Muscle Shoals High School Principal named Superintendent of Opelika City Schools
Dr. Davis will be taking on his new role with more than two decades experience in public education.
Previously, Davis has been a coach, teacher, assistant principal, athletic director, and principal. In 2024, he was named the CLAS District 7A North High School Principal of the Year and currently serves as President of CLAS District 7A.
'Dr. Davis has an outstanding record of success as a leader in education, and we are excited to welcome him as the next superintendent of Opelika City Schools,' said Dr. Kevin Royal, Chairman of the Opelika City Schools Board of Education.
'During the evaluation process, the most consistent quality attributed to Dr. Davis by his colleagues was his genuine care and concern for the welfare of all his students. We look forward to helping him build on the foundation of excellence laid by his predecessors,' Dr. Royal added.
'First and foremost, I want to thank God for blessing me with this incredible opportunity to serve as the next superintendent of Opelika City Schools. I also want to express my deepest gratitude to my family for their unwavering support throughout my journey.
What drew me to Opelika was the deep-rooted sense of community and the genuine pride residents, families, and educators have in their schools. This is where people care deeply about students and are committed to educational excellence.
I appreciate the trust and confidence of the Opelika Board of Education. I am honored to join this outstanding team, and I look forward to rolling up my sleeves and getting to work as we continue to strive toward our shared mission: educating every child, every day.'
Dr. Kevin Davis
Davis will begin his contract on July 1, 2025.
Details for a community meet and greet to introduce Davis will be released in the coming weeks.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Absentee voting now open for the 2025 Municipal Election in Madison
MADISON, Ala. (WHNT) — Absentee Voting is now open for the 2025 Municipal Election in Madison. The City of Madison is encouraging all registered voters who are unable to vote in person to participate by requesting and submitting their absentee ballots. This ensure that anyone who wont be able to vote in person still has an opportunity to make their voices heard. Residents are urged to review eligibility requirements and submit their applications as early as possible to ensure timely processing. To receive an absentee ballot, you can write or visit the Election Manager at the City Clerk's Office. Residents will be able to request an absentee ballot as long as you provide the following: Name and residential address (or other such information to verify voter registration) Ensure that a copy of your valid photo identification is included with the application The election for which the ballot is requested Reason for absence from the polls on election day The address to which the ballot should be mailed Voter signature. (Signature must be original; electronic signatures will not be accepted. If a mark is made in place of a signature, it must be witnessed.) You can click here, to confirm that you are a registered voter at your current address before making an application for absentee voting. Voters can submit the application by mail or commercial carrier. Residents can also submit their applications in person at Madison City Hall (City Clerk's Office) which is located at 100 Hughes Road. A valid photo ID is required. Each application must be submitted in a separate envelope. Multiple applications in the same envelope will not be processed. To learn more about the absentee voting process, click here. To download the absentee ballot application, click here. Municipal elections in Madison will be held on Tuesday, August 26. Polling places will be open for voting from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis asks Supreme Court to reverse same-sex marriage decision
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was briefly jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to revisit its landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which effectively legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and celebrated its 10th anniversary in June. Davis's attorneys at the Christian nonprofit Liberty Counsel asked the court in a 90-page filing to review a March ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding a lower court's finding that Davis violated David Ermold and David Moore's constitutional right to marry when she denied them a marriage license in 2015, shortly after the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell decision. A federal jury awarded the couple $100,000 in damages in 2023, and a federal judge ordered Davis last year to pay Ermold and Moore an additional $260,000 in attorneys' fees. Davis argued in 2015 that granting the couple a marriage license would have violated her religious beliefs as a born-again Christian and 'God's definition of marriage.' She and her legal team have argued throughout a decadelong legal battle that, in denying the license, Davis was protected by her First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion. In March, a three-judge panel for the 6th Circuit ruled that Davis cannot raise a First Amendment defense in the case 'because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect.' Liberty Counsel is asking the Supreme Court to overturn both the 6th Circuit decision and the high court's ruling in Obergefell. 