logo
Gender expert biased towards judge president Mbenenge, lawyer  says

Gender expert biased towards judge president Mbenenge, lawyer  says

Mail & Guardian01-07-2025
Eastern Cape judge president, Selby Mbenenge. (Judges Matter)
Gender expert Lisa Vetten says legal professional Andiswa Mengo's ambiguous responses to Eastern Cape judge president Selby Mbenenge's overtures
The tribunal looking into whether Mbenenge is guilty of gross misconduct for the alleged sexual harassment of Mengo
'When it comes to the complainant, you are prepared to give very sympathetic, long-winded explanations for what she says, but you do not do that when you interpret what the respondent does,' Sikhakhane said on Tuesday in his continued cross-examination of Vetten.
'As an expert, you are not here as an advocate for complainants; you are here to interpret and give objective evidence.'
He said Vetten was blunt when analysing Mbenenge's texts but sympathetic when interpreting Mengo's allegations.
The gender expert had omitted salacious texts sent by Mengo, Sikhakhane added, claiming this showed the complainant was not ambiguous in her feelings and did not regard Mbenenge as a father figure but as a romantic interest. Even when Mengo was clear in her texts, Vetten wrongly interpreted it as an avoidance strategy, he said.
'The assumption of your opinion is that, faced with the words of the complainant, you offered a different interpretation of what she said,' Sikhakhane said.
Vetten said she observed a pattern in the texts in which Mengo said one thing and did another — similar to when she said 'Will do!' in response to a request for naked photos from Mbenenge but did not send them.
Sikhakhane argued that Vetten's interpretation of Mengo as a childlike victim who could not speak up for herself
Vetten responded that her opinion of Mengo and her responses within the power dynamics was consistent with similar cases of gender-based violence she had worked on.
'My comments are based on what I read here and how I understand or see what she says,' said Vetten, adding that she had considered the heads of argument and the context of the case.
Sikhakhane responded that Vetten was making generalisations about women and sexual harassment, which did not apply to the specific case between Mengo and Mbenenge.
He added that Mengo is a 42-year-old woman who is intelligent and capable of standing up for herself when made uncomfortable by sexual advances.
Sikhakhane said Mengo had a history of belligerence in the workplace, including an incident in which she physically attacked her line manager. He said this behaviour showed that she was not timid or afraid of confrontation.
'[This] particular complainant has exhibited a propensity not to fear authority and has physically attacked her line manager.'
Vetten responded that people can shift between aggressive and passive-aggressive behaviour, adding that a history of being extroverted did not mean power dynamics did not affect a person in subtle ways.
Sikhakhane resumed his earlier argument, first made during the tribunal's initial sitting in January, that power relations are not static and that his client's case did not fit a conventional gender dynamic.
He said that power could shift during a relationship and that, during the course of their conversation, the less powerful court secretary had held power over the judge president.
Sikhakhane said Vetten lacked an understanding of cultural and linguistic nuances and was therefore unable to analyse what is appropriate during courtship between two African people.
Vetten responded that her observation was that the conversation between Mengo and Mbenenge was inappropriate for the workplace.
While she argued that it was misconduct for a judge president to pursue a junior employee, Sikhakhane said this did not constitute harassment
Sikhakhane said Vetten was a well-known gender activist who, although she had helped many women, brought bias against his client and showed sympathy for Mengo.
'If I were to testify in matters where I must choose between African people and others, I would refuse, because I would not resist the temptation of not being objective.
'Do you agree with me that a person like me or you, who has strong views about a particular side of things, can actually sacrifice objectivity and present views filled with their own feelings and idiosyncrasies?'
Vetten responded that she had served on panels before and adjudicated cases in which the evidence presented did not fit a finding of sexual harassment.
Sikhakhane argued that since Vetten had admitted to not understanding isiXhosa, her expert analysis lacked insight into prevailing cultural practices around courtship.
'Your analysis is deficient without a cultural understanding of how romantic relationships unfold in an African setup,' he said.
'If you had read the cross-examination, it would have enhanced your analysis and impacted some of the things you said, because you do not know what he said.'
Vetten said she was aware from media reports and the evidence leader's heads of argument that Mbenenge believed the relationship was consensual. However, she was not convinced when she read the WhatsApp messages.
What stood out from the messages was that, while Mengo did not explicitly reject Mbenenge, she refused to commit to any of his sexual advances.
Sikhakhane said Vetten's description of Mengo as a submissive and docile woman was inaccurate and that false claims of sexual harassment risked undermining the experiences of actual victims.
Vetten said she was aware that false claims do occur but noted that women's credibility is often undermined when they do not 'behave well' enough to fit the description of a victim.
Sikhakhane implied that Mengo was making a false claim against Mbenenge and was using the allegation of sexual harassment to attack his character, which he said undermines gender-based violence advocacy.
The judicial conduct tribunal continues until 11 July, with Mbenenge expected to bring his witnesses and testify himself.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Madlanga inquiry into police corruption to hear first witness in August
Madlanga inquiry into police corruption to hear first witness in August

