SIA Q1 profit falls 59% to S$186mil; airline group sees volatile times ahead
SINGAPORE: Singapore Airlines saw its earnings slide 59 per cent in the first quarter of its latest financial year, it announced on July 28 after trading hours.
This was due to lower interest income and the share of losses of associates, SIA said. Net profit dropped to S$186 million (US$144.6 million) for the first quarter in the 2025/2026 financial year that ended June 30, down from S$452 million in the corresponding period a year ago.
'In addition to the lower operating profit, the reduction in net profit was largely attributable to a lower interest income on the back of lower cash balances and interest rate cuts, and the group recording a share of losses of associated companies compared to a share of profits for the same quarter last year,' SIA said.
This loss was from Air India's financial results, which were not part of the group's results for the same quarter in 2024. SIA started equity accounting for Air India's financial performance from December 2024 following the full integration of Vistara into Air India.
Before the merger, Vistara was jointly owned by Tata Sons and SIA. After the merger, SIA holds a 25.1 per cent stake in the enlarged Air India, allowing it to participate directly in the fast-expanding Indian aviation market.
SIA's operating profit fell around 14 per cent year on year, to S$405 million.
But group revenue climbed 1.5 per cent in the three months that ended June 30.
'Despite economic and geopolitical uncertainties across the network, demand for air travel and cargo remained strong,' SIA said.
SIA and Scoot carried a record 10.3 million passengers, up 6.9 per cent from the same quarter in 2024.
But passenger yields – the amount earned per passenger for each kilometre flown – slipped 2.9 per cent to 10 cents per revenue passenger-kilometre. This was due to heightened competition, as more airlines continue to add capacity, SIA said.
Despite healthy demand for air travel in the second quarter due to the traditional summer peak season, SIA sees volatile times ahead.
It said: 'The global airline industry continues to face a volatile operating environment, with challenges ranging from geopolitical developments and macroeconomic fluctuations to changing market dynamics and supply chain constraints.
'The group will be agile and proactive in responding to changes in demand patterns.'
Its cargo business is also affected by tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump. A 90-day truce was announced on tariffs, which was meant to end in July but was extended till Aug 1.
'Ongoing tariffs have led to unpredictable and uncertain demand,' SIA said.
'The group's diversified network and verticals reduce its exposure to specific regions or market segments, and will continue to adapt its capacity and seize opportunities as they arise.'
It added that it will remain vigilant in this operating environment, while identifying emerging areas of growth.
SIA also said its strong balance sheet, workforce and digital capabilities put it in good stead to maintain its industry-leading position.
SIA announced recently that it will ramp up capacity to various Asian destinations in Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand, given the closure of Jetstar Asia on July 31. This includes Scoot starting operations to Labuan Bajo and Medan in Indonesia, as well as Okinawa, subject to regulatory and operational approvals.
'In addition, the group has worked closely with Jetstar Asia to accommodate affected passengers and offer employment opportunities to impacted staff, where possible,' SIA said.
Scoot has also announced plans to launch services to Da Nang in Vietnam and Kota Bharu in Malaysia in October, as well as to Nha Trang in Vietnam in November.
As at June 30, the group's passenger network covered 129 destinations in 37 countries and territories. Its operating fleet comprised 204 passenger and freighter aircraft with an average age of seven years and nine months.
SIA operated 144 passenger aircraft and seven freighters, while Scoot operated 53 passenger aircraft. The group also has 72 aircraft on order at the end of this quarter.
SIA shares closed up by 0.4 per cent at S$7.60 on July 28. - The Straits Times/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
From Laos to Brazil, Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers. But even the winners like Vietnam will pay a price
WASHINGTON (AP): President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers - from small, poor countries like Laos and Algeria to wealthy US trading partners like Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty taxes - tariffs - on the products they export to the United States starting Aug. 7. The closest thing to winners may be the countries that caved to Trump's demands - and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run - even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies. "In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School. Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do. "The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former U.S. trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. "He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded - dramatically.'' Everything goes back to what Trump calls "Liberation Day'' - April 2 - when the president announced "reciprocal'' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10% "baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else. He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs - all of which is now being challenged in court. Trump retreated temporarily after his Liberation Day announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate. Eventually, some of them did, caving to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs for the privilege of continuing to sell into the vast American market. The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs on its exports to the United States - up from 1.3% before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The US demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the UK for 19 straight years. The European Union and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low single-digit rates they paid last year - but lower than the tariffs he was threatening (30% on the EU and 25% on Japan). Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines. Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15% from 32% in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5%. And while Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20% from 32% in April, the pain will still be felt. "20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's president Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei Friday. Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15% from the 50% he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there. Countries that didn't knuckle under - and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath - got hit harder. Even some of the poor were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 - versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff and Algeria with a 30% levy. Trump slammed Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for trying to lose his electoral defeat in 2022. Never mind that the U.S. has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007. Trump's decision to plaster a 35% tariff on longstanding U.S. ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Switzerland was clobbered with a 39% import tax - even higher than the 31% Trump originally announced on April 2. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, said Wolff, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "They're clearly not at all happy.'' Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his Liberation Day tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law. In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade , a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wend its way through the legal system, and may likely end up at the U.S. Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs. "If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said. Trump portrays his tariffs as a tax on foreign countries. But they are actually paid by import companies in the U.S. who try to pass along the cost to their customers via higher prices. True, tariffs can hurt other countries by forcing their exporters to cut prices and sacrifice profits - or risk losing market share in the United States. But economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the most of the tab. Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel and Stanley Black & Decker, have all hiked prices due to U.S. tariffs. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,'' Appleton said. "Sneakers, knapsacks ... your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.'' Trump's trade war has pushed the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% now, the highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. And that will impose a $2,400 cost on the average household, the lab estimates. "The US consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff said. -- AP Economics Writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this story.
