Editorial: Nothing fake about synthetic food dye health risks
These are the same dyes linked to health risks, particularly in children, and they're already banned in several countries. Sure, RFK Jr. can be a lightning rod and some of his ideas are farfetched, but Democrats shouldn't bolt just because he's on board. This is a cause with history, science and voters on its side and it's one where both sides can actually agree.
The dangers of synthetic food dyes aren't new news. A 2021 California report tied them to hyperactivity and behavioral issues in kids. Some, like Red No. 3, have been flagged for cancer risks in animal studies. Since the 1950s, their use has skyrocketed 500%, a trend that has worried health experts.
Democrats have a track record of tackling this kind of thing: President John F. Kennedy tightened U.S. Food and Drug Administration rules in the '60s; the agency banned dyes like Red No. 1 over possible liver damage. In 1990, bipartisan support got Red No. 3 out of cosmetics. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, even signed a 2024 law banning six dyes in school lunches. This isn't a partisan issue — it's about keeping Americans, especially American kids, safe.
Yes, we know RFK Jr.'s name can make some Democrats twitch, especially with his history of vaccine skepticism which certainly misses the mark. But dismissing this dye ban because it aligns with his agenda would be throwing out a good idea for no reason.
The science is solid and the politics are too. A 2023 YouGov poll found 66% of Americans, including 62% of Democrats, want stricter rules on food additives. A 2024 Rasmussen Reports survey showed 71% of parents — across party lines — support banning dyes linked to health risks.
Democrats can score points here: Voters, especially younger ones and parents, are all in for cleaner food. In a 2025 Pew Research Center survey, 78% of Gen Z and Millennials said they'd back candidates prioritizing public health. Supporting Luna's bill is a no-brainer for Dems looking to connect with their base and swing voters.
Globally, the U.S. is behind the curve on this vital health issue. The European Union slaps warning labels on foods with Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6 for their impact on kids' behavior. Countries like the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway have either banned these dyes or pushed companies to use natural options like beet juice or turmeric. Big brands like Kraft have already reformulated products for those markets, so why not here? Luna's bill sets a deadline of Dec. 31, 2026. We think that's a reasonable timeline for billion-dollar brands.
This would seem an especially ideal opportunity for Democrats, with their history of fighting for consumer safety, to join Republicans and score a bipartisan win for the wellbeing of all America — and help reestablish their consumer-oriented brand. The data's clear, the voters are on board, and other countries are already there. Indeed, a majority of states are already moving to impose artificial dye bans of their own and not just on food products.
The legislation may pose challenges for products like Lucky Charms breakfast cereal or Cheetos chips as they switch to more natural alternatives but that seems a small price to pay to address the various health threats associated with synthetic food dyes.
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
33 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump plans to sign his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump plans to sign his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law Friday after his cajoling produced almost unanimous Republican support in Congress for the domestic priority that could cement his second-term legacy. Against odds that at times seemed improbable, Trump achieved his goal of celebrating a historic — and divisive — legislative victory in time for the nation's birthday. Fighter jets and a stealth bomber are expected to streak the sky over the annual White House Fourth of July picnic where Trump plans to sign the bill. The legislation, the president said, is 'going to make this country into a rocket ship. It's going to be really great.' Democrats assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said during a record-breaking speech that delayed the bill's passage by eight-plus hours. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' The legislation extends Trump's 2017 multitrillion-dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law. The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a monthslong push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering. It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump's wrath in opposing it. Vice President JD Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote. In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump's well-funded political operation. The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama's Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden's tax credits for renewable energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. Trump exulted in his political victory Thursday night in Iowa, where he attended a kickoff of events celebrating the country's 250th birthday next year. 'I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,' he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because 'they hate Trump — but I hate them, too.' The package is certain to be a flashpoint in next year's midterm elections, and Democrats are making ambitious plans for rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours and even a multiday vigil, all intended to highlight the most controversial elements. Upon his return to Washington early Friday, Trump described the package as 'very popular,' though polling suggests that public opinion is mixed at best. For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of U.S. adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid. But the poll found majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers. About 60% said it was 'unacceptable' that the bill is expected to increase the $36 trillion U.S. debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade.
