‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions.
Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago.
So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley.
The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction.
The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.''
Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5.
Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion.
'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5.
Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health.
Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means.
About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us.
To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees.
Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow.
People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest.
Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty.
To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account.
While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley has new goal of Georgia Senate race
As the football coach at Tennessee, it often seemed like Derek Dooley was in the wrong business. Sure, he had the right surname and the right resumé to be a head coach in the Southeastern Conference, thanks mostly to his father Vince, who led Georgia to the national championship in 1980 and whose influence reached across a wide swath of college football. But when it came time to actually do the job, Derek Dooley – with his coiffed side part, fancy law degree and University of Virginia education – often seemed as if he was cosplaying the role, like he would have fit in better as a professor, an attorney or perhaps even future politician. 'Right now we're like the Germans in World War II,' Dooley said in 2010 as he descended into an infamous soliloquy comparing Tennessee's 2-5 record to the confusion of Nazi forces as the Battle of Normandy began with commanding field marshall Erwin Rommel back in Germany visiting his wife. 'Here comes the boats, it's coming, the binoculars like, 'Oh my god, the invasion is coming.' That's what they did. They were in the bunkers. 'It's coming.' They call Rommel. They can't find Rommel. 'What do we do? I'm not doing anything until I get orders. Have you gotten Rommel yet?' And the Americans were the exact opposite.' After that rant, and a few others that went viral for their sheer weirdness, you can understand why a group of young football players didn't respond to him. Dooley was fired after three seasons and a 4-19 SEC record, his legendary incompetence dragging Tennessee's proud program into a cycle of dysfunction that would last nearly a decade. Now he's got a new job that always made a lot more sense: Running for Senate. This is not a column about Dooley's politics, which in fact we know very little about other than he's running as a Republican and has a lifelong friendship with Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, who encouraged him to get in the race. It is also not a column about the viability of his candidacy, either in a primary field or against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff. That's for voters to decide. We'll see how that all plays out over the next year. And, at least in Georgia, we have a recent example of an actual Bulldogs legend in Herschel Walker losing a statewide race. Dooley, if he's remembered for anything in Georgia, it's as the coach who had 13 men on the field for LSU's final snap from the 1-yard line in 2010, handing the Tigers the one extra chance they needed to win. Out-mangling Les Miles at the end of a game? Now that takes some talent. The point is this: Whereas sports people from Jack Kemp to Tom Osborne to Tommy Tuberville often leverage their athletic or coaching success into political gravitas, it is the fact that Dooley never belonged on a college sideline in the first place that makes his Senate run seem plausible. How bad was it? He was the first Tennessee coach to lose to Kentucky in 27 years. He lost to Vanderbilt by 23 points, the worst margin in that rivalry since 1954. He was the first Tennessee coach to suffer three consecutive losing seasons since 1909-11. And In Dooley's 2012 recruiting class, he didn't sign a single offensive lineman. Not one. For an SEC program, it's unheard of. The Vols paid for that mistake for many years to come. It was one of the most disastrous coaching tenures in SEC history. Yet anyone who has been around or interacted with Dooley understands he's a man of high intelligence, with a heavyweight education to back it up. He speaks in coherent sentences. He knows history, as he demonstrated with the World War II analogy. He even knows a little bit about infectious diseases, as he revealed in another of his greatest hits. 'We have a few staph infections, so we did a clinic yesterday on proper shower technique and soap and using a rag,' he once told the media. 'Y'all think I'm kidding. I'm serious. We have the worst shower discipline of any team I've ever been around, so we talked about application of soap to the rag and making sure you hit all your body. You can neglect it trying to cut corners and it shows in how you practice and elsewhere.' It's a fair point to make. But as with so many of these Dooley tangents that made him the butt of jokes around the SEC, his instinct to show the world he was the smartest guy in the room would have been more useful coaching Tennessee's debate team than its football program. Still, it's hard to say Dooley made the wrong choice when he left a prestigious Atlanta law firm in 1996 to join the family business. As successful as he probably would have been in any other field, Tennessee paid him $5 million just to go away. Dooley never seemed like he belonged in the SEC, but now he's reemerged to test the theory he'll be more adept at a different bare-knuckle sport than the one that takes place on Saturdays in the fall. We'll see soon whether Georgia voters agree or Dooley's home state puts one more L on his resumé.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Why Fleeing Texas Democrats Won't Stop Republicans
