Can things only get better, Keir? Government approval falls to worst EVER after PM's benefits humiliation and Chancellor's tears
YouGov found just 13 per cent approve of the administration's performance, the worst level yet detected by the polling firm.
Some 67 per cent had a negative view, with the net score of minus 54 equalling the previous nadir from March.
The latest dire reading came after Sir Keir was forced to U-turn on proposals to curb spiralling disability and health handouts.
There were also extraordinary scenes as Rachel Reeves burst into tears at PMQs. She has insisted it was down to a 'personal issue' rather than politics.
Pollsters and historians have suggested Sir Keir has endured the worst start of any premier, after he marked his first year in power.
Since racking up one of the biggest Commons majorities ever on July 4, the PM has seen Reform leapfrog Labour in voting intention.
Polling guru Sir John Curtice has observed that Sir Keir was 'never especially popular' and the public 'still don't know what he stands for'.
Economists have warned that things are only set to get harder, with the Chancellor scrambling for taxes to hike to fill an estimated £30billion hole in the government books this Autumn.
Sir Keir has shrugged off his disastrous start, telling panicking MPs the 'toughest' part is over.
But the premier also acknowledged an array of blunders, saying caving in to Labour rebels on welfare was a 'tough day' and he regretted a speech warning uncontrolled immigration could turn Britain into an 'island of strangers'.
Speaking on the Political Thinking podcast with Nick Robinson, the premier tried to make a virtue out of U-turns on issues such as the national inquiry into grooming gangs, arguing it was 'common sense' to 'look again' when doubts were raised.
And he bizarrely branded himself a 'hard-enough bast***' when asked whether he had the determination to revive Labour's fortunes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
Orgreave inquiry launched to 'uncover truth' behind clashes at 1984 miners' strike
A new public inquiry will "uncover the truth" behind the so-called "Battle of Orgreave", a bloody fight between striking miners and police officers in the 1980s. One hundred and twenty people were injured in the violent confrontation on 18 June 1984, outside a coal processing factory in Orgreave, South Yorkshire. Five thousand miners clashed with an equal number of armed and mounted police during a day of fighting. Police used horse charges, riot shields and batons against the picketers, even as some were retreating. In the aftermath, miners were blamed for the violence in what campaigners believe was an institutional "frame-up". "There were so many lies," says Chris Peace, from campaign group Orgreave Truth and Justice, "and it's a real historic moment to get to this stage." "There's a lot of information already in the public domain," she adds, "but there's still some papers that are embargoed, which will hopefully now be brought to light." Although dozens of miners were arrested, trials against them all collapsed due to allegations of unreliable police evidence. Campaigners say some involved have been left with "physical and psychological damage", but until now, previous governments have refused calls for a public inquiry. Launching the inquiry today, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Sky Newsi that she wanted to "make sure" campaigners now got "proper answers". "We've obviously had unanswered questions about what happened at Orgreave for over 40 years," Ms Cooper says, "and when we were elected to government, we determined to take this forward." The inquiry will be a statutory one, meaning that witnesses will be compelled to come and give evidence, and chaired by the Bishop of Sheffield, Pete Wilcox. "I'm really happy," says Carl Parkinson, a former miner who was at Orgreave on the day of the clash, "but why has it took so long?" "A lot of those colleagues and close friends have passed away, and they'll never get to see any outcome." Mr Parkinson and Chris Skidmore, who was also there that day, were among the group of campaigners informed first-hand by Ms Cooper about the public inquiry at the Orgreave site. "It wasn't frightening to start off with," Mr Skidmore remembers of the day itself, "but then what I noticed was the amount of police officers who had no identification numbers on. It all felt planned." "And it wasn't just one truncheon," says Mr Parkinson, "there were about 30, or 40. And it was simultaneous, like it was orchestrated - just boom, boom, boom, boom. "And there's lads with a split down their heads for no good reason, they'd done nothing wrong. We were just there to peacefully picket." In the intervening years, South Yorkshire Police have paid more than £400,000 in compensation to affected miners and their families. But no official inquiry has ever looked at the documents surrounding the day's events, the lead-up to it and the aftermath. "We need to have trust and confidence restored in the police," says South Yorkshire Mayor Oliver Coppard, "and part of that is about people, like this campaign, getting the justice that they deserve. "Obviously, we've had things like Hillsborough, CSE [Child Sexual Exploitation] in Rotherham, and we want to turn the page."
