Gamma-ray bursts reveal largest structure in the universe is bigger and closer to Earth than we knew: 'The jury is still out on what it all means.'
The universe's largest structure, the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall, was already a challenge to explain with models of the universe due to its incredibly vast size — and now, using the most powerful blasts of energy in the universe, Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), astronomers have discovered this structure is even bigger than they realized. Plus, the team even found that parts of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall are actually closer to Earth than previously suspected.
The Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall is a so-called "supercluster" of galaxies; it's a filament of the cosmic web around which the first galaxies in the universe gathered and grew. Its name was coined by Johndric Valdez, a Filipino teenager who aspires to be an astronomer. That name isn't very literal, however. This is because the round-shaped Great Wall spans not just the constellations Hercules and Corona Borealis but also the region of the celestial sphere from the constellations Boötes to Gemini.
The Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall was first discovered in 2014 by a team led by István Horváth, Jon Hakkila and Zsolt Bagoly, who also led the team that has now determined the size of this structure more accurately than ever before. In particular, the team found that it extends over a larger radial range than previously calculated. Before this research, scientists didn't recognize that some nearby gamma-ray bursts are also part of this massive structure.
The finding is extraordinary because the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall was already known to cover an area that's 10 billion light-years wide by 7.2 billion light-years and be almost 1 billion light-years thick! For context, that is large enough to fit over 94,000 Milky Way galaxies placed side by side along the Great Wall's longest side, which stretches out for around 10% of the total width of the entire observable universe.
"Since the most distant extent of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall is hard to verify, the most interesting finding is that the closest parts of it lie closer to us than had previously been identified," Jon Hakkila of the University of Alabama in Huntsville told Space.com.
The Milky Way, our home galaxy, is part of a different supercluster called Laniakea, which, at 500 million light-years wide, is dwarfed by the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall. In fact, the team says the true extent of the latter structure is currently undetermined.
"Our gamma-ray burst sample is not large enough to place better upper limits on the maximum size of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall than we already have," Hakkila said. "But it probably extends farther than the 10 billion light-years we had previously identified. It is larger than the size of most anything to which it might be compared."
GRBs were key to the discovery of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall in 2014, and indeed to the recent, deeper investigation of this vast cosmic structure. Considered the most luminous and most energetic explosions in the universe, two different types of GRBs are thought to originate from two mechanisms of stellar-mass black hole formation, Hakkila explained.
Long-duration GRBs, which are blasts of high-energy gamma rays that last over two seconds, come from the core collapse of massive stars that leads to a supernova explosion. Short-duration GRBs, on the other hand, are thought to originate from the collision and merger of two ultradense stellar remnants called neutron stars in double-star systems.
"In both cases, the tremendous energies produced from the collapse of the star system are ejected in the form of relativistic particle jets. Far from a jet's nozzle, the particles react to produce gamma-rays and X-rays," Hakkila said. "Gamma-ray bursts can be seen at incredibly large distances because they are so luminous."
Hakkila says that because gamma-ray bursts are related to dying stars or the collision of two dead stars, and since stars are found in galaxies, gamma-ray bursts can act as measures of where galaxies are, too. Because of how bright they are, GRBs can indicate the presence of a galaxy even when that galaxy itself is too faint to be seen.
"The tremendous brightness of gamma-ray bursts allows them to be markers of where matter can be found in the universe," Hakkila said.
Part of the reason structures like the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall are so perplexing to scientists has to do with the cosmological principle, which most models of the cosmos are founded upon.
The cosmological principle suggests the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales, meaning it should look the same in all directions. Tracing the location of matter with GRBs, however, shows that this is not the case.
"It is surprising that gamma-ray bursts clustering is so much more pronounced in the northern galactic sky than in the southern galactic sky," Hakkila explained.
In their new paper, Hakkila and colleagues assert that, according to the cosmological principle, any cosmic structure larger than 1.2 billion light-years long shouldn't have had sufficient time in the 13.8 billion-year-old universe to form if the spread of matter is homogeneous and isotropic.
So, as a vast 10 billion light-year structure of galaxies located around 10 billion light-years away (as indicated by dense GRBs clustering toward the northwestern region of the celestial sphere over Earth_ the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall definitely challenges the cosmological principle.
"Some theoretical cosmological models can account for structures this large, while others cannot," Hakkila added. "The jury is still out on what it all means."
The team reached their new hint at the size of the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall using a database of 542 GRBs resulting from observations collected up until 2018, predominantly by NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory.
Gamma-ray bursts are useful measurement tools in cosmology — with a few caveats. The main one is that it takes the observation of a tremendously large number of GRBs to draw meaningful conclusions about their distribution.
