
‘I saw him kill people:' Libya and Italy's shadowy migrant deals
His release two days later was for what the Italian government said on Wednesday were 'inaccuracies' in the warrant.
Njeem is accused by the ICC of crimes committed in his role overseeing the Tripoli branch of the Reform and Rehabilitation Institution, a network of detention centres run by the government-backed Special Defence Force (SDF).
Amnesty International identifies Njeem as a 'long-term member of Tripoli-based militia the Deterrence Apparatus for Combatting Terrorism and Organised Crime (DACTO)', one of several militias the internationally recognised Tripoli government relies on, and absorbs, to project power across the western parts of Libya, which it nominally controls.
The rights group 'has long documented horrific violations committed with total impunity at the Mitiga prison in Tripoli, under the control of DACTO', and says there is 'no prospect of domestic accountability in Libya of powerful commanders of militias'.
Al Jazeera has spoken to two people who were held in prisons overseen by Njeem about the atrocities they witnessed.
'I saw him commit war crimes. I saw him kill people,' David Yambio, president of the NGO Refugees in Libya, said.
The accusations against Njeem are numerous, ranging from murder to torture and people trafficking.
His release has been condemned as 'outrageous' by rights groups and 'hypocritical' by leading political figures within Italy. Shortly after Njeem was returned to Libya, Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi told the Italian senate he had been released, rather than handed over to prosecutors from the ICC, 'in view of the danger [he] posed [to Italian society]'. A little more than a week later, the justice minister announced that the release had been on a legal technicality.
Njeem is said by the ICC to control several prison facilities in Tripoli, including that at Mitiga, Ain Zara and al-Jadida, 'where thousands of persons were detained for prolonged periods'.
According to the ICC, Njeem 'is suspected of crimes against humanity and war crimes, including murder, torture, rape and sexual violence, allegedly committed in Libya from February 2015 onwards'.
The human cost
Yambio, now 27, arrived in southern Libya in December 2018 after a long journey from his native South Sudan – where he had been forced to fight as a child soldier – through Africa and eventually to Libya.
After capture, torture and eventual escape, Yambio, along with dozens of other people, was trying to flee for Europe in November 2019 when he was captured by the Libyan Coastguard – itself largely funded by the Italian government - and bundled into a detention facility at Triq al-Sika.
Yambio says he was 'sold' into a network of prisons operated by Njeem and the Judicial Police in December 2019, initially held in the sprawling facility at al-Jadida in Tripoli.
Yambio described terrible conditions at al-Jadida, including beatings and ill-treatment, adding he was corralled into a prisoner slave army and forced to work on construction sites for the benefit of his captors.
But worst of all was when Njeem was there, he said, adding that everyone at al-Jadida knew who Njeem was.
'Every two days they would line us up in our thousands [for a head count] and, when he would visit, al-Masri would walk down the line, picking out people to beat, either with a metal tube or with the handle of his pistol. Sometimes he would enter the cells where people were sleeping and beat them with a metal or plastic pipe.'
'I saw him kill people'
In March 2020, months into an assault on Tripoli and the western government by eastern-based renegade commander Khalifa Haftar, Yambio was transferred to the combined prison, military base and airfield at Mitiga, near Tripoli.
The abuse meted out at Mitiga has been reported on by rights groups, including Amnesty , which described the 'horrific violations committed with total impunity at the Mitiga prison', such as 'torture and other ill-treatment, unlawful killings, enforced disappearances, and other crimes under international law'.
'Conditions were very, very bad,' 33-year-old Lam Magok, also from South Sudan, told Al Jazeera of his time alongside Yambio at al-Jadida and Mitiga.
The two had met at al-Jadida, thrown together in the same prison ward and bound together, Yambio said, by their shared ill fortune.
'We would stay up at night talking,' Yambio recalled, 'recalling our home and the country that had forsaken us.'
In March, Yambio was selected with some others to be transferred to Mitiga to fight in one of Njeem's fighter groups.
Magok, not realising that he would eventually follow in April, pressed some paper into Yambio's hand.
