'Under review': Israel launches probe into its deadly Gaza cafe strike; says it targeted 'Hamas terrorists'
A
day after at least 24 Palestinians were killed and dozens wounded in an Israeli strike on a seafront Gaza café, the Israeli military on Tuesday announced a review into the strike.
However, the Israeli army maintained that it had conducted the strike against "several Hamas terrorists in the northern Gaza Strip."
"Prior to the strike, steps were taken to mitigate the risk of harming civilians using aerial surveillance. The incident is under review," an army spokesperson told news agency AFP.
The Al-Baqa café, a prominent venue along Gaza City's coastal promenade, had so far survived more than 20 months of war and intense bombings on the Palestinian territory.
It had become a gathering spot for those not displaced by the conflict.
"There's always a lot of people at that spot, which offers drinks, spaces for families, and internet access," a witnesss said
"It was a massacre. I saw bits of bodies flying everywhere, bodies mangled and burned. It was a bloodcurdling scene; everybody was screaming," he added.
The Israel-Hamas war
Israel launched its campaign in response to Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack, in the Jewish State, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, as per an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Of the 251 hostages seized during the assault, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
The retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,531 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers these figures to be reliable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'One Big Beautiful Bill': Senate passes Trump's spending bill after marathon voting session; JD Vance breaks tie
The US Senate on Tuesday passed President Donald Trump's flagship spending bill after a marathon voting session that lasted more than 18 hours. The vote came after a prolonged "vote-a-rama" during which senators offered and debated numerous amendments to the nearly 1,000-page legislation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The bill, which Trump calls the "One Big Beautiful Bill", aims to extend his first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion, increase military spending, and fund mass deportations and border security. The legislation is expected to add over $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, as per a report by the news agency AFP. The Senate passage is seen as a significant step for the Trump administration, which is pushing to have the legislation signed into law by Friday, ahead of US Independence Day celebrations. However, the bill now faces a separate vote in the House of Representatives, where several Republican lawmakers have expressed concerns. Senators have been divided over provisions in the bill that would strip around $1 trillion in subsidised health care from millions of low-income Americans. Independent analysts, as quoted by AFP, say nearly 12 million people could lose health coverage by 2034 due to proposed cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Earlier, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt urged Republicans to "stay tough and unified" as the Senate slogged through the amendment process. Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticised the pace of proceedings, saying, "They've got a lot of members who were promised things that they may not be able to deliver on. And so they're just stalling. But we're just pushing forward amendment after amendment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They don't like these amendments. The public is on our side in almost every amendment we do." Senate Democrats focused their amendments on opposing cuts to health care, food aid programmes, and clean energy tax credits. Despite strong opposition from Democrats, Trump maintained support within the Senate, where Republicans hold a narrow majority. Republican Majority Leader John Thune could only afford to lose one more vote after conservatives Rand Paul and Thom Tillis publicly opposed the bill. The bill's next hurdle is the House of Representatives, where it may face stronger resistance. Some fiscal conservatives argue the bill does not cut spending enough, while moderate Republicans are worried about the impact on Medicaid. The bill has also led to internal rifts within the Republican camp. Trump's former adviser Elon Musk, who resigned as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in May, renewed his criticism of the bill. As voting began, Musk said, "debt slavery" and called for the creation of a new political party. He added, "Republicans campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill," and said he would work to challenge lawmakers who supported the package. A vote in the House could take place as early as Wednesday. The 'Big, beautiful bill' includes a total of $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, based on the latest analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). It makes permanent the tax rates introduced in Trump's 2017 legislation, which are set to expire at the end of the year unless Congress approves. The bill also introduces new tax measures Trump had proposed during his campaign, including eliminating taxes on tips. The legislation rolls back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits. Democrats argue this move will significantly impact investments in wind and solar energy across the country. The bill outlines $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, mainly affecting Medicaid and food assistance programs. These cuts would come through new work requirements for able-bodied individuals, including some parents and older adults, stricter eligibility rules, and adjustments to how the federal government reimburses states. In addition, the bill allocates $350 billion for border and national security, including funding for deportation operations. A portion of this would be financed through new fees levied on immigrants.
