King and Queen begin Holyrood Week under guard of ceremonial female bodyguards
Charles and Camilla began their official stay in Scotland – known as Holyrood Week – by carrying out solo engagements in Edinburgh and later hosted a garden party together.
Earlier when the Queen opened Ratho library, she told her hosts the weather was 'cooler' than conditions in England and described the weather in Scotland as a 'drop in temperature'.
Scots from a range of backgrounds from NHS workers to the military and charity volunteers were invited to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, the King and Queen's official residence in the Scottish capital, for the garden party.
Annabel Biddulp was one of four female members of the Royal Company of Archers, the Sovereign's Body Guard in Scotland, on duty at the social event with their bows.
She described herself as the sixth generation of her family to be an Archer, with her father and uncle also on duty, and said the historic moment was 'absolutely wonderful, so many of my family have been part of the Archers for generations'.
Ms Biddulph was going to celebrate with a 'jolly good party tonight' and said the King mentioned the trusty bow she was holding.
'He asked 'are you a dab hand at that' to which the answer was yes'.
The garden party was staged in Holyroodhouse gardens, overlooked by Holyrood Park where Republic had staged a protest spelling out the words 'Not My King' with what appeared to be large pieces of white card that was visible by guests.
Charles also chatted to Second World War veteran George McLeod, aged 99, who served as a private with the 4th Battalion, King's Own Scottish Borderers.
Mr McLeod was joined by his daughter Jan McLeod who said: 'The King spoke about the VE Day events in London and said it was very important to keep the memories alive and how sad it was we were losing veterans.'
She added her father was in the German city of Bremen when the war ended in 1945: 'He was in communications and the first to hear the war was over, he's a bit of a joker, and no one believed him at first.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
How martial law made the American Revolution
On this Fourth of July, with federal troops still on the ground in Los Angeles, our own American Revolution provides a surprising lesson on the perils of military overreach in domestic affairs. Notably, the nation's political and military leaders should consider the British blunders of the 1770s as they weigh the prospect of militarizing American streets, now and in the future. Parliament's Stamp Act tax of the mid-1760s ignited the Anglo-American conflict. Yet, as historians broadly agree, it was escalating martial law in Boston under different legislation, the Coercive Acts of 1774, that transformed American resistance into full-scale revolution. Let's start by recalling what had happened four years earlier during protests over the Townshend duties, a series of taxes Parliament added to everyday goods, including tea, exported to the colonies. The British ministry responded to the unrest by stationing approximately 2,000 redcoats in Boston. On the night of March 5, 1770, in an accidental bloodbath set off by the pelting of soldiers with snowballs, the British opened fire on a crowd of unarmed civilians outside the Custom House, killing five and wounding others. 'Let me observe,' Sam Adams soon wrote about the Boston Massacre, 'how fatal are the effects, the danger of which I long ago mentioned, of posting a standing army among a free people.' The problem worsened after the Boston Tea Party. The hacking to pieces of 342 crates of tea owned by the East India Co. in late 1773 was, of course, criminal activity. As such, it warranted the full application of colonial and municipal law against the offenders. Instead of leaving justice to the locals, however, Parliament passed the four draconian bills known as the Coercive Acts. To enforce them, in a fatal progression, King George III's ministers dispatched a military governor and occupying army to Boston, in effect imposing martial law on the entire colony for the unlawful actions of a few. Each of the Coercive Acts struck at the heart of Massachusetts self-rule. The Boston Port Act shut down all trade through Boston Harbor and its surrounding waterways, while the Massachusetts Government Act dissolved the colony's assembly, courts and town meetings. The remaining two acts allowed trials to be relocated overseas and forced residents to house British troops at the governor's discretion. Taken together, the Coercive Acts constituted an unprecedented assault on the rights and freedoms of the American people. Colonists decried them as 'barbarous,' 'diabolical' and 'Tyrannic' — the work of a 'Despotic power.' What followed is familiar to many Americans. Massachusetts, under martial law, summoned the other colonies to a continental congress in Philadelphia. In reaction, the king and Parliament declared the colonies to be in a state of rebellion, ordering thousands of additional redcoats across the Atlantic to crush dissent and make arrests. A conflict the British thought they could resolve with boots on the ground only escalated. On April 19, 1775, in another tragedy of unintended carnage — this time triggered by a stray bullet — the king's troops gunned down eight colonials on Lexington Green, turning protest into civil war. Fifteen months later, as a remedy of last resort, the colonies declared independence, highlighting Britain's regime of martial law as the first cause of the breach. The declaration pointedly charges King George with 'abolishing our most valuable laws,' 'suspending our own Legislatures' and '[keeping] among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.' History doesn't deliver road maps, but it does abound in examples of military overreach sparking unpredictable violence. In the case of the American Revolution, we are reminded that deploying an army on the streets where one's own citizens live and work provokes tension, fear and anger — and sometimes, by the twin forces of accident and escalation, bloodshed and lasting civil discord. Eli Merritt is a political historian at Vanderbilt University. He writes the Substack newsletter American Commonwealth and is the author of 'Disunion Among Ourselves: The Perilous Politics of the American Revolution.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Details of Macrons' unconventional UK state visit revealed - could Trump's be similar?
