AmCham delegation heads to Washington for 2025 Doorknock
The Doorknock is an annual event held in Washington that connects global companies in Korea with US officials to discuss industry issues and strengthen bilateral economic cooperation.
This year's visit marks the first such trip following the inauguration of new administrations in South Korea and the United States.
The delegation, comprising around 20 senior executives from major global companies including Amazon Web Services, Google, Coupang, Hyundai Motor Group and LG CNS, will engage in a series of meetings with Trump administration officials, members of Congress and leading policy think tanks.
Key agenda items include strengthening cooperation in strategic industries such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence, stabilizing supply chains and improving the trade and investment landscape between the two countries.
'This year's Doorknock comes at a pivotal time for Korea-US economic cooperation,' said AmCham Chairman James Kim. 'It's a timely opportunity to directly convey the perspectives of American companies operating in South Korea.'
AmCham also plans to advocate for US engagement in the upcoming APEC Summit in Korea and promote greater regulatory alignment and regional collaboration in the Asia-Pacific.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea, US continue joint efforts to 'make progress' toward OPCON transition: Pentagon official
South Korea and the United States continue cooperation to "make progress" toward the transition of wartime operational control to Seoul, a Pentagon official said Friday, indicating that discussions on the major alliance issue are ongoing. The official made the remarks as new South Korean President Lee Jae Myung's administration seeks to retake it at a time when US President Donald Trump's administration has been urging allies to take a greater security burden while prioritizing deterring Chinese threats. "The U.S. and ROK continue to work together to make progress toward OPCON transition," the official told Yonhap News Agency. ROK is short for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The official added that the Pentagon has nothing to announce at this time. Seoul and Washington have been working on the "conditions-based" OPCON transfer. Conditions include South Korea's capabilities to lead combined Korea-US forces, its strike and air defense capabilities, and a regional security environment conducive to such a handover. During an interview with Yonhap News Agency in May last year, Elbridge Colby, currently under secretary of defense for policy, expressed his backing for the swift OPCON transition, saying the Asian ally should undertake "overwhelming" responsibility for its own defense. Retaking OPCON from Washington was among Lee's campaign pledges. On Wednesday, Wi Sung-lac, Lee's top security adviser, reiterated that the OPCON transition is one of Lee's pledges, while noting that past governments had also pursued the transfer. The public has been divided over the timing of the OPCON transition. Opponents have raised concerns that the OPCON transfer could lead to a weakening of America's security commitment at a time of deepening North Korean threats, while supporters agrue the transfer would bolster efforts to enhance South Korea's independent military capabilities and greater autonomy in the security alliance. South Korea handed over operational control of its troops to the US-led U.N. Command during the 1950-53 Korean War. Control was then transferred to the two allies' Combined Forces Command when the command was launched in 1978. Wartime operational control still remains in the U.S. hands, while South Korea retook peacetime OPCON in 1994. The OPCON transfer was supposed to occur in 2015 but was postponed, as the allies agreed in 2014 to a conditions-based handover -- rather than a timeline-based one -- due to Pyongyang's advancing nuclear and missile threats. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
As Trump seeks to be a peacemaker, Netanyahu leaves Washington without breakthrough on Gaza deal
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trip to Washington this week netted President Donald Trump another nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize he covets, but the ceasefire the US. leader sought for the war in Gaza didn't emerge. Despite Trump throwing his weight behind a push for a 60-day truce between Israel and Hamas, no breakthrough was announced during Netanyahu's visit, a disappointment for a president who wants to be known as a peacemaker and has hinged his reputation on being a dealmaker. "He prides himself or being able to make deals, so this is another test case," said Rachel Brandenburg, the Israel Policy Forum's Washington managing director and senior fellow. Trump's ability to strike a ceasefire deal in the 21-month war will reveal the boundaries of his influence with Netanyahu, especially after their recent joint strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities that both leaders touted at the White House this week. Beyond the back-to-back meetings Trump and Netanyahu had at the White House this week, there was little public evidence of progress at a time when the Republican US. president is pushing to end the fighting. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday that when it comes to a ceasefire in Gaza, "we're closer than we've been in quite a while and we're hopeful, but we also recognize there's still some challenges in the way." Rubio, who spoke to reporters while traveling in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, also said that Trump "wants to see a ceasefire and we've invested a lot of time and energy." Beyond ending the bloodshed, ending the war in Gaza would give Trump more leeway to strike some of the broader agreements he seeks in the Middle East, such as expanding the Abraham Accords that started in his first term and normalizing relations with Syria's new government . "He wants to be the one who gets hostages home and see the war in Gaza end so he can move on to some of these bigger deals," Brandenburg said. Even if a truce is reached, Netanyahu has promised fighting will continue if necessary until Hamas is destroyed. The militant group, meanwhile, has conditioned the release of the remaining hostages on Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, a stipulation Israel has been unwilling to accept. It's unclear how much pressure Trump put on Netanyahu in their private talks this week. But the two leaders came into the visit seeming more aligned than ever — at least for now — fresh off the president having twice come to the Israeli leader's assistance. Trump made the risky move to join Israel's attacks on Iran last month, delivering pivotal US. firepower while alarming world leaders and some of Trump's "America first" supporters. Trump also inserted himself into Israel's domestic affairs, calling for Netanyahu's yearslong corruption trial to be thrown out. That's a marked turnaround in their relationship, which had appeared somewhat strained in recent years. Trump shocked some of his fellow Republicans and staunch supporters of Israel by publicly criticizing Netanyahu not long after Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, setting off the conflict. He said that Netanyahu "was not prepared" for the attack from Hamas and that Netanyahu had "let us down" just before the US. killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in 2020. Even during his last visit to the White House earlier this year, Netanyahu seemed caught off guard when Trump announced the US. would hold talks with Iran over its nuclear deal rather than embrace Netanyahu's push for military pressure. With their military objectives aligning for a time on Iran, the Israeli leader has worked to foster a warmer relationship. In a video he released after the US. strikes, Netanyahu spoke — in English instead of Hebrew — of the "unshakeable alliance" between their countries while repeatedly praising Trump. "His leadership today has created a pivot of history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace," Netanyahu said. In his visit to Washington this week, the Israeli leader also showed he knows how to praise the president in a way that matters greatly to him when he unveiled a letter in front of reporters and cameras to announce he had nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize. Those gestures, though, may only carry him so far as Trump pushes for a deal that Netanyahu may not be able to accept. "I think if Netanyahu stands in the way too much for too long of the sort of loftier objectives Trump has set out for himself," Brandenburg said, "Netanyahu will be cast aside as more of a problem than an asset." Netanyahu, like many Israelis, believes Trump is the greatest friend they have ever had in the White House and is deeply grateful for the US. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites last month. But the Israeli leader is also under mounting public pressure to end the war as hostages languish in captivity and more Israeli soldiers are killed in guerrilla-style attacks . Israel's military success against Iran has given him some political capital, but if he ends the war while leaving Hamas intact, he will have broken his repeated promise of "total victory." His far-right coalition partners have threatened to bolt if he does that, sparking early elections that could end his nearly unbroken 16 years in power and leave him more vulnerable to long-standing corruption charges . That may prove too heavy a price for delivering the kind of lasting ceasefire sought by Trump and demanded by Hamas. Instead, Netanyahu, who is seen as a masterful politician by friends and foes alike, is expected to thread the needle. In a video statement on Thursday, Netanyahu said that he would agree to a "temporary" 60-day ceasefire in return for the release of half the hostages remaining in Gaza, many of whom are believed dead, and that he would begin negotiations on ending the war. But he conditioned any lasting ceasefire on Hamas giving up its arms – something the militants have refused to do as long as Israel occupies parts of Gaza. If Hamas can be disarmed through negotiations, "so much the better," Netanyahu said. "If it is not achieved through negotiations in 60 days, we will achieve it in other ways — by using force." (AP)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea, US open drive to ‘modernize' alliance in full-fledged talks
