Temenos Recognized by CNBC as One of the World's Top Fintech Companies
Temenos was selected following a comprehensive evaluation of more than 2,000 global firms across key fintech categories. The final 300 companies were chosen based on a combination of publicly available data, company-submitted performance metrics, and independent sector-specific research conducted by Statista and CNBC.
Jean-Pierre Brulard, CEO, Temenos, said: 'This recognition by major US news outlet CNBC reflects the strength of Temenos technology and our position as a trusted partner to financial institutions around the world. With our customer-centric focus and relentless investment in innovation, Temenos continues to lead banking forward.'
With its market-leading core banking suite and best-in-class modular solutions, Temenos offers financial institutions choice, flexibility and a proven path to banking modernization – underpinned with cloud-native architecture, and embedded AI. Trusted by over 950 core banking clients and over 600 digital clients around the world, Temenos software can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or as SaaS.
Investing around 20% of revenues in R&D, Temenos continues to enhance its capabilities. Recent innovations include the launch of a Gen AI Copilot to help financial institutions design, launch, test and optimize financial products faster, as well as an FCM AI Agent that can help banks significantly reduce false positives in sanctions screening.
This recognition from CNBC adds to a growing list of accolades for Temenos, which was recently named the World's Best Core Banking Solution by Euromoney and Best Core Banking System in the Banking Tech Awards USA. Temenos was also named best-selling core banking provider for the 20 th consecutive year in the IBS Intelligence Sales League Table 2025.
About Temenos
Temenos (SIX: TEMN) is a global leader in banking technology. Through our market-leading core banking suite and best-in-class modular solutions, we are modernizing the banking industry. Banks of all sizes utilize our adaptable technology – on-premises, in the cloud, or as SaaS – to deliver next-generation services and AI-enhanced experiences that elevate banking for their customers. Our mission is to create a world where people can live their best financial lives.
For more information, please visit www.temenos.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Tesla plans 'friends and family' car service in California, regulator says
In an earnings call this week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk teased an expansion of his company's fledgling robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area and other U.S. markets. But California regulators are making clear that Tesla is not authorized to carry passengers on public roads in autonomous vehicles and would require a human driver in control at all times. 'Tesla is not allowed to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in an AV with or without a driver,' the California Public Utilities Commission told CNBC in an email on Friday. 'Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a non-AV, which, of course, would have a driver.' In other words, Tesla's service in the state will have to be more taxi than robot. Tesla has what's known in California as a charter-party carrier permit, which allows it to run a private car service with human drivers, similar to limousine companies or sightseeing services. The commission said it received a notification from Tesla on Thursday that the company plans to 'extend operations' under its permit to 'offer service to friends and family of employees and to select members of the public,' across much of the Bay Area. But under Tesla's permit, that service can only be with non-AVs, the CPUC said. The California Department of Motor Vehicles told CNBC that Tesla has had a 'drivered testing permit' since 2014, allowing the company to operate AVs with a safety driver present, but not to collect fees. The safety drivers must be Tesla employees, contractors or designees of the manufacturer under that permit, the DMV said. In Austin, Texas, Tesla is currently testing out a robotaxi service, using its Model Y SUVs equipped with the company's latest automated driving software and hardware. The limited service operates during daylight hours and in good weather, on roads with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Robotaxis in Austin are remotely supervised by Tesla employees and include a human safety supervisor in the front passenger seat. The service is now limited to invited users, who agree to the terms of Tesla's 'early access program.' On Friday, Business Insider, citing an internal Tesla memo, reported that Tesla told staff it planned to expand its robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area this weekend. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment on that report. In a separate matter in California, the DMV has accused Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its driver assistance systems, previously marketed under the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (or FSD). Tesla now calls its premium driver assistance features, 'FSD Supervised.' In owners manuals, Tesla says Autopilot and FSD Supervised are 'hands on' systems, requiring a driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at all times. But in user-generated videos shared by Tesla on X, the company shows customers using FSD hands-free while engaged in other tasks. The DMV is arguing that Tesla's license to sell vehicles in California should be suspended, with arguments ongoing through Friday at the state's Office of Administrative Hearings in Oakland. Under California state law, autonomous taxi services are regulated at the state level. Some city and county officials said on Friday that they were out of the loop regarding a potential Tesla service in the state. Stephanie Moulton-Peters, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a phone interview that she had not heard from Tesla about its plans. She urged the company to be more transparent. 'I certainly expect they will tell us and I think it's a good business practice to do that,' she said. Moulton-Peters said she was undecided on robotaxis generally and wasn't sure how Marin County, located north of San Francisco, would react to Tesla's service. 'The news of change coming always has mixed results in the community,' she said. Brian Colbert, another member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview that he's open to the idea of Tesla's service being a good thing but that he was disappointed in the lack of communication. 'They should have done a better job about informing the community about the launch,' he said. Google spinoff Waymo, which is far ahead of Tesla in the robotaxi market, obtained a number of permits from the DMV and CPUC before starting its driverless ride-hailing service in the state. Waymo was granted a CPUC driverless deployment permit in 2023, allowing it to charge for rides in the state. The company has been seeking amendments to both its DMV and CPUC driverless deployment permits as it expands its service territory in the state.
