US strikes Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran warns of ‘everlasting consequences'
US President Donald Trump asserted that Iran's key nuclear sites had been 'completely and fully obliterated', in an address to the nation from the White House. There was no independent damage assessment.
The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed attacks took place on its Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz sites, but it insisted its nuclear programme will not be stopped.
Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there are no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes.
It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran.
Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces.
'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said.
Iran's top diplomat, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, warned in a post on X that the US attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate.
Hours later, Iranian missiles struck areas in northern and central Israel, according to an Israeli rescue service. Initial reports suggested at least 16 people suffered minor injuries and several buildings were damaged.
Following the Iranian barrage, Israel's military said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the Iranian missile launchers that had fired, and that it had begun a series of strikes towards military targets in western Iran.
Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Mr Trump and Israeli leaders have argued Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat.
The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel that significantly degraded Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, and damaged its nuclear enrichment facilities.
But US and Israeli officials have said American B-2 stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb that only they have been configured to carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground.
Mr Trump appears to have made the calculation – at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republicans – that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently.
pic.twitter.com/wu9mMkxtUg
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025
'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media.
'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.'
Mr Trump later added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!'
Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks.
The White House and Pentagon did not immediately elaborate on the operation but an update is expected on Sunday morning.
But one US official said the attack used bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant that is built deep into a mountain. The weapons are designed to penetrate the ground before exploding.
In addition, US submarines launched about 30 Tomahawk missiles, according to another US official.
The decision to attack was a risky one for Mr Trump, who won the White House partially on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism.
But he has vowed he will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear programme peacefully.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WATCH: President Donald Trump struggles to pronounce Tua Tagovailoa's name
Pronunciation guides are your friend. That's the lesson that President Donald Trump learned on Thursday when he was faced with the challenge of pronouncing Tua Tagovailoa's name. It wasn't particularly close from the commander-in-chief, who butchered the last name of the Miami Dolphins' quarterback. Take a look: Trump was announcing that he has reestablished the Presidential Fitness Test, which went away at the end of the 2012-13 school year. In doing so, the president also established a council that includes professional athletes, with Tagovailoa also being involved. 'Saquon Barkley is on the council, and Tua Tagovailoa [tag-oh-vah-lee-ah], the quarterback who is … really he's been fantastic, … when he's not injured," Trump said. "He's got to stay healthy,' Trump isn't the first – and likely won't be the last – to struggle with the pronunciation, but to his credit, the president battled through it. Like a classic politician, Trump quickly pivoted and turned the attention to the quarterback's health – making it seem as though he wasn't tripped up on the pronunciation. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: WATCH: President Donald Trump butchers Tua Tagovailoa's name


New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Quote of the Day: Texas Pushes Redistricting Into an Era of ‘Maximum Warfare'
'Redistricting is going from like a decennial bare-knuckle rugby match to an every-other-year Hunger Games.' JAMIE RASKIN, Democratic representative from Maryland, on efforts to regularly rezone districts for political gain outside of the traditional post-census period.


CBS News
43 minutes ago
- CBS News
USDOT pulls the plug on $26 million MagLev project citing poor planning, rising costs
Sean P. Duffy, the U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary, cancelled two grants that would've funded the proposed high speed MagLev train between Baltimore to Washington, D.C. The USDOT along with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) made the announcement on Friday calling off two grants totaling over $26 million for the Super Magnetic Levitation Project (SCMAGLEV). The project was highly favored by Governor Moore, who traveled to Ogatayama, Japan in April during a trade mission to test ride the train. The press release cites the ending of the government's involvement due to, "a decade of poor planning, significant community oppositions, tremendous cost overruns, and nothing to show for it..." "We want big, beautiful projects worthy of taxpayer dollars – including high-speed rail. This project lacked everything needed to be a success from planning to execution. This project did not have the means to go the distance, and I can't in good conscience keep taxpayers on the hook for it," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy. "We'll continue to look for exciting opportunities to fund the future of transportation and encourage innovation." The FRA also claims the project would have major negative impacts to federal and national security agencies. Sincer 2016, when the FRA began working on the project, there have been many delays along with rising costs. The environmental review process for the project has also been stopped two times on the Federal Permitting Dashboard. It has been on hold since August 2021 until now. Overall, the estimated cost to complete the project would have been nearly $20 billion. The MagLev, short for magnetic levitation, is the world's fastest train. Some models are reportedly able to reach speeds of 370 miles per hour using magnetic fields to lift and propel trains without direct contact with train tracks. Without the friction caused when train wheels touch their tracks, the train can essentially levitate, creating a smoother, faster experience. The train had the potential to boost Maryland's economy, per Wayne Rogers, Northeast Maglev Chair. According to him, the project could have created over 160,000 jobs. However, many Marylanders whose homes were in the path of the proposed project were angry with the thought of a high speed train in their backyard.