Additionally, if scientists want to draw accurate conclusions about the structure of the universe, misidentification of GRB origin positions in space must be eliminated. Thus, it may take a long time before scientists can use GRBs to gather a better picture of the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall.
"It has taken years of observation to collect a sample this large, using data mainly from Fermi and Swift, which have been instrumental in building this unprecedented dataset," Hakkila said. "Assembling a sample of this size took more than 20 years of observations, and we do not anticipate significant additions in the near future."
Related Stories:
— 'Mind-blowing' dark energy instrument results show Einstein was right about gravity — again
— Dark energy is even stranger than we thought, new 3D map of the universe suggests. 'What a time to be alive!' (video)
— Dark energy could be getting weaker, suggesting the universe will end in a 'Big Crunch'
Moving forward, the team intends to continue analyzing the properties of the GRBs in the sample used for this research.
"We probably need to study it more carefully and in greater detail than has been done before," Hakkila explained. "Looking ahead, new missions will be essential to overcome current limitations. We are actively contributing to the development of THESEUS, a proposed ESA mission designed to revolutionize GRB studies."
With its unparalleled sensitivity and sky coverage, Hakkila said that THESEUS, or the "Transient High Energy Sources and Early Universe Surveyor," is expected to dramatically increase the number of known GRBs, particularly at great cosmic distances or high redshifts.
"This could finally provide the observational leverage needed to map the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall in its full extent, offering a breakthrough in understanding large-scale structure formation and the cosmic web," Hakkila said.
A pre-peer-reviewed version of the team's research appears on the paper repository site arXiv.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
How To Easily Find The ‘Northern Cross' In The Sky This Weekend
Photo of the constellation Cygnus with annotations from IAU and Sky & Telescope. Here is the ... More non-annotated version. You've heard of the Southern Cross in the Southern Hemisphere's night sky, but what about the Northern Cross? Far larger, easier to find and arguably more impressive, here's how to find the Northern Cross in your night sky tonight. When And Where To Look The Northern Cross is mostly a different way of looking at the constellation of Cygnus, the swan. Comprised of six stars, all easily visible to the naked eye even from the world's most light-polluted cities, the Northern Cross dominates the eastern sky after sunset from mid-June and finally sinks in the west during November. Right now, it's high in the southeastern night sky as seen from the Northern Hemisphere. From south of the equator, it becomes visible in the middle of the night due north, but never gets high above the horizon. What You'll See As well as finding the six stars of the Northern Cross — which is an asterism, not an official constellation — you'll also get to see the Milky Way (if you're under a dark sky). That's because the Northern Cross lies over the plane of the Milky Way, so expect rich starfields and the arc of the Milky Way's aptly named Cygnus arm. The former looks incredible through binoculars; the latter is best seen with the naked eye. Begin by finding Deneb, the brightest star on the Northern Cross and one of the most luminous stars in the Milky Way. Now take a line down through it to Sadr (where the cross intersects), then Eta Cygni, with the base of the cross marked by Albireo (a double star consisting of a gold and a blue stars that look fabulous in a small telescope). Either side of Sadr, where the cross intersects, are Gienah and Rukh. The Cygnus constellation (including the Northern Cross). Observing Tips Once you've found the Northern Cross, reverse it to see the constellation of Cygnus, with Albireo as the swan's head and it wings spread further back, either side of Sadr. If you have a very dark sky, look below a line from Sadir to Albireo for the "Great Rift," a dust cloud between the solar system and the Sagittarius Arm of the Milky Way. It looks like a dark band within the stars of the Milky Way. If you have a telescope, there's plenty to see with the Northern Cross — the North America Nebula (NGC 7000), the Pelican Nebula (IC 5070, IC 5067) and the Veil Nebula. What's Next In The Night Sky On Sunday, July 27, a crescent moon will be visible as it approaches Mars, while a few nights later, on July 29-30, the Delta Aquariid meteor shower will peak. Expect a display of shooting stars in the early hours of July 30. For exact timings, use a sunrise and sunset calculator for where you are, Stellarium Web for a sky chart and Night Sky Tonight: Visible Planets at Your Location for positions and rise/set times for planets. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Interstellar Meteors Hit Earth All the Time but Still Elude Astronomers