A personal greeting from the Prince and Princess of Wales and a carriage procession through Windsor await Emmanuel Macron and his wife, as the royals roll out the red carpet for the French president. Details of the French state visit next week have been released, with a different look from usual, as the important diplomatic event takes place in Windsor and not around Buckingham Palace. In the first unusual step, the Prince and Princess of Wales will travel out to RAF Northolt and personally meet and his wife Brigitte off their plane, before travelling with them to Windsor. and Queen will then formally greet their guests on a special royal dais constructed in Datchet Road in Windsor town centre, with the castle the backdrop as gun salutes sound in nearby Home Park. There will then be a carriage procession through the town and along part of the Long Walk, which leads to Windsor Castle, before the full ceremonial welcome takes place in the castle's quadrangle. Later, a grand state banquet will be held with both the King and President Macron giving speeches. Kensington Palace has not confirmed if will attend. At a cancer wellbeing centre in Colchester this week, she and how during recovery it can still be difficult to "function normally at home as you perhaps once used to". Mr Macron's state visit, from 8 to 10 July, is the first at Windsor Castle rather than Buckingham Palace, in more than a decade - since that of Irish president Michael D Higgins in 2014. Windsor has been chosen because of refurbishment at Buckingham Palace. State visits are seen as the ultimate diplomatic gift the UK can offer, with the royals' soft power used to strengthen diplomatic ties. The French president will also visit the Palace of Westminster on Tuesday, where he will address parliamentarians in the Royal Gallery and meet opposition leaders at Lancaster House. On Wednesday, the president and Mrs Macron will join Prime Minister and Lady Starmer for lunch at Downing Street, ahead of a UK-France summit at Number 10 on Thursday. But it will be the personal touches that will no doubt make this a special visit for the Macrons. The King and Queen will take them to see a horse - Fabuleu de Maucour, a 10-year-old grey gelding Mr Macron gifted to known horse-lover in 2022 for her Platinum Jubilee. They will also view a Charabanc carriage from the Royal Mews, a present to Queen Victoria from King Louis-Philippe of France in 1844. And the Macrons will privately pay their respects and lay flowers at the late Queen's tomb in St George's Chapel in Windsor. The King - as ranger of Windsor Great Park - will also invite the president to tour the Windsor Castle Gardens, including areas of nature restoration and biodiversity and the wider Great Park. Read more from Sky News: The last state visit to the UK from France was in March 2008. The King and Queen paid their own a state visit to France in September 2023 and enjoyed a warm rapport with Mr and Mrs Macron, who will stay in the castle during their trip. Interestingly, the arrangements could be seen as a potential template for US President 's high-profile state visit in September.
Washington Post
6 hours ago
- Washington Post
Thom Tillis cared about the poor. It was enough to end his career.
