logo
FDA panel promotes misinformation about antidepressants during pregnancy, psychiatrists say

FDA panel promotes misinformation about antidepressants during pregnancy, psychiatrists say

Yahoo6 days ago
A Food and Drug Administration panel discussing the use of antidepressants during pregnancy Monday largely amounted to misinformation or facts taken out of context, according to several psychiatrists who tuned in to the meeting.
The panel had promised to feature diverse viewpoints about antidepressants and pregnancy. But nearly all of the 10 panelists bucked medical consensus on the drugs' safety and emphasized what they said were risks of taking the drugs while pregnant — such as causing autism, miscarriages or birth defects. In some cases, they claimed that antidepressants don't work at all and that depression goes away on its own.
Three of the 10 panelists were from outside the United States. Another runs a clinic to help people taper off of psychiatric drugs.
'They were really rousing concerns about safety that are not evidence-based or established and not at all balanced with concerns about the risks of untreated depression,' said Dr. Joseph Goldberg, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City.
Dr. Jennifer Payne, director of the Reproductive Psychiatry Research Program at the University of Virginia, said, 'I'm disappointed that the FDA brought people in from outside of the United States when there's so many experts here in the United States who truly know this [medical] literature inside and out.'
A spokesperson for the FDA said in a statement that the claim that the panel was one-sided was 'insulting to the independent scientists, clinicians, and researchers who dedicate their expertise to these panels.' The spokesperson added that FDA Commissioner Martin Makary 'has an interest in ensuring policies reflect the latest gold standard science and protect public health.'
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called for a probe into the risks of antidepressants. His 'Make America Healthy Again' report in May claimed there were 'potentially major long-term repercussions' associated with use of the drugs in childhood.
The panel discussion focused on a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, which includes Lexapro, Prozac and Zoloft. The medications increase levels of serotonin, a chemical messenger in the brain that can improve mood.
Psychiatrists often advise women who are taking SSRIs to continue doing so during pregnancy, since the risks of untreated depression tend to outweigh the potential risks of the medication to mother and child. However, the decision is a personal one.
For ethical reasons, there are no randomized-control trials of SSRIs in pregnant women, meaning data on potential risks mostly comes from observational studies and drug registries.
Some babies born to mothers taking SSRIs may develop symptoms such as jitteriness, irritability or difficulty eating or sleeping that resolve quickly — what's known as 'neonatal adaptation syndrome.' The symptoms may be caused by medication in the babies' systems or withdrawal from it.
Certain studies have also found a slightly elevated risk of miscarriage associated with antidepressant use in pregnancy, though others have found no association. However, there's no convincing evidence to suggest that SSRIs are linked to autism or birth defects.
'Well-controlled studies continue to not find an association,' Payne said.
Women with histories of depression are also at an increased risk of symptoms' recurring during pregnancy, and depression can come with its own risks — including thoughts of self-harm or low birth weight.
'The best thing a pregnant individual could do for herself and her baby is to get the treatment that they need,' said Dr. Nancy Byatt, a perinatal psychiatrist at UMass Chan Medical School, who wasn't part of the panel.
In addition to raising concerns about side effects, several panelists questioned the efficacy of antidepressants or suggested that data favoring the use of SSRIs was manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry.
'It's been said that SSRIs help people who are severely depressed. They don't,' said David Healy, an FDA panelist and fellow at the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the United Kingdom.
Goldberg and other psychiatrists said that's simply untrue.
'You can say the moon landing was faked. Conspiracy theories abound in our world. But there is not a doubt about whether SSRIs work,' said Goldberg, a past president of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology who has previously consulted for pharmaceutical companies. He said he was invited to join the FDA panel but declined because the language of the invitation suggested it wouldn't be a fair discussion.
Healy, the panelist, also claimed that some people 'recover spontaneously' from depression.
Another panelist, psychologist Roger McFillin — who hosts a podcast that challenges conventional mental health advice — suggested that depression wasn't an illness but rather a product of 'women just naturally experiencing their emotions more intensely.' He added, without evidence, that many women feel coerced into taking antidepressants.
Psychiatrists who weren't part of the discussion broadly decried those characterizations.
'I have never, ever, ever, ever heard of a third party pushing a prescription in pregnancy,' Goldberg said. However, he said he is aware of some obstetrician-gynecologists who aren't as familiar with SSRIs who have wrongly told pregnant patients to stop taking the medications.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a statement Monday that SSRIs can be lifesaving for some pregnant people.
'Today's FDA panel on SSRIs and pregnancy was alarmingly unbalanced and did not adequately acknowledge the harms of untreated perinatal mood disorders in pregnancy,' it said. 'On a panel of 10 experts, only one spoke to the importance of SSRIs in pregnancy as a critical tool, among others, in preventing the potentially devastating effects of anxiety and depression when left untreated during pregnancy.'
One panelist, Dr. Kay Roussos-Ross, a psychiatrist and an OB-GYN at the University of Florida College of Medicine, was the most vocal advocate for using SSRIs, often pushing back against others' assessments of the risks. Psychiatrists who weren't on the panel praised her science-backed commentary.
'All of us can find a study that agrees with exactly what we think,' Roussos-Ross told the panel. 'But we need to look at the data very objectively.'
Several psychiatrists who weren't on the panel said they worry that the discussion could lead to regulatory action that makes it harder to access SSRIs. For example, one panelist, Dr. Adam Urato, chief of maternal-fetal medicine at MetroWest Medical Center in Framingham, Massachusetts, called for stronger warnings on SSRI labels.
'I am just very nervous that some of the discourse around the risks of antidepressants could lead to even more barriers for people seeking care,' said Dr. Lindsay Lebin, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, who wasn't part of the FDA discussion.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakthrough as two FDA-approved drugs are found to reverse Alzheimer's — including restoring memory
Breakthrough as two FDA-approved drugs are found to reverse Alzheimer's — including restoring memory