On it were the numbers of an activist and a journalist, with details of his legal asylum status, and the contact details of his uncle with a plea that, should he ever get the chance, Yambio at least try and tell his family that Magok was alive.
'If heaven permits, find them. Tell them I'm alive,' Yambio recalled him saying. While Magok was spared the fighting, conditions for him at Mitiga were no less severe.
'Every second day, they would call us for a [head] count,' he said, the smile in his voice at odds with the brutality he recalled. 'They would make us kneel and then beat us… If you did something they didn't like, they would take you away, lock you in a room and torture you.' Killings were not unknown, he added.
'We were held with Libyans and [foreign] migrants, but it was always migrants who were sent to clean up the rooms. They would be told to put the body in a bag and carry it to the ambulance. It was bad.'
Magok was forced to work in the military stores, loading ammunition onto vehicles, while Yambio says he was sent daily to the nearby front line where he was made to fight alongside other migrants, Libyan groups and Turkish and Syrian forces to repel Haftar's forces.
'We were used to carry munitions as well as fire the howitzers. I still have tinnitus. Conditions were really bad. There were prisoners, Libyans and migrants forced into holes in the ground,' he said, describing the underground cells at Mitiga where the smell of the sick and the dying would catch on him and follow him through the day.
'We watched them being escorted into the interrogation rooms, where they would be beaten, electroshocked, have their fingers cut off, or forced into barrels of water and held under,' he said of the methods being used against both Libyan and migrant prisoners at Mitiga.
'Al-Masri was a brutal person. When people knew he was coming, they would panic. I sometimes wondered if he was on drugs, but he wasn't. That was just who he was. He was purely evil.
'I saw him kill people,' Yambio added flatly. 'One time, two people tried to escape … Mitiga. Al-Masri had us line up as he shot one. I had the blood on my body. Another time, someone had given the people working the howitzer the wrong drone coordinates. Al-Masri killed him.
'It was wretched and cruel beyond description.'
Yambio's account is supported by other reports from prisoners, one of whom told Italian state television in January that he had witnessed Njeem kill prisoners 'to frighten the people inside. He kills a few people inside. Even using his hands. I saw this,' he claimed, 'more than once.'
Two young men, the man said, were killed in this manner in front of him by Njeem.
Al Jazeera contacted both Libya's Ministry of Justice and its Judicial Police for comment on the points raised in this article and the accusations against Njeem. Neither has responded by the time of publication.
Blowback
Releasing Njeem provoked anger across Italy's political establishment. Former Prime Minister Matteo Renzi told senators: 'The prime minister said she wants to hunt traffickers all over the world. Yesterday she had one … and you released him and sent him back to Tripoli on a government plane.
'Is it just me who thinks this is crazy or is this the behaviour of a hypocritical and indecent government?'
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni later revealed she is under judicial investigation over her role in Njeem's release.
'What was true yesterday is true today: I cannot be blackmailed and I will not be intimidated. Let's move forward with our heads held high!' Giorgia Meloni, Twitter
Meloni's office has been contacted about the points raised in this article but has not responded by the time of publication.
'It is outrageous that Italian authorities fully disregarded an [ICC] warrant in deciding to free Osama el-Masry,' Bassam Khawaja, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch told Al Jazeera.
He noted other examples of Italy flouting international norms, such as its announcement that it would not enforce an ICC warrant for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.
Njeem is the second Libyan accused of crimes to be set free by Italian authorities within six months.
In August last year, Khalifa Haftar's son Saddam – who met with senior Italian diplomats to discuss security, economic cooperation and migration at least four times last year – was briefly detained by Italian border authorities who questioned him concerning an arrest warrant issued by Spain for allegations of weapons smuggling.
Both Haftars have faced allegations from media outlets and rights groups, including Amnesty, of involvement in the kidnapping, torture, trafficking and extortion of migrants.