Astronomers think small space rocks from beyond our solar system routinely strike Earth—but proving it isn't easy Aliens are visiting our solar system. Not little green men, sadly, but natural alien objects—cosmic bodies such as comets and asteroids born elsewhere in the galaxy that zip by the sun as they drift through the Milky Way. They're not so much visiting as just passing through. Though these objects were speculated to exist for a long time, we didn't know they were out there for sure until October 2017, when astronomers noticed a small body moving through space at exceptionally high speed. Observations over just a few nights showed it was moving far too quickly to be orbiting the sun and thus must have come from some other star. It was our first known interstellar visitor. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Eventually designated 1I/'Oumuamua, it was 30 million kilometers from Earth and already outward bound from the solar system when it was discovered, offering scant time for follow-up studies. But then, less than two years later, a second such object was found, also moving far faster than usual. 2I/Borisov turned out to be a comet very similar to those we're familiar with, except for its trajectory, which clearly showed it came from interstellar space. And now a third such alien body is barreling through the solar system: 3I/ATLAS, moving so rapidly its path is barely bent at all by the sun's gravity as it zooms past. In science, one is an anomaly and two might be coincidence, but three is a trend. Clearly, objects like this are passing by on the regular. Roughly speaking, there could be ones 100 meters in size or larger passing through the inner solar system at any time. Given their speed and intrinsic faintness, though, they're difficult to detect. We also know that when it comes to things such as asteroids and comets, nature tends to make many more smaller ones than bigger ones. In our own solar system, for example, only a couple of dozen main-belt asteroids are bigger than 200 km wide, but more than a million are 1 km across or larger. This generalization should hold for interstellar interlopers as well. For every kilometer-scale one that we see, there should be far more that are smaller. In fact, there could be millions of sand-grain-sized alien objects whizzing past us right now. And we already know that they're out there: in 2014 astronomers announced they had found seven grains of cosmic dust brought down to Earth from the Stardust space probe, which was designed to catch material ejected from a comet. Also, embedded in some meteorites that have hit Earth are tiny bits of material, called presolar grains, that are so old they actually formed around other stars. They got here after being blown across the void of space into the collapsing cloud of gas and dust that formed the sun and planets 4.6 billion years ago. Larger material could be ejected from an alien planetary system if it's given a gravitational assist when passing by a planet there, or it could be torn away from its parent star by another star passing closely to that system. So it seems certain interstellar jetsam would occasionally hit our planet. Earth is a small target, but with so many galactic bullets, you'd think some would actually find their way to our planetary bull's-eye. The problem is detecting them. Every day Earth is hit by very roughly 100 tons of locally grown interplanetary debris—material ejected from asteroids and comets native to our solar system—which translates into billions of tiny specks zipping across our sky daily. Detecting the tiny fraction that have an interstellar origin is tough. And the difficulty is not just in the sheer numbers. It's in tracing the trajectories of that small handful across the sky back up into space to calculate their orbits. When an object such as a planet or an asteroid orbits the sun, we say it's gravitationally bound to our star. That orbit in general is an ellipse, an oval shape. These can be defined mathematically, with the key factor being the eccentricity: how much the ellipse deviates form a circle. A perfect circle has an eccentricity of 0, and the higher the eccentricity, the more elliptical the orbit, up to a value of just under 1. An orbit with an eccentricity of 0.99, say, is extremely elongated; you might find that an object dropping down very close to the sun from the outer solar system has an eccentricity that high. It's possible to have an eccentricity higher than 1 as well. That kind of trajectory is called hyperbolic—named after the mathematical curve, not because it's exaggeratedly over-the-top—and an object on this path is not bound to the sun gravitationally. Once it's heading out, it's gone forever. It ain't coming back. This is how we know 'Oumuamua, Borisov and ATLAS are from interstellar space; each has an eccentricity greater than 1—'Oumuamua's is about 1.2 and Borisov's 3.4, which is quite high, but ATLAS has them both beat with an astonishing eccentricity of 6.2. That's extraordinarily high and also indicates it's hauling asteroid (or, more accurately, it's not comet back). Do we see any meteors with eccentricities like these? If the exact path of a meteoroid (the term for the solid bit that burns up in the air and becomes a meteor) through Earth's atmosphere can be determined, that can be backtracked up into space, allowing the object's trajectory, including its eccentricity, to be calculated. This can be done with multiple sky cameras set up in various locations; if a meteor streaks across their field of view, the multiple vantages can allow astronomers to triangulate on the rock and measure its path. There are quite a few such camera networks. It's actually difficult getting good enough data to determine solid orbits for meteoroids, though. Many do have eccentricities very close to 1; these likely come from long-period comets that originate out past Neptune. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory maintains a database of bright fireballs—exceptionally luminous meteors—at the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS). The earliest recorded meteors in the database date back to 1988, so there is a rich hunting ground in the data. Are any of the meteors listed hyperbolic? Unfortunately, no. At least, not unambiguously—there have been false positives but nothing clear-cut. Additionally, a study from 2020 looked at 160,000 measurements by the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar covering 7.5 years. The researchers found just five potential interstellar meteors. The results aren't quite statistically strong enough to claim detections for sure, but they're very compelling. What we need are more eyes on the sky, more meteor camera networks that can catch as many of these pieces of cosmic ejecta burning up in our atmosphere as possible. It's a numbers game: the more we see, the more likely we'll see some that are not from around here. The science would be, well, stellar: these meteors can tell us a lot about the environments around other stars, the ways they formed and perhaps even the stars they come from. We're getting physical samples from the greater galaxy for free. We should really try to catch them. Hat tip to planetary scientist Michele Bannister for the link to the CNEOS article. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Surprise Cosmic Clouds Likened to Finding Ice Cubes in a Volcano
Astronomers have found 11 unexpectedly cold hydrogen clouds hiding in the superheated turbulence of the Fermi Bubbles, in a discovery likened to finding ice cubes inside a volcano. The Fermi Bubbles are two lobes of incredibly energetic gas that extend 25,000 light-years above and below the Milky Way's disk, spanning a total height of 50,000 light-years. These still-mysterious structures were revealed in 2010 by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, which gave them their name. They originated from an outburst of galactic proportions, likely from the Milky Way's central black hole, and are moving at millions of miles per hour. Related: Now, using the unique capabilities of the US National Science Foundation Green Bank Telescope (NSF GBT), astronomers performed the deepest-ever radio survey of the Fermi Bubbles, twice as sensitive as previous surveys, and discovered 11 relatively cool, neutral hydrogen clouds embedded within these extreme environs. The Milky Way harbors many violent environments and the Fermi Bubbles are among the most intense. The plasma here reaches a temperature around 1 million Kelvin (999,730 degrees Celsius), so it's a surprise to spot hydrogen clouds that are at least 100 times cooler, or about 10,000 Kelvin. In fact, seeing such relatively frigid hydrogen clouds within the Fermi Bubbles is akin to "finding ice cubes in a volcano," explains Andrew Fox, astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute and study co-author. The discovery provides an existential galactic conundrum: "We didn't know that cold gas can survive in these extreme outflows. This challenges our understanding of how galaxies recycle and expel matter," says Rongmon Bordoloi, astrophysicist at North Carolina State University and the study's lead researcher. The hydrogen clouds vary in mass and size. The 8 that have been more clearly resolved are up to 1,470 solar masses and range between 13 and 91 light-years in length. They're also the highest latitude-hydrogen clouds yet discovered, about 13,000 light-years above the Milky Way's center. Given their structure and energetic surroundings, astronomers estimate that the hydrogen clouds may be several million years old. This matches an independent estimate of the age of the Fermi Bubbles themselves, challenging other formation models that suggest the bubbles could be as many as tens of millions of years in age. "It wouldn't be possible for the clouds to be present at all if the Fermi bubbles were 10 million years old or older," explains Bordoloi. Their extrapolated age suggests the hydrogen clouds were carried high into the Fermi Bubbles by the nuclear wind, or outflow from the Milky Way's nucleus. This wind, which blasts out at hundreds of kilometers per second, is responsible for cycling mass and energy throughout a galaxy, circulating it from the galactic center to the galactic halo. Jay Lockman, astronomer at the Green Bank Observatory and study co-author, clarifies the importance of the clouds in revealing the nuclear wind: "Just as you can't see the motion of the wind on Earth unless there are clouds to track it, we can't see the hot wind from the Milky Way but can detect radio emission from the cold clouds it carries along." As on Earth, these clouds are ephemeral, with a projected lifespan of up to 8 million years – a snap of the fingers on galactic timescales. In fact, they've already changed much, and may have been part of a larger cloud that was fragmented by the surrounding plasma. Conversely, the hydrogen clouds may have condensed from the surrounding plasma due to thermal instability. Overall, this study has universal implications. Finding such cool hydrogen clouds within the chaos of the Fermi Bubbles isn't just relevant to the Milky Way. It also helps improve models of galactic evolution, reshaping astronomers' understanding of how matter and energy are cycled throughout galaxies across the cosmos. This research is published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. Related News Is 3I/ATLAS 'Comet' an Alien Probe? These Are The Signs to Look For. Early Forms of Cells Could Form in The Lakes of Saturn's Moon Titan Blinking 'Unicorn' Discovered in Space a One-of-a-Kind Object Solve the daily Crossword