The Wire
25 minutes ago
- The Wire
'Deadly, Military-Controlled': Over 170 International NGOs Call For End of Israel, US-Backed Gaza Aid Scheme
Since its launch, the GHF has replaced over 400 aid distribution points that were operating during the temporary ceasefire across Gaza with just four military-controlled, centralised sites. People in Gaza collect food and essentials at an aid distribution site near Rafah on June 5, 2025. Photo: Gaza Humanitarian Foundation New Delhi: More than 170 other organisations, including Oxfam and Amnesty International, have called for an immediate end to the US and Israel-backed distribution scheme, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), accusing it of facilitating starvation and attacks on the people of Gaza. They have demanded a return to UN-led coordination, and the lifting of the brutal blockade on Gaza. In a joint statement, the NGOs said, 'Today, Palestinians in Gaza face an impossible choice: starve or risk being shot while trying desperately to reach food to feed their families. The weeks following the launch of the Israeli distribution scheme have been some of the deadliest and most violent since October 2023,' they said. They highlighted that more than 500 Palestinians have been killed and almost 4,000 were injured while desperately trying to access or distribute food. Two million people are forced into overcrowded, militarised zones where Israeli forces and armed groups, allegedly backed by Israeli authorities, now 'routinely' open fire on desperate civilians trying to access food and other life-saving supplies. Notably, since its launch earlier this year, the GHF has replaced over 400 aid distribution points that were operating during the temporary ceasefire across Gaza with just four military-controlled, centralised sites. 'Under the Israeli government's new scheme, starved and weakened civilians are being forced to trek for hours through dangerous terrain and active conflict zones, only to face a violent, chaotic race to reach fenced, militarized distribution sites with a single entry point. There, thousands are released into chaotic enclosures to fight for limited food supplies. These areas have become sites of repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law,' the statement read. 'Amidst severe hunger and famine-like conditions, many families tell us they are now too weak to compete for food rations,' the charities wrote, insisting that 'This is not a humanitarian response.' 'This normalization of suffering must not be allowed to stand. States must reject the false choice between deadly, military-controlled food distributions and total denial of aid. States must uphold their obligations under international humanitarian and human rights law, including prohibitions on forced displacement, indiscriminate attacks, and obstruction of humanitarian aid. States must ensure accountability for grave violations of international law,' the statement read. The joint statement has been backed by UN agencies and other humanitarian leaders, who have also previously criticised the GHF model. Philippe Lazzarini, the commissioner-general of UNRWA shared the statement by the NGOs, saying, 'The humanitarian community calls for an end to the so called "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" (GHF) since it provides nothing but starvation and gunfire to the people of #Gaza.' The humanitarian community calls for an end to the so called "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" (GHF) since it provides nothing but starvation and gunfire to the people of #Gaza. Since this scheme began, at least 500 starving people have been reported killed and nearly 4,000 injured… — Philippe Lazzarini (@UNLazzarini) July 1, 2025 Last week, UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres, while reiterating his call for an immediate ceasefire, labelled the GHF as 'inherently unsafe,' further assessing, 'It is killing people.' According to a Reuters report, Israel and the US want the UN to work through the GHF but the UN has refused, accusing it of militarising aid and forcing displacement. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Civilised people don't...': Zohran Mamdani's eating habit faces fire as deportation calls from GOP intensifies
— RepBrandonGill (@RepBrandonGill) Live Events Brandon Gill vs Zohran Mamdani Gill's Indian-origin wife comes to his rescue (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel At a time when Zohran Mamdani , the newly minted face of New York City's progressive wave, is facing calls for deportation from Republicans, he is also at the center of a culture war. An interview of the Democratic socialist has gone viral on social media where spoke about eating with his hands, a practice he said connects him to his roots. 'I have to eat with my hand,' he said. 'In Uganda, we even eat salad with our hands.'The clip drew fierce criticism and a racially charged response from Republican Congressman Brandon Gill , who reposted it on X with a sneering caption: 'Civilised people in America don't eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World.'On Sunday, a clip showing Mamdani eating with his hands went viral on social media, with some Republicans questioning whether his upbringing in Uganda and South Africa shaped his understanding of the Palestinian in 2023 during an interview with Uncivilised Media, the video shows him saying, "When you grow up as someone, especially in the Third World, you have a very different understanding of the Palestinian struggle. It is one that is framed in terms of empathy and solidarity."Brandon Gill's response sparked a massive fury online and he was brutally criticised by the social media users for his "racist" commentary on New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. The internet was quick to lash out at the congressman, from grilling him to digging up the family photos of his Indian-origin users were quick enough to point out that Gill is married to Danielle D'Souza, the Indian-origin daughter of right-wing commentator Dinesh D'Souza. The internet users also dug out old pictures of Gill and his Indian-origin father-in-law eating with their hands, slamming him for attacking the Democrat on cultural lines. Replying to Gill's post, an X user asked, "How do you eat tacos, french fries, burgers etc? Do you eat Lays with a fork too?"Another user posted pictures of Gill's father-in-law, Dinesh D'Souza, eating with his hands and wrote, "Hello Civilised person from America. Here's your father-in-law Dinesh D'Souza 'eating like this'."A user also posted a picture of Gill himself enjoying a pizza and a hot dog and wrote, "We need to send you back first then." "How do you eat hamburgers, pizza, hot dogs, tacos, burritos, fried chicken, french fries, onion rings, and chicken wings ya racist ***? Ugly," a user wrote.A British-American journalist posted a family photo of Brandon Gill with his Indian-origin wife Danielle D'Souza Gill and her father Dinesh D'Souza."Brandon Gill's father-in-law Dinesh D'Souza was born and raised in India and has definitely eaten with his hands. Is he going to ask his father-in-law to leave the US too?" he picture is going viral on the internet, that shows Brandon Gill's in-laws sitting in a restaurant and posing for a photo. It shows food kept in front of them and pieces of what looks like a 'naan' in their hands."If you're gonna be a giant racist douche against Indians, don't go marrying an Indian," a post that shared the picture said, slamming Brandon supporter and "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) activist Laura Loomer also criticised Mamdani's eating video, and wrote: "Honestly, being an Islamist and a Communist was enough for me to not want @ZohranKMamdani in office. He is from Africa. And you can tell in the way he eats. Disgusting. My dogs are cleaner and more civilised when they eat than little Muhammad.""@ZohranKMamdani eats his food and licks his fingers with his right hand. We already know what he does with the left hand as a "third worlder". You don't want to shake either hand," Loomer added calling the New York leader a rich, nepo wife, Danielle D'Souza Gill, however, supported his remarks, saying she always uses cutlery while having to X, she wrote, "I did not grow up eating rice with my hands and have always used a fork. I was born in America. I'm a Christian MAGA patriot. My father's extended family lives in India and they are also Christian and they use forks too. Thank you for your attention to this matter."Zohram Mamdani's surprising victory against Andrew Cuomo in the NYC Democratic primary made him the prime target of Republicans, with many calling for his deportation. Trump has also threatened to cut federal funds for New York if Mamdani does not toe the line after becoming the recently defeated former governor Andrew Cuomo in New York City's mayoral primary. If Zohran Mamdani wins, he would be New York's first Muslim mayor.