Alliance talks touch on US demands for higher Korean defense spending, troop posture review South Korea and the United States held 'full-fledged and focused' talks this week to discuss modernizing their alliance, with the aim of strengthening its capabilities and readiness posture amid an evolving regional security environment, the Foreign Ministry said Friday. The director-general-level consultations, held Thursday and Friday in Seoul, marked the first public working-level talks on the subject, bringing together key foreign affairs and defense officials from both sides. Kevin Kim, deputy assistant secretary for China, Japan, Korea, Mongolia and Taiwan at the US State Department, and Hong Jeepyo, director-general for North American affairs at South Korea's Foreign Ministry, led their respective delegations during the meeting. 'The two sides discussed ways to strengthen the US-ROK Alliance into a future-oriented, comprehensive strategic alliance, and to modernize the Alliance in a mutually beneficial manner in the face of an evolving regional security environment,' an English-language joint press release read. The ROK is the acronym for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The press statement did not share further details, including the agenda topics for the consultations. When asked by The Korea Herald about the specific agenda topics discussed, a Foreign Ministry official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, 'Extensive consultations were held regarding the future direction of the alliance, including the strengthening of its capabilities and posture.' The Korea Herald learned from diplomatic sources that the consultations included discussions on US calls for South Korea to increase its own defense spending and the potential recalibration of the posture of US Forces Korea. The US side has defined alliance modernization as a shift toward jointly addressing new strategic challenges and emerging regional issues — particularly those stemming from intensifying US-China competition. From the US side, alliance modernization includes the repositioning of US assets and defense capabilities, and the recalibration of the posture of US forces in the Indo-Pacific region, such as US Forces Korea and US Forces Japan. The US has called for South Korea to increase its defense spending. In late June, National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac, who attended the NATO summit on behalf of President Lee Jae Myung, said that President Donald Trump had delivered a request to South Korea similar to his call for NATO members to raise their defense spending to around 5 percent of GDP. On the matter, the unnamed official said the "Korean government maintains its position that defense spending is a sovereign matter to be determined based on a comprehensive review of both domestic and international security conditions, as well as the government's fiscal capacity." The official underscored that "Korea is among the key US allies with one of the highest levels of defense spending relative to GDP." "South Korea has continued to steadily increase its defense budget in light of the grave security situation, including North Korea's nuclear and missile threats," the official said, adding that Seoul will continue efforts to reinforce its defense capabilities and posture. 'These efforts are expected to be shared with the US side in the course of bilateral security consultations.' In late June, Joseph Yun, charge d'affaires ad interim at the US Embassy in Seoul, said the allies should revisit South Korea's financial contributions beyond the scope of the current Special Measures Agreement — the defense cost-sharing deal between the two countries. South Korea has financially supported the stationing of approximately 28,500 US Forces Korea personnel by covering three major categories: labor costs for USFK's Korean employees, construction expenses for military facilities, and logistical support for military operations — all under the framework of the SMA. In response to The Korea Herald's question about whether the allies discussed South Korea's coverage of costs beyond the SMA — such as expenses for the deployment of US strategic assets — a second unnamed official dismissed the possibility of Seoul accepting such a proposal, even if it were formally raised by the US. Focused talks amid packed diplomatic calendar The Foreign Ministry emphasized the need for face-to-face talks to discuss alliance modernization when asked by The Korea Herald about the rationale for holding two days of in-person consultations on the matter, separate from other high-level talks with the US on Friday. 'In particular, as new administrations have recently been launched in both countries, the two sides have been consulting on the future direction of the alliance, including strengthening its capabilities and posture amid a changing security environment,' the first unnamed official said. 'Against this backdrop, the official consultations were held based on a shared understanding between the two sides of the need for more full-fledged and focused discussions.' On Friday, South Korea, the United States and Japan held a trilateral foreign ministers' meeting — the first since the launch of the Lee Jae Myung administration — on the sidelines of the ASEAN-related Foreign Ministers' Meetings in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoon-joo represented South Korea in place of Foreign Minister nominee Cho Hyun, who is awaiting a confirmation hearing at the National Assembly. Also on Friday, the chairmen of the joint chiefs of staff from South Korea, the US and Japan convened in Seoul for the Trilateral Chiefs of Defense meeting.