Mail & Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Madlanga inquiry into police corruption to hear first witness in August

Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga The inquiry established by President Cyril Ramaphosa to investigate allegations of criminality, corruption and political interference in the criminal justice system will begin hearing public testimony in August, its chairperson, Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, said on Monday. Ramaphosa set up the inquiry in response to Madlanga said the commission has begun its preparatory work, including the appointment of senior personnel and the scheduling of the first witness consultation. 'Our first consultation with a witness is imminent. We are mindful that South Africa is eager to see the first witness in the stand. We too are keen to see that happen,' he told a media briefing. While Madlanga would not name the first witness, he confirmed that the commission would consult Mkhwanazi 'imminently'. Mkhwanazi alleged in a media briefing earlier this month that Mkhwanazi said 121 case dockets were removed from Mchunu, On Monday, Madlanga said the commission is treating the matter with urgency but must follow procedures, including consulting witnesses, assessing information and determining the need for follow-ups before public hearings can begin. 'The fact that General Mkhwanazi made the allegations does not make us ready to start hearing evidence immediately,' he said. He added that public hearings will take place in Gauteng, with a procurement process under way to secure a building. Madlanga assured the public that this would not delay preparations. 'We are proceeding full steam ahead. The lack of infrastructure does not affect progress on the commission's preparatory work,' he said. The commission will also establish facilities for members of the public to lodge relevant information, both in person and online. 'We consider it important that the public be afforded an opportunity to contribute,' Madlanga said. The commission has appointed a high-level team of professionals, with advocates Sesi Baloyi and Sandile Khumalo serving as co-commissioners. Advocate Terry Motau is the chief evidence leader, with Lolita Vukuza appointed as the commission secretary. Peter Gous is the chief investigator and Jeremy Michaels the commission's spokesperson. 'We believe this team is up to the task and will deliver on the mandate,' Madlanga said. The commission is expected to submit an interim report within three months and conclude its work in six months. Madlanga reiterated that the commission is bound by a timeline and said the interim report by the end of its first three-month period may include recommendations for immediate action. Madlanga also outlined the terms of reference, which include investigating the South African Police Service, metro police departments in Gauteng, the National Prosecuting Authority, the State Security Agency, the judiciary, correctional services and any executive members responsible for the criminal justice system. The inquiry will look into whether these entities have been infiltrated by criminal syndicates, including attempts to shield politically connected individuals and obstruct justice. Asked about witness safety, Madlanga said each case would be assessed to determine whether protection was required. Given that some implicated parties are still in the system, this is 'receiving serious consideration'. He said the commission is also empowered to conduct search-and-seizure operations when necessary, but would do so in a way that 'does not alert the intended persons'. When pressed on whether arrests could follow, Madlanga said: 'I cannot give a categorical answer at this stage.' He added that litigation challenging the commission's legitimacy is pending before the constitutional court, and the commission would abide by the court's ruling on whether it would be interdicted or continue. Mkhwanazi's disclosures include allegations that the police service is compromised at senior levels and that attempts were made to destabilise it, including efforts to frame national commissioner Fannie Masemola and remove senior officials. Mkhwanazi said Mchunu had tried to 'smooth the waters' between him and Sibiya, whom he referred to as 'a criminal'. He also alleged that Mchunu misled parliament about links to Brown Mogotsi, a man with alleged ties to organised crime, and Vusumuzi 'Cat' Matlala, a business person who allegedly benefited from police tenders despite criminal allegations against him. Ian Cameron, the chairperson of parliament's police portfolio committee, said Mkhwanazi had effectively 'He was fully aware of the risks — physical or career-related — and acknowledged this publicly,' Cameron said. Parliament is establishing an ad hoc committee to Madlanga declined to provide a budget estimate, which he said would be determined by the justice department. He said it was too early to estimate how many witnesses would testify. He confirmed that the commission's rules — including procedures for public access and media attendance — will be published.