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Tesla plans 'friends and family' car service in California, regulator says
In an earnings call this week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk teased an expansion of his company's fledgling robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area and other U.S. markets. But California regulators are making clear that Tesla is not authorized to carry passengers on public roads in autonomous vehicles and would require a human driver in control at all times. "Tesla is not allowed to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in an AV with or without a driver," the California Public Utilities Commission told CNBC in an email on Friday. "Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a non-AV, which, of course, would have a driver." In other words, Tesla's service in the state will have to be more taxi than robot. Tesla has what's known in California as a charter-party carrier permit, which allows it to run a private car service with human drivers, similar to limousine companies or sightseeing services. The commission said it received a notification from Tesla on Thursday that the company plans to "extend operations" under its permit to "offer service to friends and family of employees and to select members of the public," across much of the Bay Area. But under Tesla's permit, that service can only be with non-AVs, the CPUC said. The California Department of Motor Vehicles told CNBC that Tesla has had a "drivered testing permit" since 2014, allowing the company to operate AVs with a safety driver present, but not to collect fees. The safety drivers must be Tesla employees, contractors or designees of the manufacturer under that permit, the DMV said. In Austin, Texas, Tesla is currently testing out a robotaxi service, using its Model Y SUVs equipped with the company's latest automated driving software and hardware. The limited service operates during daylight hours and in good weather, on roads with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Robotaxis in Austin are remotely supervised by Tesla employees, and include a human in the front passenger seat. The service is now limited to invited users, who agree to the terms of Tesla's "early access program." On Friday, Business Insider, citing an internal Tesla memo, reported that Tesla told staff it planned to expand its robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area this weekend. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment on that report. In a separate matter in California, the DMV has accused Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its driver assistance systems, previously marketed under the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (or FSD). Tesla now calls its premium driver assistance features, "FSD Supervised." In owners manuals, Tesla says Autopilot and FSD Supervised are "hands on" systems, requiring a driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at all times. But in user-generated videos shared by Tesla on X, the company shows customers using FSD hands-free while engaged in other tasks. The DMV is arguing that Tesla's license to sell vehicles in California should be suspended, with arguments ongoing through Friday at the state's Office of Administrative Hearings in Oakland. Under California state law, autonomous taxi services are regulated at the state level. Some city and county officials said on Friday that they were out of the loop regarding a potential Tesla service in the state. Stephanie Moulton-Peters, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a phone interview that she had not heard from Tesla about its plans. She urged the company to be more transparent. "I certainly expect they will tell us and I think it's a good business practice to do that," she said. Moulton-Peters said she was undecided on robotaxis generally and wasn't sure how Marin County, located north of San Francisco, would react to Tesla's service. "The news of change coming always has mixed results in the community," she said. Brian Colbert, another member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview that he's open to the idea of Tesla's service being a good thing but that he was disappointed in the lack of communication. "They should have done a better job about informing the community about the launch," he said. Alphabet's Waymo, which is far ahead of Tesla in the robotaxi market, obtained a number of permits from the DMV and CPUC before starting its driverless ride-hailing service in the state. Waymo was granted a CPUC driverless deployment permit in 2023, allowing it to charge for rides in the state. The company has been seeking amendments to both its DMV and CPUC driverless deployment permits as it expands its service territory in the state.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
401(k): What the Average Person in Their 30s Has Saved
With financial literacy growing at an exponential rate, people aren't waiting to start thinking about their retirement. Without the security of a company-sponsored pension, most Americans contribute to things like a 401(k) to ensure they have enough funds to live off once they quit their 9-to-5. Read More: Learn More: According to a survey conducted by Northwestern Mutual, Americans believe they will need approximately $1.26 million to retire comfortably. Unfortunately, their savings may not be enough to cover this bold number. Here is how much the average person in their 30s has saved and what you can do to help boost your retirement funds if you are falling short of your goal. Average 401(k) for People in Their 30s Recent data from Fidelity shows that the average 401(k) savings for people ages 30 to 34 was $44,800 at the end of the first quarter of 2025, CNBC reported. The average 401(k) balance for individuals aged 35 to 39 was $71,400 during the same period. The data was based on Fidelity's quarterly analysis of over 50 million retirement accounts. Check Out: How This Year's 401(k) Balances Compare With 2024's Overall, market volatility at the beginning of the year left some balances short of their 2024 levels. According to data provided by Fidelity, 401(k) balances for individuals in their 30s decreased by approximately 2% in the first quarter. The good news, as highlighted by the investment company, is that savings rates remained consistent. How Much Should Someone in Their 30s Have Saved? Fidelity suggests that a person should have one year's salary saved by the time they are 30. By age 40, the global financial services company advises that a person should have three times their annual salary saved. Current 401(k) account balances indicate that individuals in their 30s may be significantly short of these recommendations. However, many savvy investors have other retirement accounts, such as IRAs or Roth IRAs, that may better align their savings with expert suggestions. What To Do To Boost Retirement Savings Millennials were skeptical whether they had saved enough, according to Northwestern Mutual's 2025 Planning & Progress Study, with 57% saying they were somewhat likely or very likely to outlive their savings. Fortunately, there are several options available to 30-year-olds hoping to boost retirement savings. The financial experts at Charles Schwab recommend that individuals in their 30s and 40s strive to cut back where possible, particularly in the face of competing interests. While many millennials are well into their careers, they are also paying back student loans and raising families. Retirement savings may be on the back burner, but they should not be out of the picture. Putting more money into investment accounts, even small amounts, can help boost retirement savings exponentially, especially during this critical decade. As income increases, the experts at Charles Schwab encourage individuals in their 30s and 40s to refrain from excessive spending and instead focus on investing. They recommend funding savings first and contributing to a tax-advantaged IRA if they have maxed out their 401(k) contributions. Finally, the financial services company also said individuals should avoid borrowing from their 401(k). Even if the amount is paid back with interest, it would not compensate for the growth that could have occurred. More From GOBankingRates 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on 401(k): What the Average Person in Their 30s Has Saved Sign in to access your portfolio