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Water industry faces ‘root and branch reform' after landmark review
Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to promise 'root and branch reform' of the sector in a bid to clean up England's rivers and limit rises in water bills. The commitment will follow the publication of the final report of the Independent Water Commission led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe. In a speech responding to Sir Jon's report, Mr Reed is set to describe the water industry as 'broken' and welcome the commission's recommendations to ensure 'the failures of the past can never happen again'. He is also widely reported to be preparing to abolish the industry's beleaguered regulator Ofwat, which has faced criticism for overseeing a sharp rise in sewage pollution while failing to crack down on executive pay and large dividends at debt-ridden water companies. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the way the sector was regulated, with duties split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. On Sunday, Mr Reed would not confirm that Ofwat was in line to be scrapped, but declined to express confidence in the regulator either, saying it was 'clearly failing'. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have agreed that water regulation needs to change. Urging the Government to be 'transparent' about what would replace Ofwat and how it would work, Tory shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: 'No one disputes that the water sector is under pressure, and we all want to see meaningful improvements. 'Reforming regulation must be focused on improving performance and guaranteeing water security.' Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey has called for the creation of a Clean Water Authority that could 'hold these water companies to account' and 'fine them when they fail'. While Mr Reed has pledged to avoid the need for 'huge shock hikes' in water bills, such as the 26% increase seen this year, reform is unlikely to lead to a fall in costs for consumers. The Government hopes that investment in long-neglected infrastructure will make large bill increases unnecessary, but Mr Reed acknowledged on Sunday that there needed to be 'appropriate bill rises' to secure 'appropriate levels of investment'. He is also unlikely to commit to expanding social tariffs that could help households struggling with bills at the cost of higher charges for wealthier families, saying he was yet to be convinced that this was needed. Prior to Monday's announcement, Mr Reed had already committed to halving sewage pollution in England's rivers by 2030 thanks to a £104 billion investment from the sector in upgrading infrastructure. He has also announced the creation of a new, legally binding water ombudsman, expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water and bringing the sector into line with other utilities. But the Conservatives have accused Labour of copying the policies of the previous government. Ms Atkins said: 'Labour have already wasted a year since the general election as they came into office with no plans for water, instead claiming that the work we started in office is their own.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government to launch new water ombudsman to boost consumer protection
The Environment Secretary will commit to setting up a new water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve disputes, rather than the current voluntary system that is thought to lack teeth. The changes, which will expand the role of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), will bring the sector into line with other utilities by creating a legally binding consumer watchdog. It will also provide a single point of contact for consumers with complaints, instead of leaving them uncertain about where to go. The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the new watchdog would help 're-establish partnership' between water companies and consumers. In May, a survey by the CCW found trust in water companies had reached a new low, with less than two-thirds of people saying they provided value for money. Only 53% said they thought what water companies charged was fair, even before the impact of a 26% increase in bills that came into effect in April. CCW chief executive Mike Keil said he welcomed the move to create a mandatory ombudsman, saying it had been a 'key ask' of his organisation 'so people can have absolute confidence that when they complain, they have robust protection'. The new ombudsman is part of Mr Reed's wider plans for a 'root and branch reform' of the water industry, set to be unveiled alongside a major review of the sector on Monday. Following publication of the review, he is expected to say: 'The water industry is broken. Our rivers, lakes and seas are polluted with record levels of sewage. 'Water pipes have been left to crumble into disrepair. Soaring water bills are straining family finances. 'Today's final report from Sir Jon Cunliffe's Independent Water Commission offers solutions to fix our broken regulatory system so the failures of the past can never happen again.' The key recommendation is expected to involve scrapping Ofwat and creating a new regulator, which could incorporate the work of the CCW. Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said stronger consumer protections were 'welcome in principle' but only 'part of the serious long-term reforms the water sector needs'. She said: 'We all want the water system to improve, and honesty about the scale of the challenge is essential. Steve Reed must explain that bill payers are paying for the £104 billion investment plan. Ministers must also explain how replacing one quango with another is going to clean up our rivers and lakes. 'Public confidence in the water system will only be rebuilt through transparency, resilience, and delivery.' Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron called for Ofwat to be scrapped, saying the sector needed 'fundamental change, not another layer of bureaucracy'. He added: 'If Ofwat remains in either name or nature, then the Government will have let the public down. 'Simply scrapping Ofwat but retaining a balkanised and weak regulatory framework will only be window dressing, so we are interested in the Government's proposals but the jury is still out as to whether they'll make much difference.'