'Kim Davis' case underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman,' said Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel's founder and chair. The group's petition argues that the court should revisit and reverse its Obergefell decision 'for the same reasons articulated in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Center,' the case that led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. 'Obergefell was wrong when it was decided and it is wrong today because it was grounded entirely on the legal fiction of substantive due process.' Bill Powell, counsel for Ermold and Moore, told The Hill in an email the Supreme Court is unlikely to take up Davis's case. 'Not a single judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis's rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention,' he said. The high court declined to intervene in Davis's case in 2020. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, conservatives who dissented from the court's majority opinion in Obergefell, said they agreed with the court's decision not to accept Davis's appeal but used the occasion to renew their objections to its same-sex marriage decision. 'Davis may have been one of the first victims of this court's cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last,' wrote Thomas, joined by Alito. 'Due to Obergefell, those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Obergefell and its effect on other anti-discrimination laws.' Davis's appeal to the Supreme Court comes as it faces calls from Republican lawmakers to overturn Obergefell. In June, Southern Baptists voted overwhelmingly to approve a resolution endorsing a ban on same-sex marriage and calling for the court to reverse its decision. National support for same-sex marriage remains at record highs, though a May Gallup poll showed Republican support for marriage equality falling to 41 percent, the lowest in a decade. In a separate survey conducted by three polling firms in June, 56 percent of Republican respondents said they support same-sex marriage.
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Could the Supreme Court revisit marriage equality? New appeal offers chance
Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses after the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage, wants the high court to overturn that decision. WASHINGTON – A former Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses in 2015 because of her religious beliefs is hoping the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority wants to scrap the court's 10-year-old decision extending marriage rights to LGBTQ+ couples. Kim Davis asked the court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges in an appeal filed on July 24 about the compensation she was ordered to pay a couple after denying them a marriage license. Mat Staver, head of Liberty Counsel, the conservative legal group representing Davis, said that decision threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman. "The High Court now has the opportunity to finally overturn this egregious opinion from 2015," Staver said in a statement. More: He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he's worried. Mary Bonauto, a senior director with GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, said Davis' legal team is trying to shoehorn an opportunity to relitigate Obergefell into a narrow legal question of whether the former clerk should have to pay damages. "There's good reason for the Supreme Court to deny review in this case rather than unsettle something so positive for couples, children, families, and the larger society as marriage equality," Bonauto said in an emailed response. Davis attracted international attention when she refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage, landing her in jail on a contempt of court charge for five days. When Davis was sued by David Ermold and David Moore, she argued legal protections for public officials prevented the challenge. Lower courts let the suit proceed and the Supreme Court in 2020 declined to intervene. More: Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling Justice Clarence Thomas wrote at the time that while Davis' case was a "stark reminder" of the consequences of Obergefell, it didn't "cleanly present" questions about that decision. After the district court ruled against Davis, she was ordered to pay $100,000 in damages to the couple and $260,000 for their attorneys fees and expenses. Her appeal to the Supreme Court opens with comments made by the dissenting justices in the 5-4 decision issued 10 years ago. Since then, the court's makeup has changed to a 6-3 conservative supermajority. Opinion: I was the named 'opposition' in Obergefell v. Hodges. I've never been happier to lose. Still, Carl Esbeck, an expert on religious liberty at the University of Missouri School of Law, said there's "not a chance" the court is going to overturn Obergefell. That's in part because Congress passed a law in 2022 guaranteeing federal recognition of same-sex marriage rights, he said. "It would be a useless act to overturn Obergefell," Esbeck said. "The politics have simply moved on from same-sex marriage, even for conservative religious people." Geoffrey R. Stone, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, agreed the court is unlikely to scrap Obergefell despite its willingness in recent years to overturn precedents on abortion and affirmative action. While a majority of the current justices may disagree with Obergefell, the decision is generally approved by the public, he said. "For that reason, and to avoid the appearance of interpreting the Constitution in a manner that conforms to their own personal views," Stone said in an emailed response, "even some of the conservative justices might not vote to overrule Obergefell."
