Police commissioner Chambers 'angry' and 'let down' following allegations against former deputy
Photo:
Calvin Samuel / RNZ
The police commissioner has emailed staff saying he is aware there are many who are "angry and feel let down" following revelations that
child exploitation and bestiality material
were allegedly found on the former deputy commissioner's work devices.
"I feel the same," Richard Chambers told staff in an email.
Jevon Skimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop in May amid separate investigations by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) and police.
His resignation came a week after RNZ approached him, via his lawyer, with allegations about material found on his work devices.
RNZ
earlier revealed
pornography found on McSkimming's work devices was being investigated as alleged objectionable material.
On Friday, an interim injunction that prohibited publishing the nature of the allegedly objectionable material lapsed after Justice Karen Grau declined McSkimming's application to continue the order.
Do you know more? Email
sam.sherwood@rnz.co.nz
Police Commissioner Richard Chambers said he was unable to comment at this time on Friday.
He has since sent an email to staff, seen by RNZ.
In the email Chambers addressed the media reports "in relation to an individual".
"I am aware that there are many who are angry and feel let down. I feel the same.
"It is important to let you know at this point I am unable to comment on the matter, but I do intend to do so when I am able to.
"As I have said before, I have high expectations of all Police staff and will act if standards are not met, irrespective of rank or role.
"These are the actions of an individual, and I will do my best not to let it distract from the job we are all here to do.
"However, I am aware there may be reactions from some that do not sit easily with you."
Chambers said if any staff wanted to talk they could contact him or their manager.
RNZ has spoken to several police officers after the order lapsed on Friday evening, each of whom on the condition of anonymity.
A senior police officer told RNZ the news was "a sad time for New Zealand police".
If the allegations were found to be true the officer felt "he's betrayed us all".
Former Deputy Police Commissioner Jevon McSkimming.
Photo:
Getty Images
Another police officer said they were "very disappointed" to hear of the allegations.
"Especially someone at that level of leadership. I hope all details of his alleged offending will be revealed as soon as possible. At police college we got a talk about how much the historic sexual abuse allegations from Rotorua tarnished our image. They would stop someone during a routine traffic stop and be told 'just don't rape me' many years after the allegation came out people were still talking about it."
A former police officer told RNZ the allegations would have a "significant impact" on frontline staff.
They had spoken to several serving police officers following the news, many of whom were "gutted".
He said one former staffer told them McSkimming would not be welcome near a police station again, others expressed frustration at the reputational damage to police.
Police Minister Mark Mitchell declined to comment on Friday.
Following McSkimming's resignation, Mitchell accepted trust in the police could take a hit. But he told reporters he hoped the public realised New Zealand had a "world class police force".
"The public are savvy enough to know that you are going to have isolated cases of bad behaviour, but they also recognise the fact that our police act very quickly to deal with that," Mitchell said.
As an ex-cop, the police's reputation was very important to him, Mitchell said.
"I hope that the public see through and realise that we have got an outstanding police force, we've got incredible police officers.
"Yes, like any big large organisation, if there's bad behaviour, or you get people who don't hold to the values ... then quick action is taken.
"In this case, even though it involves one of our most senior police officers, you've seen that action was taken very quickly to make sure that that public confidence can be maintained."
McSkimming's lawyer Linda Clark was earlier granted
a rare "superinjunction"
by Justice Grau that prohibited reporting the existence of the injunction itself as well as the nature of the allegedly objectionable material.
Following a teleconference held by Justice Gwyn, the order prohibiting publication of the nature of the allegedly objectionable material was continued - but the order prohibiting the existence of the injunction was not continued, meaning RNZ could report the fact of McSkimming's application and the interim result.
On 3 June, a hearing was held in the High Court at Wellington before Justice Karen Grau in relation to the injunction. RNZ, NZME and Stuff were jointly represented by Robert Stewart KC.
On 11 July, Justice Grau released her judgement, declining McSkimming's application, but her reasons for doing so were suppressed and the existing interim injunction was continued to allow McSkimming time to consider his appeal options, should he wish to do so.
No notice of appeal was filed, and RNZ can now report the type of objectionable publication purportedly found on his work devices.
In November last year McSkimming was placed on "special leave" as the IPCA and then police carried out their separate investigations. RNZ understands it was during police's investigation that the alleged objectionable material was found on his work devices. A second criminal investigation was then launched.
At the injunction hearing, Clark alleged information deemed "essential" to the investigation had been leaked to the media, who were intending to publish the information.
The information gathered during the police investigation was "confidential", she said.
She said that every time police had provided some substantive piece of information to McSkimming, it had appeared within the media "in a day or two days without exception".
Clark said there was public interest in McSkimming's situation, but that interest had been served by the reporting to date.
Stewart KC said there were two sorts of harm that could be considered, one of which was harm to the police investigation. He said the police had no concern that further disclosure of the material would impact their investigation.
In relation to privacy, Stewart KC said McSkimming was "quite clearly" a public figure.
"There is a huge public interest in these investigations into Mr McSkimming's abrupt resignation from office, first working day after he had been provided with the material by the Public Service Commission."
Stewart KC said his clients submitted that, if the interim restraint should be continued, then "matters should be left to take their course, if there is to be any restraining at all, it should be as limited as possible for as short as possible".
At the time of McSkimming's resignation Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended.
"When Mr McSkimming was invited to respond to these allegations he chose to resign. Mr McSkimming's resignation has confirmed my view that his continuation in the role was untenable."
The IPCA earlier announced it was investigating allegations of misconduct by McSkimming following a
complaint from a member of the public
.
It is also conducting an investigation into if there was misconduct or neglect of duty by any other police officers or employee in responding to the allegations.
