
Want to leave New York for Bengaluru: 'Am I a loser?' asks Reddit user after living 4.5 years with cultural shock abroad
The user, who lived in Kolkata, Hyderabad, and Bengaluru before moving abroad, shared a deeply personal account of feeling out of place in the West, despite the career and lifestyle benefits it offered. The post, titled 'Am I a loser if I wanna return to India?', opened the door for a wide-ranging discussion about identity, culture shock, loneliness, and whether returning home should be seen as failure.
Feeling Out of Place in Western Culture
The original poster, who spent 1.5 years in Sydney and another three in New York City, explained that despite professional growth, there remained a persistent sense of disconnection. Conversations with non-Indians often left him feeling isolated. The casualness of Western friendships, the individualism, and a focus on appearance felt superficial and unfamiliar. Reflecting on his upbringing in India, the user shared how his school and college years were driven by academic pressure, not socializing, partying, or dating — making the Western lifestyle feel alienating rather than aspirational.
Dating, in particular, was a cultural clash. The poster pointed out that the norm of having multiple sexual partners by one's mid-20s, commonly accepted in the U.S., felt jarring. Compared to India, where dating still remains limited to certain urban circles, he found the attitudes abroad overwhelming.
'You Are Not a Loser'—Reddit Weighs In
Redditors were quick to respond with mixed, often passionate, opinions. Many users reassured him that choosing to return doesn't make him a failure. One user encouraged him to follow his instincts and prioritize his happiness. Others reminded him, however, that Indian society is rapidly changing too — especially in tier-1 and tier-2 cities. Several noted that hookup culture, dating apps, and social superficiality are no longer unique to the West.
Some commenters urged caution. A few pointed out that he might feel alienated in India as well, given the ongoing cultural shift. Others suggested a trial return before making a full move, especially since work-from-home wasn't an option for him. A proposed transfer to a Bengaluru office within six months seemed like a practical path forward.
Critics Say Grass Isn't Greener Anywhere
Not everyone was sympathetic. Some accused the poster of chasing a fantasy, suggesting he was disillusioned with both worlds. One commenter remarked that people in India are also caught in a rat race and obsessed with Western ideals. Another criticized the notion of returning after 'abandoning' India in pursuit of a better life, while some NRIs confessed they too were tired of the West and longed for the cultural familiarity of home.
A few Reddit users took a more cynical tone. They claimed India, too, has adopted superficial values and casual relationships, warning that returning wouldn't resolve the poster's deeper discontent. Others advised him not to return unless his quality of life, salary, and career prospects could remain stable.
Beyond personal experiences, many saw the post as emblematic of a broader identity crisis among NRIs. Some users noted that modern society—regardless of location—often emphasizes individualism over meaningful human connection. As one Redditor put it, the user's struggle wasn't about geography but about reconciling internal values with external realities.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Man's Reddit post asking ‘Why do Indians abroad look down on their own' sparks debate
A man who has lived in the United States for over a decade shared a candid post on Reddit about an encounter with a fellow Indian in New York City that left him feeling disheartened. His post sparked discussion on how Indians abroad treat each his post on Reddit's 'r/India' thread titled 'Is It Just Me or Do Indians Abroad Look Down on Their Own? Here's My Personal Experience,' the man explained how a casual interaction turned lived in the US for over 10 years and picked up the habit of smiling at strangers, making small talk, just being friendly, you know? Feels normal here. But something odd happened recently in NYC that made me think,' he wrote. He continued, 'Saw a guy who looked Indian at a coffee shop, so I smiled and said hi. Instead of being chill, he gave me this 'who the hell are you' look and responded pretty arrogantly, talking about his startup and how much he's raised. Honestly, he acted like I was below him.'The situation took an unexpected turn when the man revealed, 'Here's the best part turned out his last funding came from a VC firm where I'm actually an LP/angel investor, and the partner is a good friend. When he realised, his energy immediately changed. Awkward doesn't even cover it.'The man concluded his experience by saying, 'Why is it that a lot of Indians abroad act like this with each other? Like, would it kill us to just be nice or at least not look down on someone? But put the same guy in front of a white person, and he'd probably be all smiles and manners. Not sure what it is - ego, insecurity, or just a bad habit. But honestly, it sucks. Anyone else experience this? Is it just me?'Take a look at the viral Reddit post here: Reddit users had a lot to say about the viral post. 