Mumbai Train Blasts Case: SC stays Bombay HC order
The top court passed the interim stay order after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the bench that the verdict could impact trials in other cases under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).
The court also clarified that the High Court's verdict would not be treated as a precedent in deciding other cases. This comes days after the High Court bench of justices Anil Kilor and SC Chandak on refused to confirm the death sentences awarded to five men in the case and acquitted all 12 accused. The High Court, in its 671-page judgment, said the prosecution had failed to establish the type of explosives used, and found the confessional statements inadmissible due to allegations of torture.
The court also raised doubts over witness credibility and procedural lapses in the identification process. The acquitted individuals had been held under the stringent MCOCA law and had spent nearly two decades in jail.
The HC ruling has sparked widespread reactions, with political and legal circles divided over the implications for the justice system and the conduct of the investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Kangana Ranaut hails government's OTT ban to protect culture and youth
Actress-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut has voiced strong support for the Centre's recent crackdown on OTT platforms accused of streaming sexually explicit content. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has directed Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block public access to 25 such platforms, including Ullu, ALTT, Desiflix, and others like Big Shots App, Boomex, Kangan App, and Mojflix. Kangana, known for her outspoken views, lauded the move as necessary to safeguard Indian cultural values and the well-being of future generations. 'In order to preserve the overall culture of our country and the future path of our youngsters, and so that our society does not collapse completely, this step was much awaited and is now much appreciated,' she said. 'The action taken against these apps, especially the illegal ones, is highly appreciated.' The blocked platforms were reportedly in violation of multiple Indian laws, including Section 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000; Section 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023; and Section 4 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. The government has also requested the Department of Telecommunications to ensure swift compliance by the ISPs in disabling these platforms. This decision follows a petition filed in the Supreme Court earlier this year seeking a ban on sexually explicit content on OTT and social media platforms. While the Supreme Court stated that it was not within its domain to act, it emphasized the need for executive intervention—prompting the present move. Ranaut's endorsement adds weight to the cultural debate surrounding digital content regulation in India.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Does being patriotic Indians mean we can't protest the horrors in Gaza?
When the Bombay High Court scolded petitioners seeking permission to hold a protest over the Gaza conflict this week, stating that they should 'look at their own country,' it did more than just deny a plea. To mourn for children in Gaza is not to betray India. To protest the unjust killing of innocents abroad is not to ignore injustice at home. It is to declare, as our freedom fighters once did, that truth has no borders and conscience no passport. At the heart of this matter lies Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantee to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. These are not minor provisions. They are foundational to the democratic life of the Republic. Protest, in this framework, is not a disruption of order — it is the music of democratic breathing. It is the only means by which ordinary citizens, powerless in the machinery of state, can voice their hope, grief, and resistance. To deny permission for a peaceful protest mourning deaths in Gaza — under the reasoning that it does not concern India — is to misunderstand the very idea of Indian constitutionalism. The Supreme Court, in Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan vs Union of India (2018), has made it clear: 'Citizens have a fundamental right to assemble peacefully and protest against governmental action.' And in Amit Sahni vs Commissioner of Police (2020), while dealing with the Shaheen Bagh protests, the Court emphasised that protest must be balanced with public order — but it did not deny the right itself. That distinction matters. Courts are not to extinguish the flame of protest but to ensure that it does not burn others' homes. Even earlier, in the landmark Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978), the Court warned against arbitrary state action: 'Any restriction on fundamental rights must pass the test of reasonableness and fairness. Arbitrary denial erodes the very fabric of liberty.' What was the crime here? A candlelit gathering. A moment of collective grief. A people who could not remain indifferent. The Indian tradition does not shy away from this impulse — it sanctifies it. From the Mahā Upanishad's declaration of vasudhaiva kutumbakam — 'The world is one family' — to the Isha Upanishad's invocation: 'He who sees all beings in himself and himself in all beings… he never turns away from it,' Indian thought has always affirmed that compassion is a civic virtue. Even our national poet, Rabindranath Tagore, warned against the dangers of closed sympathies: 'Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high/ Where the world has not been broken up into fragments/ By narrow domestic walls.' The judge's remarks — to 'look at your own country' — seem to invoke a narrow nationalism that betrays this expansive inheritance. Indeed, Mahatma Gandhi himself said: 'My patriotism is not an exclusive thing. It is all-embracing… I want the cultures of all the lands to be blown about my house as freely as possible.' In that spirit, a gathering for Gaza is not un-Indian. It is Indian in its deepest moral sense. Great civilisations not only permit dissent — they preserve it. And great poets, through centuries, have told us what silence costs. Kabir, the weaver-saint, wrote: 'Dard ke dāman se jo lipta, soī to insān hai/ Dusre ke dukh se jo dukh paaye, vahī Bhagwān hai.' (One who clings to the cloak of sorrow is truly human/One who grieves another's grief — that is God.) Sa'adi of Shiraz, whose words are etched into the walls of the United Nations building in New York, said: 'Human beings are limbs of one another/ Created from the same essence/ When one limb is afflicted with pain/The others cannot remain at peace.' And lest we forget the price of selective empathy, we must remember the warning of Pastor Martin Niemöller, who survived Nazi prisons: 'First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me —and there was no one left to speak for me.' This poem is not history, it is prophecy. And we forget it at our peril. By reprimanding citizens who seek to protest global injustice, we do not 'look at our own country'. We blindfold it. When we tell people to silence their grief for others, what we're really saying is: 'Let injustice grow, as long as it's not at your door.' But injustice, like fire, spreads unseen through silence. This is not a Gaza issue. It is not a Muslim issue. It is not even a foreign affairs issue. It is an Indian constitutional issue. For it is we, the people — not robes, not gavels — who breathe life into our Constitution. In the end, history will not ask whether we obeyed orders, but whether we saw clearly — and stood in solidarity with whoever in our universal family was suffering. For again, we are the people who emphasised at the G20 we hosted recently that India's abiding value is vasudhaiva kutumbakam. The writer is President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's Grain from Ukraine Ambassador for South Asia. He has worked at the United Nations on all five continents and is also a multilingual award-winning poet
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Police invoke MCOCA against three held for cow slaughter in Maharashtras Thane
Thane, Jul 26 (PTI) Police in Maharashtra's Thane district have invoked stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against three persons arrested for allegedly slaughtering a cow, a top official said on Saturday. The incident had occurred during the intervening night of June 30 and July 1, in which the accused had stolen the cow from a cricket ground in Badlapur before the slaughter, he said. This is the second instance in the state in which the MCOCA has been invoked against the individuals accused of cow slaughter and related offences, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone-IV Ulhasnagar) Sachin Gore said. 'The first such case (under MCOCA) was registered in Pimpri," he said, adding that this is the first instance in the Konkan range. Based on the complaint lodged by the owner of the cow, the police initially registered a case under section 303 (2) (theft) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), along with the provisions of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and the Maharashtra Police Act. 'The police later arrested three persons in this connection. They are presently in police custody, and we have now slapped charges under the MCOCA against them," the DCP said. PTI COR NP First Published: July 26, 2025, 17:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