MK party to square off in court against Ramaphosa and Mchunu
MK party to square off in court against Ramaphosa and Mchunu

Mail & Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

MK party to square off in court against Ramaphosa and Mchunu

In the dog box: Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, who comes from KwaZulu-Natal, has been put on 'special leave' by President Cyril Ramaphosa. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy The At the centre of the case are questions about the limits of presidential power, the legality of acting appointments and whether Ramaphosa acted rationally when he established a judicial commission of inquiry into serious allegations of criminal infiltration of law enforcement agencies. Ramaphosa suspended Mchunu after serious allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi that he colluded with a criminal syndicate, accepted illicit payments, interfered in investigations and disbanded a specialised task force into political killings. Through its deputy president, John Hlophe, the MK party argues in court papers that Ramaphosa acted outside the bounds of the Constitution when he suspended Mchunu and installed Cachalia, who is not a cabinet minister, to act in his place. 'The president has no constitutional authority to place a minister on leave,' Hlophe argued, describing the measure as 'a fancy phrase for suspension with pay'. He insisted that ministers are political appointees, not employees, and therefore not subject to labour law. In a supporting affidavit, Zuma accused Ramaphosa of 'inventing new powers' not grounded in law, calling the president's interpretation of the Constitution 'indecipherable gobbledygook'. Ramaphosa, in his response, argued that his power to appoint and dismiss ministers include the discretion to place them on special leave, especially under circumstances that require an impartial investigation. 'This is not a punitive measure,' the president said. 'It is an interim step to preserve the integrity of the inquiry.' He said the Constitution vests in him the discretion to manage the cabinet and to act in the public interest when questions of credibility arise. Addressing concerns about Cachalia's appointment, Ramaphosa said he had followed a formal process. He said Cachalia was first to be appointed as a minister and then assigned the police portfolio on an acting basis. Hlophe dismissed this as a legal 'contrivance' and accused the president of manipulating constitutional provisions to serve political ends. He said the inquiry chaired by the acting deputy chief justice, Ramaphosa said the allegations made by Mkhwanazi were serious and required a process that would not be clouded by political interference or public suspicion. According to Mkhwanazi, the disbandment of the police's political killings task team was linked to efforts by criminal syndicates to capture the state's security architecture, a claim Mchunu has strongly denied. In his affidavit, Mchunu said Mkhwanazi's allegations were both 'unsubstantiated' and misinformed. He said he had instructed national police commissioner Fannie Masemola to disband the unit based on operational assessments, not political motives. Mchunu also criticised the timing of Mkhwanazi's public statements, arguing that the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner did not inform him of his intentions to make allegations. 'He did not afford me any right to comment on the nature and basis of his intended 'revelations' before he made them. I was taken by complete surprise on 6 July 2025, when I learnt that Lieutenant General Mkhwanazi had called a press conference at short notice in order to level serious allegations against me,' Mchunu said. 'What is even more unfortunate is that the allegations he made against me relate to events which on his own version occurred several months ago, in particular, my decision in relation to the disbandment of the political killings task team. 'General Mkhwanazi had ample time to liaise with me and afford me a right to respond to any concerns that he may have had before he went into the public domain and made his extravagant and misinformed allegations.' Mchunu further stated that he had informed Ramaphosa of his willingness to cooperate with the inquiry, and denied that the ANC's The Madlanga commission has been tasked with investigating the infiltration of law enforcement and intelligence agencies by criminal syndicates. Its terms of reference include the South African Police Service, metropolitan police departments, the State Security Agency, the NPA and parts of the judiciary. The commission has the power to summon witnesses, compel documents and, in limited cases, conduct search-and-seizure operations. According to a government gazette last week, the commission may also recommend prosecutions, internal disciplinary steps and systemic reforms. Interim reports are expected within three and six months, with a final report to be submitted to the speaker of the National Assembly, Thoko Didiza, and Chief Justice Mandisa Maya.

Macpherson halts EPWP funds to Free State municipality amid 'political gains'
Macpherson halts EPWP funds to Free State municipality amid 'political gains'

The Herald

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald

Macpherson halts EPWP funds to Free State municipality amid 'political gains'

Public works and infrastructure minister Dean Macpherson has suspended expanded public works programme (EPWP) funds to the Matjhabeng municipality in the Free State pending investigations into alleged politically connected individuals receiving inflated salaries through the programme. City Press reported the municipality's EPWP pays inflated salaries to former councillors and sitting political office bearers, with others earning more than R31,000 a month — 10 times more than the average EPWP stipend. The EPWP provides unemployed individuals, especially youth, with temporary employment opportunities while equipping them with skills to be employable. Participants receive a stipend. Macpherson said the programme was not a 'vehicle for patronage'. 'The EPWP is an essential lifeline for many in communities around the country, including in Matjhabeng, and it would be unacceptable if any politician or official is found to have used the programme for personal benefit,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store