The investigations were being given priority, but no timeframe for their completion date could be given.
McSkimming was one of the final two candidates for New Zealand's top cop job last year, with Chambers eventually appointed police commissioner.
McSkimming was promoted to statutory deputy commissioner in 2023 on the recommendation of then-prime minister Chris Hipkins.
Late last year he was overseeing road policing and operational services, which include strategy, media and communications, risk and assurance, and firearms regulation and reform.
During his appointment process, it was noted he had a "relatively unique career path", working at police headquarters since 2010 across a range of areas: strategy, service delivery, resolution, financial planning, arms admin, ICT and infrastructure.
McSkimming joined the police in 1996 and worked on the frontline in Auckland and Southland.
He had also been responsible for large restructures - as well as managing police IT systems, property portfolio, vehicles, and launching the 105 non-emergency number.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Person critically hurt in Masterton crash
Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER A person has been critically injured and another hurt in a serious crash in Masternon. Police said the intersection of Kitchener Street and Puriri Crescent in the suburb of Lansdowne is blocked. They were called to the crash about 6.30am on Monday. A diversion was in place and drivers were warned to expect delays. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Supreme Court to hear appeal against sentence of man who committed rape at age 15
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of The young man's lawyers say he should have been dealt with in the Youth Court, where a prison sentence would have been unlikely. Photo: RNZ Insight This article deals with sexual offending against three young women and may be distressing for some readers. A 15-year-old who raped a teen before going on to sexually assault two women a few years later was found guilty and sent to prison for just over three years. Now lawyers are arguing before the Supreme Court about whether he should have been sentenced as a youth, based on his age when he first offended, or as a grown man when he was convicted at the age of 21. His lawyers say he was a child when he offended and should have been dealt with as such by the courts. But lawyers for the Crown say he turned out to be a repeat sexual offender with no remorse, who assaulted two more young women when he was 18. The outcome of the case could determine if he will be sent back to prison - he is currently out on bail - or if he receives a community-based sentence and rehabilitation. The young man's name, personal details, and the identities of his victims are all suppressed. The rape victim was older than him. One of the other two women he went on to offend against several years later was older, the other younger. His first victim had consumed alcohol and drugs before the young man, at that time just 15 years old, gave her sleeping pills. She was unable to stay alert, and he raped her. The offending against the other two women happened when he was 18. The women each awoke to find him sexually assaulting them. The offences came to light later on and the young man, by then an adult, was charged in respect of all three women at the same time - one charge of rape and two of unlawful sexual connection. He admitted the lesser sexual connection charges on the morning his trial was due to begin and was found guilty of the rape by a jury two days later. He was 21 years old when convicted, and was sentenced in a district court to three years and four months in prison after the judge took the rape as the most serious and "lead" offence. He is now appealing against that sentence. His lawyers, Letizea Ord and Emily Blincoe, say that if he had been charged with rape close to the time he committed it, he would probably have been dealt with in the youth justice system, for offenders aged 17 and under. The emphasis in the Youth Court is on rehabilitation. In their submissions his lawyers say it was "highly unlikely" that he would have been sent to prison had he been dealt with there. They say that the two charges of unlawful sexual connection, which would have been dealt with in an adult court, would not have attracted a sentence of imprisonment on their own. They also say that the community would be safer if he were dealt with outside the prison system, with specialist treatment, because no targeted youth sexual offender programmes are available behind bars. Ord and Blincoe argue that New Zealand is an "outlier" in how it deals with offences committed by minors but uncovered later. In England and Wales, an offender's age at conviction is specified in law, but sentencing guidelines are based on the outcome that was likely to have been applied at the date of the offence, and prison is a "last resort". The Australian states take a similar approach, and Canada has a law which says that youth justice legislation applies to all offending committed under the age of 18, regardless of when charges are laid. However, the Crown Law Office said New Zealand law did not support sentencing outcomes in such cases that disregarded the legislation and methodology of the adult courts in favour of the processes governing the "intensely specialised" Youth Court. "The appeal also requires the [Supreme] Court to engage with an artificial factual scenario: to treat [the appellant] as though he was still 15 years old for the purpose of sentencing," the Crown submissions to the court said. "That ignores the reality of the case before the court: a 22-year-old repeat sexual violation offender who denied any wrongdoing and remained unremorseful at sentencing. One who, up until the time this court granted him bail, had taken no steps towards rehabilitation." The young man has so far spent 13 months in custody. He has engaged in rehabilitation since being bailed. The Supreme Court will begin hearing his case on Tuesday. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Police hunt for people, weapons after in fatal Hamilton fight
A cordon on Alexandra Street in Hamilton. Photo: RNZ / Daniel Gilhooly Police are continuing to search for the people and any weapons involved in a fatal fight in Hamilton over the weekend. Officers were called to a brawl between two groups on Alexandra Street, in the central city, just after midnight on Sunday. Four people were injured, including a 20-year-old man who died in hospital. The three other victims suffered injuries ranging from moderate to serious. RNZ understands the victims were stabbed. A cordon on Alexandra Street in Hamilton. Photo: RNZ / Victor Waters A homicide investigation was launched and Detective Sergeant Reece Durston said officers are still looking for several people, including the main offender. "The investigation team is working hard to understand how and why this happened, and we are wrapping support around the family of the deceased, and the other victims," Detective Sergeant Durston said. Sources have told RNZ that the stabbing may have been linked to a club event in the central city. The person, who did not want to be named, said the central city was heaving last night following the All Blacks test against France at FMG Stadium. Bar workers were unable to access their cars parked on the street and were told by police to either walk home or Uber, sources told RNZ. Police said there will continue to be a visible police presence in Hamilton as the investigation continues, as well as reassurance patrols in the community. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.