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Breakthrough as two FDA-approved drugs are found to reverse Alzheimer's — including restoring memory

In a stunning scientific discovery, researchers have found that a pair of drugs can not only slow down Alzheimer's disease but actually reverse it and restore memory in mice. And the best part of all? Both are already FDA-approved — albeit for cancer. Researchers first pinpointed how Alzheimer's disease scrambles gene activity in individual brain cells. 3 Researchers have found that a pair of drugs can not only slow down Alzheimer's disease but actually reverse it and restore memory in mice. Pixel-Shot – Using the Connectivity Map database of 1,300 FDA‑approved drugs, the researchers looked for medications that reverse Alzheimer's‑associated gene expression — landing on a shortlist of five, and zeroing in on two cancer drugs. In what one researcher called a 'mock clinical trial,' they then mined 1.4 million patients' medical records, finding that those who had taken letrozole or irinotecan for cancer were significantly less likely to develop Alzheimer's. When given together in an aggressive Alzheimer's mouse model, letrozole — used to treat certain types of breast cancer in postmenopausal women — and irinotecan — an anti-cancer medication used to treat colon cancer and small cell lung cancer — reversed disease‑related gene expression signatures, dissolved toxic tau protein clumps and prevented brain degeneration. Most importantly, they restored memory and learning in mice that had already developed severe symptoms. It's an exciting development for an illness that's notoriously tricky. 3 Letrozole — used to treat certain types of breast cancer in postmenopausal women — and irinotecan — an anti-cancer medication used to treat colon cancer and small cell lung cancer — reversed disease‑related gene expression signatures, dissolved toxic tau protein clumps and prevented brain degeneration. Eric Hood – 'Alzheimer's disease comes with complex changes to the brain, which has made it tough to study and treat, but our computational tools opened up the possibility of tackling the complexity directly,' Marina Sirota, the interim director of the UCSF Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, said in a statement. 'We're excited that our computational approach led us to a potential combination therapy for Alzheimer's based on existing FDA-approved medications.' 'Alzheimer's is likely the result of numerous alterations in many genes and proteins that, together, disrupt brain health,' said Yadong Huang, a professor of neurology and pathology at UCSF. 'This makes it very challenging for drug development — which traditionally produces one drug for a single gene or protein that drives disease.' 3 'Alzheimer's is likely the result of numerous alterations in many genes and proteins that, together, disrupt brain health,' said Yadong Huang, a professor of neurology and pathology at UCSF. yurakrasil – The findings were published in the journal Cell. Both drugs are already FDA‑approved for other uses, which could dramatically speed up the path to human trials. However, because they are cancer drugs, repurposing them may be complex and risky. This finding adds to a growing number of potential Alzheimer's treatments. A compound found in rosemary and sage — carnosic acid — has been shown to reverse memory loss and reduce brain inflammation in mice with Alzheimer's, bringing their cognitive function back to near-normal levels. A study from Stanford Medicine found that seniors who received the shingles vaccine were 20% less likely to develop dementia over seven years. And researchers at Penn State and Stanford University discovered that a certain cancer drug could restore memory and brain function in early stage Alzheimer's models.