This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox. If you're one of the millions of Texas residents living in a blue state House district, there's a better-than-even-odds chance your state rep has fled the state. Even if you live in a red district, or really anywhere else in the country, those truancies could determine the final two years of President Donald Trump's time in Washington. More than 30 Texas lawmakers are in Illinois. Another six are in New York. Massachusetts was a draw for others as their comrades gathered for an unrelated wonkfest. And a few are in California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom first floated a plan that has become a national script for Democrats preparing to retaliate against Texas, where Republicans plan to further gerrymander the state's U.S. House districts to improve their chances at maintaining the national balance of power in Washington. In a striking reminder just how fragile politics can be, roughly 60 state lawmakers—each standing as proxy for just shy of 200,000 constituents—stand to potentially decide who will be the next House Speaker dictating policy for 345 million Americans. They split from their state on Sunday in what boosters have branded a 'Texodus,' one day after a GOP-led panel in Austin moved forward with a partisan rewrite of the state's district maps. And yet, despite serving as a rallying cry among Democrats nationally, this gambit by Texas Democrats is going to fail if history is to be a guide. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called a special legislative session that would, if successful, shrink the number of Democrats the state sends to the U.S. House by five. That would leave Democrats with eight seats, roughly 20% of the 38 Texans there, despite Democratic nominee Kamala Harris netting more than 42% of the vote in Texas last year. In response, 57 of the Texas House's 62 Democrats fled the states rather than allow a quick vote approving the new lines. And in turn, Abbott threatened to remove those citizen lawmakers from their elected positions unless they hoofed it home while hinting they may face felony charges. Even if Texas Democrats run out the clock on this special session, nothing is stopping Abbott from calling another immediately after, setting this up for a perpetual stand-off that could cost each absent lawmaker $500 a day, as well as months away from their families and jobs. When Democrats fled Texas in the past to block similar GOP power grabs, they ultimately gave up. Nationally, Democrats loudly cheered the move, even if they quietly knew it would ultimately prove a delay but not a defeat. Lacking a unified front since Harris' stinging loss last year that brought Trump back to the White House, Democrats have been rather listless as they try to regain their footing. The base wants a fight. The Establishment wants to spare itself the tough conversations. The consultant class wants to keep the cash flowing. All of which is to say this: Democrats will take anything passing muster for a win, albeit a brief one, especially if it triggers Democrats in other states to respond. The Texas walkout drew a collective huzzah, with the chief Democratic group focused on state legislative power calling on their members to retaliate in spades. 'All options must be on the table—including Democratic state legislatures using their power to fight back and pursue redistricting mid-cycle in order to protect our democracy,' Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee chief Heather Williams said. Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin seemed to signal his concurrence: 'Democrats everywhere should be ready to fight fire with fire to combat Trump and Republicans' craven scheme to rig the maps in their favor.' But this tit-for-tat escalation has national implications, both in terms of who will hold gavels after the 2026 midterms and also for the slate of candidates on the national ticket in 2028. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who has been loudly assembling his own campaign-in-waiting for 2028, is fanning the flames of retribution. New York, another deep-blue state where the governor is threatening to redraw their own congressional map in response to Texas, might be the launching ground for a campaign from progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a natural heir to the movement helmed by Sen. Bernie Sanders of New York. Never count out Massachusetts, where Gov. Maura Healey is toying with following fellow Bay Staters Michael Dukakis, Paul Tsongas, John Kerry, Mitt Romney, Deval Patrick, and Elizabeth Warren onto a national ticket. And Newsom, the California Governor and not-so-subtle contender for the Democratic nomination for President next turn, has threatened through allies to respond in kind to Texas' gamesmanship. It's no accident those states have become Ground Zeroes for evacuating Texans, even as nonpartisan redistricting processes remain on the books of some of those states. Nor is it happenstance that national Democrats are looking to elevate those political refugees into proxies for their protest to come. In turn, leaders in Republican-led states like Florida, Missouri, and New Hampshire have said they may throw open their maps as well. Politics has always carried an element of performance art and a common winning playbook is pretty basic: Find a pariah, brand it toxic, shame it into folding, declare victory, move on. But there's a problem which assumes the playing field is level. Few in Texas believe Republicans are trying to draw a map that better represents the state's 31 million constituents. Yet Republicans are assuming their voters won't mind. For more than two decades, Republicans have outnumbered Democrats in the state legislature. Texas has the longest dryspell in the nation for electing a Democrat statewide despite a perpetual phantom hope that this will be the cycle that finally breaks the fever. Despite this reality, Democrats are jumping onto the hopes that the planned tweaks to districts in Houston, Dallas, and Austin, and along the U.S.