'I always smile, but other Indians don't care, so I stopped as well. This is too much in Germany compared to the UK,' a user said. Sharing a similar view, another user said, 'Hot take as someone living in Germany for six years: Germans are more friendly and welcoming than they seem. Indians—it's like a lottery, you'd never know what you'd get. Drawing parallels from your experience, most Indians I've met are absolute show-offs. I've had countless second-hand embarrassing moments.'Others offered a balanced perspective. 'I see both sides of the coin. I'm in a city in the UK, and I too smile and make small talk with people I meet. However, I've noticed something in my student-facing service job. If I become friendly with another Indian, they expect favours or favourable behaviour from me. At the same time, I have also met fellow Indians who are just nice human beings. So, I'd say those who look down are pre-empting a judgement. The benefit of the doubt should be given. Be kind,' said a users linked this behaviour to insecurity. 'Yup. I live in Vancouver and I've often seen this. It's nothing but insecurity. Forget about random Indian guys, even my colleagues give this look of 'how did this company sponsor a visa for you?' Like, stop judging me based on skills and start treating me like a human first,' one user user attempted to explain, 'I'm probably going to get downvoted for this, but here I go. First, what happened with you, that I am not condoning. As someone else wrote above, it's because they're a douche, not because they're Indian. But I'm going to say there are a small percentage of Indians who choose not to associate with other Indians. They try to remain cordial, though. The reason is that (especially here in Europe) a lot of people from India, BD, and Pakistan behave in the most disrespectful manner. From aggressively hitting on teaching assistants to playing loud music in public to misbehaving with women in bars. And the worst part is, even if you try to explain, they don't seem to care. That's why people like me avoid other Indians in public unless we know them personally.'advertisementWhile several users admitted to mixed feelings, others simply disagreed. 'I'm an Indian in the US, and I am always happy at the prospect of finding another Indian around,' said one user added, 'While I'm having coffee on the street and minding my own business, if someone randomly approaches me right there, it does seem justified to be annoyed at first. I'm aware it's an American thing to do, but it's a weird thing honestly. I dislike only poorly-mannered, loud, misogynistic idiots. You don't need to be Indian to be that. But if they're Indian, it's easy to spot them from afar since I'm also an Indian.'The Reddit post triggered discussion about how stereotypes can be harmful and why they should not be generalised. For several users, the takeaway was simple: kindness shouldn't come with conditions.- Ends advertisement


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why UP's proposed ‘One District, One Cuisine' initiative risks flattening India's rich food heritage
The first time I went to Lucknow, in 2013, I followed the usual script handed out by friends, family, and the internet. I sampled the famous galawat ke kebab at Tunday Kababi, biryani from Idrees, kachoris from Durga Khasta Corner, chaat from Royal Café, and, of course, a steaming kulhad of chai from Sharma Ji ki Chai. Lucknow's food felt like a neatly curated checklist; one dish, one shop, one picture for each craving. But moving and living in Lucknow has changed how I taste the city. Kebabs, chai, kachori, or even chutney — there are dozens of variations, each with its own loyal following and story. Chowk's tangy khasta is nothing like Hazratganj's buttery one, and the tea that fuels conversations in Aminabad tastes and feels different from the chai in Gomti Nagar. When people ask me for food recommendations today, my goal is simple: To make them see Lucknow beyond galawati kebabs and Instagram-famous shops. That's why the Uttar Pradesh government's proposed 'One District, One Cuisine' initiative, which got a boost after Lucknow's nomination for 'UNESCO's Creative City of Gastronomy' got accepted, and through which the government intends to popularise one cuisine from each district, worries me. It sounds neat on paper — who wouldn't want to link every district to a proud local delicacy? But food doesn't work like that. A