Vinay Prasad Is a Bernie Sanders Acolyte in MAHA Drag
Vinay Prasad Is a Bernie Sanders Acolyte in MAHA Drag

Wall Street Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Vinay Prasad Is a Bernie Sanders Acolyte in MAHA Drag

Meet Vinay Prasad, a young disciple of Bernie Sanders who ranks as one of the most powerful officials in the federal government. He determines whether patients get access to many life-saving medicines. Or not. Think of him as a one-man death panel. Dr. Prasad was named by Marty Makary, the Food and Drug Administration commissioner, as head of the agency's biologics division in May, and last month as its chief medical and scientific officer. More on why he was tapped to these posts later. But it isn't an exaggeration to say that Dr. Prasad wields more power than Anthony Fauci ever did at the National Institutes of Health.

Ice Cream Recalled Nationwide As Warning Issued Over Products
Ice Cream Recalled Nationwide As Warning Issued Over Products

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Ice Cream Recalled Nationwide As Warning Issued Over Products

Tropicale Foods, based in Ontario, California, announced on Friday a voluntary recall of select Helados Mexico and La Michoacana ice cream products. The decision followed a label audit which revealed that although the products list "cream," they do not explicitly declare "milk"—that could endanger those allergic to milk. Newsweek contacted the company for comment on Sunday via email outside of usual working hours. Milk is a major allergen under federal labeling laws, and its accidental presence in products poses a risk to consumers with allergies or severe sensitivities. Undeclared ingredients can trigger life-threatening reactions, making accurate labeling a critical public health requirement. The company announcement, published on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s website on Saturday, states: "Tropicale Foods of Ontario, CA is recalling certain Helados Mexico and La Michoacana products with specific best by dates, as detailed below because these products contain undeclared milk. "Though these products include 'cream' in the product ingredient lists, the common name 'milk' is not declared. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products." Affected items include single-flavor offerings (such as Coconut, Strawberry, Bubble Gum, Cookies and Cream, Mango), as well as multi-packs (6‑pack, 12‑pack, 16‑pack varieties). The recalled products are as follows: Photos of the affected products are available on the FDA website. The recall covers a wide range of "best by" dates from May 2026 through July 2027. Distribution spanned retail locations nationwide across the U.S. As of the FDA announcement, one consumer illness has been reported. Consumers with affected items who are allergic or sensitive to milk are advised not to consume the products and to properly dispose of them. Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE) states on its website: "When a person with a milk allergy is exposed to milk, proteins in the milk bind to specific antibodies made by the person's immune system. This triggers the person's immune defenses, leading to reaction symptoms that can be mild or very severe." Consumers who have the affected product should dispose of and not consume this product if allergic or sensitive to milk, and consult medical advice if symptoms arise. Anyone with queries may contact the company at 909-563-3090 between 8 am and 5 pm Pacific, Monday to Friday. The FDA will continue oversight and monitor any additional consumer reports or updates. Related Articles Is the FDA Doing Enough About Food Additives?Nationwide Ritz Cracker Recall Update as FDA Issues Risk WarningCanned Fruit Recall Sparks Nationwide Warning to CustomersFDA Issues Highest Risk Warning for Tofu Recall 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store