-Mexico border might be a step too far for centrist voters who just want the government to function normally. Even so, even in places where Democrats have a free hand to do their own shenanigans, such as Oregon and Illinois, there aren't many districts that haven't already been designed to their advantage. For now at least, that reality isn't blunting the temporary ardor for counter-attack. At Monday's opening of the bipartisan National Conference of State Legislatures summit in Boston, the Texas defectors earned a standing ovation when they arrived and they planned a Wednesday press conference at the statehouse. Their compatriots in Illinois planned a media event on Monday near Chicago. And they were all looking forward to a quorum call on Monday in Austin that was doomed to fail because not enough lawmakers would be present. How Abbott responds stands to dictate the rest of this week, the first of a congressional recess until after Labor Day. Still, this is a lot of posturing ahead of the inevitable given Democrats' past iterations of this ploy that failed for two decades. Texas Republicans have the votes to put in place the new maps. Texas Democrats are all but certain to lose five House districts. That might, if everything else holds, preserve Republicans' razor-thin majority in Washington after next year's U.S. House elections. Texas Democrats have never stopped a political map from taking shape and they don't have the numbers now to break that cycle. Instead, this is a moment of name-and-shame politics—in an era powered by the churn of Trump's tumult and insult. It's a waiting game that has triggered an unexpected optimism among Democrats, one completely unmoored from the current reality or not-so-distant history. Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran fund manager raises eyebrows with Palantir review ahead of earnings
If you're planning to raise Hell in Gotham, you're gonna have to go through Batman first. The Caped Crusader looms large over the crime-ridden comic book city and he's said to be a significant presence in the New York office of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) in the form of a statue and prints. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter And just to keep the superhero imagery going, the company's Manhattan location is called Gotham, which is also the name of Palantir's core government product. The company provides AI-driven data analytics software, and Gotham, released in 2008, is used widely by government agencies, including intelligence, defense, law enforcement, and national security organizations, for threat analysis, operational, intelligence gathering and other tasks. "Gotham's targeting offering supports soldiers with an Al-powered kill chain, seamlessly and responsibly integrating target identification and target effector pairing," Palantir said on its website. "Operators experience enhanced situational awareness and effectiveness as Gotham streamlines critical decision-making in the modern battlespace." Bloomberg/Getty Images The company encourages users to "harness the full power of the platform from operations centers to the edge, transforming any bunker or outpost into an instant command center with mixed reality capabilities." "We are making America more lethal, making our adversaries increasingly afraid of acting against the interest of America and especially Americans," Alex Karp, Palantir's outspoken CEO and co-founder, has said. In a letter to shareholders, Karp said in May that the company's U.S. government revenue increased 45% year-over-year to $373 million in the first three months the year. "Our software systems for planning and executing special forces and other military operations, and for assessing and selecting targets, has been embraced by the American defense sector," he said. More Palantir Veteran trader surprises with Palantir price target and commentsMusk moves xAI, Grok onto Palantir turfVeteran analyst sends bold message on Palantir stock targetPalantir makes surprise move into weather Palantir has been criticized for its involvement with agencies like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for enabling mass deportation programs. In response to a May 30 New York Times article, the company said in a blog post that it was "committed to providing transparency around who we are and what we do." "Since our founding, we have always placed the preservation of privacy and civil liberties at the center of our mission," the post said. Palantir has fared well in the Trump administration's efforts to streamline the government. The Denver company's stock more than doubled (up 112%) this year and has skyrocketed 550% from this time in 2024. Piper Sandler recently initiated coverage of Palantir with an overweight rating and $170 price target, according to The Fly. The shares are richly valued but the company offers "one-of-a-kind" growth and margin potential, the firm said. Piper Sandler said Palantir could grow to a $24 billion revenue run rate by 2032 due to market-share gains in two trillion-dollar total addressable markets - government and U.S. commercial. The firm told investors to be patient and buy the shares on weakness, as it sees Palantir as a winner in the artificial intelligence revolution. Palantir is scheduled to report second-quarter earnings after the market closes on Aug. 4. Related: Analyst revamps Palantir stock forecast before earnings The company is forecasting quarterly revenue of $934 million to $938 million, surpassing the consensus estimate of $899.1 million. On Aug. 1, Palantir said that it had signed a contract with the U.S. Army valued at up to $10 billion over the next decade. The deal consolidates multiple contracts into a single enterprise agreement, giving the Army more flexibility in purchasing software and services and reduces procurement delays and contract-related fees. Chris Versace, TheStreet Pro portfolio's lead manager, says the contract will be a hot topic on the company's earnings call, but reminded investors that "Palantir shares have run." "We're mindful that we're going to have to likely bump up our price target again, yet again, especially after this multiyear, very, very large Army contract," he said. "But because of the sharp run in Palantir shares, remember that they will need to deliver a beat and raise quarter," he added. "This contract likely gives them the room to do that. " However, Versace said, given the size of the move, some investors out there might not impressed by what the company puts up. "We, of course, are going to take a longer term view, he said. "If we see Palantir shares sell off in the next couple of days, that could give us an opportunity to bulk up that position, which is not on the larger size for the portfolio. And we continue to believe that we are in the early days of AI adoption." Related: The stock market is being led by a new group of winners The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
