2030 and an earlier draft date for new maps will likely rewire midterm elections set to take place next year.
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Timothy J. Cavanagh: Illinois toxic tort law would prevent out-of-state companies from evading accountability
Every Illinoisan deserves to live and work in a safe environment free from hazardous, life-threatening conditions. Yet when our residents travel to other states, they may face repeated exposure to asbestos or other highly toxic substances and be vulnerable to serious illness if they were not provided proper protective clothing and breathing equipment. Out-of-state companies too often escape accountability for exposing individuals to dangerous materials, leaving them to suffer devastating health consequences with little legal recourse short of the expensive, time-consuming and impractical option of pursuing lawsuits in those other states. A bill, SB328, recently passed by the General Assembly and now under Gov. JB Pritzker's consideration, solves that dilemma by permitting a person filing a case in an Illinois court to include out-of-state companies as defendants. By strengthening the ability of Illinois residents to seek justice against all responsible parties, this legislation would help promote healthier, safer working conditions by putting businesses, regardless of where they are headquartered, on notice that they are responsible for protecting Illinoisans from preventable harms. To be clear, this legislation applies in relatively limited circumstances. SB328 does not expose Illinois-based businesses to litigation to which they are not already subject under current law. To involve companies not located in the state, but doing business here, a plaintiff must first file a case in Illinois against at least one defendant that would be subject to the specific jurisdiction of an Illinois court. Only then, contingent upon a judge's approval, could other relevant out-of-state businesses be added to the case. Additionally, this legislation pertains only to toxic substances as defined by the Illinois Uniform Hazardous Substances Act. One such example familiar to most people would be asbestos, because of its sad and long history in our country of sickening hundreds of thousands of people and condemning them to prolonged and painful deaths. If you've seen the suffering caused by the careless use of asbestos up close, you would understand why it is important to send a strong message that companies using toxic substances need to take sufficient care to protect people from being harmed by them. And, if they fail to do so, they deserve significant financial punishment to deter them and others from persisting in unsafe practices. The fearmongering from Illinois business organizations about the bill borders on hysteria. Despite what they say, prescription drugs, baby formula, beverages and food products are not a part of the bill for the simple reason they aren't made with highly toxic ingredients. Opponents also say New York rejected the same bill. Not true. New York's was far more expansive and, beyond businesses, included nonprofits and governmental entities. Finally, those against the bill argue it would make Illinois an outlier. But, in reality, other states have laws that say anyone transacting business in them consents to the jurisdiction of their courts. Pennsylvania already has a far broader toxic tort law than what is proposed in Illinois, and I have yet to see any news coverage about the cessation of business in the Steel City, the City of Brotherly Love or all the many towns between the two. Opposition from Illinois corporate associations to this legislation is puzzling, since it actually levels the playing field for Illinois companies by holding those from out of state to the same standard as applies to those that are based here. The bill's merits are attested to by the diversity of its supporters, which include dozens of trade and service unions represented by the Illinois AFL-CIO; the multitude of local and national environmental organizations that work collaboratively through the Illinois Environmental Council; and Citizen Action, the state's largest public interest organization that advocates for policies to protect the health and well-being of all Illinoisans. By reinforcing corporate accountability, this bill complements Illinois' ongoing efforts to strengthen environmental protections and public health safeguards. It sends a clear message and commonsense message: Companies that profit from doing business here must accept the responsibility of protecting the people and environment they impact. With the Donald Trump administration choosing to stop enforcing various environmental protections and, shockingly, reconsidering the ban on cancer-causing asbestos put in place by the previous administration, it is vital that states step into the breach. Pritzker's signature on SB328 will send a clear message that Illinois is leaving no stone unturned when it comes to protecting the public's health. Timothy J. Cavanagh is founder of Cavanagh Sorich Law Group in Chicago and president of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association.