An August 2023 investigation by Al Jazeera and partners showed the Tariq Ben Zeyad Brigade, led by Saddam Haftar since its emergence in 2016, was tied to 'a catalogue of horrors including unlawful killings, torture, enforced disappearance, rape and forced displacement'.
Alongside the brigade's pullbacks and subsequent exploitation of people seeking shelter in Europe, Al Jazeera documented a series of high-level meetings between the Haftar regime in eastern Libya and European leaders, including Italy, aimed at limiting the number of people trying to reach safety.
Italy's migration obsession
'Migration has been a big issue in Italy for years,' Hamza Meddeb of the Carnegie Middle East Center, who has written extensively on the subject, told Al Jazeera.
'Meloni has played this card really well. She's used her position to give legitimacy to the militias and governments in Libya, as well as that of Tunisia's [President] Kais Saied – who would otherwise be completely shunned by the West – without asking them for change or reform,' he said. Libya's neighbour is also a key departure point for irregular migration.
In the 2022 election - against a background of some 105,000 irregular arrivals that year – Meloni and her hard-right Brothers of Italy party campaigned on undocumented migration, promising to deliver a 'solution' that countless politicians before them had not.
Meloni used her inaugural speech to announce the revival of the Mattei Plan, first suggested by the leader of the national electricity company in the 1950s.
Mattei would see Italy partnering with African states on energy development in return for them helping curb migration.
Meloni is not the first Italian leader accused of ignoring credible allegations of abuse by partner organisations in her determination to stop asylum seekers from reaching Italy at all costs.
Italy contributes undisclosed sums to support Libya's Coast Guard, which is routinely accused of human rights abuses, as well as the facilities where irregular migrants are held.
'There is no way that the Italian government can say it does not know about the murder, abuse and terrorism it is supporting,' Yambio said.
'I say terrorism deliberately because that's what it is. It's terror against migrants.'
Yambio escaped Mitiga in April 2020, making his way to Italy where he was granted asylum. Magok escaped to Italy in December of the same year.
Both now work to campaign for the rights of refugees and irregular migrants.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
20 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Fact check: Did US go from ice cream trade surplus to deficit under Biden?
President Donald Trump's administration dished out a cold burn to Trump's ice-cream-loving predecessor, Joe Biden, saying he led the US ice cream industry down an economic rocky road. 'America had a trade surplus in ice cream in 2020 under President Trump's leadership, but that surplus turned into a trade deficit of $40.6 million under President Biden's watch,' the Office of the US Trade Representative wrote July 20 on X. The post included a chart that shows the US ice cream trade deficit with Japan, South Africa, the European Union, Brazil, Canada and Turkiye. The US ice cream trade balance did change dramatically in 2021, the year Biden took office. The trade balance officially flipped negative – which means imports outnumber exports – in 2022 and has remained so since then. But industry experts caution that US ice cream imports account for a minuscule fraction of all the US ice cream consumed in the US, and exports account for a tiny fraction of all US ice cream produced. The trade change was driven mostly by a jump in imports. Exports have remained largely unchanged since 2020. And the cherry on top? Disagreement over which products to classify as 'ice cream' also affects data, experts say. For example, the data referenced by the office of the US Trade Representative also includes 'edible ice', which some experts (and dairy defenders) say doesn't qualify as ice cream. Removing edible ice shows that 'the US is a net exporter by a significant margin of ($193 million) or +85% larger by value,' International Dairy Foods Association Executive Vice President Matt Herrick told PolitiFact via email. Ice cream imports increase causes US trade deficit From 1995 to 2020, the US had an ice cream trade surplus, ranging from about $20m to about $160m, according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity, an online economic data platform. Longtime customers include Mexico, followed by Saudi Arabia and Canada. In 2021, that surplus nearly vanished, and in 2022 and 2023, the US notched up an ice cream trade deficit of $92m and $33m, respectively. At first glance, importing frozen foods doesn't seem practical. 'Shipping refrigerated and frozen products overseas is expensive,' dairy economist Betty Berningat of HighGround Dairy said. 'Mexico is the top destination for US dairy exports.' But many US and European companies have tapped into global markets. 