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US says differences with India cannot be resolved overnight for deal
India faced Western pressure to distance itself from longstanding ties with Russia and the BRICS group of developing nations. (Reuters pic) WASHINGTON : Differences between the US and India cannot be resolved overnight to arrive at a trade deal, a senior US official told reporters late on Thursday, citing geopolitical disagreements. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday Washington was still negotiating with India on trade after announcing earlier that day the US would impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country starting on Friday. The 25% figure would single out India more severely than other major trading partners, and threaten to unravel months of talks between the two countries, undermining a strategic partner of Washington's and a counterbalance to China. 'Our challenges with India, they've always been a pretty closed market… there are a host of other kind of geopolitical issues,' the US official said. 'You've seen the president express concern about, you know, membership in BRICS, purchases of Russian oil and that kind of thing.' While saying there were constructive discussions with India, the official added: 'These are complex relationships and complex issues, and so I don't think things can be resolved overnight with India.' India has faced pressure from the West, including the US, to distance itself from Moscow after Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. New Delhi resisted that pressure, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and its economic needs. Trump has cast the BRICS group of developing nations – of which India is a key part – as hostile to the US. Those nations have dismissed that accusation and the group says it promotes the interests of its members and of developing countries at large. Trump has also drawn India's frustration by repeatedly taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire that he announced on social media on May 10. The ceasefire halted days of hostilities between the nuclear armed Asian neighbours. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their issues directly without outside involvement. Trump has reached a trade deal with India's rival Pakistan.
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Behind Trump's South Korea deal, a plan to transform global shipbuilding
South Korea has pledged US$150 billion to help its shipbuilders enter the US market as part of its new trade deal with Washington, a move that could help America revive its shipbuilding industry and counter China's dominance in the sector. US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States and South Korea had agreed a 'full and complete' trade deal, which would see the US impose a 15 per cent tariff on South Korean goods and receive US$350 billion of investment from its Asian ally. Shortly after, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung stated that US$150 billion of the promised investment would be dedicated to shipbuilding – an industry where South Korean firms are second only to China in global market share. The capital would provide 'solid support' for South Korean companies entering the US shipbuilding industry, Lee wrote in a Facebook post on Thursday. The wider US$350 billion investment package was intended to solidify bilateral cooperation in strategic industries, including semiconductors, he added. Seoul clarified in a media briefing on Thursday morning that the promised funds would not come in the form of direct equity investments, but 'will primarily consist of loans and guarantees'. Earlier this week, local media outlets in South Korea reported that Seoul had proposed a multibillion-dollar project to Washington named 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again' during their trade negotiations, which would involve large-scale investments in the US by Korean shipbuilders and government financial support measures. State-run entities like the Export-Import Bank of Korea and Korea Trade Insurance Corporation were being considered for involvement in the scheme, South Korea's Yonhap News Agency reported on Monday. South Korea's shipbuilding industry is regarded as being uniquely positioned to assist Washington's ambition of reviving American shipbuilding and restraining China's dominance in the sector. Earlier this year, Washington announced plans to begin charging steep port fees targeting China-built or operated vessels from October. The policy appears to already be benefiting South Korea's shipbuilders as companies become nervous about placing new orders with Chinese shipyards. In the first half of 2025, South Korea's share of new vessel orders rose to 25.1 per cent in vessel gross tonnage terms, compared with 15 per cent last year. China's share, meanwhile, slipped to 51.8 per cent from 70 per cent, according to a report released by the Export-Import Bank of Korea on Monday. The report said South Korea's recovery in market share had largely been driven by US-China tensions, but added that the benefits may not last long, as US actions against China were likely to push up freight rates and logistics costs on US routes. However, analysts expressed scepticism about the feasibility of Seoul's investment pledge and cautioned that rebuilding America's shipbuilding capacity would likely be a long and challenging process. 'It is not the foreign country investing in the US. It is individual companies doing it, and the government cannot dictate what they will do,' said Lars Jensen, founder of the maritime consultancy Vespucci Maritime. He added that it was easy to announce a large investment figure over an unspecified time period, but that the actual implementation would be a different matter. Wu Jialu, a chief analyst of industrial research at Citic Futures, said the US$150 billion investment may prompt South Korean shipbuilders to build or acquire shipyards in the US, providing talent and technological support. South Korean firms could help improve the competitiveness of the US shipbuilding industry, particularly in the construction of high-value-added vessels, but reviving the whole industry would still be a protracted process due to supply chain and capacity limitations, she said. The full impact of the US port fees has yet to become clear, and future market trends would also depend on fleet renewal and upgrading demand, Wu added. Hanwha Ocean, one of South Korea's top shipbuilders, made a major investment in December to acquire Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, which is currently the only US shipyard that is operated by a South Korean company. In late July, Hanwha Ocean's US subsidiary placed an order for a liquefied natural gas carrier at the Philly Shipyard, the first LNG carrier for export to be built in the US in nearly five decades. However, a significant portion of the construction will be carried out at Hanwha Ocean's Geoje shipyard in South Korea, while the Philly Shipyard will be responsible for US regulatory compliance and safety certifications, Hanwha said, noting it was 'laying the foundation for a collaborative production framework'. Japan also finalised a deal with the US in July that will see the creation of a US$550 billion fund to invest in a range of projects, including the construction and modernisation of US-based shipyards. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