Chicago Tribune
40 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
See clearly underwater with the best swim goggles
Over 90 million Americans swim in pools, lakes and oceans every year, and one-third of that group swims regularly for fitness. No matter where you swim, a good pair of goggles are essential. Goggles help the swimmer see beneath them, while also raising their head above the water line without having to wipe their eyes. Swimming goggles also protect the eyes from chlorine, salt or insects depending on where you are swimming. When it comes to keeping the water out of your eyes and a wide view of what's in front of you, the top choice is the Speedo Vanquisher 2.0 Mirrored Swim Goggle. Fun vs. fitness While swimming goggles can be used for all situations, you may choose different types of goggles depending on your reason for being in the water. If you are relaxing on a summer day in the lake or a public swimming pool, not all of the cutting-edge features of performance goggles may be necessary. If you are completing your regular workout or training for a triathlon, then having extra-tight seals and panoramic lenses may be ideal. Types of swim goggles There are many types of goggles, each with a different purpose. Leisure goggles are the most common and used for recreational swimming as well as swimming laps. They are designed for comfort but still provide a strong seal. Mask goggles cover most of your face and have a very tight seal. They are excellent for being able to look around at your surroundings (similar to snorkeling), but provide too much drag to be used for fitness swimming. Performance goggles are smaller with less cushion around the seal. They are used by professional athletes to reduce the amount of drag they face in the water. A substyle in this category are Swedish goggles, which are designed to cover the eye only and typically don't last long. Most manufacturers also produce goggles to fit children. Lens types There are different types of lenses to choose from for most goggles. Clear goggles are best for indoor swimming or during cloudy conditions. Mirrored goggles are best for sunny days. You can get tinted lenses, which moderately protect against the sun, polarized lenses which provide significant sun protection, or you can even get transition lenses that change according to the amount of light in the swimming area. Comfortable but tight fit One of the most important aspects of swimming goggles is the ability to keep water out of your eyes without being so tight that they make your face hurt. The combination of seals, head straps and nose clips will make up your overall comfort. You want all of them to be snug, but not so tight that it's painful. Gaskets Most leisure goggles come with either silicone, rubber or foam gaskets. These help protect the skin while a seal is formed against the water. You may need to test different materials before finding the one right for you. Racing goggles typically do not have any gaskets. Antifog coating Swimming goggles with an antifog coating help keep the goggles from becoming blurry while you swim, which often requires rinsing them out. Unfortunately, this coating will wear out over time, even with higher-priced goggles. The best way to keep the coating intact is to take care of your goggles according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Swim goggles cost as little as $10-$20 for basic and children's models, while those with adjustable straps and antifog coating are priced between $20-$50. High-performance goggles with transition lenses or prescription lenses can cost over $50. What if I need prescription goggles? A. There are prescription goggles available for people who wear glasses and prefer to keep the ability to see clearly while underwater. Why do my goggles keep fogging up? A. Even antifog goggles can get partially blurry with too much condensation. Over time, the antifog coating will wear off. There are some spray-on antifog products available. Why do my goggles keep leaking? A. It is likely that a gasket in the seal is wearing out due to exposure to chlorine or just long-term use. You should also make sure the goggles haven't been bent from improper storage. Another reason, which seems counterintuitive, is that you may have the goggles on too tightly. Overly restricted goggles can actually lead to water getting inside the lenses. Top swim goggles Speedo Vanquisher 2.0 Mirrored Swim Goggle What you need to know: For swimming in bright sunshine, these goggles set the standard with mirrored lenses. What you'll love: In addition to panoramic minimal-glare lenses, these goggles have cushioned silicone seals that keep water out and an adjustable head strap. Different-sized nose clips are included for maximizing overall fit. What you should consider: The mirrored lenses can make swimming difficult indoors or at night. Top swim goggles for the money ActivAqua Wide View Swimming Goggles What you need to know: These wide-lens goggles have unique design features that help them stay in place and last for a long time. What you'll love: The wide lenses are UV-plated and antifog-plated and come with double silicone seals. A one-snap buckle strap is easy to adjust, even while swimming. The goggles come with a protective case that drains quickly. What you should consider: These goggles are easily adjusted everywhere except the nosepiece. Worth checking out Aqua Sphere Kayenne Swim Goggles What you need to know: These multi-feature goggles are ideal for swimmers of all ages and abilities. What you'll love: Patented curve technology creates a 180-degree view. UV-protected and antifog clear lenses allow natural sunlight. Quick-fit straps and a stabilizing nose piece make for a tight, yet comfortable fit. What you should consider: There have been some reports of the lenses scratching. BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Christina Bohannan feels empowered by close 2024 finish and toss-up of IA-01 race in 2026
Jul. 4—Democrat Christina Bohannan doesn't feel defeated. In fact, she is emboldened by her narrow loss to Republican U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks back in 2024, which was decided by less than 800 votes. Knowing victory was close, her third campaign for Congress is motivated to get those votes she lost. During a recent trip to Newton, Bohannan told local Democrats that she will be giving extra attention on Jasper County and Warren County for 2026. The candidate said her campaign outperformed expectations during the last election, only losing to Miller-Meeks by a 0.2 percent margin. "Outperformed by more than eight points across the entire district, by 15 points in the more rural and reddest counties in the district; 33,000 people who voted for Donald Trump also voted for me," Bohannan said on June 28 in Maytag Park. "And that doesn't just happen, friends. That kind of stuff doesn't just happen." Bohannan credited the work to local parties and supporters who donated to her campaign or knocked doors. It made a difference, she said, and it was because that race was so close is why she was standing in front of them again, ready to take on Miller-Meeks once more. However, Bohannan is convinced the 2026 election cycle is going to be different. She noted that in the past the race for Iowa's 1st Congressional District has been favored for Republicans, which was certainly true in Bohannan's first bid for the seat back in 2022. It took work from 2024 to make the election a toss-up. Christina Bohannan, a Democratic candidate seeking her third bid for Iowa's 1st Congressional District seat, speaks during a potluck picnic hosted by the Jasper County Democratic Party on June 28 in Maytag Park in Newton. For 2026, Bohannan said the seat is already considered a toss-up race, a notion that is backed up by a number of political analysts and the results from 2024. "We showed we can win," Bohannan said. "...People are fed up and they are fired up. We have been seeing these rallies. Some of them I know went to some of those recently. Hundreds and thousands of people are showing up to protest representatives like Mariannette Miller-Meeks all throughout Iowa." Why? Bohannan claimed it is because Miller-Meeks does not represent her constituents and gets her political agenda from party leaders. The Democratic candidate argued her Republican opponent is compromised and votes by what her donors and corporate PACs want, rather than the people she represents. "I get my political agenda from you," Bohannan said. Miller-Meeks is "making life worse for Iowans" and is putting "party bosses, corporate PACs and billionaire donors" ahead of her own constituents. Bohannan said she cannot stand by and let that happen. Miller-Meeks has had three terms in Congress. To Bohannan, she has had three chances to do right by Iowans. "And every single time she has sold us out," Bohannan said. "She has sold us out to divisive party politics. She has sold us out to the billionaires and the corporate PACs who fund her campaign and who help her get re-elected no matter how bad she's been. But enough is enough. It is time for a change."