'Consumers may also want a specific treat that is styled after or known to be from another country,' Herrick said. Italy, the birthplace of gelato, is now the United States' largest single source of imported ice cream. Italian ice cream imports more than quintupled from about $12m to almost $65m between 2020 and 2021 alone, before decreasing somewhat in 2023, the last year for which data is available. Some of this stems from increased consumer demand for specialty pints. A report by Mordor Intelligence, a global market research firm, said 'product innovation and premiumisation' have become key in the US ice cream industry. 'This trend is particularly evident in the growth of premium pint offerings and individually wrapped novelties that cater to both indulgence and portion control preferences,' the report said. The US produces far more ice cream than it imports or exports To get to the pint: The vast majority of ice cream consumed in the United States is made there, not overseas. The Trump administration is cherry-picking stats from a fraction of a sliver of the US ice cream industry. According to US Agriculture Department data, US ice cream makers churned out 1.31 billion gallons of ice cream in 2024. This includes regular ice cream, low-fat and nonfat ice cream, sherbet and frozen yoghurt. By comparison, the US imported 2.35 million gallons of traditional ice cream in 2024 – that's 0.18 percent of the amount produced domestically, Herrick said. The US exported 16.4 million gallons of that domestic production, which is also a tiny fraction of 1.31 billion gallons of ice cream – a little more than 1 percent. Factoring in ice cream mixes, excluding 'edible ice' products Another caveat about the international trade data: It does not include 'mixes', which skews the totals, said Herrick of the International Dairy Foods Association. Mixes are used to make ice cream shakes and soft-serve products, and they account for a significant portion of US ice cream exports. 'Inclusion of such data points would change the picture quite significantly,' said Herrick. 'While it is true that traditional ice cream and edible ice exports have seen decreased exports, the same cannot be said for exports of mixes.' US milk-based drink exports increased 621 percent over the past five years, he said. In 2024, the US exported nearly $35m in mixes to the European Union. Americans and dairy-based ice cream: A centuries-old love affair melting away? The White House has churned out plenty of ice cream devotees. George Washington stocked the capital with ice cream-making equipment. Thomas Jefferson is credited as being the first American to record an ice cream recipe. Ronald Reagan declared July National Ice Cream Month in 1984. Barack Obama even slung scoops back in the day. Biden, who was often sighted with a cone in hand, proclaimed while visiting Jeni's Splendid Ice Cream headquarters in 2016: 'My name is Joe Biden, and I love ice cream.' But consumption of regular dairy ice cream – a category that does not include frozen yoghurt, sherbet or nonfat and low-fat ice creams – has been trending down for years. In 1975, Americans ate an average of 18.2 pounds each of ice cream per year. That figure fell to 11.7 pounds by 2023. Our ruling The office of the US Trade Representative purported a summertime scoop: 'America had a trade surplus in ice cream in 2020 under President Trump's leadership, but that surplus turned into a trade deficit of $40.6 million under President Biden's watch.' It's accurate that the US ice cream trade balance had a surplus for a quarter of a century before turning negative while Biden was president. But the US Trade Representative's statement makes the US ice cream deficit appear out of cone-trol. There are three scoops of context on this trade sundae: The change was driven mostly by a jump in imports. Exports have remained largely unchanged since 2020. US ice cream imports and exports are a negligible amount compared to domestic production. There's also disagreement over which products should or shouldn't be included in the data set, which can skew trend interpretations. Excluding edible ice products and factoring in ice cream mixes leaves the US with a surplus. The statement is accurate but needs a sprinkling of clarification and additional details, so we rate it Mostly True. Louis Jacobson contributed to this report.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
China trade talks could include TikTok: Lutnick
Agencies TikTok may come up in trade talks with China next week, but if Beijing does not approve a divestment deal for Chinese owner ByteDance, the app will soon go dark in the United States, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday. US President Donald Trump's administration will allow TikTok to remain in the US 'if it's in American control, and … China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece', Lutnick said, speaking on CNBC. 'Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm. That's something Donald Trump is willing to do. If that deal gets approved then by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' he said. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' Asked whether an agreement over TikTok is part of current trade negotiations, Lutnick said 'yes and no'. 