'Another one bites the dust,' goes the popular Queen song, which might have been written for this week's news in Trumpworld. I refer to Sen. Thom Tillis, the Republican senator from North Carolina, who, in the wake of a virtual assault by Donald Trump, announced that he won't seek reelection next year. Thus, Tillis joins a lengthening line of dropouts or, as the presiding party prefers, RINOs — Republicans in Name Only — who have left public office during the years since Trump first became president rather than be forced to breathe the sulfurous vapors emanating from Pennsylvania Avenue and seeping into congressional offices. Among other considerations for Tillis was Trump's promise to seek revenge through a primary challenger as recompense for Tillis's 'betrayal' in withholding his vote for Trump's massive tax and immigration bill, which the House of Representatives passed on Thursday afternoon. You've probably heard of it. Tillis didn't like parts of the bill that cut Medicaid over the next decade. Tillis and Trump spoke about their differences and, Tillis said, reached a meeting of the minds. But it wasn't long after that Trump stood in the doorway of his Truth Social platform and began firing insults at Tillis, saying he was 'a talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' Not the machine-gun fire of Queen's song, but effective enough in getting rid of Tillis, though the senator claims he had been mulling a departure before Trump's sniping. In a statement to reporters, Tillis said: 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species.' That's a polite way of saying America is doomed. So much for the balance of power. It's hard to miss the irony, if you're in the mood, of the chainsaw-wielding, empathy-deficient Elon Musk, richest man in the world, slashing government programs while a man such as Tillis, who moved out of his family's trailer at 16 to get a job, is run out of town for caring about his state's poor. Such are Trump's priorities, in a nutshell. 'Screw the poor' is the leitmotif running through this 'moral abomination,' as Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) recently described the proposed legislation. Thanks to tax cuts that benefit the wealthy — and notwithstanding the firing of thousands of federal employees when Musk and Trump were still bromancing — an estimated 17 million people could lose health insurance under the megabill. In plain terms, this legislation translates to a loss of health care — and food subsidies — for tens of thousands if not millions of children. And to think that evangelical America claims God chose Trump to lead the country and, presumably, the world. By now, surely, we should stop saying America is a Christian nation. Jesus Christ and the religion he inspired are all about helping the poor, the meek, the hungry, the homeless. If Republicans are representing themselves as Christians while cutting essential aid to the neediest among us, then we might infer that they're all going to hell. Trump is no more Christian than he is a Republican. Yes, this is a man who sells Bibles engraved with his own name at the top and 'God Bless America' on the cover ($99.99 on eBay). Hypocrite, have thee no shame? I'd be willing to wager that Trump hasn't read so much as a Psalm, much less a book he seems to think he co-authored. Trump famously doesn't read much of anything. He makes Sarah Palin look like Jane Austen. Trump isn't just a Bible-thumping sideshow barker pitching gospel and perfumes. He also peddles fake news, false motives and packs of lies, notably that he wants to help the working class while decreasing the federal deficit. Perhaps he meant bigger Christmas bonuses for his Latino landscaping crews and golf caddies because the Congressional Budget Office found that his bill would add roughly $3.3 trillion to the national debt over 10 years. Another part of the legislation that allows wait staff to earn tax-free tips is a swell idea that surely will help a handful of households, but eliminating that tax income also creates the need for budget cuts elsewhere. It's possible, of course, that the folks whose Medicaid coverage is eliminated could always seek restaurant jobs. Thanks to Vice President JD Vance's tiebreaking vote, the Republican-controlled Senate embraced the rich and shafted the poor. (Not to be outdone, the GOP-led House did the same with its Thursday vote, though much more quickly.) We can surmise that at least the three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill, including Tillis, had hoped that the House would reject the Senate version. The other two senators demonstrating possession of a spine were Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Collins plans to seek reelection next year, but with a recent unfavorable rating of 57 percent, and just 29 percent of Republicans viewing her favorably, she isn't a shoo-in. Paul isn't up for reelection until 2028. There was no need to rush to pass the monster bill before July 4, the deadline Trump had set. Understandably, he might have hoped to declare one great big, beautiful victory on Independence Day to displace the national memory of his tedious, snooze-worthy birthday parade. Too bad Trump couldn't have adapted a more fitting deadline — Labor Day, perhaps, for a bill that should pay greater heed to the needs of the less fortunate than to the billionaire club to which Trump has always aspired. Tillis's legacy, meanwhile, might well be that a Democrat fills his seat. Though North Carolina is a swing state that went for Trump in 2024 by a slight margin, voters are split almost evenly between the two major parties. The largest group of voters, at 38 percent, is unaffiliated. By November 2026, given the accelerating pace of crazy, there's no telling which direction the political winds might blow — or who next might bite the dust.