city's culinary identity is not a single dish on a pedestal. It's a messy, fragrant, indefinable table where stories, communities, and forgotten recipes coexist. How do you pick one dish to represent Lucknow when its foodscape includes street-side kachoris, temple prasads, majlis tabarruk, and home-cooked aloo gosht with a side of faith, migration, caste, and family history? Food is part of our intangible cultural heritage, a way of life passed down through generations. Recipes, cooking techniques, and even the etiquette of dining are reflections of values, belief systems, and social identities. As Harvard anthropologist Theodore Bestor said, 'the culinary imagination is the way a culture conceptualises and imagines food'. Reducing an entire district to one state-approved 'representative' dish risks flattening that imagination, turning living traditions into branded commodities. Just as there is no one 'Indian' language, there is no one 'Indian' food. India's culinary heritage is enormous, shaped by local ingredients, caste-based cooking methods, and regional beliefs. For the longest time, the West thought Indian food meant butter chicken. Now, chefs like Vijay Kumar are changing that narrative; Semma, which serves South Indian food, has won Michelin stars three years in a row in New York. That's what happens when you let food speak for itself instead of forcing it into a simplified box. India's diversity cannot be captured in a single dish. What we eat, how we eat and why we eat what we do are key to understanding India's social landscape. It is a work of caste, class, religion, region and kinship. Consider Lucknow again. During Muharram, some distribute roti, others sharbat or khichda; during Shravan, some cook sabudana khichdi, others make makhana kheer or khamang kakdi. These are not just recipes but expressions of belief and community, woven into social interactions and rituals. Which one of these would you choose to represent 'Lucknow's cuisine'? And more importantly, who gets to decide? Colleen Taylor Sen, in Feasts and Fasts (2014), describes Indian cuisine as 'an active, ever-changing product of 5,000 years of political upheavals, migrations and conquests, revelries and lamentation'. How then can a policy like 'One District, One Cuisine' hope to do justice to this dynamism? Social media already promotes homogeneity by amplifying the most photogenic or viral dishes. The algorithm favours popularity, not cultural nuance. When state policy mirrors that behaviour, we risk celebrating virality instead of vitality. Food scholar Lucy M Long defines culinary tourism as 'the intentional, exploratory participation in the foodways of another — participation including the consumption, preparation, and presentation of a food item, cuisine, meal system, or eating style considered to belong to a culinary system not one's own.' Culinary adventuring, whether through street food in a far-off country or at an immigrant-run eatery in your own city, promotes diversity and understanding. A plate of kebabs in a Hazratganj restaurant might tell a story of aristocratic Awadhi refinement, while the same kebab in a Chowk stall speaks of street-side hustle and working-class ingenuity. A one-cuisine policy stands to kill curiosity by presenting a single, state-sanctioned narrative of what a place 'tastes like'. Which story would 'One District, One Cuisine' choose to erase? Food is not just about consumption; it is about belonging. A humble plate of food can be a profound communicator of identity: both a representation offered by those who cook it and an experience for those who taste it. In multicultural societies, culture is constantly recreated and reconstructed through interactions, and food often crosses ethnic and religious boundaries. Khamiri rotis, for example, are shared between Hindus and Muslims in Old Delhi; sharbat is as much a community beverage in Muharram as it is during a langar or bhandara during festivals. When policies are imposed from the top down, they risk silencing these organic cultural exchanges. Promoting food democratically, from the bottom up by listening to the people who cook, sell, and eat these dishes every day would be a different matter altogether. But if it comes through government committees and hashtags, it feels less like a celebration and more like appropriation. To truly celebrate Uttar Pradesh's food, we need to listen to its kitchens, not its hashtags. The writer is a chef and author


Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
How Bengaluru handles dry waste differently from India's mega cities
Bengaluru generates over 6,000 tonnes of waste every day, a combination of wet, dry, and sanitary waste. Unlike many other Indian cities, the dry waste here is handled through a decentralised system. Watch the video to know what happens to your waste once it leaves your doorstep.