'It's not really part of the trade talks, but you can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are relevant,' he said. 'So … it's not officially part of it, but unofficially? Of course.' ByteDance is under pressure to divest the short-video app by September 17 or face a ban in the US. Last year, then-US President Joe Biden signed a sale-or-ban law, requiring that a 'foreign adversary' no longer control the app, defined as a 20 per cent stake, over national security concerns. Despite an original January deadline, Trump has repeatedly delayed enforcement of the law. The original deadline as set in law was January 19, with allowance for a one-time 90-day extension if progress towards a sale was evident. Trump had extended that deadline his first day in office via executive order, days after a call with Chinese President Xi Jinping during which TikTok was discussed. He has since extended it twice more. If the sale is approved, the app is expected to use an algorithm and data system separate from its global platform, Reuters reported this month. That would resolve years of debate over whether ByteDance would share what is considered TikTok's secret sauce – the recommendation algorithm – and mark a potential end to years of angst over the app's security concerns in Washington. A deal had reportedly been in the works earlier this year to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. But the plan was put on hold after Beijing indicated it would not approve it after Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese imports, according to Bloomberg. Under current Chinese export controls, some technologies used by TikTok, including the recommendation algorithm, require Beijing's approval for export. The restriction was implemented by Beijing in 2020, killing a deal that had been under negotiation involving ByteDance, Oracle and Walmart during the first Trump administration. In the years since, Beijing had given little indication it would support a sale, urging the US to provide an 'open, fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment' for Chinese businesses. The law mandating the divestment, passed last year as part of a foreign aid package, reflects concern in Washington that TikTok's ownership makes it beholden to the Chinese government and that Beijing could use the app to spy on Americans or conduct influence operations. Free speech advocates have argued that a ban would unlawfully restrict Americans from obtaining access to foreign media in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Other critics, including some US lawmakers, have pointed to the lack of evidence of content manipulation by Beijing. The US Supreme Court upheld the forced divestment law in January. Over 60 per cent of American teens and about a third of US adults use TikTok, according to a Pew Research Centre study from last year.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Saudi Arabia signs deal worth $6 bn with Syria
dpa Damascus Saudi Arabia on Thursday signed economic deals worth over $6 billion with war-shattered Syria, the latest sign of support from the oil-wealthy Gulf monarchy for Syria's new rulers. The deals were signed at a major Saudi-Syrian business forum that opened on Thursday in Damascus. Saudi Arabia has thrown its political and economic weight behind Syria since an Islamist-led rebel alliance deposed the country's long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad in December. Iran was a major ally of al-Assad. In May, Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, hosted a meeting in Riyadh between US President Donald Trump and incumbent Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, marking the first encounter between the leaders of the two countries in 25 years. During his trip to Saudi Arabia, Trump announced the lifting of US sanctions on Syria. The European Union has also taken a similar step. The pacts signed on Thursday cover a wide range of fields including energy, infrastructure, industry, fiscal services, information technology and agriculture, according to Saudi Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih. 'We will work to encourage international investors to explore investment opportunities in Syria,' Al-Falih said on Thursday. The Saudi official arrived in Damascus on Wednesday, leading a large business delegation. He also attended the launch of Syria's first white cement plant near Damascus. In April, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, another Gulf energy-rich emirate, said they would settle Syria's outstanding arrears with the World Bank Group, amounting to some $15 million. Qatar has pledged investments of over $7 billion for the construction of gas-fired power plants to improve Syria's poor electricity supply Earlier this month, investment-hungry Syria signed an $800 million deal with the Dubai-based DP World to develop and manage the port of Tartus, a key Syrian Mediterranean facility. Since al-Assad's overthrow, Syria's new leadership has sought to garner world recognition and economic support to rebuild the country devastated by more than a decade of war.